☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
The Concept Of A Living Guru
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr Karminder Singh" data-source="post: 216720" data-attributes="member: 9642"><p><strong>Spirituality of the Shabad</strong></p><p></p><p>SGGS 479 Rag Asa Bhagat Kabir</p><p></p><p>ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਜਾਗਤਾ ਹੈ ਦੇਉ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥</p><p></p><p>Satgur Jaagta Hai Deyo</p><p></p><p>In this shabad, the word <em>Jaagata</em> is used as opposed to <em>Jeevan</em>. Both have <strong>life</strong> as their basis. But there is a critical difference. <em>Jeevan</em> means being physically alive. Something that is physically alive needs hot and warm clothes, fans, air-conditioners, it has limbs (<em>ang</em>) etc. </p><p></p><p><em>Jaagat </em>has three meanings – living, awakened, and enlightened. Put them all together and <em>Jaagat </em>means being spiritually alive, being spiritually awakened. </p><p></p><p>Our Guru is the s<em>habad</em>. It is a <em>Jaagat </em>Guru because it breathes <em>Jaagarta</em> (spiritual life/enlightenment) into the spiritually dead/un-enlightened. </p><p></p><p><strong>Satgur Mera Maar Jewalley </strong></p><p></p><p>This verse is wrongly translated by our spiritually dead clergy as: </p><p>‘our Guru kills and brings back to life.’ </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Firstly, our Guru does NOT kill anyone.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Secondly, the grammar of the word <em>Maar</em> is someone who is already dead.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">And thirdly the verse is about spiritual death and spiritual life. Hence the true meaning of this verse is ‘my Guru breathes spiritual life into the spiritually dead.’ </li> </ul><p>Put all the above together and the meaning of Living (S<em>habad</em>) Guru is</p><p></p><p>that we live out the <em>shabad’s</em> messages within us. <em>The Shabad</em> is living <strong>within us</strong>. </p><p></p><p>The question to be asked is not if our living guru needs air-conditioning or winter clothes. </p><p></p><p>The question to ask has to be ‘Is the Shabad living within me, am I living the Shabad or is the Shabad dead within me?’</p><p></p><p><strong>Claims Pertaining to The Literal Meaning </strong></p><p></p><p><em><strong>Claim 1</strong></em> is that the literal meaning of the Shabad applies to ‘those who have had the ‘<em>partakh darshan</em> of the 10 Gurus when they bow (<em>metha tek</em>) to the Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji.’</p><p></p><p>Such claims are devoid of the essence of Gurbani. Like half-cooked food, they cause spiritual indigestion at the very least. Mostly, such ‘food’ is actually meant to stop us from thinking. </p><p></p><p>Where are the verses that support statements like ‘<em>darshan</em> of the 10 Gurus when they <em>metha tek</em> to Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji?’ </p><p></p><p>Such claims are routinely made by so called <em>dera mahapurakhs</em> and easily believed by their gullible <em>chelas</em>. They get ‘<em>darshan</em> of the 10 Gurus’ at their convenience, the ‘<em>shaheed</em> Sikhs’ attend their diwans, and dead ‘<em>mahapurakhs</em>’ sit behind them when they do their ‘Kirtan? </p><p></p><p>One even claimed that Sri Guru Teg Bahadur ji did ‘<em>Chaur</em>’ when the ‘<em>mahapurakh baba</em>’ sat on the stage! Such blasphemy!</p><p></p><p><em><strong>Claim 2</strong></em> is that the above discourse ‘sounds like an interpretation from the so-called intellectuals who have never experienced their Guru alive.’</p><p></p><p>Such a claim is pure hogwash! Was Guru Nanak an‘intellectual’ too when he called on Sikhs to use their intellect?</p><p></p><p>SGGS 1245 Rag Saarang M: 1</p><p></p><p>ਅਕਲੀ ਸਾਹਿਬੁ ਸੇਵੀਐ ਅਕਲੀ ਪਾਈਐ ਮਾਨੁ ॥</p><p></p><p>Aklee Sahib Sayveay Aklee Payeay Maan</p><p></p><p><em>Aklee</em> means use your <em>akal </em>(intellect). <em>Sayveay</em> means to serve and to conduct our spirituality. </p><p></p><p>Guru ji continues with</p><p></p><p>ਅਕਲੀ ਪੜ੍ਹ੍ਹਿ ਕੈ ਬੁਝੀਐ ਅਕਲੀ ਕੀਚੈ ਦਾਨੁ ॥</p><p></p><p>Aklee Parh Kay Bhujeay Aklee Keechey Daan</p><p></p><p>Meaning use your intellect to read and understand and internalize Gurbani messages. Those who wish to remove the use of intellect and reason from Sikhi are those who have not understood the essence of Guru Nanak and also the SGGS ji. At the very worst they are the self-serving clergy who want to keep Sikhs in the shroud of darkness and under their control. </p><p></p><p><em><strong>Claim 3</strong></em> is that ’Satgur Mera Mar Jiwalay can be seen literally from the act of Guru Gobind Singh Ji taking away the heads of the 5 Panj Pyaray and then bringing them back to life.’</p><p></p><p>To say this is to make a mockery of the deeply spiritual verse, the Panj Pyare, Guru Gobind Singh and the <em>pahul</em> process. As explained above, the verse is not about physical killing and bringing back to life. </p><p></p><p>The Pyare were not dead that they had to be brought back to life. They were of superior enlightenment to have gotten up at the call of Guru ji and to offer themselves. </p><p></p><p>To suggest that the Guru physically beheaded such highly enlightened Sikhs who answered his call is to insult the Guru’s love and appreciation for such Gurbani-enlightened Sikhs. </p><p></p><p>To say that we ‘cannot ignore the literal’ is to say we cannot ignore the darkness. Let’s say it loud and clear. The literal is NOT the message.</p><p></p><p>As an example when Gurbani says ‘<em>Bhavjal Tarankey’</em> the literal meaning is ‘swim across the ocean.’ If the ‘literal cannot be ignored’ then all Sikhs should go for swimming lessons! And spirituality would be about what swimming strokes are better and who is a fit swimmer! </p><p></p><p>But the discerning and thinking Sikh would want to know which <em>bhavjal</em> (Ocean) is Guruji talking about. And what does Gurbani mean by <em>tarankey</em> (to swim).</p><p></p><p>Guru Nanak was the first Guru to ‘ask for the head’ of a Sikh. If understood literally, then His demand was far more difficult than that of the tenth master. </p><p></p><p>SGGS 1412 Salok Vaaran Te Vadheek M:1</p><p></p><p>ਸਿਰੁ ਧਰਿ ਤਲੀ ਗਲੀ ਮੇਰੀ ਆਉ ॥</p><p></p><p>Ser Dhar Talee Galee Meri Aao.</p><p></p><p>The literal meaning would be ‘Cut your own head yourself, place it on your palm and bring it to me.’ Obviously no Sikh did such in the literal sense. So the message is something else – about self-surrender, about offering our thought process <em>(ser</em>/head) and about accepting the Guru’s spiritual wisdom. When viewed spiritually and not literally, then both calls – Guru Nanak’s and Guru Gobind Singh’s are one and the same!</p><p></p><p>The 5 <em>Pyare</em> who stood up in 1699 were totally aware of Guru Nanak’s call ‘for their head.’ So they understood perfectly what the tenth master was asking. Further all <em>Panj</em> had already ‘given their head’ to Guru Nanak. Hence they had no problem answering the call of the tenth Guru. They knew Guru Gobind Singh was asking what Guru Nanak has asked earlier. </p><p></p><p>Guru Gobind ji was also aware of the call of Guru Nanak. To say that he physically beheaded such spiritually awakened Sikhs is an insult to Guruji and the entire process of Sikhi. Such tales are created by the <em>nirmalas, udhasis</em> and other anti-Sikh elements who wished to paint Guru Gobind Singh ji as a blood-thirsty, sword-swinging and violence-prone Guru who beheaded his own beloved Sikhs. </p><p></p><p>Other tales were created to make the <em>Pahul</em> process ridiculous.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Guruji slaughtered goats.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">He personally stitched back the heads one by one (Abu Turani’s account)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mata Sahib Kaur added sugar to reduce the level of ‘aggression’ from the <em>Pahul. </em></li> </ul><p>If we examine each of these tales critically (something our clergy and <em>dera </em>folk DONT want us to do) we will discover how irrational they are. </p><p></p><p>For example the goat-slaughtering story. A critical examination would go like this ‘the guru asked for human heads and slaughtered goat heads.’ What does this make our Guru? Honest? Courageous? Dishonest? Deceiving ?</p><p></p><p>This is what we Sikhs need to ask ourselves when we choose what to believe OUTSIDE of the Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji and into the web of ‘literal meaning.’</p><p></p><p><strong>Readers’ Comments</strong></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">This ‘literal meaning’ leads acceptance of anyone who claims any ‘<em>darshan’</em> to be automatically elevated and placed on a pedestal; hence ‘godmen’ like Gurmeet Ram Rahim make millions of followers and billions of cash.<br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Some even say that the heads were reattached to different bodies to give a message of equality and being against the caste system. Guru Nanak had already condemned the caste system and spoke of equality. So did all the other gurus. Guru Gobind Singh ji has been made to stand different and superior to all the other gurus. That again is an insult. Guru Nanak is the first <em>aape gurchela.</em> So were Guru Angad and Guru Amardas.<br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Some can afford air-conditioning, some may just use a fan, but there are others who may just afford environment’s breeze through the vent and windows. All these modern methods are an addition to the way we may want to respect and revere SGGS. But the question is, when there were no fans or air conditions what was the method used? Were those forefathers less accepted by our Satguru? Was someone made to sit all night long using a <em>chaur</em> to fan our revered SGGS. We ought to be reasonable in our reverence and avoid overdoing it. Otherwise we are only attracting another ritual.<br /> <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">So long as the verses of SGGS are unread by us mortals, the Gurbani or the Shabad Guru is not in the living form. The Shabad in SGGS ji manifests to life when it is read and assimilated. It’s like the active antibiotic in the capsule. So long as it’s not consumed it is not potent. The moment it’s consumed it becomes active in our body to take up a particular role. To keep its potency, we need to take action – store the antibiotic in a cold environment.</li> </ol><p>In the case of SGGS ji, it becomes more potent when we read, understand and assimilate it and in the form of actions/deeds. Gurbani acts inside us in all the human cells in a peculiar phenomenon. We can call this spirituality.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">For some, reading Gurbani may mean an action instructed by others. But for others, one gets into tears on feeling the presence of our Gurus in soul and spirit. It’s just like ‘Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.’ With repeated readings, we can feel the Guru’s messages reaching out to us and then we internalize the greatness of the Creator.</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr Karminder Singh, post: 216720, member: 9642"] [B]Spirituality of the Shabad[/B] SGGS 479 Rag Asa Bhagat Kabir ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਜਾਗਤਾ ਹੈ ਦੇਉ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Satgur Jaagta Hai Deyo In this shabad, the word [I]Jaagata[/I] is used as opposed to [I]Jeevan[/I]. Both have [B]life[/B] as their basis. But there is a critical difference. [I]Jeevan[/I] means being physically alive. Something that is physically alive needs hot and warm clothes, fans, air-conditioners, it has limbs ([I]ang[/I]) etc. [I]Jaagat [/I]has three meanings – living, awakened, and enlightened. Put them all together and [I]Jaagat [/I]means being spiritually alive, being spiritually awakened. Our Guru is the s[I]habad[/I]. It is a [I]Jaagat [/I]Guru because it breathes [I]Jaagarta[/I] (spiritual life/enlightenment) into the spiritually dead/un-enlightened. [B]Satgur Mera Maar Jewalley [/B] This verse is wrongly translated by our spiritually dead clergy as: ‘our Guru kills and brings back to life.’ [LIST] [*]Firstly, our Guru does NOT kill anyone. [*]Secondly, the grammar of the word [I]Maar[/I] is someone who is already dead. [*]And thirdly the verse is about spiritual death and spiritual life. Hence the true meaning of this verse is ‘my Guru breathes spiritual life into the spiritually dead.’ [/LIST] Put all the above together and the meaning of Living (S[I]habad[/I]) Guru is that we live out the [I]shabad’s[/I] messages within us. [I]The Shabad[/I] is living [B]within us[/B]. The question to be asked is not if our living guru needs air-conditioning or winter clothes. The question to ask has to be ‘Is the Shabad living within me, am I living the Shabad or is the Shabad dead within me?’ [B]Claims Pertaining to The Literal Meaning [/B] [I][B]Claim 1[/B][/I] is that the literal meaning of the Shabad applies to ‘those who have had the ‘[I]partakh darshan[/I] of the 10 Gurus when they bow ([I]metha tek[/I]) to the Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji.’ Such claims are devoid of the essence of Gurbani. Like half-cooked food, they cause spiritual indigestion at the very least. Mostly, such ‘food’ is actually meant to stop us from thinking. Where are the verses that support statements like ‘[I]darshan[/I] of the 10 Gurus when they [I]metha tek[/I] to Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji?’ Such claims are routinely made by so called [I]dera mahapurakhs[/I] and easily believed by their gullible [I]chelas[/I]. They get ‘[I]darshan[/I] of the 10 Gurus’ at their convenience, the ‘[I]shaheed[/I] Sikhs’ attend their diwans, and dead ‘[I]mahapurakhs[/I]’ sit behind them when they do their ‘Kirtan? One even claimed that Sri Guru Teg Bahadur ji did ‘[I]Chaur[/I]’ when the ‘[I]mahapurakh baba[/I]’ sat on the stage! Such blasphemy! [I][B]Claim 2[/B][/I] is that the above discourse ‘sounds like an interpretation from the so-called intellectuals who have never experienced their Guru alive.’ Such a claim is pure hogwash! Was Guru Nanak an‘intellectual’ too when he called on Sikhs to use their intellect? SGGS 1245 Rag Saarang M: 1 ਅਕਲੀ ਸਾਹਿਬੁ ਸੇਵੀਐ ਅਕਲੀ ਪਾਈਐ ਮਾਨੁ ॥ Aklee Sahib Sayveay Aklee Payeay Maan [I]Aklee[/I] means use your [I]akal [/I](intellect). [I]Sayveay[/I] means to serve and to conduct our spirituality. Guru ji continues with ਅਕਲੀ ਪੜ੍ਹ੍ਹਿ ਕੈ ਬੁਝੀਐ ਅਕਲੀ ਕੀਚੈ ਦਾਨੁ ॥ Aklee Parh Kay Bhujeay Aklee Keechey Daan Meaning use your intellect to read and understand and internalize Gurbani messages. Those who wish to remove the use of intellect and reason from Sikhi are those who have not understood the essence of Guru Nanak and also the SGGS ji. At the very worst they are the self-serving clergy who want to keep Sikhs in the shroud of darkness and under their control. [I][B]Claim 3[/B][/I] is that ’Satgur Mera Mar Jiwalay can be seen literally from the act of Guru Gobind Singh Ji taking away the heads of the 5 Panj Pyaray and then bringing them back to life.’ To say this is to make a mockery of the deeply spiritual verse, the Panj Pyare, Guru Gobind Singh and the [I]pahul[/I] process. As explained above, the verse is not about physical killing and bringing back to life. The Pyare were not dead that they had to be brought back to life. They were of superior enlightenment to have gotten up at the call of Guru ji and to offer themselves. To suggest that the Guru physically beheaded such highly enlightened Sikhs who answered his call is to insult the Guru’s love and appreciation for such Gurbani-enlightened Sikhs. To say that we ‘cannot ignore the literal’ is to say we cannot ignore the darkness. Let’s say it loud and clear. The literal is NOT the message. As an example when Gurbani says ‘[I]Bhavjal Tarankey’[/I] the literal meaning is ‘swim across the ocean.’ If the ‘literal cannot be ignored’ then all Sikhs should go for swimming lessons! And spirituality would be about what swimming strokes are better and who is a fit swimmer! But the discerning and thinking Sikh would want to know which [I]bhavjal[/I] (Ocean) is Guruji talking about. And what does Gurbani mean by [I]tarankey[/I] (to swim). Guru Nanak was the first Guru to ‘ask for the head’ of a Sikh. If understood literally, then His demand was far more difficult than that of the tenth master. SGGS 1412 Salok Vaaran Te Vadheek M:1 ਸਿਰੁ ਧਰਿ ਤਲੀ ਗਲੀ ਮੇਰੀ ਆਉ ॥ Ser Dhar Talee Galee Meri Aao. The literal meaning would be ‘Cut your own head yourself, place it on your palm and bring it to me.’ Obviously no Sikh did such in the literal sense. So the message is something else – about self-surrender, about offering our thought process [I](ser[/I]/head) and about accepting the Guru’s spiritual wisdom. When viewed spiritually and not literally, then both calls – Guru Nanak’s and Guru Gobind Singh’s are one and the same! The 5 [I]Pyare[/I] who stood up in 1699 were totally aware of Guru Nanak’s call ‘for their head.’ So they understood perfectly what the tenth master was asking. Further all [I]Panj[/I] had already ‘given their head’ to Guru Nanak. Hence they had no problem answering the call of the tenth Guru. They knew Guru Gobind Singh was asking what Guru Nanak has asked earlier. Guru Gobind ji was also aware of the call of Guru Nanak. To say that he physically beheaded such spiritually awakened Sikhs is an insult to Guruji and the entire process of Sikhi. Such tales are created by the [I]nirmalas, udhasis[/I] and other anti-Sikh elements who wished to paint Guru Gobind Singh ji as a blood-thirsty, sword-swinging and violence-prone Guru who beheaded his own beloved Sikhs. Other tales were created to make the [I]Pahul[/I] process ridiculous. [LIST] [*]Guruji slaughtered goats. [*]He personally stitched back the heads one by one (Abu Turani’s account) [*]Mata Sahib Kaur added sugar to reduce the level of ‘aggression’ from the [I]Pahul. [/I] [/LIST] If we examine each of these tales critically (something our clergy and [I]dera [/I]folk DONT want us to do) we will discover how irrational they are. For example the goat-slaughtering story. A critical examination would go like this ‘the guru asked for human heads and slaughtered goat heads.’ What does this make our Guru? Honest? Courageous? Dishonest? Deceiving ? This is what we Sikhs need to ask ourselves when we choose what to believe OUTSIDE of the Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji and into the web of ‘literal meaning.’ [B]Readers’ Comments[/B] [LIST=1] [*]This ‘literal meaning’ leads acceptance of anyone who claims any ‘[I]darshan’[/I] to be automatically elevated and placed on a pedestal; hence ‘godmen’ like Gurmeet Ram Rahim make millions of followers and billions of cash. [*]Some even say that the heads were reattached to different bodies to give a message of equality and being against the caste system. Guru Nanak had already condemned the caste system and spoke of equality. So did all the other gurus. Guru Gobind Singh ji has been made to stand different and superior to all the other gurus. That again is an insult. Guru Nanak is the first [I]aape gurchela.[/I] So were Guru Angad and Guru Amardas. [*]Some can afford air-conditioning, some may just use a fan, but there are others who may just afford environment’s breeze through the vent and windows. All these modern methods are an addition to the way we may want to respect and revere SGGS. But the question is, when there were no fans or air conditions what was the method used? Were those forefathers less accepted by our Satguru? Was someone made to sit all night long using a [I]chaur[/I] to fan our revered SGGS. We ought to be reasonable in our reverence and avoid overdoing it. Otherwise we are only attracting another ritual. [*]So long as the verses of SGGS are unread by us mortals, the Gurbani or the Shabad Guru is not in the living form. The Shabad in SGGS ji manifests to life when it is read and assimilated. It’s like the active antibiotic in the capsule. So long as it’s not consumed it is not potent. The moment it’s consumed it becomes active in our body to take up a particular role. To keep its potency, we need to take action – store the antibiotic in a cold environment. [/LIST] In the case of SGGS ji, it becomes more potent when we read, understand and assimilate it and in the form of actions/deeds. Gurbani acts inside us in all the human cells in a peculiar phenomenon. We can call this spirituality. [LIST=1] [*]For some, reading Gurbani may mean an action instructed by others. But for others, one gets into tears on feeling the presence of our Gurus in soul and spirit. It’s just like ‘Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.’ With repeated readings, we can feel the Guru’s messages reaching out to us and then we internalize the greatness of the Creator. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
The Concept Of A Living Guru
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top