My reply:-I've read SRM and Damdami maryadas. Your point?
And how exactly do you propose to atone for your continuing sin of carrying on conversation with us Patit Sikhs? Are you going to start ignoring our posts? Or is it ok when YOU talk to patit Sikhs but others can't? Or is it ok to talk with them online but just not face to face? How are you going to tell who has their hair and who doesn't?
I'm a supporter of common sense, I could care less about patit or not patit.
I am not sharing with you anything. I am saying on the internet that a patit sikh is an outcast as far as Sikhism is concerned. I don't know you whether you are patit or not as I don't know you personally.
You are showing that you are over smart. I started a topic on SPN why can't Sikhs excommunicate Patit Sikhs and I received some replies supporting the Patits.
You say you are supporter of common sense. You want to say you don't support what SRM says. With your view you are alleging that SRM is authored and published by people who have no common sense. That is the difference between a patit and a Sikh. That is the reason why Sikhs are not allowed to interact or have relations with patits.