Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

1984 Anti-Sikh Pogrom It Was A POGROM. Nov 1984 Delhi. Revisited

Discussion in 'Sikh History' started by Gyani Jarnail Singh, Oct 11, 2009.

  1. Gyani Jarnail Singh

    Gyani Jarnail Singh Malaysia
    Expand Collapse
    Sawa lakh se EK larraoan
    Mentor Writer SPNer Thinker

    Jul 4, 2004
    Likes Received:
    www.outlookindia.com | ?Their Demeanour Was Frighteningly Casual?

    Sikh riots
    'Their Demeanour Was Frighteningly Casual'
    Ashok Jaitly

    Ashok Jaitly, an IAS officer posted in Delhi in November 1984, was
    one of the rare officers to testify against the police and political
    workers for their role in the anti-Sikh riots:

    I was on leave around the time Indira Gandhi was assassinated in
    1984. All through October 31, we heard reports of Congress Seva Dal
    workers coming out on the streets shouting slogans like khoon ka
    badla khoon se lenge; we heard reports of mobs attacking Sikhs. That
    evening, my then wife Jaya and I drove down Lodhi Road to see gangs
    pulling Sikhs out of buses. Around Defence Colony, we found a Sikh on
    a motorcycle, his old father hanging on the pillion. Rather than
    letting them risk their lives, we convinced them to come home with
    us. I remember how shaken up the old Sardar was.

    On the morning of November 1, a number of us got together around
    Lajpat Nagar. While marching for peace, we passed a gurudwara to see
    hoodlums standing outside with trishuls in their hands, wearing
    saffron headgear. Inside, the scared Sikhs were holding swords. When
    we came out onto the Ashram flyover, I remember seeing corpses lying
    on the rail tracks. A group of us went to Congress leader Arun Nehru,
    demanding the army be brought out. His demeanour was frighteningly
    casual; he claimed he and his party were doing all they could.

    Within no time, we had set up the Nagrik Ekta Manch. Groups went in
    all directions, coming back with horrendous stories of people found
    dead and burnt. We got affidavits from victims in which they detailed
    what had happened. Much of that evidence was put before the Nanavati
    Commission. I myself testified before the commission. On the basis of
    the evidence we found, there is no question that what transpired in
    1984 was not a riot, it was a pogrom. Thousands died and there was
    barely a response because there was a quiet complicity between the
    establishment and the mob, like in Gujarat.

    When I look back, I realise my actions weren't out of the ordinary.
    My generation had many bureaucrats who thought differently. We had an
    ideology, which to use a cliche, was pro-poor, pro-minority,
    pro-secular. Even our 'elitist' St Stephen's-Oxbridge education
    taught us that. If one had to desperately hunt for a positive, it
    would have to be that in 1984, there emerged a unique citizen's
    movement, a spontaneous response to the pogrom.
    • Like Like x 3
  2. Loading...

Since you're here... we have a small favor to ask...     Become a Supporter      ::     Make a Contribution     

Share This Page