☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
The World Of Words By I J Singh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mandemeet" data-source="post: 165031" data-attributes="member: 17682"><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">Without giving quotes, which can define eku iku ikk and other words, grammatical difference in their use doesn’t become clear. You should have selected some quotes to define their difference right here. What you have done is grammar structure of the words without application. It is like defining a noun without an example. This is the flaw in your explanation I have observed. Whenever, time comes to explain them with Gurbani quotes, you simply say you will give quotes. Why to put it off ? Shouldn’t we discuss one point before we proceed to the next point? I feel that will make easier to understand this new approach. I have defined the meaning of Ik(u); I have proved how one number is conveyed through Iku. You can prove my explanation incorrect with quote, I shall take it honorably. </span></em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD"></span></em></strong></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD"></span></em></strong></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">A wave but single wave; then a wave but complete</span></em></strong></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">Obviously the first wave is incomplete and the second is complete. The quotes about Har Prabhu and Har Prabh, I gave you earlier, do not fit in this explanation; that is the problem. If you can apply this explanation in those quotes, it will be better to understand it</span></em></strong></span>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">What is the difference between a wave and a complete wave? Why?</span></em></span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">This appears “not applicable in the quotes I gave containing Har Prabhu and Har Prabh because the meaning is the same. If it is not, prove otherwise with quote, please.</span></em></strong></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">We cannot write it in Roman as you write; “u” letter doesn’t stand for ounkud, you just have made it that way. I shall go with that. When we speak, again this form doesn’t sound separately as you know its pronunciation is Har not Hari</span></em></span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">You can figure out all this when you read Gurbani in original lipi, Gurmukhi and interpret it in English but Roman just cannot do justice to such forms. So don’t stick to it and keep explaining as you write these words, I shall accept that.</span></em></span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">In concept of Ekankar, there is no various entities as you refer; these vowels may address Ekankar’s virtues (powers or waves or whatever you feel to address these virtues) but not call them entities. This will be the biggest distortion coming at your hands. As per your own words, there is a wave, and there is a complete wave; you must define their origin. There are many things made of matter but we accept the matter as the origin of the things. Entities are incorrectly misunderstood by you as I see you looking at various words. I shall prove that. Whenever singular verb follows with such words, they define it as single </span></em></strong></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">With regards</span></em></strong></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><em><span style="color: #4F81BD">mandemeet</span></em></strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mandemeet, post: 165031, member: 17682"] [SIZE=3][B][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]Without giving quotes, which can define eku iku ikk and other words, grammatical difference in their use doesn’t become clear. You should have selected some quotes to define their difference right here. What you have done is grammar structure of the words without application. It is like defining a noun without an example. This is the flaw in your explanation I have observed. Whenever, time comes to explain them with Gurbani quotes, you simply say you will give quotes. Why to put it off ? Shouldn’t we discuss one point before we proceed to the next point? I feel that will make easier to understand this new approach. I have defined the meaning of Ik(u); I have proved how one number is conveyed through Iku. You can prove my explanation incorrect with quote, I shall take it honorably. [/COLOR][/I][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]A wave but single wave; then a wave but complete[/COLOR][/I][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]Obviously the first wave is incomplete and the second is complete. The quotes about Har Prabhu and Har Prabh, I gave you earlier, do not fit in this explanation; that is the problem. If you can apply this explanation in those quotes, it will be better to understand it[/COLOR][/I][/B][/SIZE]. [B][SIZE=3][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]What is the difference between a wave and a complete wave? Why?[/COLOR][/I][/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3][B][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]This appears “not applicable in the quotes I gave containing Har Prabhu and Har Prabh because the meaning is the same. If it is not, prove otherwise with quote, please.[/COLOR][/I][/B][/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]We cannot write it in Roman as you write; “u” letter doesn’t stand for ounkud, you just have made it that way. I shall go with that. When we speak, again this form doesn’t sound separately as you know its pronunciation is Har not Hari[/COLOR][/I][/SIZE][/B] [B][SIZE=3][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]You can figure out all this when you read Gurbani in original lipi, Gurmukhi and interpret it in English but Roman just cannot do justice to such forms. So don’t stick to it and keep explaining as you write these words, I shall accept that.[/COLOR][/I][/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3][B][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]In concept of Ekankar, there is no various entities as you refer; these vowels may address Ekankar’s virtues (powers or waves or whatever you feel to address these virtues) but not call them entities. This will be the biggest distortion coming at your hands. As per your own words, there is a wave, and there is a complete wave; you must define their origin. There are many things made of matter but we accept the matter as the origin of the things. Entities are incorrectly misunderstood by you as I see you looking at various words. I shall prove that. Whenever singular verb follows with such words, they define it as single [/COLOR][/I][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]With regards[/COLOR][/I][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B][I][COLOR=#4F81BD]mandemeet[/COLOR][/I][/B][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
The World Of Words By I J Singh
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top