I have just finished reading General Brar's account and justifications for his actions on Wikipedia. It was surprising to me that none of the Editors questioned the Neutrality of the article NPOV as they do so often. General Brar may have convinced himself that he handled his affairs with sense and ethically. Perhaps he was given bad information. I am not questioning the facts because who can possibly know. I question his interpretation of the situation. His version of events, and what they meant militarily, is at variance with so many others I have read. Of course I was not an eye-witness. But what happened there simply cannot gee with his narrative.