• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

Canada On Sikh Separatism, Harper In India Defends Freedom Of Expression

Jan 6, 2005
3,450
3,762
Metro-Vancouver, B.C., Canada
On Sikh separatism, Harper in India defends freedom of expression

By STEVEN CHASE - THE GLOBE AND MAIL - November 8, 2013


Prime Minister tells India hosts that violence and terrorism can't be confused with the right of Canadians to hold and promote their political views

Stephen Harper is pushing back at suggestions that Ottawa needs to do more about Sikh separatist activity in Canada, saying his government already keeps a sharp lookout for terrorist threats and that merely advocating for a Khalistan homeland in the Punjab is not a crime.

He said violence and terrorism can’t be confused with the right of Canadians to hold and promote their political views.

“It may be a political position that both the government of Canada and the government of India disagree with,” the Prime Minister said during a visit to the southern Indian city of Bangalore Thursday.

But “we can’t interfere with the right of political freedom of expression.”

The Prime Minister found himself pressed by the Indian government minister during his six-day trade visit to the south Asian country on what New Delhi calls a revival of “anti-India” voices in Canada. That’s code for Sikh extremists who want to carve a separate homeland out of India.

Speaking near the end of his India visit, Mr. Harper first made it clear that Canada unequivocally backs a united India.

“The government of Canada, and I believe the vast majority of Canadian people, including the vast majority of Indo-Canadians have no desire to see the revival of old hostilities in this great country,” the Prime Minister told reporters in the southern city of Bangalore, where he announced Ottawa would open a new consulate.

Mr. Harper had been asked what he was doing to tackle Sikh extremism in Canada.

He replied that the Canadian government closely watched “extremist developments – those who may embrace violence or threats of violence or terrorism.”

But he said his government does not consider it a crime to argue or promote a Sikh homeland.

“It may be a political position that both the government of Canada and he government of India disagree with,” he said.

But “we can’t interfere with the right of political freedom of expression.”

Mr. Harper said he believes other political parties in Canada agree with him and declared that he won’t be moved on this matter.

“The government of Canada’s policy positions on these matters are extremely well known,” he told journalists.

“I believe they are shared across the political spectrum –and they’re not going to change.

Mr. Harper has found himself walking a fine line during his India visit this week, fielding pressure from New Delhi to crack down on Sikh separatists in Canada but then journeying to one of this religion’s most sacred spots to show Punjabi voters he’s not tarring them as extremist.

On Wednesday, Mr. Harper journeyed by plane and helicopter to the Sikh faith’s second holiest city in northern India Wednesday.

About half of Indian immigrants to Canada trace their roots to the Punjab region, Mr. Harper’s latest stop on a six-day tour of India. It’s not a place he can afford to skip given the sizeable role that Indo-Canadian voters played in helping the Conservatives win Greater Toronto Area seats.

After landing in the Punjab capital of Chandigarh Wednesday, the Prime Minister flew by helicopter to Anandpur Sahib, a city revered by Sikh adherents, where he visited the Khalsa Heritage Memorial Complex. The recently-opened museum, designed by Israeli-Canadian architect Moshe Safdie traces the history of the Sikh religion.

It was just Tuesday that India’s junior foreign minister used a meeting with Mr. Harper to voice her country’s continued anxiety about what it considers resurgent support in Canada for a separatist Sikh state – Khalistan – in the Punjab region.

“Prime Minister, there was another area of great concern for us, which was the revival of anti-India rhetoric in Canada,” Preneet Kaur, Minister of State of External Affairs, told Mr. Harper during his stop in New Delhi.

“We have after very hard times got a good situation of peace and progress back in Punjab and in India and we would like that to continue – so it does concern us,” Ms. Kaur said.

In recent years former Liberal cabinet minister Ujjal Dosanjh, a Sikh, has warned more than two years ago that he believed Sikh extremism was on the rise in Canada.

“It’s more entrenched, it’s more sophisticated and sometimes it’s double-faced,” he told Agence France-Presse in a 2010 interview.

In 2010 Mr. Dosanjh and another Sikh politician were publicly advised by the organizer of a Sikh parade in British Columbia that their safety could not be guaranteed if they chose to attend. Mr. Dosanjh, an outspoken moderate, had previously complained about a parade float that featured a picture of the alleged mastermind of the Air India Flight 182 bombing.

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...defends-freedom-of-expression/article5085143/
 

Luckysingh

Writer
SPNer
Dec 3, 2011
1,634
2,758
Vancouver
Very Good statement!
Harper seems to have been cornered a little on his visit into declaring that Canada has sikh extremists that are pushing for Khalistan.
This is another of India's tactics to exploit sikhs in the mainstream afterthe failed attempt with General Brar in UK. To try and tell the world that all those with hopes for a separate homeland are extremists is the current employed protocol of India.

Thanks to Harper, he may have sent out a more clearer message and thus highlighting human rights of fellow indo-canadians.
Freedom of speech and hope for a homeland does not class you as a sikh extemist.

Well Done!!
 

GSingh1984

SPNer
Mar 28, 2013
69
31
39
You do understand, that all they're doing then is letting sikhs speak loudly and then looking to see the loudest, smartest and slap a security certificate on them and throw them in jail/deport them for torture.

This is the same british that gave gold to generals and dogras to destroy our raaj. After tasting our bullets, do you think they want more?
 

GSingh1984

SPNer
Mar 28, 2013
69
31
39
Do you really think it's in the interests of world governments (who after you see the thread about Canada being a corporation and the one I'll post about law vs statute are instituted in a massive world-wide fraug on the people) to have a free sikh state, whose creed is to fight injustice and walk towards the truth?

The poster was given an opportunity but will not explain what he meant by a sentence that could be understood to be threatening or promoting illegal activity. The sentence is deleted. Poster was asked to explain twice. spnadmin
 
Last edited by a moderator:

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
GSingh ji

Please explain what you mean in the last sentence. I have no idea what you mean. If you will not explain it I am going to delete it.

And how did Khalistan, or a free sikh state, get woven into the thread? What is the relevance?
 

GSingh1984

SPNer
Mar 28, 2013
69
31
39
I did it's the concept of they don't want our freedom. Are you not aware of the british buying our our generals during our raaj?

Now, when there is a sikh raaj do you not think there shall be fights? Do you not think 'western' nations will either fund by proxy or try to fight it themselves at some point?

Do you think they want to face the nation that defeated them again, in it's true form as a united one??



--
Delete it if it gives the wrong message, I speak in metaphors sometimes.. but at the same time I mean it in duality, spiritually/conceptually and physically as well.

What I know and think about the raaj is beside the point in this situation. You were asked to explain a sentence and have not done so. I am not going to beg you to stop speaking in metaphors. spnadmin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mar 27, 2013
48
82
43
Freedom of Speech is the most basic human Right.

Sikh community cannot be held responsible when Law could not prove involvement of any Sikh in those bombing as they were probably done by Indian RAW because Sikhs were fleeing from Punjab to avoid getting killed in fake encounters and Anti Sikh Loby in Indian Administration absolutely hated that.
 

❤️ CLICK HERE TO JOIN SPN MOBILE PLATFORM

Top