☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Intellectual Translations
Understanding Chitr-Gupt and Dharam Raj
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSikhRenaissance" data-source="post: 221506" data-attributes="member: 23670"><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Forward:</strong></span></p><p>As the sole canonical Sikh authority, the Guru Granth provides an internal threefold criterion for comprehending the profound messages within its poetic injunctions. This consists of:</p><p></p><p>-Context.</p><p></p><p>-Continuity and,</p><p></p><p>-<em><a href="https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/rahaao" target="_blank">Rahaao</a></em>.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Context:</strong></span></p><p>The context, it should be appreciated, is not the context provided by the various atrophied self-alleged Sikh <em>Brahmgyanis </em>and preachers who lace it with Indic/Vedic mythology. The latter is a blatant misappropriation which derails <em>Gurbani’s </em>unique reworking of pre-Sikh terms while negating its distinctive spiritualism. This malpractice is prevalent in <em>Gurdwaras </em>in the Punjab and beyond with illiterate Sikh preachers inimically fusing <em>Gurbani</em> and materials it derides to the degree that differentiation is rendered impossible for the layman. The Guru Granth’s context is not reliant on alien elements for interpretation and imbibement. Nor would its depth be rendered defunct if Indic mythology is removed from any curriculum geared towards understanding its content<em>. </em>Its context is entirely innate and should be interpreted in light of its content rather than any exterior purviews.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Continuity:</strong></span></p><p>The continuity of context when reading <em>Gurbani</em> is crucial and entirely reliant upon first comprehending the primary verses of Guru Nanak. If these are read and appreciated in their own unique light rather than in that of antithetical material, a continuity can be provided to the context within the Guru Granth. This is crucial given that the message of the canon is reliant upon the singularity of Guru Nanak’s thought. This very same singularity establishes the context which permeates the rest of the scripture.</p><p></p><p>Conspicuous examples of inconsistent continuity can be found in the never-ending hair splitting which is triggered among Sikh ranks whenever the issue of Reincarnation is brought forward. As we discussed in our recent <em><a href="https://anchor.fm/the-sikh-renaissance/episodes/The-Reincarnation-Bait-Does-Sikhi-Accept-It-Or-Not-e12m6m3" target="_blank">podcast episode</a></em><a href="https://anchor.fm/the-sikh-renaissance/episodes/The-Reincarnation-Bait-Does-Sikhi-Accept-It-Or-Not-e12m6m3" target="_blank">,</a> Guru Nanak makes evident his dismissal of Reincarnation as some physical process in which the soul moves house from one body to another. He advises it to be a mental process via which an individual consciously/subconsciously imbibes base animal traits when bereft of any comprehension of reality. With this purview, a continuity of context can be established via which subsequent verses on Reincarnation can be understood as per their specific author’s intentions. This, though, is ignored when the continuity of context is overlooked to associate Sikh doctrine with preceding archaic doctrines.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Rahaao:</strong></span></p><p><em><a href="https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/rahaao" target="_blank">Rahaao</a> </em>denotes gist. The gist of a particular hierarchy of verses, in a specific composition, can only be deduced by comprehending the line alongside the mentioned <em>Rahaao</em>. For example:</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਤਿਸੁ ਗੁਰ ਕਉ ਸਿਮਰਉ ਸਾਸਿ ਸਾਸਿ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਗੁਰੁ ਮੇਰੇ ਪ੍ਰਾਣ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਮੇਰੀ ਰਾਸਿ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“I solely remember a Guru in each and every phase of my life; a Guru who has become the cause behind my life and behind my success in life.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 239.</p><p></p><p>The <em>Rahaao </em>verse elucidates why the author (Guru Arjan) remembers a particular Guru (in this case the truth) in each and every phase of his life because this very Guru is the reason behind his success in life and lends it meaning. The gist is for the reader-accept the truth for it will lend your life meaning and make you successful in realizing it. The truth can only be remembered 24/7 if it is made the constitution for living life. Otherwise, the charade of repetitive chanting with each and every breath is dismissed in the Sikh ethos.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>The Divine Debt Collectors:</strong></span></p><p>Keeping the above three-fold parameters in mind, let us analyze the mythos of <em>Dharam-Raaj </em>and <em>Chitar-Gupt</em>-the allegedly divine debt collectors<em>. Dharam-Raaj</em>, in conventional Indic mythology, is the deity regulated with arbitrating upon one’s conduct in life and then delegating transgressors to his hellish realm where they suffer eternal damnation. In his dispensations, he is assisted by his chief-of-staff <em>Chitar-Gupta</em> or Revealed/Unrevealed who is able to discern any dichotomies between the defendant ’ actions and the intentions behind those actions. Upon learning of a human’s demise, <em>Dharam-Raaj </em>dispatches his <em>Yamdoots </em>or hellish foot-soldiers to torment the soul and drag it to his realm. There is, however, excessive discrepancies between the multiple Indic texts which mention the existence of <em>Dharam-Raaj.</em></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Origins:</strong></span></p><p>The conceptual birth of <em>Dharam-Raaj </em>is found in the <em>Rig-Veda</em>. There, he is named <em>Yama </em>and becomes the foremost entity to die in order to pave the way to the afterworld; the power over which he is entrusted with. His second appearance is in the <em>Atharva-Veda </em>in which he has evolved into some super-deity and now retains two dogs to do his bidding. Subsequent texts mention him sporadically. In the <em>Bhagvad Gita</em> Krsna asserts that he himself is <em>Yama.</em> Irrespective of the superstitious spiritual tint given to this statement, its grammatical syntax evinces that Krsna is by no means elucidating that he permeates <em>Yama </em>but that he is <em>Yama</em> <em>Per se. </em>In the <em>Srimad Bhagvatam</em>, this explanation is contradicted when Krsna travels to <em>Yama’s </em>realm to liberate a devotee’s deceased son.</p><p></p><p>It is in the <em>Brahama Purana </em>that <em>Yama </em>emerges as a fully etched-out deity. In this latter text he is lent a distinctive identity apart from others of his pantheon and given a sterling tribute. The <em>Puranas </em>being supplemental to the Vedas, <em>Brahama </em>establishes the criterion for <em>Yama’s </em>subsequent appearances. But as countless scholars have underscored, <em>Yama </em>evokes an expansive contradiction within the Vedic ethos. Is Reincarnation a metaphor for hell or is hell an alternative to Reincarnation within which the soul is tormented for a brief period? The <em>Rigveda, Atharva-Veda, Shatapatha Brahmana, Srimad Bhagvatam, Bhagvata Purana, Devi Bhagvata Purana</em> and the <em>Manusimriti </em>expound that <em>Yamaloka</em>, <em>Yama’s</em> realm, is indeed an existential realm transcending time and space but one within which the soul undergoes palpable torment for eternity.</p><p></p><p>In the early twentieth century, Dayanand Saraswati attempted to argue that <em>Yamaloka </em>was figurative. However, the veteran Sikh scholar Giani Ditt Singh took him to task and in a series of editorials illustrated how the Vedic genre of literature left no doubt as to the existence of <em>Yamaloka </em>in the tactile sense. Saraswati, much embittered against the Sikhs, was unable to resolve the contradiction between Reincarnation and <em>Yamaloka</em>. Were they alternatives? If so, then what damned one to the cycle of Reincarnation via which a second chance could be obtained and <em>Yamaloka </em>where any form of amnesty was absent? The quagmire is still to be resolved.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Revamping:</strong></span></p><p>The inclusion of existent terms within <em>Gurbani </em>by the Sikh Gurus was done with a twofold aim. On the one hand the masses had to be instructed with concepts and elements relatively familiar to them. On the other, Sikhi’s distinctive essence had to be preserved against the ravages of atrophied conventional faiths. Guru Nanak appropriated the terms <em>Dharam-Raaj</em> (synonymous with <em>Yama</em>) and and <em>Chitar-Gupt</em> but revamped their definitions. In his purview, <em>Dharam-Raaj </em>became a metaphor for impartial justice and was housed within the human mind. Gone was the deity <em>Yama. Dharam-Raaj </em>became an aspect of the refined <em>Bibek </em>or intelligence. An enlightened Sikh utilizes their <em>Bibek </em>to discriminate between what is right and what is wrong. A retrospective analysis of one’s day-to-day life accrues one enough clarity to improve upon the next morrow thus transforming one into a <em>Dharam-Raaj.</em></p><p></p><p>This necessitated the consecutive re-defining of <em>Chitar-Gupt </em>as well<em>.</em> The conventional perspective (plagiarized by the Sikh <em>Pujaris </em>of today) holds that the soul is confronted by <em>Yama</em> and <em>Chitar-Gupt </em>who takes a mischievous pleasure in acting the Devil’s Advocate. The Sikh definition of <em>Chitar-Gupt </em>obliterates all vestiges of its theoretical predecessor. The Nanakian <em>Chitar-Gupt </em>is a mental compound. <em>Chitar </em>is the exterior character; <em>Gupt </em>the internal intent. By no means is the concept a deity which can be placated through worship as inscribed in the <em>Vedas. </em>Rather, it is a mental equilibrium which can only be struck into equipoise by the individual through rigid discipline.</p><p></p><p><em>Dharam-Raaj</em>, an aspect of the human intellect; <em>Chitar-Gupt</em>, a mental process-the <em>Yamdoots </em>were rewritten as regrets. These consist of fears which manifest upon one’s deathbed. Mankind’s challenge in the Nanakian equation is not to dissolve all sense of responsibility and self in worship. Rather, humanity is to sharpen its <em>Bibek</em> a part of which constitutes discriminating between right and wrong (<em>Dharam-Raaj</em>); synchronizing deed and intent (<em>Chitar-Gupt</em>)-all the while accepting the reality of Creation and contributing to its progress.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Revolution:</strong></span></p><p>This revelation of Guru Nanak met its fair share of detractors. The Guru, though, had foreseen this. His words in <em>Japji </em>articulate that the conventional <em>Yama</em> and <em>Chitar-Gupt </em>are nothing more than mental effusions originating from unrestrained minds. As such, they are illusions which are still subject to the Creator’s power as the Creator gifts humanity with its unbridled intelligence. This conventional duo is exposed, in <em>Gurbani</em>, for what it really is: a fear tactic.</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਸੰਤਨ ਮੋ ਕਉ ਪੂੰਜੀ ਸਉਪੀ ਤਉ ਉਤਰਿਆ ਮਨ ਕਾ ਧੋਖਾ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਧਰਮ ਰਾਇ ਅਬ ਕਹਾ ਕਰੈਗੋ ਜਉ ਫਾਟਿਓ ਸਗਲੋ ਲੇਖਾ ॥੩॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“In the presence of the enlightened Beings I was entrusted with great responsibility. This alleviated all my mind’s doubts. What can the (archaic) <em>Dharam-Raai</em> do to me now? All his ledgers have been shredded to bits.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 614.</p><p></p><p>The comprehension of <em>Hukam </em>(reality) consists of accepting the resultant <em>Naam (Gian</em> or wisdom) and living life in accordance with it.</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਸਿਮਰਤ ਨਾਮੁ ਕਿਲਬਿਖ ਸਭਿ ਕਾਟੇ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਧਰਮ ਰਾਇ ਕੇ ਕਾਗਰ ਫਾਟੇ ॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“Forever imbibing wisdom, an enlightened individual’s transgressions are effaced. <em>Dharam-Rai’s </em>archives are torn apart through wisdom.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 1346.</p><p></p><p>And,</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਹਰਿ ਦਰੁ ਸੇਵੇ ਅਲਖ ਅਭੇਵੇ ਨਿਹਚਲੁ ਆਸਣੁ ਪਾਇਆ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਤਹ ਜਨਮ ਨ ਮਰਣੁ ਨ ਆਵਣ ਜਾਣਾ ਸੰਸਾ ਦੂਖੁ ਮਿਟਾਇਆ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਗੁਪਤ ਕਾ ਕਾਗਦੁ ਫਾਰਿਆ ਜਮਦੂਤਾ ਕਛੂ ਨ ਚਲੀ ॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“They who serve their Maker, they are given this imperishable understanding: there is, in reality, no coming and no going (Reincarnation). This effaces all their anxiety and anguish. <em>Chitar-Gupt</em> and the <em>Yamdoots</em> have their existence negated as a result.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 77.</p><p></p><p>Prior to the Sikh Gurus, <em>Bhagat </em>Kabir challenged the Hindu clergy on the issue of <em>Dharam-Raaj </em>even going so far as to proclaim:</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਧਰਮ ਰਾਇ ਕਾ ਦਫਤਰੁ ਸੋਧਿਆ ਬਾਕੀ ਰਿਜਮ ਨ ਕਾਈ ॥੩॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“I have stormed this <em>Dharam-Rai’s</em> chambers and destroyed all his records. Now nothing can be found against me.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 793.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Verdict:</strong></span></p><p><em>Gurbani </em>explicitly rejects any tactile definitions of <em>Chitar-Gupt</em>, <em>Dharam-Raaj</em> and <em>Yamdoots.</em> How the <em>Pujariwaadi Deras </em>can still claim that their alleged <em>Brahm-Gyanis </em>have seen these three concepts in personified form defies common-sense.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/the-devils-advocates[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSikhRenaissance, post: 221506, member: 23670"] [SIZE=6][B]Forward:[/B][/SIZE] As the sole canonical Sikh authority, the Guru Granth provides an internal threefold criterion for comprehending the profound messages within its poetic injunctions. This consists of: -Context. -Continuity and, -[I][URL='https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/rahaao']Rahaao[/URL][/I]. [SIZE=6][B]Context:[/B][/SIZE] The context, it should be appreciated, is not the context provided by the various atrophied self-alleged Sikh [I]Brahmgyanis [/I]and preachers who lace it with Indic/Vedic mythology. The latter is a blatant misappropriation which derails [I]Gurbani’s [/I]unique reworking of pre-Sikh terms while negating its distinctive spiritualism. This malpractice is prevalent in [I]Gurdwaras [/I]in the Punjab and beyond with illiterate Sikh preachers inimically fusing [I]Gurbani[/I] and materials it derides to the degree that differentiation is rendered impossible for the layman. The Guru Granth’s context is not reliant on alien elements for interpretation and imbibement. Nor would its depth be rendered defunct if Indic mythology is removed from any curriculum geared towards understanding its content[I]. [/I]Its context is entirely innate and should be interpreted in light of its content rather than any exterior purviews. [SIZE=6][B]Continuity:[/B][/SIZE] The continuity of context when reading [I]Gurbani[/I] is crucial and entirely reliant upon first comprehending the primary verses of Guru Nanak. If these are read and appreciated in their own unique light rather than in that of antithetical material, a continuity can be provided to the context within the Guru Granth. This is crucial given that the message of the canon is reliant upon the singularity of Guru Nanak’s thought. This very same singularity establishes the context which permeates the rest of the scripture. Conspicuous examples of inconsistent continuity can be found in the never-ending hair splitting which is triggered among Sikh ranks whenever the issue of Reincarnation is brought forward. As we discussed in our recent [I][URL='https://anchor.fm/the-sikh-renaissance/episodes/The-Reincarnation-Bait-Does-Sikhi-Accept-It-Or-Not-e12m6m3']podcast episode[/URL][/I][URL='https://anchor.fm/the-sikh-renaissance/episodes/The-Reincarnation-Bait-Does-Sikhi-Accept-It-Or-Not-e12m6m3'],[/URL] Guru Nanak makes evident his dismissal of Reincarnation as some physical process in which the soul moves house from one body to another. He advises it to be a mental process via which an individual consciously/subconsciously imbibes base animal traits when bereft of any comprehension of reality. With this purview, a continuity of context can be established via which subsequent verses on Reincarnation can be understood as per their specific author’s intentions. This, though, is ignored when the continuity of context is overlooked to associate Sikh doctrine with preceding archaic doctrines. [SIZE=6][B]Rahaao:[/B][/SIZE] [I][URL='https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/rahaao']Rahaao[/URL] [/I]denotes gist. The gist of a particular hierarchy of verses, in a specific composition, can only be deduced by comprehending the line alongside the mentioned [I]Rahaao[/I]. For example: [I][B]ਤਿਸੁ ਗੁਰ ਕਉ ਸਿਮਰਉ ਸਾਸਿ ਸਾਸਿ ॥ ਗੁਰੁ ਮੇਰੇ ਪ੍ਰਾਣ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਮੇਰੀ ਰਾਸਿ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥[/B][/I] “I solely remember a Guru in each and every phase of my life; a Guru who has become the cause behind my life and behind my success in life.” -Guru Granth, 239. The [I]Rahaao [/I]verse elucidates why the author (Guru Arjan) remembers a particular Guru (in this case the truth) in each and every phase of his life because this very Guru is the reason behind his success in life and lends it meaning. The gist is for the reader-accept the truth for it will lend your life meaning and make you successful in realizing it. The truth can only be remembered 24/7 if it is made the constitution for living life. Otherwise, the charade of repetitive chanting with each and every breath is dismissed in the Sikh ethos. [SIZE=6][B]The Divine Debt Collectors:[/B][/SIZE] Keeping the above three-fold parameters in mind, let us analyze the mythos of [I]Dharam-Raaj [/I]and [I]Chitar-Gupt[/I]-the allegedly divine debt collectors[I]. Dharam-Raaj[/I], in conventional Indic mythology, is the deity regulated with arbitrating upon one’s conduct in life and then delegating transgressors to his hellish realm where they suffer eternal damnation. In his dispensations, he is assisted by his chief-of-staff [I]Chitar-Gupta[/I] or Revealed/Unrevealed who is able to discern any dichotomies between the defendant ’ actions and the intentions behind those actions. Upon learning of a human’s demise, [I]Dharam-Raaj [/I]dispatches his [I]Yamdoots [/I]or hellish foot-soldiers to torment the soul and drag it to his realm. There is, however, excessive discrepancies between the multiple Indic texts which mention the existence of [I]Dharam-Raaj.[/I] [SIZE=6][B]Origins:[/B][/SIZE] The conceptual birth of [I]Dharam-Raaj [/I]is found in the [I]Rig-Veda[/I]. There, he is named [I]Yama [/I]and becomes the foremost entity to die in order to pave the way to the afterworld; the power over which he is entrusted with. His second appearance is in the [I]Atharva-Veda [/I]in which he has evolved into some super-deity and now retains two dogs to do his bidding. Subsequent texts mention him sporadically. In the [I]Bhagvad Gita[/I] Krsna asserts that he himself is [I]Yama.[/I] Irrespective of the superstitious spiritual tint given to this statement, its grammatical syntax evinces that Krsna is by no means elucidating that he permeates [I]Yama [/I]but that he is [I]Yama[/I] [I]Per se. [/I]In the [I]Srimad Bhagvatam[/I], this explanation is contradicted when Krsna travels to [I]Yama’s [/I]realm to liberate a devotee’s deceased son. It is in the [I]Brahama Purana [/I]that [I]Yama [/I]emerges as a fully etched-out deity. In this latter text he is lent a distinctive identity apart from others of his pantheon and given a sterling tribute. The [I]Puranas [/I]being supplemental to the Vedas, [I]Brahama [/I]establishes the criterion for [I]Yama’s [/I]subsequent appearances. But as countless scholars have underscored, [I]Yama [/I]evokes an expansive contradiction within the Vedic ethos. Is Reincarnation a metaphor for hell or is hell an alternative to Reincarnation within which the soul is tormented for a brief period? The [I]Rigveda, Atharva-Veda, Shatapatha Brahmana, Srimad Bhagvatam, Bhagvata Purana, Devi Bhagvata Purana[/I] and the [I]Manusimriti [/I]expound that [I]Yamaloka[/I], [I]Yama’s[/I] realm, is indeed an existential realm transcending time and space but one within which the soul undergoes palpable torment for eternity. In the early twentieth century, Dayanand Saraswati attempted to argue that [I]Yamaloka [/I]was figurative. However, the veteran Sikh scholar Giani Ditt Singh took him to task and in a series of editorials illustrated how the Vedic genre of literature left no doubt as to the existence of [I]Yamaloka [/I]in the tactile sense. Saraswati, much embittered against the Sikhs, was unable to resolve the contradiction between Reincarnation and [I]Yamaloka[/I]. Were they alternatives? If so, then what damned one to the cycle of Reincarnation via which a second chance could be obtained and [I]Yamaloka [/I]where any form of amnesty was absent? The quagmire is still to be resolved. [SIZE=6][B]Revamping:[/B][/SIZE] The inclusion of existent terms within [I]Gurbani [/I]by the Sikh Gurus was done with a twofold aim. On the one hand the masses had to be instructed with concepts and elements relatively familiar to them. On the other, Sikhi’s distinctive essence had to be preserved against the ravages of atrophied conventional faiths. Guru Nanak appropriated the terms [I]Dharam-Raaj[/I] (synonymous with [I]Yama[/I]) and and [I]Chitar-Gupt[/I] but revamped their definitions. In his purview, [I]Dharam-Raaj [/I]became a metaphor for impartial justice and was housed within the human mind. Gone was the deity [I]Yama. Dharam-Raaj [/I]became an aspect of the refined [I]Bibek [/I]or intelligence. An enlightened Sikh utilizes their [I]Bibek [/I]to discriminate between what is right and what is wrong. A retrospective analysis of one’s day-to-day life accrues one enough clarity to improve upon the next morrow thus transforming one into a [I]Dharam-Raaj.[/I] This necessitated the consecutive re-defining of [I]Chitar-Gupt [/I]as well[I].[/I] The conventional perspective (plagiarized by the Sikh [I]Pujaris [/I]of today) holds that the soul is confronted by [I]Yama[/I] and [I]Chitar-Gupt [/I]who takes a mischievous pleasure in acting the Devil’s Advocate. The Sikh definition of [I]Chitar-Gupt [/I]obliterates all vestiges of its theoretical predecessor. The Nanakian [I]Chitar-Gupt [/I]is a mental compound. [I]Chitar [/I]is the exterior character; [I]Gupt [/I]the internal intent. By no means is the concept a deity which can be placated through worship as inscribed in the [I]Vedas. [/I]Rather, it is a mental equilibrium which can only be struck into equipoise by the individual through rigid discipline. [I]Dharam-Raaj[/I], an aspect of the human intellect; [I]Chitar-Gupt[/I], a mental process-the [I]Yamdoots [/I]were rewritten as regrets. These consist of fears which manifest upon one’s deathbed. Mankind’s challenge in the Nanakian equation is not to dissolve all sense of responsibility and self in worship. Rather, humanity is to sharpen its [I]Bibek[/I] a part of which constitutes discriminating between right and wrong ([I]Dharam-Raaj[/I]); synchronizing deed and intent ([I]Chitar-Gupt[/I])-all the while accepting the reality of Creation and contributing to its progress. [SIZE=6][B]Revolution:[/B][/SIZE] This revelation of Guru Nanak met its fair share of detractors. The Guru, though, had foreseen this. His words in [I]Japji [/I]articulate that the conventional [I]Yama[/I] and [I]Chitar-Gupt [/I]are nothing more than mental effusions originating from unrestrained minds. As such, they are illusions which are still subject to the Creator’s power as the Creator gifts humanity with its unbridled intelligence. This conventional duo is exposed, in [I]Gurbani[/I], for what it really is: a fear tactic. [I][B]ਸੰਤਨ ਮੋ ਕਉ ਪੂੰਜੀ ਸਉਪੀ ਤਉ ਉਤਰਿਆ ਮਨ ਕਾ ਧੋਖਾ ॥ ਧਰਮ ਰਾਇ ਅਬ ਕਹਾ ਕਰੈਗੋ ਜਉ ਫਾਟਿਓ ਸਗਲੋ ਲੇਖਾ ॥੩॥[/B][/I] “In the presence of the enlightened Beings I was entrusted with great responsibility. This alleviated all my mind’s doubts. What can the (archaic) [I]Dharam-Raai[/I] do to me now? All his ledgers have been shredded to bits.” -Guru Granth, 614. The comprehension of [I]Hukam [/I](reality) consists of accepting the resultant [I]Naam (Gian[/I] or wisdom) and living life in accordance with it. [I][B]ਸਿਮਰਤ ਨਾਮੁ ਕਿਲਬਿਖ ਸਭਿ ਕਾਟੇ ॥ ਧਰਮ ਰਾਇ ਕੇ ਕਾਗਰ ਫਾਟੇ ॥[/B][/I] “Forever imbibing wisdom, an enlightened individual’s transgressions are effaced. [I]Dharam-Rai’s [/I]archives are torn apart through wisdom.” -Guru Granth, 1346. And, [I][B]ਹਰਿ ਦਰੁ ਸੇਵੇ ਅਲਖ ਅਭੇਵੇ ਨਿਹਚਲੁ ਆਸਣੁ ਪਾਇਆ ॥ ਤਹ ਜਨਮ ਨ ਮਰਣੁ ਨ ਆਵਣ ਜਾਣਾ ਸੰਸਾ ਦੂਖੁ ਮਿਟਾਇਆ ॥ ਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਗੁਪਤ ਕਾ ਕਾਗਦੁ ਫਾਰਿਆ ਜਮਦੂਤਾ ਕਛੂ ਨ ਚਲੀ ॥[/B][/I] “They who serve their Maker, they are given this imperishable understanding: there is, in reality, no coming and no going (Reincarnation). This effaces all their anxiety and anguish. [I]Chitar-Gupt[/I] and the [I]Yamdoots[/I] have their existence negated as a result.” -Guru Granth, 77. Prior to the Sikh Gurus, [I]Bhagat [/I]Kabir challenged the Hindu clergy on the issue of [I]Dharam-Raaj [/I]even going so far as to proclaim: [I][B]ਧਰਮ ਰਾਇ ਕਾ ਦਫਤਰੁ ਸੋਧਿਆ ਬਾਕੀ ਰਿਜਮ ਨ ਕਾਈ ॥੩॥[/B][/I] “I have stormed this [I]Dharam-Rai’s[/I] chambers and destroyed all his records. Now nothing can be found against me.” -Guru Granth, 793. [SIZE=6][B]Verdict:[/B][/SIZE] [I]Gurbani [/I]explicitly rejects any tactile definitions of [I]Chitar-Gupt[/I], [I]Dharam-Raaj[/I] and [I]Yamdoots.[/I] How the [I]Pujariwaadi Deras [/I]can still claim that their alleged [I]Brahm-Gyanis [/I]have seen these three concepts in personified form defies common-sense. [URL unfurl="true"]https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/the-devils-advocates[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Intellectual Translations
Understanding Chitr-Gupt and Dharam Raj
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top