☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Sikhism And Homosexuality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="drkhalsa" data-source="post: 59145" data-attributes="member: 384"><p>Dear KDS1980</p><p></p><p>Please escuse me for short reply as I am quite bust these days .We can discuss these in details sometime </p><p></p><p>About the study : my firend its not easy to really get what the study wants to teel and its practicle implications .It takes many years to train mind of medical students and doctors to understand how to read such studies for use in clinical practice I am still in the learning priocess and I expect that you alos wont be able to get good conclusions preety easily </p><p></p><p>Siad all that I have read the page you posted link : few main points</p><p></p><p>1) There is general agreement about how enviornment effects genderidentity and this study tries to to give alternative hypothesis Its still hypotheses and one study just cant make new rule sin medical science </p><p>2) even going by study to be absolute perfect study model( which is always immpossible) you statement </p><p>still stands wrong !</p><p></p><p>why yur statement is based on these lines I guess</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>these lines are not telling anything definate in medical terms in all these patients there is normal production of Testosterone ( instead of predominant estrogen ) to definaely 100% od them are expected and should be showing male characters and typical male sexual interest even if single patient out of it shows something otherwise IT IS HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT because even in presence of male hormones there enviornment made impact and this what is important not that in presense of testosterone all showed male charcters( it is obvious thing that should happen ).I know that study shows that no participants showed female charcter but wordused is TYPICAL and also there is no explanation in study why remaning 26 % of patients after knowing all this about their male thing dont want to revert back to male lifestyle </p><p></p><p></p><p>why study not say anything about it .This is shows the imperfection of study ( just like all studies done in such rare disease)</p><p></p><p>YOUR STAEMENT CAN BEST MODIFIED AS </p><p>ENVIORNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE DECIDING IMPACT ON SEXUALITY ( as far as I know no literaure says otherwise )</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All about this post DOES NOT HAVE MUCH TO RELATE TO HOMOSEXULAITY AS THREAD IS ABOUT IT SO ALL THESE POST ARE DEVIATION FROM IT AS ALL THESE PATIENTS ARE ABNORMAL PHYSICALY AND NOT HOMOSEXUAL IN ANY WAY </p><p></p><p></p><p>THE ONLY STATEMENT SIGNIFICANT ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY IN THE STUDY WAS </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Also important statement is :</p><p></p><p></p><p>If we go by your earlier conclusion then there is no room left for option and everybody should be advised to go by genetic gender but Dr William G. Reiner does not think so as clearly evident fronm this statement </p><p></p><p></p><p>I dont know whether I have explained something or created more confusion .in later case I m sorry </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Jatinder SIngh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="drkhalsa, post: 59145, member: 384"] Dear KDS1980 Please escuse me for short reply as I am quite bust these days .We can discuss these in details sometime About the study : my firend its not easy to really get what the study wants to teel and its practicle implications .It takes many years to train mind of medical students and doctors to understand how to read such studies for use in clinical practice I am still in the learning priocess and I expect that you alos wont be able to get good conclusions preety easily Siad all that I have read the page you posted link : few main points 1) There is general agreement about how enviornment effects genderidentity and this study tries to to give alternative hypothesis Its still hypotheses and one study just cant make new rule sin medical science 2) even going by study to be absolute perfect study model( which is always immpossible) you statement still stands wrong ! why yur statement is based on these lines I guess these lines are not telling anything definate in medical terms in all these patients there is normal production of Testosterone ( instead of predominant estrogen ) to definaely 100% od them are expected and should be showing male characters and typical male sexual interest even if single patient out of it shows something otherwise IT IS HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT because even in presence of male hormones there enviornment made impact and this what is important not that in presense of testosterone all showed male charcters( it is obvious thing that should happen ).I know that study shows that no participants showed female charcter but wordused is TYPICAL and also there is no explanation in study why remaning 26 % of patients after knowing all this about their male thing dont want to revert back to male lifestyle why study not say anything about it .This is shows the imperfection of study ( just like all studies done in such rare disease) YOUR STAEMENT CAN BEST MODIFIED AS ENVIORNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE DECIDING IMPACT ON SEXUALITY ( as far as I know no literaure says otherwise ) All about this post DOES NOT HAVE MUCH TO RELATE TO HOMOSEXULAITY AS THREAD IS ABOUT IT SO ALL THESE POST ARE DEVIATION FROM IT AS ALL THESE PATIENTS ARE ABNORMAL PHYSICALY AND NOT HOMOSEXUAL IN ANY WAY THE ONLY STATEMENT SIGNIFICANT ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY IN THE STUDY WAS Also important statement is : If we go by your earlier conclusion then there is no room left for option and everybody should be advised to go by genetic gender but Dr William G. Reiner does not think so as clearly evident fronm this statement I dont know whether I have explained something or created more confusion .in later case I m sorry Jatinder SIngh [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Sikhism And Homosexuality
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top