☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Painting Without A Canvas (part 2)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pk70" data-source="post: 80771" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>ello Pk70 ji,[/FONT]</p><p> <span style="color: green">Howdy Sinister ji ![/FONT]</span></p><p> <span style="color: green">Was on the road for some days, so couldn’t address your brilliant comments. They are so interesting but I have to disagree with them.[/FONT]</span></p><p> Quote:</p><p> Originally Posted by <strong>pk70</strong> </p><p> <strong><em>When it gets aligned in harmony to others, it ceases to exist even though it still there.</em></strong></p><p> you lost me bro...is this one of em literary nonsense type of things? [/FONT]</p><p> <span style="color: green">First of all, literature was not, is not, will be not nonsense, let me correct you on this. Every thing in this world is not mere science and logic. Emotions, instincts (most of the time it goes beyond boundaries of logic and science) are big players in life and they are major subject of the top literature of the world. Please read” Age of reason” by ( I think) Jean Paul Satre, , “Lust for life” Irving Stone, Art of Loving by Erick Fromm. Nineteen Eighty Four by George Orwell, War of the Worlds by H.G Wells, it will brush up some absurd views about literature. If you personally fail to enjoy it, please don’t call it nonsense even in humorous way. Or accept the facts humorous way.[/FONT]</span></p><p> <span style="color: green">Now coming to my quote that triggered your kingly declaration on literature as “ nonsense”( just trying to amuse on it) When it gets aligned with harmony to others, all actions due to it, just cease, still it doesn’t mean the individual and his/her identity are gone, actually harmony with others took over conflicting instinct, that is all. Spiritual experiences are unique and above logical explanation, that is why they are known as inexpressible completely. Only attempts are made to express them and this practice is repeated in Gurbani. You really are not fond of falling in love,( I may be wrong, you never know, right?) so how emotions take over logic, I may not succeed in convincing you but what can I do except saying it is inexpressible? Life cannot be guided only with science and logic, if it could, there would have been no spiritual pursuits ever. Being in that personal experience Guru Nanak ji refers how people would call him “ ghost like, lost one, a poor thing” All those idiots calling him with these assumptive adjectives were more into logical understanding due to devoid of spiritual understanding. I still hope you can take it as separate supernatural phenomenon that doesn’t fit in science theories, even in psychiatric guessing. [/FONT]</span></p><p> </p><p> Quote:</p><p> Originally Posted by <strong>pk70</strong> <a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/general/20657-painting-without-a-canvas-part-2-a-post80327.html#post80327" target="_blank">http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/general/20657-painting-without-a-canvas-part-2-a-post80327.html#post80327</a><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Conflicts are also faced in the same manner. I-ness defends I-ness but never promotes the I-ness during conflicts;</em></strong></p><p> <strong>? I disagree.. or maybe you need to clarify what type of conflict you are talking about. Are you talking about a particular ethic or human nature? [/FONT]</strong></p><p> <strong><span style="color: green">Since you pointed out at Sikhism, I referred here to Sikhs’s fights in self defense and their unshettered faith in Guru teaching not to let ego ever come in a way even during conflicts they faced with. More clarification I can do with examples but you are brilliant, I feel, you don’t need it.[/FONT]</span></strong></p><p> Quote:</p><p> Originally Posted by <strong>pk70</strong> <u></u></p><p><u></u><strong><em>it is also style of I-ness in harmony of others. </em></strong></p><p> Originally Posted by <strong>pk70</strong> </p><p><a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/general/20657-painting-without-a-canvas-part-2-a-post80327.html#post80327" target="_blank">http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/general/20657-painting-without-a-canvas-part-2-a-post80327.html#post80327</a><strong><em>Truth, factual, visible or understandable by reason, can be a mater of science but neurological experiences supersede reasoning,</em></strong></p><p> <strong>So you live under the assumption that reasoning is not a neurological experience? or did you mean emotion?[/FONT]</strong></p><p> <strong><span style="color: green">Here forgive me my wonderful buddy, I meant” spiritual”, not neurological, big heart can forgive me and by the way thanks for pointing it out otherwise it would have remained an abstract statement, may be incorrect one.[/FONT]</span></strong></p><p> Quote:</p><p> Originally Posted by <strong>pk70</strong> <u></u></p><p><u></u><strong><em>in out world it can be named as delusions or so but experienced ones understand that too because they understand in religion, that kind of personal experience rises too big to express. </em></strong></p><p> <strong>hmmm ... i suspected this...which is why it is fruitless to continue with this analysis.[/FONT]</strong></p><p> <strong><span style="color: green">Why do you think it is fruitless, I disagreed with you, did I feel so? Where is the intellectual patience? [/FONT]</span></strong><span style="color: green"></span></p><p><span style="color: green"></span></p><p><span style="color: green"></span><strong>Sikhism is an esoteric and psuedo-gnostic faith? It is a philosophy that guides its adherers to go beyond the realm of reason to prove to themselves the existence of God. The realization of god can only come about through the acquisition of Esoteric Knowledge not Exoteric Knowledge. Or better yet, no distinction is ever made between the two types of knowledge because Sikhism adopts a certain characteristic holistic view of knowledge. (just like Hinduism) [/FONT]</strong></p><p><strong>Sikhism basically rejects Reductionism which is the reason it escapes from the rubrics </strong>[/FONT]</p><p> <strong>of epistemology[/FONT]</strong></p><p> <strong><span style="color: green">Of co{censored} Sikhism is an esoteric faith but it was made exoteric by preaching through sharing over two hundred years. How can you call it pseudo-gnostic? It was experienced one,(Maajh Ki Vaar Guru Nanak), have you ever heard any one used” pseudo” word with experience. May be you missed some thing. The real experiences are well expressed by Guru Sahiban numerous times in Guru Granth Sahib ji. If you want to disbelieve in Guru Nanak, then “ no further question” Actually it doesn’t reject reductionism since complexities about spiritual liberation were made more simple compare to prior existing expressions of it especially in Hinduism. By the way it should not be rubrics of epistemology any way because it deals with taking mind to another elevation where purpose of epistemology becomes useless.[/FONT]</span></strong></p><p> </p><p> <strong><span style="color: green">All the same, I always enjoy your statements triggering brain exercises.[/FONT]</span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pk70, post: 80771, member: 5889"] ello Pk70 ji,[/FONT] [COLOR=green]Howdy Sinister ji ![/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=green]Was on the road for some days, so couldn’t address your brilliant comments. They are so interesting but I have to disagree with them.[/FONT][/COLOR] Quote: Originally Posted by [B]pk70[/B] [B][I]When it gets aligned in harmony to others, it ceases to exist even though it still there.[/I][/B] you lost me bro...is this one of em literary nonsense type of things? [/FONT] [COLOR=green]First of all, literature was not, is not, will be not nonsense, let me correct you on this. Every thing in this world is not mere science and logic. Emotions, instincts (most of the time it goes beyond boundaries of logic and science) are big players in life and they are major subject of the top literature of the world. Please read” Age of reason” by ( I think) Jean Paul Satre, , “Lust for life” Irving Stone, Art of Loving by Erick Fromm. Nineteen Eighty Four by George Orwell, War of the Worlds by H.G Wells, it will brush up some absurd views about literature. If you personally fail to enjoy it, please don’t call it nonsense even in humorous way. Or accept the facts humorous way.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=green]Now coming to my quote that triggered your kingly declaration on literature as “ nonsense”( just trying to amuse on it) When it gets aligned with harmony to others, all actions due to it, just cease, still it doesn’t mean the individual and his/her identity are gone, actually harmony with others took over conflicting instinct, that is all. Spiritual experiences are unique and above logical explanation, that is why they are known as inexpressible completely. Only attempts are made to express them and this practice is repeated in Gurbani. You really are not fond of falling in love,( I may be wrong, you never know, right?) so how emotions take over logic, I may not succeed in convincing you but what can I do except saying it is inexpressible? Life cannot be guided only with science and logic, if it could, there would have been no spiritual pursuits ever. Being in that personal experience Guru Nanak ji refers how people would call him “ ghost like, lost one, a poor thing” All those idiots calling him with these assumptive adjectives were more into logical understanding due to devoid of spiritual understanding. I still hope you can take it as separate supernatural phenomenon that doesn’t fit in science theories, even in psychiatric guessing. [/FONT][/COLOR] Quote: Originally Posted by [B]pk70[/B] [URL="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/general/20657-painting-without-a-canvas-part-2-a-post80327.html#post80327"][/URL][B][I] Conflicts are also faced in the same manner. I-ness defends I-ness but never promotes the I-ness during conflicts;[/I][/B] [B]? I disagree.. or maybe you need to clarify what type of conflict you are talking about. Are you talking about a particular ethic or human nature? [/FONT][/B] [B][COLOR=green]Since you pointed out at Sikhism, I referred here to Sikhs’s fights in self defense and their unshettered faith in Guru teaching not to let ego ever come in a way even during conflicts they faced with. More clarification I can do with examples but you are brilliant, I feel, you don’t need it.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] Quote: Originally Posted by [B]pk70[/B] [U] [/U][B][I]it is also style of I-ness in harmony of others. [/I][/B] Originally Posted by [B]pk70[/B] [URL="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/general/20657-painting-without-a-canvas-part-2-a-post80327.html#post80327"][I][B][/B][/I][/URL][B][I]Truth, factual, visible or understandable by reason, can be a mater of science but neurological experiences supersede reasoning,[/I][/B] [B]So you live under the assumption that reasoning is not a neurological experience? or did you mean emotion?[/FONT][/B] [B][COLOR=green]Here forgive me my wonderful buddy, I meant” spiritual”, not neurological, big heart can forgive me and by the way thanks for pointing it out otherwise it would have remained an abstract statement, may be incorrect one.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] Quote: Originally Posted by [B]pk70[/B] [U] [/U][B][I]in out world it can be named as delusions or so but experienced ones understand that too because they understand in religion, that kind of personal experience rises too big to express. [/I][/B] [B]hmmm ... i suspected this...which is why it is fruitless to continue with this analysis.[/FONT][/B] [B][COLOR=green]Why do you think it is fruitless, I disagreed with you, did I feel so? Where is the intellectual patience? [/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=green] [/COLOR][B]Sikhism is an esoteric and psuedo-gnostic faith? It is a philosophy that guides its adherers to go beyond the realm of reason to prove to themselves the existence of God. The realization of god can only come about through the acquisition of Esoteric Knowledge not Exoteric Knowledge. Or better yet, no distinction is ever made between the two types of knowledge because Sikhism adopts a certain characteristic holistic view of knowledge. (just like Hinduism) [/FONT][/B] [B]Sikhism basically rejects Reductionism which is the reason it escapes from the rubrics [/B][/FONT] [B]of epistemology[/FONT][/B] [B][COLOR=green]Of co{censored} Sikhism is an esoteric faith but it was made exoteric by preaching through sharing over two hundred years. How can you call it pseudo-gnostic? It was experienced one,(Maajh Ki Vaar Guru Nanak), have you ever heard any one used” pseudo” word with experience. May be you missed some thing. The real experiences are well expressed by Guru Sahiban numerous times in Guru Granth Sahib ji. If you want to disbelieve in Guru Nanak, then “ no further question” Actually it doesn’t reject reductionism since complexities about spiritual liberation were made more simple compare to prior existing expressions of it especially in Hinduism. By the way it should not be rubrics of epistemology any way because it deals with taking mind to another elevation where purpose of epistemology becomes useless.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green]All the same, I always enjoy your statements triggering brain exercises.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Painting Without A Canvas (part 2)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top