☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Separate Taxis For Women In Mumbai, Exclusively For Woman Passengers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spnadmin" data-source="post: 123699" data-attributes="member: 35"><p><strong>Re: Separate Taxis for Women in Mumbai----Exclusively for woman passengers.</strong></p><p></p><p>rajneesh ji</p><p></p><p>You raise so many issues inside of one post that I cannot possibly react to all of them. Let me therefore tackle just one of them. When speaking of outsourcing there are basically two kinds: </p><p></p><p>1) off shore where the workers are not actually working or residing inside of a country (in this case the US) and </p><p></p><p>2) contracting jobs to companies that bring foreign workers into a country. In the latter case these workers need visas, in the case of the US either L-1 or H-1B visas. At the present time there is no limit on L-1 visas though there is a limit on HB-visas. Under an L-1 visa someone can work in the US for up to 2 years. </p><p></p><p>None of this applies to the situation you have described as I understand it, where women will lose jobs in India because of cuts to outsourcing on the US side. I understand you to be speaking of women who continue to live in India, while working for a US company. That makes them employees in an off-shore, outsourcing situation. </p><p></p><p>So here is the most recent information that I can find and it basically reinforces what I have said regarding "outsourcing." There is rumbling about restricting off-shore, outsourcing. No action to speak of.</p><p></p><p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>This is from a May 10, 2009 article in the Hindustani Times-- almost a year ago</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Blue fonts are my reactions inline. </span></p><p></p><p><strong>Anti-offshoring pitch, H-1B visa cap may affect biz: Infosys</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/sectorsbpos/Obama-remark-on-Bangalore-worrying-admits-Azim-Premji/Article1-408414.aspx" target="_blank">Obama remark on Bangalore worrying, admits Azim Premji</a> </strong></p><p></p><p> Terming the US President Barack Obama's tax reform proposal as a "worrying" development, Wipro chairman Azim Premji on Thursday said it was against what Obama said at the recent G-20 summit. </p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Here we can see that Obama has apparently said 2 different things, or his remarks have been interpreted in 2 different ways. This is politics.</span></p><p> </p><p></p><p> Expressing concerns over the <strong>possible measures </strong>by foreign countries, especially the US, to restrict off-shoring and movement of work visa-holders, Indian IT bellwether Infosys has said that such steps could adversely impact the company's business.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">No one is sure what will happen yet. Infosys is sending up a warning flag. </span></p><p></p><p><strong> The Obama administration has restricted the hiring of H-1B visa-holders by companies bailed out by the Federal government </strong>and recently announced a plan to end tax incentives for American entities generating jobs overseas.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Here we have two developments. Number 1 does not apply directly to the situation of the person in IT working/living in India. Of course, there can be unique situations that do apply, but the policy per se is not directed at workers in India. </span></p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">1) <strong>restriction of H-1B visas if a company has been bailed out the the US government. </strong>In other words their ability to hire foreign workers will be restricted, not eliminated. <strong>This affects only those foreign workers working and living in the US.</strong> </span></p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p><span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">2) Tax incentives would be removed for companies that generate overseas jobs. This is the removal of an incentive -- in other words, tax incentives or tax credits may be withheld. I did indicate that this might be a new policy. </span></p><p></p><p> Both moves are expected to impact the Indian IT sector, whose major chunk of revenues come from the US.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Yes this is possible. </span></p><p></p><p> Infosys has said that in the prevailing economic environment, there could be a change in the existing laws or the enactment of new legislation, restricting "offshore outsourcing" or imposing restrictions on the deployment of work visa holders at client locations.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">But so far nothing specific has been mentioned. </span></p><p></p><p> Such actions "may adversely impact our ability to do business in the jurisdictions in which we operate, especially with governmental entities," the IT firm said in its annual filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.</p><p></p><p> Nearly 60 per cent of Indian IT-Business Process Outsourcing industry caters to the US companies, according to latest figures. India's BPO industry employs over 17 lakh professionals. </p><p></p><p> Every year, a major chunk of the Indian professionals receive H-1B visas, which is basically a working visa for highly skilled people. In the previous fiscal year, nearly 8,200 Infosys employees held H-1B visas. <span style="color: Blue">These people will be affected. </span></p><p></p><p> Moreover, Infosys has pointed out the possibility of private sector companies working with these governmental entities, being restricted from outsourcing projects which are related to government contracts. <span style="color: Blue">Same</span></p><p></p><p> These firms could even face "disincentives if they outsource certain operations", the filing noted.</p><p></p><p><strong>Many foreign governments mainly in the US and the UK have pumped in billions of dollars into companies battered by the financial turmoil.</strong> In return, these administrations have snapped up significant stakes in those bailed out firms.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Here is one major reason why the new policies if enacted, as Infosys predicts, are not likely to have a mouthful of sharp teeth. We know that the corporate sector in the US is in large part foreign-owned. The government knows this too. So the on-shore visas will probably become bargaining chips in foreign policy discussions and disputes. It is a form of capital. </span></p><p></p><p> "Equity investments by governmental entities in, or governmental financial aid to, our clients may involve restrictions on the ability of such clients to outsource offshore or otherwise restrict offshore IT vendors from utilizing the services of work visa-holders at client locations," Infosys said.</p><p></p><p>On this point Infosys is expressing fears and has produced no evidence that i can see. There may -- I repeat myself - be tax penalties or changes in tax incentives affecting companies that engage in off-shore outsourcing. It could happen. </p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">There is a limit to how far this can go. The US government would be playing into two deficiencies in the American market place. 1) a severe shortage of IT talent at home; 2) policies that raise the cost of doing business beyond what American corporations can bear to remain even marginally profitable.</span></p><p></p><p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p><span style="color: Blue">This is from Obama's State of the Union address in January 2010, and the focus is on adjusting tax policies to make it less desirable to outsource. </span></p><p></p><p> <span style="color: Blue">from the targana blog</span> </p><p>(<a href="http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/obamas-state-of-the-union-address-how-it-impacts-outsourcing/" target="_blank">Obama’s State of the Union Address : How it impacts Outsourcing</a>) He stated that this is the time to end tax break to US firms that outsource their jobs to overseas and allow fresh tax breaks to those firms that create jobs within USA. The latter part of the last statement is an indirect threat to the outsourcing destination like India, Phillipines etc. Obama emphasised his previous comment in May, 2009 that job creation within US is his topmost priority and he advised outsourcing company to choose "Buffalo over Bangalore".<p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="color: Sienna">"To encourage … Businesses to stay within our borders, it is time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas, and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America," Obama said.</span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="color: Blue">The interpretation on the targana blog</span>. <span style="color: Sienna">"Although, most of the countries recovered from recession, the post recession period is still making a big dent in USA in terms of the single biggest issue like unemployment. That's why US president made this statement. However, outsourcing saves cost for many US industries , but, it creates an issue of unemployment within US. As a result of this, recession is further aggravated."</span></p><p> <span style="color: Blue"></span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">And I guess one insight from history is needed. The Democratic Party in the US has, with the exception of former president Bill Clinton, been a party that promotes protectionist policies. For that reason it has advocated policies that have a stultifying effect on international trade. It won't work anymore because there is nary a business of significant capitalization in the US that is not affected in some way by global economies. </span></p><p></p><p></p><p> Infosys has expressed concern that restriction on deployment of trained people at client locations could require the company to seek local talent. In such a case, the "local resources may only be available at higher wages," it said.</p><p></p><p> "Any resulting increase in our compensation, hiring and training expenses could adversely impact our revenues and operating profitability," the firm said.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">My point as above.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">So it makes sense to see where Infosys is with these predictions and concerns. How much has materialized. I do believe that visa restrictions have been implemented and they have adversely affected hiring of Indian nationals <strong>in the US. </strong> The off shore outsourcing -- I think we have to watch and wait.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">----------------------------------------------------------------------------</span></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Some recent historical background - pertaining to outsourcing to client locations only (visas for workers who are hired to work on US soil)</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">BILL MAY STALL OUTSOURCING OF L-1 VISA-HOLDERS IN US (the US bill to restrain companies from outsourcing their L-1 visa holders to client locations).</span></strong></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-23354364_ITM" target="_blank">Article: BILL MAY STALL OUTSOURCING OF L-1 VISA-HOLDERS IN US (the US bill to... | AccessMyLibrary - Promoting library advocacy</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spnadmin, post: 123699, member: 35"] [b]Re: Separate Taxis for Women in Mumbai----Exclusively for woman passengers.[/b] rajneesh ji You raise so many issues inside of one post that I cannot possibly react to all of them. Let me therefore tackle just one of them. When speaking of outsourcing there are basically two kinds: 1) off shore where the workers are not actually working or residing inside of a country (in this case the US) and 2) contracting jobs to companies that bring foreign workers into a country. In the latter case these workers need visas, in the case of the US either L-1 or H-1B visas. At the present time there is no limit on L-1 visas though there is a limit on HB-visas. Under an L-1 visa someone can work in the US for up to 2 years. None of this applies to the situation you have described as I understand it, where women will lose jobs in India because of cuts to outsourcing on the US side. I understand you to be speaking of women who continue to live in India, while working for a US company. That makes them employees in an off-shore, outsourcing situation. So here is the most recent information that I can find and it basically reinforces what I have said regarding "outsourcing." There is rumbling about restricting off-shore, outsourcing. No action to speak of. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is from a May 10, 2009 article in the Hindustani Times-- almost a year ago [COLOR=Blue]Blue fonts are my reactions inline. [/COLOR] [B]Anti-offshoring pitch, H-1B visa cap may affect biz: Infosys[/B] [B][URL="http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/sectorsbpos/Obama-remark-on-Bangalore-worrying-admits-Azim-Premji/Article1-408414.aspx"]Obama remark on Bangalore worrying, admits Azim Premji[/URL] [/B] Terming the US President Barack Obama's tax reform proposal as a "worrying" development, Wipro chairman Azim Premji on Thursday said it was against what Obama said at the recent G-20 summit. [COLOR=Blue] Here we can see that Obama has apparently said 2 different things, or his remarks have been interpreted in 2 different ways. This is politics.[/COLOR] Expressing concerns over the [B]possible measures [/B]by foreign countries, especially the US, to restrict off-shoring and movement of work visa-holders, Indian IT bellwether Infosys has said that such steps could adversely impact the company's business. [COLOR=Blue]No one is sure what will happen yet. Infosys is sending up a warning flag. [/COLOR] [B] The Obama administration has restricted the hiring of H-1B visa-holders by companies bailed out by the Federal government [/B]and recently announced a plan to end tax incentives for American entities generating jobs overseas. [COLOR=Blue]Here we have two developments. Number 1 does not apply directly to the situation of the person in IT working/living in India. Of course, there can be unique situations that do apply, but the policy per se is not directed at workers in India. 1) [B]restriction of H-1B visas if a company has been bailed out the the US government. [/B]In other words their ability to hire foreign workers will be restricted, not eliminated. [B]This affects only those foreign workers working and living in the US.[/B] 2) Tax incentives would be removed for companies that generate overseas jobs. This is the removal of an incentive -- in other words, tax incentives or tax credits may be withheld. I did indicate that this might be a new policy. [/COLOR] Both moves are expected to impact the Indian IT sector, whose major chunk of revenues come from the US. [COLOR=Blue]Yes this is possible. [/COLOR] Infosys has said that in the prevailing economic environment, there could be a change in the existing laws or the enactment of new legislation, restricting "offshore outsourcing" or imposing restrictions on the deployment of work visa holders at client locations. [COLOR=Blue]But so far nothing specific has been mentioned. [/COLOR] Such actions "may adversely impact our ability to do business in the jurisdictions in which we operate, especially with governmental entities," the IT firm said in its annual filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Nearly 60 per cent of Indian IT-Business Process Outsourcing industry caters to the US companies, according to latest figures. India's BPO industry employs over 17 lakh professionals. Every year, a major chunk of the Indian professionals receive H-1B visas, which is basically a working visa for highly skilled people. In the previous fiscal year, nearly 8,200 Infosys employees held H-1B visas. [COLOR=Blue]These people will be affected. [/COLOR] Moreover, Infosys has pointed out the possibility of private sector companies working with these governmental entities, being restricted from outsourcing projects which are related to government contracts. [COLOR=Blue]Same[/COLOR] These firms could even face "disincentives if they outsource certain operations", the filing noted. [B]Many foreign governments mainly in the US and the UK have pumped in billions of dollars into companies battered by the financial turmoil.[/B] In return, these administrations have snapped up significant stakes in those bailed out firms. [COLOR=Blue]Here is one major reason why the new policies if enacted, as Infosys predicts, are not likely to have a mouthful of sharp teeth. We know that the corporate sector in the US is in large part foreign-owned. The government knows this too. So the on-shore visas will probably become bargaining chips in foreign policy discussions and disputes. It is a form of capital. [/COLOR] "Equity investments by governmental entities in, or governmental financial aid to, our clients may involve restrictions on the ability of such clients to outsource offshore or otherwise restrict offshore IT vendors from utilizing the services of work visa-holders at client locations," Infosys said. On this point Infosys is expressing fears and has produced no evidence that i can see. There may -- I repeat myself - be tax penalties or changes in tax incentives affecting companies that engage in off-shore outsourcing. It could happen. [COLOR=Blue]There is a limit to how far this can go. The US government would be playing into two deficiencies in the American market place. 1) a severe shortage of IT talent at home; 2) policies that raise the cost of doing business beyond what American corporations can bear to remain even marginally profitable.[/COLOR] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [COLOR=Blue]This is from Obama's State of the Union address in January 2010, and the focus is on adjusting tax policies to make it less desirable to outsource. [/COLOR] [COLOR=Blue]from the targana blog[/COLOR] ([URL="http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/obamas-state-of-the-union-address-how-it-impacts-outsourcing/"]Obama’s State of the Union Address : How it impacts Outsourcing[/URL]) He stated that this is the time to end tax break to US firms that outsource their jobs to overseas and allow fresh tax breaks to those firms that create jobs within USA. The latter part of the last statement is an indirect threat to the outsourcing destination like India, Phillipines etc. Obama emphasised his previous comment in May, 2009 that job creation within US is his topmost priority and he advised outsourcing company to choose "Buffalo over Bangalore".[INDENT][COLOR=Sienna]"To encourage … Businesses to stay within our borders, it is time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas, and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America," Obama said.[/COLOR] [/INDENT][COLOR=Blue]The interpretation on the targana blog[/COLOR]. [COLOR=Sienna]"Although, most of the countries recovered from recession, the post recession period is still making a big dent in USA in terms of the single biggest issue like unemployment. That's why US president made this statement. However, outsourcing saves cost for many US industries , but, it creates an issue of unemployment within US. As a result of this, recession is further aggravated."[/COLOR] [COLOR=Blue] And I guess one insight from history is needed. The Democratic Party in the US has, with the exception of former president Bill Clinton, been a party that promotes protectionist policies. For that reason it has advocated policies that have a stultifying effect on international trade. It won't work anymore because there is nary a business of significant capitalization in the US that is not affected in some way by global economies. [/COLOR] Infosys has expressed concern that restriction on deployment of trained people at client locations could require the company to seek local talent. In such a case, the "local resources may only be available at higher wages," it said. "Any resulting increase in our compensation, hiring and training expenses could adversely impact our revenues and operating profitability," the firm said. [COLOR=Blue]My point as above.[/COLOR] [COLOR=Blue]So it makes sense to see where Infosys is with these predictions and concerns. How much has materialized. I do believe that visa restrictions have been implemented and they have adversely affected hiring of Indian nationals [B]in the US. [/B] The off shore outsourcing -- I think we have to watch and wait.[/COLOR] [COLOR=Blue]---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some recent historical background - pertaining to outsourcing to client locations only (visas for workers who are hired to work on US soil)[/COLOR] [B][SIZE=3]BILL MAY STALL OUTSOURCING OF L-1 VISA-HOLDERS IN US (the US bill to restrain companies from outsourcing their L-1 visa holders to client locations).[/SIZE][/B] [URL="http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-23354364_ITM"]Article: BILL MAY STALL OUTSOURCING OF L-1 VISA-HOLDERS IN US (the US bill to... | AccessMyLibrary - Promoting library advocacy[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Separate Taxis For Women In Mumbai, Exclusively For Woman Passengers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top