Archived_Member16
SPNer
With the Divine Love & Blessings of WAHEGURU JI, may you all always enjoy: peace, love, light (enlightenment), health, happiness & prosperity in life !
Harbhajan Singh Sangha
Happy Post Vaisakhi as well Post Khalsa Day to all.
I think the money spent on Gurudwara buildings is better spent on other more important things like improving what goes on INSIDE the gurughar.
I haven't been to Gurudwaras in ages but I am planning to get connected again this summer. but speaking from past experience, it happens. Parades, crowded Gurughars? yep that's Khalsa Day alright.
I can't say about the rest of Canada but where I live, there are Punjabi classes in Gurughars and in regular schools.
Can the youth speak it fluently? This is subjective. I believe even the teachers speak broken Punjabi! They cannot differentiate the G with G. and Sh with Chh, etc either! If you know what I mean...
I haven't been to Gurudwaras in ages but I am planning to get connected again this summer. but speaking from past experience, it happens. Parades, crowded Gurughars? yep that's Khalsa Day alright.
I can't say about the rest of Canada but where I live, there are Punjabi classes in Gurughars and in regular schools.
Can the youth speak it fluently? This is subjective. I believe even the teachers speak broken Punjabi! They cannot differentiate the G with G. and Sh with Chh, etc either! If you know what I mean...
I think its kind of like the vava or the wawa. I think we need a dotted letter to separate those two sounds as well. I think soft kh and the up front 'KH' were both used like you said so one of the sounds had to be dotted. I think 'KH' is the dotted one.If I'm getting you right, I think your talking about some of the sounds corresponding to the last "new" line in the Gurmukhi alphabet (the ones with a dot). These came in quite recently (around the time of Dasmesh Pita), to cover Persian based words which were used by the ruling classes.
I though that "indigenous Panjabi" did not have the 'Chh' sound and that they used 'Shh' instead.So maybe it is no surprised that the average pindu Panjabi may still struggle with them. lol
But it is remarkable that indigenous Panjabi did not have the ssh sond (as in sharaab) or the gutteral khh. I note that over time the Persian words themselves become "Panjabised" like the word "khyaal", when I hear Muslim Panjabis use it they still use the gutteral "khhhh" sound. Panjabis have softened it to kyaal.
No Tejwant Singh ji, I don't live in BC. I have adopted a position on faith schools after listening to what Richard Dawkins said in that video "The Big Debate" but as I recall, the Sikh dude in there does point out that even though he agrees with Dawkins, he realizes that Dawkins is speaking only about Abrahamic faiths and not Sikhism, which is more open. So that begs the question should we, as Sikhs, really have "full time" Khalsa schools?
Anyway, its a good thing that Punjabi and Gurbani are being taught, I just think they should be left for the weekend or summer.
To Dal Singh ji,
I think its kind of like the vava or the wawa. I think we need a dotted letter to separate those two sounds as well. I think soft kh and the up front 'KH' were both used like you said so one of the sounds had to be dotted. I think 'KH' is the dotted one.
I though that "indigenous Panjabi" did not have the 'Chh' sound and that they used 'Shh' instead.
As in Vand ke Shakna as opposed to Vand ke Chhakna.
OH and what about soft 'gh' vs stessed and emphasized 'GH'???
I think this requires a new topic and I think the Gurmukhi script needs a reform to include all these sounds. And this script and sounds need to be made clear to every school.
I thought it was the other way. I thought that words without dots had that soft persian sound. I am getting confused.You can pretty much bet that if a word we use has a dot in it, its roots lie outside of the Panjab.
See, I think they did, and thats because the "chhachha" of punjabi in pinds, is pronounced "shasha". The sassa with dot (sha) is almost meaningless to them.It does have two variations of the sound represented by the first two letters of teh third line of Painti. You know, Chucha - Chumcha (spoon), Chhacha - Chhuttri (umbrella). Panjabi did not use the "shhhh" sound until the sassa paer bindi came in to represent it. Again, this is a Persian vowel. Think of some words that clearly use the shhh sound and odds are they wil have Persian (or Arabic) antecedents i.e. shaitaan, sharaab, sharia.
yes, thats a good idea. Also can I say we need to improve the "quality" of Punjabi that is taught?A better idea would be to introduce compulsary English and Panjabi learningfrom a young age in the Panjab.
I thought it was the other way. I thought that words without dots had that soft persian sound. I am getting confused.
See, I think they did, and thats because the "chhachha" of punjabi in pinds, is pronounced "shasha". The sassa with dot (sha) is almost meaningless to them.
My pendu teacher was like why did they introduce letters with dots, they don't add any sounds and are meaningless. This shows he cannot recognise the sounds and therefore is not teaching pure or rather "more correct" Punjabi.
[/quote]yes, thats a good idea. Also can I say we need to improve the "quality" of Punjabi that is taught?
I can't help it.PS- Stop upsetting people dude!
Now I feel about a thousand years old.........Sikh yoda....That is fine. The discussion with dalsing about Punjabi works. Dalsingh ji has the wisdom of a sage. aad0002
You missed the point of it if that's your response to why I had showed it to you in the first place.Bhagat, the clip you posted. I saw the complete documentary here in the UK. It did nothing to convince me of its arguments and I consider myself open minded.
If you are Sikh, then you must at least have a belief and some faith in God.
Stop this nonsense now young man! lol
He says that he is labelled rude and arrogant whenever he criticizes religion. Sound like anyone you know on the forum? He then asks why has religion been given such an immunity towards criticism. (that people think its insensitive to criticize it)That both you and the main speaker cannot stop getting into arguments about religion?