Dr tirlochan singh did a lot of research in manuscripts and writings in dasam granth. given below is a good article by him.
The History and Compilation of the Dasm Granth (Part 1) - Dr. Trilochan Singh
There seems to be no analysis of authenticity.
Dr tirlochan singh did a lot of research in manuscripts and writings in dasam granth. given below is a good article by him.
The History and Compilation of the Dasm Granth (Part 1) - Dr. Trilochan Singh
There seems to be no analysis of authenticity.
Dear Jaspi,
Gurufateh ji,
would like to address few of your concerns, first of all is need to understand the maryada word itself. All educated people know that their are rules/laws made for betterment. Now as every individuals are unique so is their thinking, but to bring the mass to a common platform you need to agree collectively on some thing. This has been the puratan maryada when sikhs used to gather and reveiw their activities/problems. And in this event they also took a call on Ardass too. We need to be a bit humble to understand the need, it is very common feeling among all the people in the world to have their own unique code of conduct, which makes them different and important in the human society. It was also imparted to the sikh society to be in maryada, it is all together different issue who is doing what?
Ardass has few forms as acknowledged by the panth, which changes as per the need ( khushi di Ardass, markat di Ardass, Nawen Karj di Ardass, Shukrane di Ardass, Gupat ardass etc.) But in all the main body is same only in part where we need to adress the topic is taken in account. Ardass is in simple terms a prayer to your Godly connection. It can be done personaly too, but when it comes in question for mass then the layed maryada shoud be followed. But why? I might be able to clear it with some examples. In every school, before the starting the day they offer prayer and all the different schools have their own prayer, but the schools of same manegment/group across different places have same prayer(please try to understand the psychology behind it). I have seen children arguing on the topic that your schools prayer is not right see my schools prayer. This attitude is not only with kids it is more in grown up ones, this issue was well addressed in past by making one common Ardass for the panth and was even layed down the way to bring change future if ever required.
All Gurujis also setted up a maryada and who followed it were Gurmukhs and the ones who made their own ways, went away from Gurus. This was treated as Guru Panth not some bodies personal Panth so the changes should not be done on personal thinking . The unique code is very much essential to keep the racial identity intact.
Now regarding the fact of Muslims and Hindus. History has proved, if some body wants to know the facts, that my dear Hindu friends were more disastrous to the Sikhs than the Muslim friends. It was Muslim government but was always provoked by influential Hindu personalities. The Muslims were not so bad as portrayed by preachers, they trialed people with their sharah rules and gave punishments, now the way the cases were presented was different, they were cunning on those grounds. Lets not forget that at that time their was no democracy, and any ruling power will not take a threat so easily. They allowed the kiths and kins to practice the last rituals as per ones own religion. But what happened in the so called 48 years old Democracy, the sworn-in Prime Minister himself says " Muthi bhar Sikh hai kuchal dalo"( ****** teach them a dyer lesson). And this was solemnly abided by his fellow gentlemen, each of them wanted to score more than each other, by killing innocent people(sikhs) in the country to please their master. And this the BBC's report that their was no body to take care of the bodies lying on the streets for seven/eight days, and snaps show dogs dragging the bodies. Thank God still people have faith in democracy. What happened after that it is going to be 25 years now, not a single person punished for the ****** act. It was a crime committed in the broad day light in front of thousands (literate, nonliterate, professionals, businessmen, peasants, kids, women etc.) and that too not for a day or two, the killing went on and on for six/seven days, till your Democratic Prime Minister was satisfied.
There is always room for difference of opinion but at large it should not be so that it completely changes the ground realities. And if some body is not practicing the right path it doesn't give me the liberty to another wrong. And never two wrong can make a right.
with the pledge be concerned for each other, be united , be humble and understanding and maintain the concept of Nayara Panth.
with regards,
Bhupinder Singh.
..-I request you humbly my sister to please justify the change with comparison of old and new ardaas, and please elaborate your thinking?. We don’t want people who direct goats sitting on camel..its a proverb…HARTEJ KOUR
this change in Ardaas is made for the good and i don’t think there is anything debatable on this..
-Veer Ji…please elaborate your opinion.RUPINDER SINGH
In my opinion..Nothing has been done wrong...
-Where it says that Bhagawti means a idol or devi…? Please go through the links: http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/sikh-sikhi-sikhism/25092-ardaas-changed-7.html#post101324And I dont think it is anything about showing anti-faminine attitude at all..but It is about extending the theme of Guru Granth Sahb into Ardaas. Sikhs are never told to worship idols..they are only told to worship The True God. And Akal Purkh could not be translated as Kal Purush Mahadev as the very starting lines of Guru Granth sahb explain "Karta Purkh" as formless. It is just a way to address GOD. True Sikhs have due respect for females and will continue to do so.
-Even Radha Soami and Dera Saccha Sauda, and many others have suit ready…so do Sikhs wear it? We have to decide what is wrong and what is right. Not everything happens is right, and not everything happens is wrong. But changing first lines of ardaas which is said by our Guru is actually changing Gurbani ( A baani from Guru) (in hindi it means Vaani of Guru…) and this has to be stopped before it damages whole Sikh system.….which will happen soon, if it is not stopped.But now the suit is there some will wear it and some won't
-You are right..but you really not bothered about changing something which is said by our Guru? I agree to change to some extent…change the rest of portion of Ardaas, but that has to be from SGPC and should be universally broadcasted. Changing our Guru wordings is really disgraceful to whole Sikh foundationBILLMAMAK
Remember Ardas is just a prayer. Say it in any manner and any language and anywhere. To whom it is addressed will understand and accept.
- Veer ji..I request you to try to find out the reason why it tooks 10 Shareer or Jaama and 1430 Angs to complete Sikhi and Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. I hope you will find a reason of creation of Khalsa, Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. I am getting a message from your that we should follow earlier process which is easy, for example…don’t smoke…just eat raw tobacco leaf..its easy.. ( it’s a negative example…(Sorry for using this example…I mean something else)..lest have some positive example…. say lets drink water, eat sugar, tea powder…there is no need to cook it to get a tea….. ( Bhul chuk maaf..but this came to mind after reading your reply)-par (parminder)singh Ji
usa
Let us propogate Sikh and Sikhi of AGGS, and move away from the Khalsa rituals which are more akin to Brahmanism. (period).
-Wrongly Said…first one has to be Sikh, then he will become Singh…Singh is only after he Armit Chak and becomes Khalsa….the basic principle and understanding is not clear..Guru Gobind Singh Ji was Guru Gobind Rai…before Amrit Chak and became Singh only after Amrit Chak. I particularly say that if somebody is mona..then he is neither Sikh, nor of any religion. Because earlier everybody used to keep hairs, muslims, hindus, even in European countries…but they were not Sikh….one has to follow Guru Nanak to be called as Sikh……. I know I am harsh..but I have to clarify the truth that Sikhs basic identity is our Guru Nanak …who kept his hairs…and first Sikh was Bibi Naanki, Second was Nawab Rai Bular (a muslim)…and at later stage, before starting UDAASI- starting journey for Srilanka (Sangla Deep) to meet Raja Shiv Naab, Guru Nanak Ji gave Charan Pahul to Rai Bular . Even in Sri Lanka..Guru Nanak Ji gave charan Pahul to many for letting them in Sikhism…and Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave it to us forever via Panj Pyare…… Like a son of scientist may not be a scientist…a son or daughter of Sikh may not be a Sikh…I don’t know how a person proudly say that he is a sikh without hairs, and even have Singh as his middle name….Sikh…then Singh………Sikh means who is learner of Guru and if anyone hasn’t learned the teachings of Guru, then I don’t think he is a Sikh. Particularly he is without any religion, without any Murshid…(Sorry if I hurted any body reading this)'every Khalsa is a Sikh, but not every Sikh is a Khalsa'. These are TWO separate entities, and should live in harmony and with absolute respect for each other. I am a Sikh of AGGS. It is time to follow the teachings of our Gurus, let us all work to remove the shackles of rituals, which got added upon us without even our knowing.
I have to clarify the truth that Sikhs basic identity is our Guru Nanak …who kept his hairs…and first Sikh was Bibi Naanki, Second was Nawab Rai Bular (a muslim)…and at later stage, before starting UDAASI- starting journey for Srilanka (Sangla Deep) to meet Raja Shiv Naab, Guru Nanak Ji gave Charan Pahul to Rai Bular . Even in Sri Lanka..Guru Nanak Ji gave charan Pahul to many for letting them in Sikhism…
Adskhalsa ji,
Guru Fateh.
Your write:
Please elaborate the concept of Charan Pahul from Gurmat viewpoint. You can use SGGS as your guide, our only Guru now to explain it if you wish to.
Regards
Tejwant Singh
Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa..Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh...(parminder)singh Ji
usa
Let us propogate Sikh and Sikhi of AGGS, and move away from the Khalsa rituals which are more akin to Brahmanism. (period).
Tejwant Singh Ji...
Thanks for encouraging me to find out this in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji...I will try my best...with Guru's Grace......Before being Khalsa creation...Charan Pahul was a tradition where Guru Ji keep thumb of feet in water and Sikhs drink that...well I heard it in Katha veechar...of Suraj Prakash...Ithihass Guru Nanak Dev Ji...live from Gurdwara Dukh Niwaran Sahib, Ludhiana...Uploaded the live recordings at Sikhitube.com but presently that site is down...its down since last one week...but a concerned person emailed me that whenever that site will up..he will email me....... Once that up..will provide the Ithihaas links here....... till then let me find out a support from SGGS Ji.......I am just a beginner and as you are Waheguru Seeker.....I am far behind you in line...I will try my best Veer Ji...
Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa...Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.........
Adskhalsa ji,
Guru Fateh.
1.Please share with us what kind of Sikh tradition and based on what Gurmat principles the ritual of Charan Pahul was practiced?
2.Why would our Gurus insert their big toe in the water and make people drink it when they did not even write their own names while writing Gurbani which is in SGGS?
They only gave themselves mere numbers?
3.What would the water become by inserting one's toe and make people drink it?
4.Initiation in what?
5.If this initiation was the only way to become Sikhs, then how about those who did not take it?
6.Was there anything tangible, like a janeiu kind of necklace, a bracelet etc etc given to those who were initiated like that as a proof that they had taken Charan Pahul and hence had become Sikhs?
7. Does this initiation contradict or compliment the concept of 4 doors of Harmandir Sahib?
Your responses based on Gurmat values would be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Tejwant Singh
.Please share with us what kind of Sikh tradition and based on what Gurmat principles the ritual of Charan Pahul was practiced?
I learned this from Katha veechar, but what ever knowledge Guru gave me ..let me try to justify it.........Why would our Gurus insert their big toe in the water and make people drink it when they did not even write their own names while writing Gurbani which is in SGGS?
They only gave themselves mere numbers?
You answer lies in my question...What a water becomes by reciting 5 baanis, in presence of Guru Ji and Panj Pyare...with Khanda and Patashe in Khanda Baata...with all five have hands and eyes in water.......?What would the water become by inserting one's toe and make people drink it
If this initiation was the only way to become Sikhs, then how about those who did not take it?
Was there anything tangible, like a janeiu kind of necklace, a bracelet etc etc given to those who were initiated like that as a proof that they had taken Charan Pahul and hence had become Sikhs?
Does this initiation contradict or compliment the concept of 4 doors of Harmandir Sahib?
Sikh becomes a sikh after he/she gets Gurmantra. In guru period there was a procedure of charan amrit and that was substituted by Khande bate da amrit by Guru Gobind singh ji.
Bhai Gurdas ji writesਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਰਹਰਾਸਿ ਕਰਿ ਚਰਣਾਮ੍ਰਿਤੁ ਸਿਖਾਂ ਪੀਲਾਇਆ ।
charan dhoi raharaasi kari charanaamritu sikhaan peelaaiaa|
He washed His feet, eulogised God and got his Disciples drink the ambrosia of his feet.
Vaar 1 pauri 23
Sikh becomes a sikh after he/she gets Gurmantra. In guru period there was a procedure of charan amrit and that was substituted by Khande bate da amrit by Guru Gobind singh ji.
Bhai Gurdas ji writesਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਰਹਰਾਸਿ ਕਰਿ ਚਰਣਾਮ੍ਰਿਤੁ ਸਿਖਾਂ ਪੀਲਾਇਆ ।
charan dhoi raharaasi kari charanaamritu sikhaan peelaaiaa|
He washed His feet, eulogised God and got his Disciples drink the ambrosia of his feet.
Vaar 1 pauri 23
Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa ..Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh...
Thanks for support from Gurbani......
Adskhalsa ji,
Guru Fateh,
I am sorry to disappoint you but the fact remains that only Gurbani in SGGS is called GURBANI which does not include Bhai Gurdas' poetry. So let's not degrade SGGS by calling his poetry Gurbani.
Tejwant Singh
Here is the entire pauree. What is there in this pauree that makes one think that "drink the ambrosia of his feet" means the water in which the Guru washed his feet? And in reading the entire pauree, could there not be a larger and more spiritual lesson that goes beyond the literal sense of water for washing feet, and water for Amrit
