Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

Atheism Is Atheism The Ultimate Sikhi?

Discussion in 'Interfaith Dialogues' started by Harry Haller, May 2, 2011.

  1. Harkiran Kaur

    Harkiran Kaur India
    Expand Collapse

    Leader

    Writer SPNer Thinker

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    1,843
    Using Logic:

    God is all that ever existed or will exist - unity - formless (Nirgun)
    If truth existed as something separate then there is not ONEness so truth was not discovered but just IS. Since God is all there is then God IS that truth.
    All else happens within God - duality (Sargun formed expression of the ONE). Truth is within God. Truth IS God.

    Mool Mantra is very clear on this.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. dalvindersingh grewal

    dalvindersingh grewal India
    Expand Collapse
    Writer Historian SPNer Thinker

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    411
    Likes Received:
    319
    In Sikhism, Guru Nanak laid three fundamentals: Kirat Karna, Naam Japna, vand Chhakna'; they all should go on simultaneously.
     
  3. dalvindersingh grewal

    dalvindersingh grewal India
    Expand Collapse
    Writer Historian SPNer Thinker

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    411
    Likes Received:
    319
    Logic is not truth and truth not logic. These are two different pedestals. God was, is and will be the Truth, so says Guru Nanak. Truth is an attribute/quality as well as a reality here. He created an ever changeable universe; nothing remaining the same the next minute. What ever changes cannot be called a stable or permanent truth. Permanent Truth is the one which does not change. God is the Permanent truth as per the definition given in the Shlok after manglacharan Ikongkaar. Creation being transitory hence is not the truth, though he created the Universe is a truth. Truth is not a discovery: it is an attribute; it is a quality; however sometime we give names to individuals on the basis of the qualities. 'satnam', 'nirbhau', 'nirvair' etc have been the names given to individuals as well. Truth is thus the name given to the God on the basis of quality; quality name.
     
  4. Harry

    Harry United Kingdom
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2017
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    35
    but surely truth must be logical? a good example of universal truth is gravity, if you fall of a building, you will move in the direction of the ground, it is a clear logical truth, unshrouded in mystery or suberfuge, if my knowledge of Sikh history serves me well, I recall that in most of the stories surrounding Guru Nanak, although many may be fabrication, he followed a path of revealing the truth in a logical and understandable manner, to simply say, this is the truth, but please take my word for it, did not seem part of his remit. How else could he free people from the superstitions and rituals of the time, if the truth had the same attributes? The truth shines so brightly it must be easily understood, easy to prove, easy to show.
     
  5. Original

    Original
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    524
    Good evening All - Harry c/o Admin Ji

    First n foremost, let me point out the obvious, which should've been picked up by the prudent Sikh that the title "Atheism n Sikh" is logically nonsensical. It's like saying "married-bachelor".
    ..the truth Nanak proclaims is metaphysical.
    ..which is what, pls cite references ?
    ..by showing them the way [Sikh] and its three pillars of kr, vs and nj.
    ..metaphysical truths can only be "experienced" by the individual:

    "..its your road, and yours alone. Others may walk it with you but no one can walk it for you" - Rumi.

    Nanak is absolutely clear, hence, nam simran.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. dalvindersingh grewal

    dalvindersingh grewal India
    Expand Collapse
    Writer Historian SPNer Thinker

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    411
    Likes Received:
    319
    Logic is a methodology and not the subject, while truth is the subject here. Guru Nanak used logic to project truth at some places but not everywhere. He used action as well. I will quote an example: Once some sanyansis came to meet Guru Nanak. While close to Kartarpur they wanted to know the house of Guru Nanak and they found some persons working in the fields. They approached the white beard person whose clothes had gone dirty while working in the field. Reluctantly they asked him about Guru Nanak's place. The old man told them to just wait for a few minutes. The sanaysis saw the old man working along with other men and reciting God's name while working in the field. One of them remarked,"How these working people full of dirt are reciting God's name and that too in a melodious way?" Meanwhile the old man washed his hands and face in the flowing water and came on the track where these sanyasis were waiting. As the old man approached a lady came and kept the food she had brought. The old men called out his fellows for food and requested the sanyasis to have food too. One of the sanyasis remarked," The food will not be sufficient for us. You can have that but guide us to Guru Nanak's house". The Old man said, "All this food is with the kind courtesy of the Lord. It is neither mine nor anyone's else. God has send you to us to share this food. Please do oblige." The lady offered the food to all and they had it since they had been feeling hungry. One of them suddenly remarked:"He must be Guru Nanak who believes in working himself to earn and share with others and reciting Name while working". Truly the Old man was Guru Nanak and the lady was Mata Sulakhni who explained the principle of "Kirat Karna, naam jpana and vand chhakna', through practical example. There was no reasoning involved; no logical discussion but the point was brought home through live example.
     
  7. Harry

    Harry United Kingdom
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2017
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    35
    I would say that would be a logical thought.
     
  8. Harry

    Harry United Kingdom
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2017
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    35
    there are many married men who behave like bachelors..

    absolutely, but its still the truth, and it still needs to be understood, in a universal fashion as well as metaphysical.
    there are many, I am surprised you ask, throwing water to the sun for one.
    in effect by showing them the truth, in an understandable and practical manner
    I would say metaphysical truths are universal, how else could one religion stake a claim in teaching these if they were not?

    can you explain this, hence nam simran, meaning?

    always a pleasure,
     
  9. dalvindersingh grewal

    dalvindersingh grewal India
    Expand Collapse
    Writer Historian SPNer Thinker

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    411
    Likes Received:
    319
    It was not a logical thought of Guru Nanak but a practical example set by Guru Nanak.
     
  10. Harkiran Kaur

    Harkiran Kaur India
    Expand Collapse

    Leader

    Writer SPNer Thinker

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    1,843
    We are getting there!!

    I know I mentioned the double slit experiment before, where it's proven that a conscious observer is required for an electron to behave as a particle (something tangible, manifest - sargun) rather than as a wave (intangible, energy flowing through something else a medium, unmanifest - nirgun). Simply put there were two slits, and an electron was fired towards either slit. When not observed, it actually formed an interference pattern on the wall just as if it had gone through both slits at the same time. When observed, it chose one or the other slit and only the one line formed on the wall.

    Well they also took that one further and decided after the electron passed thrgough the slits, whether or not it would be observed. The outcome of the experiment was astounding! In every single attempt at the original experiment, observing it, collapsed the wave function and caused the electron to behave as a solid particle. Meaning it can Only go through one or the other slit but not both at the same time. When they observed it AFTER it passed through the slit already, it actually still collapsed the wave function and only one line was seen! But how can that be when the decision was not made till after it passed through the slits already?? It was like it changed what happened in the past!

    It means both time and space are collapsible functions, held together in some physical form only by conscious observation!!! This world is really an illusion. What we experience is not what is 'out there'. In fact our entire experience is in pitch black inside our skull and we are not even seeing directly the world but only electrical signals reaching the back part of our brains called the occipital lobe. Our eyes probably can see many times the information our brains are processing. What if that information is pure frequency and our brains are just showing us the show like on tv. What if the world is like 8k resolution and we are only experiencing Atari from 1980?

    anyway just wanted to point out that these things ARE being understood through quantum physics.
    If the physical world is not what we are led to believe through our physical senses than what can it be?

    For me, the metaphysical and physical MUST have some link where we can grasp it. I think quantum physics is starting to open our eyes... no pun intended!!
     
  11. dalvindersingh grewal

    dalvindersingh grewal India
    Expand Collapse
    Writer Historian SPNer Thinker

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    411
    Likes Received:
    319
    You are right in summarising that the world is an illusion. This is what Gurbani has already stated. Experiments show that all the universe is a play of energies played by thought waves emerging continuously in various minds making the world to continuously change. The various forms are continuously made and broken as a resultant of effects of various thought energies. Solid, liquid or gases type of materials is just temporary forms showing that there are no barriers between particle and wave: sargun and nirgun. God and His creation thus should be taken both particle and wave and you are right that it can be either particle or a wave at any one time and cannot be both together at any one time; it may be partially a wave and partially a particle however but not totally a wave as well as particle. Particle physics may be on the way to make more revelations in this direction.
     
Since you're here... we have a small favor to ask...     Become a Supporter      ::     Make a Contribution     


Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Atheism Sikhism And Atheism Interfaith Dialogues Dec 5, 2015
Atheism Atheism A Religion? Government Says Yes For Tax Purposes Interfaith Dialogues Aug 23, 2013
Atheism Atheism - What Happens When We Die? Interfaith Dialogues Mar 13, 2013
Atheism Is Atheism Compatible With Sikhism Interfaith Dialogues May 15, 2012
Atheism Atheism's Odd Relationship With Morality Interfaith Dialogues Mar 27, 2011

Share This Page