☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Debunking/exposing Arya Samaj
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vijaydeep Singh" data-source="post: 7950" data-attributes="member: 313"><p>Ek Oankar Wahiguru Ji Ki Fateh</p><p></p><p>So Das will put a bit of more light on what actually happened in Benaras.</p><p></p><p>Arya Samaji's like our pro Kala Afghana lobby always try to paint thier defeat as thier victory.</p><p></p><p>As per Swami Dayananda Purans were anti Vedas.But Pandits or Even Nirmalas do not agree.As per Swami there is no mention of PuraNA in Veda.</p><p></p><p>Das just got the information by mercy of Akal.</p><p></p><p>In various Sikh scriptures we have mentin of BED(Ved) Baras or Ved years.It is coded for four years as Vedas are four.</p><p></p><p>In Guru Granth Sahib Ji term ATHDash is used to represent Puranas.As per Gurmat all things are work of God.So ARe Puranas.God of Arya Samaji does not exist so even Vedas are not 'his' work.</p><p></p><p>So some Pandits said that term Attdash(18) in Vedas is there to siginfy Puranas.And he proved it.Swami Ji were defeated but in his true spirit he tried to give vey brave face up to the level of attacking Vedwans(schooloars) personaly.Das will not write what Pandits did with him.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But Arya Samajis officialy say that some Brahmin fabricated a verse of Veda on leafe to say about Purana are pro vedic is false.Why did not they get hold of it.Das ask them using thier logic?</p><p></p><p>Das is not passing verdict over Vedas or Puranas here as Swami Ji did in Satyarth Prakash that till this day most of hindus who read Satyarth Prakash hate him.</p><p></p><p>Das considers Draupadi as mother.It was not her fault that she was forced to marry five husbands.In that 'vedic' era what a lone lady could have done.</p><p>But she had a faith in Akal so Akal protected her from being striped naked in court of the king.It gives us the message that a lady with Five Worldy husband can not protect her hnour without the help of Akal.</p><p></p><p>Then swami used unworhty words for her as well As Mother Marry.Well out of millions there could be a case that Female can get zygot formation with her eggs without male sperm(it is also possible if she herslf can produce sperm or even in otherwise also).Then Dayanand Ji were not awre of cloning either.</p><p></p><p>So Mother Mary could also be a virgeon and swamis utterance towards Lord Jesus were like some one spiting on moon and spit comes on his own face.</p><p></p><p>As Swami Ji were unmarried so he use to fancy a lot on sex so prevert things could come to his mind whcih he used to humiliate to Hindus and Christians alike.</p><p></p><p>(to be continued..)</p><p></p><p>Ek Oankar Wahguru Ji Ki Fateh</p><p></p><p>So Das was wrong when he wrote that Swami Ji were having cosy realtion with Raja but rather Swami Ji said that he must not go to his harlot as it is like lion sleeping with {censored}.</p><p></p><p>This was his views for female.Well it may not be the fult of harlot that that what he was.</p><p></p><p>This annoyed Raja or Harlot and Arya Samajis say that Swami Ji were givne poision.What ever be the thing but in anyway his presentation was not good and in fact non of the Raja or his son etc became Arya Samaji as Arya Samjis claim.</p><p></p><p>Why did Swami Ji had so Krodhi or angery attitude?</p><p></p><p>Well one unccle of Das ,who are Arya Samaji once told Das that swami Ji were Yug Purush and better placed then other tow ie Rama And Krishana.</p><p>Becasue Swami Ji was Calibate(Brahmchari).</p><p></p><p>Is not marrying something Great.Krishana was great nation bulider,He delivered Gita.He resoved many matters and still he had a big Family.</p><p></p><p>Rama also knew great of faith.He did give good preaching to dieing King Bali similar to Gita.Rama defeated the whole world in one Yagna and killed many big demons with small amry of monkeys(could be a human race).Yet he made a family.</p><p></p><p>What was wrong with Swami Ji that he did not make his own family?</p><p></p><p>Perhaps he would not have carred it preaching 'well' as he did if he had a family.He 'sacrfised' for 'us' and did not marry.</p><p></p><p>Wow! a Great leader of Great interpetation of Veda was INCAPABLE to marry to prech or to serve truth others.If he was incapble then he can not be perfect.He can not be bigger then Bhagwan Ramchadra or Bhagwan Krishana.</p><p></p><p>He had a 'weakness' that if he had wife or women or family then he would have been devaoted from 'truth' he discovered.How strong was his 'truth ' whcih could not prevent him from devaiting by earthly deviations.</p><p></p><p>And Das has seen many people taking him role model and going to Haridwar or Kankhal to serach truth from Vedas.Well if Swami Ji already has serached it and put it in Satyrath Prakash then why to read Vedas again and why to go to Hardwar.</p><p></p><p>If All Arya Samaji's will be like role model Swami Ji then perhaps thier female folks will maary hindus and may they also go to Hardwar.</p><p></p><p>So in 50 years no new Arya Samaji.</p><p></p><p>(to Be continuded..)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vijaydeep Singh, post: 7950, member: 313"] Ek Oankar Wahiguru Ji Ki Fateh So Das will put a bit of more light on what actually happened in Benaras. Arya Samaji's like our pro Kala Afghana lobby always try to paint thier defeat as thier victory. As per Swami Dayananda Purans were anti Vedas.But Pandits or Even Nirmalas do not agree.As per Swami there is no mention of PuraNA in Veda. Das just got the information by mercy of Akal. In various Sikh scriptures we have mentin of BED(Ved) Baras or Ved years.It is coded for four years as Vedas are four. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji term ATHDash is used to represent Puranas.As per Gurmat all things are work of God.So ARe Puranas.God of Arya Samaji does not exist so even Vedas are not 'his' work. So some Pandits said that term Attdash(18) in Vedas is there to siginfy Puranas.And he proved it.Swami Ji were defeated but in his true spirit he tried to give vey brave face up to the level of attacking Vedwans(schooloars) personaly.Das will not write what Pandits did with him. But Arya Samajis officialy say that some Brahmin fabricated a verse of Veda on leafe to say about Purana are pro vedic is false.Why did not they get hold of it.Das ask them using thier logic? Das is not passing verdict over Vedas or Puranas here as Swami Ji did in Satyarth Prakash that till this day most of hindus who read Satyarth Prakash hate him. Das considers Draupadi as mother.It was not her fault that she was forced to marry five husbands.In that 'vedic' era what a lone lady could have done. But she had a faith in Akal so Akal protected her from being striped naked in court of the king.It gives us the message that a lady with Five Worldy husband can not protect her hnour without the help of Akal. Then swami used unworhty words for her as well As Mother Marry.Well out of millions there could be a case that Female can get zygot formation with her eggs without male sperm(it is also possible if she herslf can produce sperm or even in otherwise also).Then Dayanand Ji were not awre of cloning either. So Mother Mary could also be a virgeon and swamis utterance towards Lord Jesus were like some one spiting on moon and spit comes on his own face. As Swami Ji were unmarried so he use to fancy a lot on sex so prevert things could come to his mind whcih he used to humiliate to Hindus and Christians alike. (to be continued..) Ek Oankar Wahguru Ji Ki Fateh So Das was wrong when he wrote that Swami Ji were having cosy realtion with Raja but rather Swami Ji said that he must not go to his harlot as it is like lion sleeping with {censored}. This was his views for female.Well it may not be the fult of harlot that that what he was. This annoyed Raja or Harlot and Arya Samajis say that Swami Ji were givne poision.What ever be the thing but in anyway his presentation was not good and in fact non of the Raja or his son etc became Arya Samaji as Arya Samjis claim. Why did Swami Ji had so Krodhi or angery attitude? Well one unccle of Das ,who are Arya Samaji once told Das that swami Ji were Yug Purush and better placed then other tow ie Rama And Krishana. Becasue Swami Ji was Calibate(Brahmchari). Is not marrying something Great.Krishana was great nation bulider,He delivered Gita.He resoved many matters and still he had a big Family. Rama also knew great of faith.He did give good preaching to dieing King Bali similar to Gita.Rama defeated the whole world in one Yagna and killed many big demons with small amry of monkeys(could be a human race).Yet he made a family. What was wrong with Swami Ji that he did not make his own family? Perhaps he would not have carred it preaching 'well' as he did if he had a family.He 'sacrfised' for 'us' and did not marry. Wow! a Great leader of Great interpetation of Veda was INCAPABLE to marry to prech or to serve truth others.If he was incapble then he can not be perfect.He can not be bigger then Bhagwan Ramchadra or Bhagwan Krishana. He had a 'weakness' that if he had wife or women or family then he would have been devaoted from 'truth' he discovered.How strong was his 'truth ' whcih could not prevent him from devaiting by earthly deviations. And Das has seen many people taking him role model and going to Haridwar or Kankhal to serach truth from Vedas.Well if Swami Ji already has serached it and put it in Satyrath Prakash then why to read Vedas again and why to go to Hardwar. If All Arya Samaji's will be like role model Swami Ji then perhaps thier female folks will maary hindus and may they also go to Hardwar. So in 50 years no new Arya Samaji. (to Be continuded..) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Debunking/exposing Arya Samaj
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top