☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Debunking/exposing Arya Samaj
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vijaydeep Singh" data-source="post: 8005" data-attributes="member: 313"><p>Ek Oankar Wahiguru Ji Ki Fateh</p><p></p><p>so as Singhvj Ji are talking of Natural laws but Swami Ji himself did an unatural act to not to marry.</p><p></p><p>He suppressed his seman.How natural this could be but by this one thing happened that his natural body mechanism did get altered a bit.</p><p></p><p>As he supressed his seman so he did got two things one was frustation and resultant anger due his body going against him.and then after his thinking that his body has been won by him he got ego also.</p><p></p><p>We all know that for a blind light is something unknown.A deaf may say that there is no sound as he does not listen.So his failure to understand Yoga and Bhakti and refusal to have faith in devine was due to the fact that he was resless due to his frustation and could not reamained dedicated to practise so he was fed up and left it.In Hath Yoga also it needs very patient and years of effort but Swami Ji could not get that.</p><p></p><p>Then he got to learn with some another swami.his level of Sanskrit could be judge by the fact that he wrote Satyath Prakash in the language of Hindus,the Hindi and not in Sanskrit.</p><p></p><p>And wow! he interpeted mother with water going to father as earth revolving sun,That is real Arya Samaji logic,when sceince will prove that sun also revolves arund earth in relative motion as our Mliky wave galaxy is moving then Das is sure that Father will be earth and mother will be sun and water will be in sun as it soaks it.</p><p></p><p>Anyway just by the logic of Arya Samaj,when they condem other faiths just by going in littral sense and not understanding deeper meanin,Was writer of Veda born out of intercourse of earth and sun so that he is calling them mother and father.</p><p></p><p>Arya Samajis simulate world of thier own which is artificial.Just being afraid of Hindus inspite of Vedas aknowledging useage of beef they did cahnge the meaning of cow in vedas or else hindus would have done justise to swami Ji.</p><p>Hinduism as per Puranas do tell not to kill or eat cow in a particular situation(not always).But Arya Samajis either could be old wine in new bottle(many of them are drunkered so will understand this thing) ie Brahmanism presented in a new way.</p><p></p><p>Well Singhvj Ji were asking for a dialogue,But actually wanted a debate,like swami ji he had some views a certion and in no case he was going to learn anything from us but wanted to prove us wrong.Dialogue is di(two) people loging or are in league or in unity as they both learn from each other.To be one with Akal as per Dasham Granth vivad is not good.</p><p></p><p>but De Bate is an attempt to beat other.Vivad has another name Shastrath taking out true meaning of scripture.but dia logue is samwad or talking by respecting other as equal.</p><p></p><p>But like nooseless dislike good nose or person with one eye dislike good eyes of other person so thier is a sense of envy in the heart of those devoid of faith towards those who have faith.</p><p></p><p>Faithless are restless and without peace of mind.They are in sorrow and frustration and thense can not tolrate others who are happy due to faith,Satan is something like this state of mind of non beliver.</p><p></p><p>So such person wants to be happy but for that he has to follow the path of beliver.Sometime by killing self ego that person comes to the path of beliver and follows the same.but some are rigid and will never say that they are wrong as they consider the temporary pleasue of ego satisfaction of one up manship.So they try to prove that belivers are wrong.</p><p></p><p>They know that they are wrong and due that they are angery and for them when a person is enraged that means that he is angery and thense wrong.That is the way Arya Samaj is still alive and dying a slow death.They are not aware that protest to falsehood is not anger.It is rather amusing to see people doing our Nindya or slander.Salnder is soap to us.</p><p></p><p>If we see Aurobindo Gosh Ji,Pandit Malviya Ji or Vevekanand Ji,they were more truthfull then swami Dayanda Ji but never offended any as they saw Truth who is eternal in all.But Arya Samji sinse long have been intellectual terrorists.</p><p></p><p>when one person who knew Gita said that God is in all.So even if we worship stone thier is no harm as as per Gita all worship goes to Akal(Akalustat has simlar signals).</p><p></p><p>Great Swami Said,If God is in east then while going in west we go far from God.</p><p></p><p>This means that Swami Ji were unawre of natural science,Singhvj if you talk of natural scince then you are going against swami Ji.</p><p></p><p>As earth is round so even if we go in west and keep on going and do not stop due to inpatent as swami Ji did with Yoga.We will reach from where as per longitude eastern most part of earth is marked(directions are also temporary).</p><p></p><p>Even if we move in north or south or in anyangle thier is always either a small or big circle in spheroid or in truth Geoid of earth wich will take us to east.</p><p></p><p>Sphereical trignometry proves that on earth directions are realtive or all path can take us to God we need to have stemina to keep on moving on them.And then thier shoould be the will of one who is source of power which gives stemina.</p><p></p><p>Then we have one more statement by Singhvj Ji that Vedas were made on creation and are true like innocense of child.So he gave very contradictory view.</p><p></p><p>Till this date in universe thier are many stars which die and from thier remins new one are borns.So is creation which he said is completed.</p><p></p><p>On earth many new one are born,Himalaya is still in the process of making.In Fact weather seven contnents were made after Vedas werew writtan when Pangea Continet was fragmented into smaller sevens.</p><p></p><p>So by which proof can he say that creation is done.Or which stage of creation is he talking about when Vedas were writtan.</p><p></p><p>So far Das did prove that Vedas were made only after space was made where Vedas could be stored.And that also after making matterial by whcih Veda could be composed either in mind or in papper or leave.</p><p></p><p>Das is going to write a thing which is to prove that Akal is bigger then Veda,Gurbani also say the same and Vedas also say the same that one who made then Veda is going to be bigger then Vedas.Perhaps as Singhvj Ji keep on saying that Sikhs have not read Vedas but problem is that Dayanand Ji also did not read Gurbani as a whole.And if know any Arya Samaji aknowldges this then they will go against thier founder Dayanand Ji.</p><p></p><p>So does Das startss.</p><p></p><p>Say if Vedas were made at start and they are eternaly perfect then there could be many great men at start who leanrt Vedas and were one who completely understood them.</p><p></p><p>Then what happened that they all were extinct and only at the time of Dayanand Ji it was to be revived?</p><p></p><p>If Vedas were perfect then why did they fail to maintain thier true meaning?If thier follwer were perfect then why did not they were they successful to prevent puranik hindus to indulge in idolatory or making meaning of Vedas false as per Arya Samaj?</p><p></p><p>Then if thier was a samll gruop of people like Guru of Dayanand Ji who still were knowing the true meaning of Vedas then what thing new did Dayanand ji did,he only made old thing to move forwards.</p><p></p><p>Then why is he a founder of Arya Samaj?</p><p></p><p>Then let us say that since creation Vedas were OK but non could understand then correctly since Swami Dayanand Ji came.Had someone understood it like Dayanand Ji had in acuent vedic time then Arya Samaj would have been since thier and hindus would have never been powerfull.</p><p></p><p>As before Dayandand Ji no one was able to understand unfailable Vedas correctly so non was strong enough to prevent non vedics from domnating.So that failure of Vedas in past did not occur as no one did understood or decode it as Dayanand ji did as since then till Dayanand Ji thier was a wrong interpetation of Veda.Only Dayanand Ji presented it in correct form.not even the writer of Veda was actually aware of the meaning which Dayanand Ji gave.</p><p></p><p>If Vedas were practically perfact at initial stage then they would not have failed to go to background and there would have been no situation that Dayanand Ji would have to start his Arya Samaj with new label.</p><p></p><p>If Vedas were perfect and infalliable since creation then Arya Samaj would not have been started in last 200 years but would have been here since long.</p><p></p><p>But as Dayanand ji are great and he started then this means that true knowledge of Vedas could be only be obtained via satyarth Praksh.So much time after coming of vedas and so much time after creation.</p><p></p><p>(to Be continued..)</p><p></p><p>Gurfateh !</p><p></p><p>so as per Das,</p><p></p><p>It was swami Dayanand ji who did bring first time the rtur meaning of Vedas to human race.Had someone did it in past then due to the perfection of them and thier follower thier would have been perfect enough to survive attackes on then and would not have been destroyed.</p><p></p><p>So this means that in the soul or mind or brain of Swami Ji there had to be some special permutation and combination of neurotransmiters or other matterial which composed him so that he became so great that he decoded Vedas correctly after millions of years and all other followers of Vedas before him were fools this includes his Guru who tought him nayik matt or one who toaught him Sanskrit.</p><p></p><p>As they all were fools so they may have taught Nayik matt or Sanskrit him in foolish manner but due to combination of matterial like genes or other environmantal or orgainc factors Swami ji were great and they understood all in correct prespective.</p><p></p><p>So if they were matterial s which made swami Ji perfect then can any Arya Samaji tell that why did such combination of matter happened in the case of swami Ji.</p><p></p><p>If they say that thug is a thug and no reason for that then it is something unreasonable.</p><p></p><p>But Arya Samajis are champions in reason and logic.Can they tell that if by chance many oragnic and neurological matterials got combined to form a creation(much more after the creation of which Vedas tell) called mool Sankar then what was great about that creation but of matterial which was in sprem of his father and eggg of his mother before he was born.</p><p></p><p>So such combination as per Arya Samajis are just by chance and that chance is something great.So it is fluke that is great and not thier Guru as he did what circumstancess made him to do.But Arya Samajis are not unable to explain why do circumstance occur?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vijaydeep Singh, post: 8005, member: 313"] Ek Oankar Wahiguru Ji Ki Fateh so as Singhvj Ji are talking of Natural laws but Swami Ji himself did an unatural act to not to marry. He suppressed his seman.How natural this could be but by this one thing happened that his natural body mechanism did get altered a bit. As he supressed his seman so he did got two things one was frustation and resultant anger due his body going against him.and then after his thinking that his body has been won by him he got ego also. We all know that for a blind light is something unknown.A deaf may say that there is no sound as he does not listen.So his failure to understand Yoga and Bhakti and refusal to have faith in devine was due to the fact that he was resless due to his frustation and could not reamained dedicated to practise so he was fed up and left it.In Hath Yoga also it needs very patient and years of effort but Swami Ji could not get that. Then he got to learn with some another swami.his level of Sanskrit could be judge by the fact that he wrote Satyath Prakash in the language of Hindus,the Hindi and not in Sanskrit. And wow! he interpeted mother with water going to father as earth revolving sun,That is real Arya Samaji logic,when sceince will prove that sun also revolves arund earth in relative motion as our Mliky wave galaxy is moving then Das is sure that Father will be earth and mother will be sun and water will be in sun as it soaks it. Anyway just by the logic of Arya Samaj,when they condem other faiths just by going in littral sense and not understanding deeper meanin,Was writer of Veda born out of intercourse of earth and sun so that he is calling them mother and father. Arya Samajis simulate world of thier own which is artificial.Just being afraid of Hindus inspite of Vedas aknowledging useage of beef they did cahnge the meaning of cow in vedas or else hindus would have done justise to swami Ji. Hinduism as per Puranas do tell not to kill or eat cow in a particular situation(not always).But Arya Samajis either could be old wine in new bottle(many of them are drunkered so will understand this thing) ie Brahmanism presented in a new way. Well Singhvj Ji were asking for a dialogue,But actually wanted a debate,like swami ji he had some views a certion and in no case he was going to learn anything from us but wanted to prove us wrong.Dialogue is di(two) people loging or are in league or in unity as they both learn from each other.To be one with Akal as per Dasham Granth vivad is not good. but De Bate is an attempt to beat other.Vivad has another name Shastrath taking out true meaning of scripture.but dia logue is samwad or talking by respecting other as equal. But like nooseless dislike good nose or person with one eye dislike good eyes of other person so thier is a sense of envy in the heart of those devoid of faith towards those who have faith. Faithless are restless and without peace of mind.They are in sorrow and frustration and thense can not tolrate others who are happy due to faith,Satan is something like this state of mind of non beliver. So such person wants to be happy but for that he has to follow the path of beliver.Sometime by killing self ego that person comes to the path of beliver and follows the same.but some are rigid and will never say that they are wrong as they consider the temporary pleasue of ego satisfaction of one up manship.So they try to prove that belivers are wrong. They know that they are wrong and due that they are angery and for them when a person is enraged that means that he is angery and thense wrong.That is the way Arya Samaj is still alive and dying a slow death.They are not aware that protest to falsehood is not anger.It is rather amusing to see people doing our Nindya or slander.Salnder is soap to us. If we see Aurobindo Gosh Ji,Pandit Malviya Ji or Vevekanand Ji,they were more truthfull then swami Dayanda Ji but never offended any as they saw Truth who is eternal in all.But Arya Samji sinse long have been intellectual terrorists. when one person who knew Gita said that God is in all.So even if we worship stone thier is no harm as as per Gita all worship goes to Akal(Akalustat has simlar signals). Great Swami Said,If God is in east then while going in west we go far from God. This means that Swami Ji were unawre of natural science,Singhvj if you talk of natural scince then you are going against swami Ji. As earth is round so even if we go in west and keep on going and do not stop due to inpatent as swami Ji did with Yoga.We will reach from where as per longitude eastern most part of earth is marked(directions are also temporary). Even if we move in north or south or in anyangle thier is always either a small or big circle in spheroid or in truth Geoid of earth wich will take us to east. Sphereical trignometry proves that on earth directions are realtive or all path can take us to God we need to have stemina to keep on moving on them.And then thier shoould be the will of one who is source of power which gives stemina. Then we have one more statement by Singhvj Ji that Vedas were made on creation and are true like innocense of child.So he gave very contradictory view. Till this date in universe thier are many stars which die and from thier remins new one are borns.So is creation which he said is completed. On earth many new one are born,Himalaya is still in the process of making.In Fact weather seven contnents were made after Vedas werew writtan when Pangea Continet was fragmented into smaller sevens. So by which proof can he say that creation is done.Or which stage of creation is he talking about when Vedas were writtan. So far Das did prove that Vedas were made only after space was made where Vedas could be stored.And that also after making matterial by whcih Veda could be composed either in mind or in papper or leave. Das is going to write a thing which is to prove that Akal is bigger then Veda,Gurbani also say the same and Vedas also say the same that one who made then Veda is going to be bigger then Vedas.Perhaps as Singhvj Ji keep on saying that Sikhs have not read Vedas but problem is that Dayanand Ji also did not read Gurbani as a whole.And if know any Arya Samaji aknowldges this then they will go against thier founder Dayanand Ji. So does Das startss. Say if Vedas were made at start and they are eternaly perfect then there could be many great men at start who leanrt Vedas and were one who completely understood them. Then what happened that they all were extinct and only at the time of Dayanand Ji it was to be revived? If Vedas were perfect then why did they fail to maintain thier true meaning?If thier follwer were perfect then why did not they were they successful to prevent puranik hindus to indulge in idolatory or making meaning of Vedas false as per Arya Samaj? Then if thier was a samll gruop of people like Guru of Dayanand Ji who still were knowing the true meaning of Vedas then what thing new did Dayanand ji did,he only made old thing to move forwards. Then why is he a founder of Arya Samaj? Then let us say that since creation Vedas were OK but non could understand then correctly since Swami Dayanand Ji came.Had someone understood it like Dayanand Ji had in acuent vedic time then Arya Samaj would have been since thier and hindus would have never been powerfull. As before Dayandand Ji no one was able to understand unfailable Vedas correctly so non was strong enough to prevent non vedics from domnating.So that failure of Vedas in past did not occur as no one did understood or decode it as Dayanand ji did as since then till Dayanand Ji thier was a wrong interpetation of Veda.Only Dayanand Ji presented it in correct form.not even the writer of Veda was actually aware of the meaning which Dayanand Ji gave. If Vedas were practically perfact at initial stage then they would not have failed to go to background and there would have been no situation that Dayanand Ji would have to start his Arya Samaj with new label. If Vedas were perfect and infalliable since creation then Arya Samaj would not have been started in last 200 years but would have been here since long. But as Dayanand ji are great and he started then this means that true knowledge of Vedas could be only be obtained via satyarth Praksh.So much time after coming of vedas and so much time after creation. (to Be continued..) Gurfateh ! so as per Das, It was swami Dayanand ji who did bring first time the rtur meaning of Vedas to human race.Had someone did it in past then due to the perfection of them and thier follower thier would have been perfect enough to survive attackes on then and would not have been destroyed. So this means that in the soul or mind or brain of Swami Ji there had to be some special permutation and combination of neurotransmiters or other matterial which composed him so that he became so great that he decoded Vedas correctly after millions of years and all other followers of Vedas before him were fools this includes his Guru who tought him nayik matt or one who toaught him Sanskrit. As they all were fools so they may have taught Nayik matt or Sanskrit him in foolish manner but due to combination of matterial like genes or other environmantal or orgainc factors Swami ji were great and they understood all in correct prespective. So if they were matterial s which made swami Ji perfect then can any Arya Samaji tell that why did such combination of matter happened in the case of swami Ji. If they say that thug is a thug and no reason for that then it is something unreasonable. But Arya Samajis are champions in reason and logic.Can they tell that if by chance many oragnic and neurological matterials got combined to form a creation(much more after the creation of which Vedas tell) called mool Sankar then what was great about that creation but of matterial which was in sprem of his father and eggg of his mother before he was born. So such combination as per Arya Samajis are just by chance and that chance is something great.So it is fluke that is great and not thier Guru as he did what circumstancess made him to do.But Arya Samajis are not unable to explain why do circumstance occur? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Debunking/exposing Arya Samaj
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top