Recent content by Kully

Sir, are you able to share the sources you have researched?

Nothing wrong with not being from Punjab, but the "Punjabi literate" is the one that is of concern. The standard of Punjabi language spoken and written word understood. No, it just has a stronger connection to understanding Gurmat. Case in point. On this forum, we had a respected admin and...

That is scary.

Ik oankar respected Tejwant Singh. Tangible examples? I made it clear in my post and you have refered to it below? So what are you trying to achieve by pretending to not understand? Yes. Tongues: ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ ਮਹਲਾ ੩ ॥ Siree Raag, Third Mehla: ਗੁਣਵੰਤੀ ਸਚੁ ਪਾਇਆ ਤ੍ਰਿਸਨਾ ਤਜਿ ਵਿਕਾਰ ॥ (ਹਿਰਦੇ ਵਿਚ)...

It is not fallacy. According to the SGPC it falls under the "definition of a Sikh." Yes. Bani means word. It was written by the Guru which makes it Guru Bani- Guru's word. Thats upto you. Like I said before, i dont' have a problem with anyone not reading/accepting DG. What I have aproblem...

Agreed. Look at the highlighted text and ask why Guru Sahib would give such vivid descriptions if none were true? ਸਲੋਕ ਮਃ ੪ ॥ Shalok, Fourth Mehla: ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਵਿਚਿ ਵਡੀ ਵਡਿਆਈ ਜੋ ਅਨਦਿਨੁ ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਧਿਆਵੈ ॥ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਵਿਚ ਇਹ ਭਾਰਾ ਗੁਣ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਹਰ ਰੋਜ਼ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ-ਨਾਮ ਦਾ ਸਿਮਰਨ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ Great is the greatness...

I'm not confused. Thats just a convenient answer for you, as it avoids answering the statement. Call it a foresight if it helps you. It is still a prophecy. Look up the meaning of prophecy as you seemed confused by it. You claim to know what it isn't, but can't/don't say what it is? Who...

2 or 3 year course, and the person who finishes it is called Gyani. What a ridiculous claim. Gurmat Gyan is a life long course. But these 2 year gyanis intellect is reflected through the nonsense they spout to sangat. But this is coming from the exalted missionary college, where you have...

Try to answer questions directly please. It keeps the topic on focus. This topic is not about the question you have posed. Great. It's our only Guru. Our ONLY source of wisdom. Now please focus on the topic and the original questions asked. If you can't answer these, then please do not...

From some days, our respected member Tejwant Singh Ji has made this reference "Guru Granth Sahib, our only Guru." Is SGGS our only Guru? If it is, then maybe Tejwant Singh and any others who feel the same, would like to respond to these questions: If SGGS is our only Guru, then surely we only...

Chaz is not the only one then. I asked you a direct question on your use of "Gurfathe." What a shame. My understanding of naam Simran is that it means "remembering the name." This remembrance can take place in your mind, or on the tongue, or also in your ears. But is naam simran necessary? I...

Niddar Singh has been dismissed a long time ago by the Nihangs.

Gurbani talks about heaven and hell as actual entities. Unlike the Abrahamic religions, it is not a place of permanancy. Gurbani tells us that also the womb is hell, and reincarnation is hell. Not in the Abrahamic sense in that there is only one day sometime in the future. For a Sikh everyday...

But let's not forget the focus of this topic. The false information that is presented by DKS should be under discussion as well.

Nobody is equating DG to SGGS. DG is that. It is not Guru Dasam Granth, nor can it ever have parkash done of it separately. DG can only parkash done of it in SGGS hazoori. Nowhere in any Gurdwara is DG parkash done by itself. Never has been so there is no question of it being equated to SGGS...