India - Man Can’t Force Wife To Conceive, Rules High Court | SIKH PHILOSOPHY NETWORK
  • Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

India Man Can’t Force Wife To Conceive, Rules High Court

Jan 7, 2005
3,450
3,760
Metro-Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Man can’t force wife to conceive, rules high court

Saurabh Malik/TNS

Chandigarh, February 11


In a first, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that a husband cannot compel his wife to conceive and give birth to his child. Making it clear that relationships that know no limits too have boundaries, the high court has asserted intimacy is one thing, giving birth to a child another.

“Mere consent to conjugal rights does not mean consent to give birth to a child for her husband,” Justice Jitendra Chauhan of the High Court has asserted.

The judgment, pregnant with significance, also makes it amply clear that “to have and to hold, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness or in health” does not give a man the right to prevent his wife from going in for an abortion.

The ruling came on revision petitions filed by Chandigarh-based gynaecologist Dr Mangla Dogra and others petitioners. The controversy in the case hovered around the decision of a wife to go in for medical termination of pregnancy without her husband’s consent.

Married in April 1994, the couple and their son were initially staying in Panipat. Due to "hostilities and strained relations”, the wife started staying with her parents, along with her son, at Chandigarh.

The wife conceived after she agreed to accompany her husband to Panipat during the pendency of her application for maintenance. She then underwent an MTP carried out by Dr Mangla Dogra, who was assisted by Dr Sukhbir Grewal as anesthetist.

The husband, subsequently, filed a civil suit for the recovery of Rs 30 lakh towards damages for mental pain, agony and harassment against his wife, her brother and parents and Dr Dogra and Dr Grewal for getting the pregnancy terminated illegally.

Taking up the plea, a Civil Judge asserted: “There is a cause of action in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants (wife and others) at this stage”. Aggrieved by the orders, Dr Dogra and other petitioners preferred the revisions.

Justice Chauhan asserted: “The wife knew her conjugal duties towards her husband. Consequently, if the wife has consented to matrimonial sex and created sexual relations with her own husband, it does not mean that she has consented to conceive a child. It is the free will of the wife to give birth to a child or not…

“The wife is the best judge and is to see whether she wants to continue the pregnancy or to get it aborted… Keeping in view the legal position, it is held that no express or implied consent of the husband is required for getting the pregnancy terminated…

“A woman is not a machine in which raw material is put and a finished product comes out. She should be mentally prepared to conceive, continue the same and give birth to a child. The unwanted pregnancy would naturally affect the mental health of the pregnant woman…” Imposing costs of Rs 50,000 on the husband, Justice Chauhan concluded: “It is held that the act of the medical practitioners Dr Dogra and Dr Grewal was legal and justified.”

source: http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120212/main7.htm
 

Ambarsaria

ੴ / Ik▫oaʼnkār
Writer
SPNer
Dec 21, 2010
3,380
5,687
Great decision.

Conversely, man cannot force a woman to abort or not bear a child.

Let it also empower women and be so publicized so woman don't have to agree to female fetus abortions/infanticide.

This puts women squarely in the controlling position to refuse any pressure or encouragement for female infanticide and preserves their fundamental right as a woman to bear or not bear a child.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Gyani Jarnail Singh

Sawa lakh se EK larraoan
Mentor
Writer
SPNer
Jul 4, 2004
7,689
14,358
72
KUALA LUMPUR MALAYSIA
Yes any woman forced/coerced to abort the feamle child should be encouraged to sue the juttees off the feet of their men..and teach them a lesson they wont forget. Sue them and take away their "Zameen" so that their ZAMEER may shame them...

Aside note..Arent we letting a couple of men (judges" ) decide a whole lot for US...as Society ?? Recently just 2 of them decided that the Bhagwad Gita is NOT a religious Text but a Way of Life.....did they even bother to look whether the HINDU SOCIETY ta large will be comfortable with that decision which was passed just to defeat a Christians petition to stop the teaching of BG in Schools or alternatively ALLOW the teaching of the Bible/Koran/etc as equals..... Can the "opinion" (maybe learned/not so learned..) matter more than the 1 Billion Hindus ?? Also recently the group of "judges" also passed judgemnet on SGGS..and Sikhs were only TOO HAPPY to let a couple of NON-SIKHS pass judgemnets on their GURU....what happens if tomorrow another simialr group pass another judgement Sikhs dont like ??
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Shabad Vichaar by SPN'ers

Sikhs, on cue from our clergy in the form of ragis and parcharaks, have translated Kaam as sex and lust. They further translate Kaaman as woman. Kaaman, after all is one who is “absorbed and...

SPN on Facebook

...
Top