• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

Humanism Imagine: Man Created God

Jan 6, 2005
Metro-Vancouver, B.C., Canada
July 21, 2011

Imagine: Man created God

Humans' need for attachment and authority figures is behind religion, some scientists argue

By Anderson Thompson and Clare Aukofer, Los Angeles Times - July 21, 2011

Before John Lennon imagined "living life in peace," he conjured "no heaven … / no hell below us …/ and no religion, too."

No religion: What was Lennon summoning? For starters, a world without "divine" messengers, such as Osama bin Laden, sparking violence. A world where mistakes, like the avoidable loss of life in Hurricane Katrina, would be rectified rather than chalked up to "God’s will." Where politicians would no longer compete to prove who believes more strongly in the irrational and untenable. Where critical thinking is an ideal. In short, a world that makes sense.

In recent years, scientists specializing in the mind have begun to unravel religion’s "DNA." They have produced robust theories, backed by empirical evidence (including "imaging" studies of the brain at work), that support the conclusion that it was humans who created God, not the other way around. And the better we understand the science, the closer we can come to "no heaven … no hell … and no religion too."

Like our physiological DNA, the psychological mechanisms behind faith evolved over the eons through natural selection. They helped our ancestors work effectively in small groups and survive and reproduce, traits developed long before recorded history, from foundations deep in our mammalian, primate and African hunter-gatherer past.

For example, we are born with a powerful need for attachment, identified as long ago as the 1940s by psychiatrist John Bowlby and expanded on by psychologist Mary Ainsworth. Individual survival was enhanced by protectors, beginning with our mothers. Attachment is reinforced physiologically through brain chemistry, and we evolved and retain neural networks completely dedicated to it. We easily expand that inborn need for protectors to authority figures of any sort, including religious leaders and, more saliently, gods. God becomes a super parent, able to protect us and care for us, even when our more corporeal support systems disappear, through death or distance.

Scientists have so far identified about 20 hardwired, evolved "adaptations" as the building blocks of religion. Like attachment, they are mechanisms that underlie human interactions: Brain-imaging studies at the National Institutes of Health showed that when test subjects were read statements about religion and asked to agree or disagree, the same brain networks that process human social behaviour — our ability to negotiate relationships with others — were engaged.

Among the psychological adaptations related to religion are our need for reciprocity, our tendency to attribute unknown events to human agency, our capacity for romantic love, our fierce "out-group" hatreds and just as fierce loyalties to the in-groups of kin and allies. Religion hijacks these traits. The rivalry between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, for example, or the doctrinal battles between Protestant and Catholic reflect our "groupish" tendencies.

In addition to these adaptations, humans have developed the remarkable ability to think about what goes on in other people’s minds and create and rehe{censored} complex interactions with an unseen other. In our minds we can de-couple cognition from time, place and circumstance. We consider what someone else might do in our place; we project future scenarios; we replay past events. It’s an easy jump to, say, conversing with the dead or to conjuring gods and praying to them.

Morality, which some see as imposed by gods or religion on savage humans, science sees as yet another adaptive strategy handed down to us by natural selection.

Yale psychology professor Paul Bloom notes that "it is often beneficial for humans to work together … which means it would have been adaptive to evaluate the niceness and nastiness of other individuals." In groundbreaking research, he and his team found that infants in their first year of life demonstrate aspects of an innate sense of right and wrong, good and bad, even fair and unfair. When shown a puppet climbing a mountain, either helped or hindered by a second puppet, the babies oriented toward the helpful puppet. They were able to make an evaluative social judgment, in a sense a moral response.

Michael Tomasello, a developmental psychologist who co-directs the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, has also done work related to morality and very young children. He and his colleagues have produced a wealth of research that demonstrates children’s capacities for altruism. He argues that we are born altruists who then have to learn strategic self-interest.

Beyond psychological adaptations and mechanisms, scientists have discovered neurological explanations for what many interpret as evidence of divine existence. Canadian psychologist Michael Persinger, who developed what he calls a "god helmet" that blocks sight and sound but stimulates the brain’s temporal lobe, notes that many of his helmeted research subjects reported feeling the presence of "another." Depending on their personal and cultural history, they then interpreted the sensed presence as either a supernatural or religious figure.

It is conceivable that St. Paul’s dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus was, in reality, a seizure caused by temporal-lobe epilepsy.

The better we understand human psychology and neurology, the more we will uncover the underpinnings of religion. Some of them, like the attachment system, push us toward a belief in gods and make departing from it extraordinarily difficult. But it is possible.

We can be better as a species if we recognize religion as a man-made construct. We owe it to ourselves to at least consider the real roots of religious belief, so we can deal with life as it is, taking advantage of perhaps our mind’s greatest adaptation: our ability to use reason.

Imagine that.

J. Anderson Thomson is a psychiatrist at the University of Virginia. Clare Aukofer is a medical writer. They are the authors of Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith.

© Copyright (c) Los Angeles Times

source: http://www.{censored}/technology/Imagine+created/5140598/story.html


May 9, 2006
This appears to be a very double-edged article. The author has delivered some valuable scientific facts with an oversized sledgehammer. If you can duck under the sledgehammer, those of us attached to our super parent might have a discussion about the facts and how they relate to us as "religious" people.

I agree with the results of the scientific studies. I don't see how people like the author make the jump from "see how our brains are wired for religion" to "God doesn't exist, it's all in our mind". He's stated himself in the article how religion has helped (and hindered) humans through our evolution, and how our brains have adapted to make use of those tools. What's wrong with that?

We can be better as a species if we recognize religion as a man-made construct. We owe it to ourselves to at least consider the real roots of religious belief, so we can deal with life as it is, taking advantage of perhaps our mind’s greatest adaptation: our ability to use reason.

I believe Guru Nanak pointed this out 500 years before the author's idolized scientists did. He pointed it out to those around him, how man-made their religions were. Guru Nanak boiled it all down to SAT NAM and presented a useful model of modern religious thought.

So our brains are wired for God -- so TAKE ADVANTAGE of it. To borrow Gyani ji's phrase, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater!

I do think religion, like the rest of humanities tools, needs to evolve, which is why there is so much friction with the older religions today, and why I think Gurbani's core truths are definately the way forward.



ੴ / Ik▫oaʼnkār
Dec 21, 2010
Sikhism must be the only religion which professes and admits that you will never know all but still keep moving in the direction of knowing more of the ultimate truths within creation.

You are not limited in this journey to human brains, ape interactions, plants and elements or other concepts and elements that define creation. Let us call Sikhism, "Understanding Creation without Borders".

Sat Sri Akal.
📌 For all latest updates, follow the Official Sikh Philosophy Network Whatsapp Channel: