• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

India David Cameron To Pay Respects To Victims Of Amritsar Massacre

Jan 6, 2005
Metro-Vancouver, B.C., Canada

David Cameron to pay respects to victims of Amritsar massacre

David Cameron to become first serving British prime minister to visit scene of 1919 atrocity, but will stop short of a full apology

Nicholas Watt in Delhi - The Guardian, Wednesday 20 February 2013

David Cameron is to offer his condolences to the victims of the 1919 Amritsar massacre when he visits the site in north-west India on Wednesday.

In a dramatic illustration of his attempt to place Anglo-Indian relations on a new footing, he will become the first serving British prime minister to visit the scene where at least 379 Indians lost their lives. Cameron, who regards the killings as one of the most deeply shameful events in British colonial history, will lay a wreath in their memory.

The massacre emboldened the Indian independence movement and helped end the British Raj 28 years later in 1947. The Indian National Congress estimated that the death toll, after Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered his troops to open fire on a crowd in Amritsar in April 1919, was closer to 1,000.

Cameron on Tuesday night acknowledged the significance of his pubic act of remorse. He said: "There are ties of history [between UK and India] – both the good and the bad. In Amritsar, I want to take the opportunity to pay my respects at Jallianwala Bagh."

The gesture by Cameron, which comes 16 years after the Queen paid her respects at the Jallianwala Bagh public gardens during a state visit to India, will be the most serious attempt by Britain to make amends for one of the most notorious episodes during the Raj. But Cameron will stop short of offering an apology for the massacre which was described the following year by Winston Churchill, then secretary of state for war, as "monstrous".

Government sources said Cameron believes it would be wrong to apologise for two reasons. It would set a precedent which could lead to endless demands for apologies for other events throughout British colonial history.

Cameron also believes the British state acknowledged the horror of the massacre at the time. Dyer was removed from his position and forced to retire the following March. The official report into the massacre, known as the Hunter commission, was highly critical of him.

One government source drew a distinction between the inquiries into Bloody Sunday in 1972, the policing on the day of the Hillsborough disaster in 1989 and the recent Mid Staffordshire NHS scandal which all prompted apologies from the prime minister. "In those three cases the state, or organs of the state, were at fault and so the prime minister apologised," one source said. Cameron believes that an agent of the state – Dyer – rather than the state itself was at fault in Amritsar.

Cameron was offered support on Tuesday night by the Bollywood actor Aamir Khan, who said there was no need to make an apology for mistakes during the Raj. Speaking after the pair met in Delhi, Khan said: "I don't think we can hold the present generation of Britishers responsible for something that happened ages ago. It is not fair."

Cameron acknowledges he will be taking a big step in Amritsar. He regards his public gesture as an important part of addressing painful memories from the past to allow Britain and India to focus on a closer trading relationship in the future.

But Cameron believes he is acting in line with Britain's response to the massacre dating back to its immediate aftermath. Edwin Montagu, then secretary of state for India, described Dyer's behaviour as an example of the "doctrine of terrorism".

Cameron points out that the Queen acknowledged the scale of the disaster in a speech on the eve of her visit to Amritsar. She said: "It is no secret that there have been some difficult episodes in our past. Jallianwala Bagh, which I shall visit tomorrow, is a distressing example. But history cannot be rewritten, however much we might sometimes wish otherwise. It has its moments of sadness as well as of gladness. We must learn from the sadness and build on the gladness."

Tony Blair visited the scene of the massacre before he became prime minister. He described it as the "worst aspects of colonialism".

As foreign secretary, Jack Straw wrote in the Jallianwala Bagh visitors' book in 2005: "This was a terrible occasion in which so many innocents were slaughtered: and for which I feel ashamed and full of sorrow."

Cameron, who has his eye on the Sikh vote in Britain, will also visit the Golden Temple in Amritsar, Sikhism's holiest site. He said: "Punjabis make an extraordinary contribution to British life and I'm delighted to have the chance to visit the land of their ancestors. There are ties of religion. Sikhism is one of the key faiths not just of India, but of Britain now too. And I cannot wait to see the Golden Temple in Amritsar, which I believe is one of the most beautiful and extraordinary places of worship in the world."

Massacrre that boosted Indian independence

The Amritsar massacre of 13 April 1919 crystallised the decline and eventual fall of the British Raj.

In the space of a few hours, Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer did more than any other person to end British rule in India, when he ordered 50 riflemen to open fire on thousands of innocent Indian protesters. At least 379 people were killed at the Jallianwala Bagh public garden, though the Indian National Congress placed the death toll nearer 1,000.

Dyer's actions, which were portrayed by Edward Fox in the 1982 Richard Attenborough film Gandhi, emboldened the Indian independence movement. Public revulsion at his actions played a decisive role in winning support for the lengthy campaign of peaceful civil disobedience led by Mahatma Gandhi which culminated in Indian independence in 1947.

But the elite of the British Raj did not see the massacre as an inevitable step towards independence, which was hastened after the second world war by Gandhi's campaign and by Britain's parlous public finances.

Britain believed that its response to the massacre was exemplary. Dyer was forced to retire a year later and a succession of political leaders denounced his actions.

Winston Churchill famously described the shootings as "monstrous". As secretary of state for war he told the House of Commons on 8 July 1920: "That is an episode which appears to me to be without precedent or parallel in the modern history of the British empire. It is an event of an entirely different order from any of those tragical occurrences which take place when troops are brought into collision with the civil population. It is an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation."

In the same debate the secretary of state for India, Edwin Montagu issued a scathing response to Dyer's claim that he had not overreacted and that he would have called in even greater firepower: "That it is the doctrine of terrorism."

David Cameron has a link to the debate that was held on a technical motion to dock Montagu's salary. His great-grandfather, Sir William Mount, voted with Churchill and Montagu as MPs rejected calls to lower his salary.

source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/20/david-cameron-pay-respects-amritsar-massacre
Jan 6, 2005
Metro-Vancouver, B.C., Canada

Cameron confronts 'shameful' colonial crime in India

AMRITSAR, India, Feb 20:

British Prime Minister David Cameron visited the site of a colonial-era massacre in India on Wednesday, describing the episode as "deeply shameful" while stopping short of a public apology.

On the last leg of a three-day trip aimed at forging deeper economic ties, Cameron took the bold decision to visit the city of Amritsar and tackle an enduring scar of British rule over the subcontinent, which ended in 1947.

Dressed in a dark suit and bowing his head, he laid a wreath at the memorial to the victims at Jallianwala Bagh where British troops opened fire on thousands of unarmed protesters in 1919.

In a message in the visitors´ book, he wrote: "This was a deeply shameful event in British history and one that Winston Churchill rightly declared at the time as ´monstrous´.

"We must never forget what happened here. And in remembering we must ensure that the United Kingdom stands up for the right of peaceful protest around the world."

The number of casualties at the Jallianwala Bagh garden is unclear, with colonial-era records showing about 400 deaths while Indian figures put the number killed at closer to 1,000.

S.K. Mukherjee, the secretary of the Jallianwala Bagh memorial trust, spent half an hour guiding the British leader around the site, showing him a well into which 120 people jumped to their deaths as the bullets flew.

Mukherjee said Cameron had struggled for words but had told him he was "regretful and this should not happen ever again" as he left the memorial which has 20,000 visitors a day.

The incident that saw soldiers under General Reginald Dyer´s command open fire on men, women and children in the enclosed area is one of the most infamous of Britain´s colonial rule and helped spur the independence movement.

But the move to visit the site is seen as a gamble by Cameron, who is travelling with British-Indian parliamentarians, and could lead to calls for similar treatment from other former colonies or even other victims in India.

It immediately invited a debate about why Cameron was opening up wounds from the past -- and was stopping short of saying sorry -- during a visit designed to stress the future of Indo-British ties.

Cameron said Monday in Mumbai that he wanted Britain to be India´s "partner of choice," stressing their shared history, democratic values and the 1.5 million Britons of Indian origin as a foundation for a deeper alliance.

"Writing a note in the visitors´ diary is a half-hearted approach. He should have met us to say sorry," Bhusan Behl, who heads a trust for the families of Jallianwala Bagh victims, told AFP.

He has campaigned for decades on behalf of his grandfather who was killed during the firing, which was immortalised in Richard Attenborough´s film "Gandhi" and features in Salman Rushdie´s epic book "Midnight´s Children".

Cameron is the first serving prime minister to visit the site, diplomatic sources said, but not the first senior British public figure.

In 1997 the Queen laid a wreath at a site during a tour of India. But her gaffe-prone husband Prince Philip stole the headlines by reportedly saying that the Indian estimates for the death count were "vastly exaggerated".

R.P Bhatia, a professor of history at Khalsa College in Amritsar who was at the ceremony on Wednesday, interpreted Cameron´s words as an apology which he said would be "remembered forever."

"This moment will be precious and cherished," he told AFP.

Daljit Kaur, a 29-year-old British citizen of Indian origin, also praised Cameron, who has visited India twice and made building an alliance with New Delhi a foreign policy priority since his election in 2010.

"I am proud that a British prime minister has admitted the blunders committed by former leaders and has invested his energy to understand Indian culture," she said.

Cameron has made several official apologies since becoming prime minister, saying sorry for the official handling of a football disaster at Hillsborough stadium in 1989 and 1972 killings in Northern Ireland known as "Bloody Sunday".

In 2006 former British prime minister Tony Blair expressed his "deep sorrow" for the slave trade in a move that was also seen as stopping short of a full apology.

Published on 2013-02-20 16:12:35

source: http://myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=50272
Nov 14, 2008




few other images ..



Mr. Michael Steiner, Ambassador of the Federal Republic of Germany to the Republic of India experience the tradition of free service at community kitchen at Golden Temple on new year 2013.



US Ambassador to India, Timothy J Roemer along with his family, performs voluntary service in the community kitchen during his visit to the Golden Temple, the most sacred place for Sikhs in Amritsar, India.
Last edited:

Gyani Jarnail Singh

Sawa lakh se EK larraoan
Jul 4, 2004
The British do have a sense of honor..responsibility..and fair play....unlike those who succeeded them to power....and straight away DIVIDED the Nation causing millions to lose their ALL !! No wonder many recall the British days...with fondness...law and order..justice fair play was in greater quantity than now....



📌 For all latest updates, follow the Official Sikh Philosophy Network Whatsapp Channel: