☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
Who Is Sikh? Who Is Not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Canuck Singh" data-source="post: 83515" data-attributes="member: 6614"><p>I have never personally bothered with debates as to definitions etc., but I think that many people have taken time to respond here and so shall I share what I have come to know...</p><p></p><p> Definition's are ego's friendly companion's. With definition's the ego finds a place and pedestal upon which it can thrive. What is ego? It is <strong>E</strong>dging <strong>G</strong>od <strong>O</strong>ut as stated by an individual who has passed in north america. Whenever someone define's another person, they do not define that person by their own definition, rather they define themselves (their egoic self) as someone who needs to place labels upon another person.</p><p></p><p> This is a rather gray area, because when it comes to distinguishing things in reality, for example a person who is American it helps to know their place of origin. But when 'American' becomes an egoic identification with a superficial sense of self, then its purpose is lost and the individual whom in their patriotic sense of self places themselves at the top of the world. Why is it that when American's define themselves as American they are proud that they are primarily responsible for much of the economical and destructive forces playing in the world. Why is it that American's feel 'they' will fulfill the manifest destiny, why is it that 'they' feel that 'others' are the enemy? WHy is it that people rarely question the definition of an American, but they question often the definition of a Sikh, which by its very nature is inclusive and humble compared to that of American? 'American Sikh' is almost a classical paradox. On one hand a power hungry materialistic definition that purports that it stands for freedom, and on the other hand a humble self inquisitive definition that is struggling for freedom. </p><p></p><p> All of this is a function or rather dysfunction of the mind, known as the ego. There is group ego, such as seen in national pride. Most of the world's atrocities have occurred by normal people who in times have become satan on earth. Examples include the various Genocides, Partition in India etc. Group think and mindlessness diffuses the responsibility of the individual to the group. This is known in research that has studied the diffusion of responsibility of self, and in legal courts a group of people can get away with murder so long as the Instigator is discovered. Interesting...</p><p> Another level of ego, is the transient Role Playing ego. This is the level at which the mind needs to identify with a role to create a sense of self purpose. This is seen with the teenage child who plays nice and courteous in front of family, and is wild and ravenous with friends, and a disgruntled student at school. The ego feeds off of role playing, being sucked into the realities that each situation creates. Is it the environment that create's the person? No, it is the ego that identifies with the role. The ego will actively pursue it's self creation, and by identifying with that which continues to feed itself the ego pushes out rationality, discipline, and courtesy because it is bludgeoned with a sense of survival. The ego constantly adapts and feeds off these various roles. </p><p> Another state of the ego, is that of the individual and of their own experience of their mind. A person confined to a cell does not last long before mental health deteriorates. Why is this? When the ego is not fed, the mind creates a dual self. Thoughts of "you are worthless, you are all alone, no on loves you" are given to the host (human) to coax it into believing that happiness is 'out there somewhere' and to force the host to feed the ego in another manner. The ego is temporarily fed with anger, lust, and chasing of materialistic possessions. Take that person out of their cell now, and the ego will continue to feed upon the environment of the host. It will believe that "my happiness is in her/him, without them I will die", when in reality the ego will easily feed off another person just as easily. The ego always attacks the host, because it needs to be fed to survive. The ego will always Edge God Out, because it becomes thought, and the thoughts that it is is thoughts of self identification, and thoughts of anger, lust, materialism, jealousy, and others... </p><p></p><p> In rare moments of existence the ego is pushed out of the way. This is due to a developing consciousness within the human. During primitive times when survival was important, the human existed almost purely out of ego. Fortunately this can be summed as thus " In the distant past, sheer necessity brought us together in first chakra consciousness. Think of the pioneer couple on the wagon train traveling across the country to start their own homestead. Their relationship was one of survival: work the farm, till the field and have children to help with the non-stop physical workload. Fast forward to the Victorian era. The Victorians: the angst and drama, love from the wrong side of the tracks (Romeo and Juliet). This is second chakra consciousness; coming together from a longing to merge with another human being, passion, fantasy, no boundaries and very messy.</p><p> Third Chakra consciousness is all about personal power and the little ‘s’ self. Dynamics of submission and domination prevail. Relationships become more like business arrangements. You do this for me, and I will do this for you. Secretly, we may view our partner as our enemy and spend our days just waiting to be betrayed."</p><p>Although this describes a personal level of human consciousness, it can be applied to the greater scale as well. We can see that ego is primarily at the center, but necessarily for human survival. The ego can not survive without the host so it is necessary for the host to survive. Yet, the host could easily survive without the ego if and when there was something to replace it. </p><p></p><p></p><p> What is there to replace it? Gurbani says that amongst millions, rare is that individual who has Love of the Lord in their heart. Very few and rare individuals' realized and accepted the True reality in their lifetimes, and here we are today attempting to discern their message...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Canuck Singh, post: 83515, member: 6614"] I have never personally bothered with debates as to definitions etc., but I think that many people have taken time to respond here and so shall I share what I have come to know... Definition's are ego's friendly companion's. With definition's the ego finds a place and pedestal upon which it can thrive. What is ego? It is [B]E[/B]dging [B]G[/B]od [B]O[/B]ut as stated by an individual who has passed in north america. Whenever someone define's another person, they do not define that person by their own definition, rather they define themselves (their egoic self) as someone who needs to place labels upon another person. This is a rather gray area, because when it comes to distinguishing things in reality, for example a person who is American it helps to know their place of origin. But when 'American' becomes an egoic identification with a superficial sense of self, then its purpose is lost and the individual whom in their patriotic sense of self places themselves at the top of the world. Why is it that when American's define themselves as American they are proud that they are primarily responsible for much of the economical and destructive forces playing in the world. Why is it that American's feel 'they' will fulfill the manifest destiny, why is it that 'they' feel that 'others' are the enemy? WHy is it that people rarely question the definition of an American, but they question often the definition of a Sikh, which by its very nature is inclusive and humble compared to that of American? 'American Sikh' is almost a classical paradox. On one hand a power hungry materialistic definition that purports that it stands for freedom, and on the other hand a humble self inquisitive definition that is struggling for freedom. All of this is a function or rather dysfunction of the mind, known as the ego. There is group ego, such as seen in national pride. Most of the world's atrocities have occurred by normal people who in times have become satan on earth. Examples include the various Genocides, Partition in India etc. Group think and mindlessness diffuses the responsibility of the individual to the group. This is known in research that has studied the diffusion of responsibility of self, and in legal courts a group of people can get away with murder so long as the Instigator is discovered. Interesting... Another level of ego, is the transient Role Playing ego. This is the level at which the mind needs to identify with a role to create a sense of self purpose. This is seen with the teenage child who plays nice and courteous in front of family, and is wild and ravenous with friends, and a disgruntled student at school. The ego feeds off of role playing, being sucked into the realities that each situation creates. Is it the environment that create's the person? No, it is the ego that identifies with the role. The ego will actively pursue it's self creation, and by identifying with that which continues to feed itself the ego pushes out rationality, discipline, and courtesy because it is bludgeoned with a sense of survival. The ego constantly adapts and feeds off these various roles. Another state of the ego, is that of the individual and of their own experience of their mind. A person confined to a cell does not last long before mental health deteriorates. Why is this? When the ego is not fed, the mind creates a dual self. Thoughts of "you are worthless, you are all alone, no on loves you" are given to the host (human) to coax it into believing that happiness is 'out there somewhere' and to force the host to feed the ego in another manner. The ego is temporarily fed with anger, lust, and chasing of materialistic possessions. Take that person out of their cell now, and the ego will continue to feed upon the environment of the host. It will believe that "my happiness is in her/him, without them I will die", when in reality the ego will easily feed off another person just as easily. The ego always attacks the host, because it needs to be fed to survive. The ego will always Edge God Out, because it becomes thought, and the thoughts that it is is thoughts of self identification, and thoughts of anger, lust, materialism, jealousy, and others... In rare moments of existence the ego is pushed out of the way. This is due to a developing consciousness within the human. During primitive times when survival was important, the human existed almost purely out of ego. Fortunately this can be summed as thus " In the distant past, sheer necessity brought us together in first chakra consciousness. Think of the pioneer couple on the wagon train traveling across the country to start their own homestead. Their relationship was one of survival: work the farm, till the field and have children to help with the non-stop physical workload. Fast forward to the Victorian era. The Victorians: the angst and drama, love from the wrong side of the tracks (Romeo and Juliet). This is second chakra consciousness; coming together from a longing to merge with another human being, passion, fantasy, no boundaries and very messy. Third Chakra consciousness is all about personal power and the little ‘s’ self. Dynamics of submission and domination prevail. Relationships become more like business arrangements. You do this for me, and I will do this for you. Secretly, we may view our partner as our enemy and spend our days just waiting to be betrayed." Although this describes a personal level of human consciousness, it can be applied to the greater scale as well. We can see that ego is primarily at the center, but necessarily for human survival. The ego can not survive without the host so it is necessary for the host to survive. Yet, the host could easily survive without the ego if and when there was something to replace it. What is there to replace it? Gurbani says that amongst millions, rare is that individual who has Love of the Lord in their heart. Very few and rare individuals' realized and accepted the True reality in their lifetimes, and here we are today attempting to discern their message... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
Who Is Sikh? Who Is Not?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top