thecoopes said:
Dear friends, as you all know I have a great respect for Sikhism and never wish to offend any of the devout.
So please treat my comments not as sarcasm or disrespectful but as they are meant to be an honest appraisal of my subjective view.
Indeed each of us that post a comment is posting by and large just their subjective view.
It's alright, man...I'm not easily offended
STRONG LIKE BULL!!
Quite frankly, I respect you for even coming here and making your views known. It's not an easy thing, and I know that a lot of my Caucasian friends get a little tentative due to the P.C. thing that has been hammered into their cubconscious about non-Caucasian ethnicities. Not to say that political correctness is a bad thing - it has its uses in terms of keeping civlity between folk and assisting in not arousing intercommunal hatred and potential violence - but it does sometimes get in the way of honest and clarity.
But you seem like a very articulate guy/gal, so I'm sure you won't have a problem communicating your ideas
It never ceases to amaze me how in all religions those that believe try to discredit the views of those that question with such retorts as...
“ You do not understand the deep things, “ or “You need to study holy writings”. Or such assertions as “God is this or is not that” etc etc.
All religions believe that their particular brand of belief is the correct one and their brand of god is the true one.
Please you cannot say that God is...
Dear Max314 you make this statement: “Haha...who does?”
Then make this statement:
” God has no "intentions", for God is not a human.
God has no "desires", for God is not a human.
God has no "hatred" or "wrath" or "judgement", for God is not a mere human.
He has no need for these human concepts of 'love', 'retribution', or 'will'.
He is all that is and he is all that ever will be.”
You can only perceive that the nature of the divine being must be different than our own.
While I would readily accept that Sikhism is one of the noblest beliefs I feel that all religions are prisoners to restricted myopic visions of what that religion teaches as dogma.
Twenty people with twenty different religions, all would dispute the others understanding of what god is, and is not!
Best wishes
There is some fiction in your truth...and some truth in your fiction
Yes, I said that God could not be understood...and those things that I pointed out about God were actually
reasons why God cannot be understood. It's the idea that he exists beyond human constructs of life, death, morality, etc that we will never be able to understand him.
You are also right to say that each religion seems to have its own unique set of rules as to what God is. And since it cannot be proven, the only thing one can do is to decide which description of God suits them most. Personally, the poetic vagaries of Nanak's description are so paradoxically lucid-yet-cryptic that this seems like the best way to describe God. Observe the Mool Mantra (the opening passage of the Guru Granth Sahib):
"There is but one God. He is all that is.
He is the Creator of all things, and He is all-pervasive.
He is without fear and without emnity.
He is timeless, unborn and self-existent.
He is the Enlightener
And can be realised by his grace alone.
He was true in the beginning; He was in all ages.
The True One, was - O, Nanak - and shall forever be."
~ 'Guru Granth Sahib', Japji, p.1 ~
What's interesting is that Einstein was convinced that God could be expressed in a mathematical equation that was no longer than an inch in length. He was sure he was on the right path, but he died before he could complete his work...and no-one has since had the intellectual capacity to continue his work. The world renowned mathematician and logician, Kurt Gödel, even came up within an ontological proof of God's existence (
click here for some mathematical mind bending

). There are plenty of other mathematical models that seem to indicate the presence of an unseen creative force.
But even if God's existence a singular, all-pervasive entity can be proven...that still would not yield the answer to the question of "what is God?"
The possibilities presented by that question are so vast and potentially limitless that even Nanak - after having attained enlightenment - effectively said "it's all bullshit...just get on with your lives in a moral way, forget religion, but keep humble remembering that we are all part of God and thus you should treat your fellow man with respect".
Of course, whilst this message was progressively humanistic and wonderful, the practical problem arises: how does one hold such humanistic beliefs when the oppressive, fascist Mughal government of the time won't allow you to do so?
Well, you debate with them.
Nanak's followers did that.
The Mughals started with the killings.
You reason with them.
Nanak's followers did that.
Then there are more killings.
Now, it's just taking the {censored}. Unless the sword is finally wielded, freedom of belief will be abolished and the very right to 'humanity' that all men deserve is jeopardised. The Sikkhs actually weren't fighting for 'themselves' as such. They were fighting for everyone.
You must understand that what the Tenth Guru did was to forge the principles of Nanak into the Granth Sahib that could effectively stand as a piece of legislature of secularism and democracy...and the Khalsa warriors were the sect assigned to protect that democracy (the Akal Takht - an extension of the Golden Temple complex - is the first recorded democratic system in the subcontinent that is comprised of an elected council who vote on issues regarding the collective interests and actions of the Sikkh community).
If the secularist democracy of the West were to somehow come to an end for whatever reason (Islamic countries nuking them, or whatever other heinous act you might care to think of), then the Granth would act as a piece of legislature that would fight for the freedom of humanity once again.
Of course, today's Sikkhs are a little...confused with the concept of saintly militancy as the chivalric guardians of the human race (they confuse
themselves to be the 'human race' :roll: ), but the essential principles still exist.
They've just gotta be...dusted away a little
Bertrand Russel concluded "that if some lucky men survive the onslaught of the third world war of atomic and hydrogen bombs, then the Sikh religion will be the only means of guiding them". Russell was asked that he was talking about the third world war, but isn't this religion capable of guiding mankind before the third world war? In reply, Russell said, "Yes, it has the capability, but the Sikhs have not brought out in the broad daylight, the splendid doctrines of this religion which has come into existence for the benefit of the entire mankind. This is their greatest sin and the Sikhs cannot be freed of it."
Pukandi Baba said:
What will happen on 666? Some say the world will end (Christians) Be nice to see the beast i think.
No, dude...
The Omen remake is coming out.
Get with the program
