☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Social Lounge
Relationships
Love & Marriage
Sikh Girls Marrying Non Sikhs In India
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Balbir27" data-source="post: 214483" data-attributes="member: 21905"><p>[USER=21923]@An Humble Creature[/USER] </p><p></p><p>ਕੇਰਪਾ ਕਾਰਕੇ ਮੈਨੂ ਸਰ ਨਾਂ ਅਡਰੈਸ ਕਰੋਜੀ।</p><p></p><p>ਜੇ ਤੂਆਨੂ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸੌਖੀ ਲਾਗਦੀ ਹੈ ਤਾ ਉਹੀ ਵਰਤੋਜੀ। (Apologies for any errors)</p><p></p><p>You addressed your answer to [USER=9004]@balbir singh[/USER]. I’m sorry I do not know who that is. Perhaps you may wish to be more accurate in future to avoid confusion. There may be thousands with that name on this planet or on this forum. Accuracy, at least for me, is important. I assume however, that you actually <em>meant to address me</em>,(if not please disregard), so here are my thoughts:</p><p></p><p>I seem to have touched something in you and hurt something really bad. For that, please accept my unreserved apologies for it is never my intention to hurt, but it is always my intention to <em>learn and correct and learn from my corrections</em>. I could not be fairer to myself than that. I don’t know about anybody else.</p><p></p><p>You may wish to ponder on this - I remember, long ago, I had presented a case, in writing, to a barrister who had commented “it’s a dog’s dinner, is it not?” He then took great pains to decipher what I had written and presented it in such a way that it made communicative and legal sense to the Judge. Take heart from this. The expectation from him was that despite my having “qualifications”, my presentation did not seem to translate into the expected “legal” standard. The “essence” was there, but the communication was “atrocious” (terrible) or “a dog’s dinner” for him. So what is “atrocious” for somebody may be “flawless” for another. The reason, in my case, lay in the fact that our qualifications were in very different fields. However, I personally do not believe in qualifications. They are simply a means to an end and do not really show what that person really is. What <em>is</em> more important is a person’s <em>thoughts and deeds. </em>Those are the<em> true qualifications.</em> I was born without any ABC or D after my name and I shall die without any such letters attached to me. I believe that the only “qualifications” that my God will be considering would be my “<em>thoughts and deeds</em>” in the life I led. Maybe something more, but nothing less. I may be wrong, but that is my belief.</p><p></p><p>Aristotle actually used the word “animal” - <strong>“</strong><em><strong>Man is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human. Society is something that precedes the individual. Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self-sufficient as not to need to, and therefore does not partake of society, is either a beast or a god. ” </strong>Is that what you meant?</em></p><p></p><p>My personal beliefs do not include any discrimination whatsoever regarding, caste, colour, height, width, weight, dress, education, wealth, poverty, religion etc. If anyone believes otherwise, then it is entirely a matter of their own opinion, howsoever derived.</p><p></p><p>You wrote about something that I allegedly possess - “<em>treasure of knowledge</em>”. To me, <em>the more I learn, the less I seem to know and the more I realize how much I don’t know.</em> So, I do not know what treasure you are referring to. Perhaps you can enlighten me?</p><p></p><p>You stated that you cannot “<em>dare to correct, admonish or enlighten</em>”, me. Regardless if it is me or anyone else, the bottom line is that if you feel that someone is incorrect, rude or in the dark, then is it not your duty to correct, admonish or enlighten, as the case may be? Why do you feel that you cannot? That, I am unable to understand.</p><p></p><p>Thank you for enlightening me regarding the meaning of “Yachak”. Much appreciated.</p><p></p><p>I believe some people are awaiting your reply to some questions and issues that they have raised. Please do not let me distract you from your mission regarding “<em>social evil and social reform</em>” and that you are “<em>concerned about decline population ratio of community, every where in world</em>”.</p><p></p><p>Ek Oankar</p><p></p><p>Sat Sri Akal</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Balbir27, post: 214483, member: 21905"] [USER=21923]@An Humble Creature[/USER] ਕੇਰਪਾ ਕਾਰਕੇ ਮੈਨੂ ਸਰ ਨਾਂ ਅਡਰੈਸ ਕਰੋਜੀ। ਜੇ ਤੂਆਨੂ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸੌਖੀ ਲਾਗਦੀ ਹੈ ਤਾ ਉਹੀ ਵਰਤੋਜੀ। (Apologies for any errors) You addressed your answer to [USER=9004]@balbir singh[/USER]. I’m sorry I do not know who that is. Perhaps you may wish to be more accurate in future to avoid confusion. There may be thousands with that name on this planet or on this forum. Accuracy, at least for me, is important. I assume however, that you actually [I]meant to address me[/I],(if not please disregard), so here are my thoughts: I seem to have touched something in you and hurt something really bad. For that, please accept my unreserved apologies for it is never my intention to hurt, but it is always my intention to [I]learn and correct and learn from my corrections[/I]. I could not be fairer to myself than that. I don’t know about anybody else. You may wish to ponder on this - I remember, long ago, I had presented a case, in writing, to a barrister who had commented “it’s a dog’s dinner, is it not?” He then took great pains to decipher what I had written and presented it in such a way that it made communicative and legal sense to the Judge. Take heart from this. The expectation from him was that despite my having “qualifications”, my presentation did not seem to translate into the expected “legal” standard. The “essence” was there, but the communication was “atrocious” (terrible) or “a dog’s dinner” for him. So what is “atrocious” for somebody may be “flawless” for another. The reason, in my case, lay in the fact that our qualifications were in very different fields. However, I personally do not believe in qualifications. They are simply a means to an end and do not really show what that person really is. What [I]is[/I] more important is a person’s [I]thoughts and deeds. [/I]Those are the[I] true qualifications.[/I] I was born without any ABC or D after my name and I shall die without any such letters attached to me. I believe that the only “qualifications” that my God will be considering would be my “[I]thoughts and deeds[/I]” in the life I led. Maybe something more, but nothing less. I may be wrong, but that is my belief. Aristotle actually used the word “animal” - [B]“[/B][I][B]Man is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human. Society is something that precedes the individual. Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self-sufficient as not to need to, and therefore does not partake of society, is either a beast or a god. ” [/B]Is that what you meant?[/I] My personal beliefs do not include any discrimination whatsoever regarding, caste, colour, height, width, weight, dress, education, wealth, poverty, religion etc. If anyone believes otherwise, then it is entirely a matter of their own opinion, howsoever derived. You wrote about something that I allegedly possess - “[I]treasure of knowledge[/I]”. To me, [I]the more I learn, the less I seem to know and the more I realize how much I don’t know.[/I] So, I do not know what treasure you are referring to. Perhaps you can enlighten me? You stated that you cannot “[I]dare to correct, admonish or enlighten[/I]”, me. Regardless if it is me or anyone else, the bottom line is that if you feel that someone is incorrect, rude or in the dark, then is it not your duty to correct, admonish or enlighten, as the case may be? Why do you feel that you cannot? That, I am unable to understand. Thank you for enlightening me regarding the meaning of “Yachak”. Much appreciated. I believe some people are awaiting your reply to some questions and issues that they have raised. Please do not let me distract you from your mission regarding “[I]social evil and social reform[/I]” and that you are “[I]concerned about decline population ratio of community, every where in world[/I]”. Ek Oankar Sat Sri Akal [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Social Lounge
Relationships
Love & Marriage
Sikh Girls Marrying Non Sikhs In India
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top