☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Social Lounge
Articles
General
The Story Of Prithviraj Chauhan And The Islamic Conquest Of India--In My Words
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kds1980" data-source="post: 149808" data-attributes="member: 1178"><p>Thanks for your version .It looks more reliable than which I posted Earlier.You are probably right that someone may have Changed the battle of Panipat with Battle of Tarain.BTW here is another version</p><p></p><p>In the second battle of Tarain, Shahabuddin Ghori defeated Prithviraj Chauhan. This happened in 1192. It was not that Ghori had a army larger in number than Prithvi. After studying the various accounts of history, the reliable and non reliable sources, we get the clear picture. The war was nothing but the shataranj ka khel between the two great kings. One Hindu and another Muslim. Prithvi had three thousand elephants in his army. These elephants were war-like and fierce. In the first battle of Tarain, which was took place in 1191, these elephants had played a major role in the victory of Prithviraj. Ghori had not a single elephant in his army at that time. His army was also small in number. His army was confused in the first battle as the soldiers of Ghori were not aware how to fight against the war-like elephants...</p><p></p><p>After the defeat in first battle of Tarain, when Ghori returned to Ghazni, he punished his generals who had ran away from the battlefield. Then he assigned a task to his new trusted general named Hammad, who was from Nishapur (nowadays in Iran and nearer to the border of Afghanistan). Hammad was assigned a task to find a trick to fight against these warlike elephants. Hammad did some experiments and within a month he was succeed to find a solution. In Ghazni he gave a demo of his new experiment to his Master and Ghori approved it and implemented it in the second battle of Tarain. What was that new trick?....</p><p>In the battlefield, Prithviraj was unaware of the fact that Ghori had come along with a new trick to take on the challenge of his elephants. In the beginning of the battle, Prithvi's three thousand elephants attacked Ghori's army from front view. Ghori signaled Hammad. Hammad's Mukaddamtuljaish cavalry was ready to take on this challenge. This force immediately counter attacked these warlike elephants. Each elephant of Prithviraj was attacked by three TulJaish soldiers. The trick was such that, One TulJaish soldier kept an elephant engaged in a fight with him while the two other TulJaish soldiers one from his left and other from his right side attacked on elephant and cut its trunk with their swords. Badly injured and jolted elephant then became more fierce and turned to Prithvi's own army and attacked on it madly. The elephants who were able to divert towards Ghori's army by Prithvi's men forcefully were jolted by the second fierce attack by Hammad's TulJaish men. These TulJaish soldiers rode towards the back of the elephants and cut each of their two back feet. Due to this attack the elephants sat on the ground and unable to move forward. Hammad's Tuljaish army thus cut around nine hundred elephants of Prithvi mercilessly. After seeing this view Prithvi called the rest of the two thousand elephants back and drove them to the back of his entire army.</p><p>By getting the first success in the battle, Ghori's confidence thus increased. In the afternoon he played second trick. He called all of his generals and made a plan. He himself along with his forty thousand Kalb cavalry attacked on Prithvi's army from front side. He had his general Kharmil with his forty thousand Maisra cavalry. His second troop of forty thousand Maimna cavalry under the leadership of Kutubuddin Aibak attacked Prithvi's army from left hand side. His third troop of forty thousand cavalry of TulJaish under the leadership of Hammad attacked Prithvi's army from right hand side. The Rajputs thus get confused and diverted into three groups to take on this new challenge.</p><p>When the battle was in its full edge, Hammad, the general of Ghori played the third trick. He kept his two commanders fighting at the right hand side of Prithvi and he himself plucked out his twelve thousand Tuljaish cavalry and rode five miles away from the battlefield and attacked on the back side of Prithvi's army. He attacked on the elephants of Prithvi, who were drove and kept at the back of his army by the Hindu king from the battlefield. Hammad's troop attacked these elephants and cut their trunks. With this sudden attack, the elephants got panic and to save theirs souls they marched straight on Prithvi's army. Thus Prithvi's army was caught in a trap. He was attacked from all the four sides.</p><p>Now it is no need to say what was the result of this Shataranj ki chal. Ghori won the battle. Prithvi did not play well and hence lost the war. No doubt, Ghori was the enemy of Rajputana India. But we should not forget here that he was an able field marshal. He was restless, dream chaser, real heart warrior and the man of the field. He was introspective. He corrected his errors in the first battle of Tarain and rectified them in the second battle. Hats of him! It is not that, Sachin Tendulkar is good but Sanath Jaisurya or Brain Lara aren't. Though Lara and Jaisurya played against India, they played well. Ghori also, played politically and militarily against Rajputana India, but played well....There is no point to blame him blindly and accused him to be greedy, rapist, cruel and all...It's all ********, I think....He got the noble generals like Hammad and Kutubuddin Aibak who made him champion. That's all...</p><p></p><p><a href="http://holyhansa.blogspot.com/2011/07/field-marshal-of-afghanistan.html" target="_blank">http://holyhansa.blogspot.com/2011/07/field-marshal-of-afghanistan.html</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kds1980, post: 149808, member: 1178"] Thanks for your version .It looks more reliable than which I posted Earlier.You are probably right that someone may have Changed the battle of Panipat with Battle of Tarain.BTW here is another version In the second battle of Tarain, Shahabuddin Ghori defeated Prithviraj Chauhan. This happened in 1192. It was not that Ghori had a army larger in number than Prithvi. After studying the various accounts of history, the reliable and non reliable sources, we get the clear picture. The war was nothing but the shataranj ka khel between the two great kings. One Hindu and another Muslim. Prithvi had three thousand elephants in his army. These elephants were war-like and fierce. In the first battle of Tarain, which was took place in 1191, these elephants had played a major role in the victory of Prithviraj. Ghori had not a single elephant in his army at that time. His army was also small in number. His army was confused in the first battle as the soldiers of Ghori were not aware how to fight against the war-like elephants... After the defeat in first battle of Tarain, when Ghori returned to Ghazni, he punished his generals who had ran away from the battlefield. Then he assigned a task to his new trusted general named Hammad, who was from Nishapur (nowadays in Iran and nearer to the border of Afghanistan). Hammad was assigned a task to find a trick to fight against these warlike elephants. Hammad did some experiments and within a month he was succeed to find a solution. In Ghazni he gave a demo of his new experiment to his Master and Ghori approved it and implemented it in the second battle of Tarain. What was that new trick?.... In the battlefield, Prithviraj was unaware of the fact that Ghori had come along with a new trick to take on the challenge of his elephants. In the beginning of the battle, Prithvi's three thousand elephants attacked Ghori's army from front view. Ghori signaled Hammad. Hammad's Mukaddamtuljaish cavalry was ready to take on this challenge. This force immediately counter attacked these warlike elephants. Each elephant of Prithviraj was attacked by three TulJaish soldiers. The trick was such that, One TulJaish soldier kept an elephant engaged in a fight with him while the two other TulJaish soldiers one from his left and other from his right side attacked on elephant and cut its trunk with their swords. Badly injured and jolted elephant then became more fierce and turned to Prithvi's own army and attacked on it madly. The elephants who were able to divert towards Ghori's army by Prithvi's men forcefully were jolted by the second fierce attack by Hammad's TulJaish men. These TulJaish soldiers rode towards the back of the elephants and cut each of their two back feet. Due to this attack the elephants sat on the ground and unable to move forward. Hammad's Tuljaish army thus cut around nine hundred elephants of Prithvi mercilessly. After seeing this view Prithvi called the rest of the two thousand elephants back and drove them to the back of his entire army. By getting the first success in the battle, Ghori's confidence thus increased. In the afternoon he played second trick. He called all of his generals and made a plan. He himself along with his forty thousand Kalb cavalry attacked on Prithvi's army from front side. He had his general Kharmil with his forty thousand Maisra cavalry. His second troop of forty thousand Maimna cavalry under the leadership of Kutubuddin Aibak attacked Prithvi's army from left hand side. His third troop of forty thousand cavalry of TulJaish under the leadership of Hammad attacked Prithvi's army from right hand side. The Rajputs thus get confused and diverted into three groups to take on this new challenge. When the battle was in its full edge, Hammad, the general of Ghori played the third trick. He kept his two commanders fighting at the right hand side of Prithvi and he himself plucked out his twelve thousand Tuljaish cavalry and rode five miles away from the battlefield and attacked on the back side of Prithvi's army. He attacked on the elephants of Prithvi, who were drove and kept at the back of his army by the Hindu king from the battlefield. Hammad's troop attacked these elephants and cut their trunks. With this sudden attack, the elephants got panic and to save theirs souls they marched straight on Prithvi's army. Thus Prithvi's army was caught in a trap. He was attacked from all the four sides. Now it is no need to say what was the result of this Shataranj ki chal. Ghori won the battle. Prithvi did not play well and hence lost the war. No doubt, Ghori was the enemy of Rajputana India. But we should not forget here that he was an able field marshal. He was restless, dream chaser, real heart warrior and the man of the field. He was introspective. He corrected his errors in the first battle of Tarain and rectified them in the second battle. Hats of him! It is not that, Sachin Tendulkar is good but Sanath Jaisurya or Brain Lara aren't. Though Lara and Jaisurya played against India, they played well. Ghori also, played politically and militarily against Rajputana India, but played well....There is no point to blame him blindly and accused him to be greedy, rapist, cruel and all...It's all ********, I think....He got the noble generals like Hammad and Kutubuddin Aibak who made him champion. That's all... [url]http://holyhansa.blogspot.com/2011/07/field-marshal-of-afghanistan.html[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Social Lounge
Articles
General
The Story Of Prithviraj Chauhan And The Islamic Conquest Of India--In My Words
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top