☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Social Lounge
Articles
General
Punjabi: Russia and Ukraine War Like Situation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dalvinder Singh Grewal" data-source="post: 222240" data-attributes="member: 22683"><p><a href="https://ondiplomacywarfare.quora.com/Many-military-analysts-predict-that-Russia-will-eventually-defeat-Ukraine-not-because-of-the-competency-of-its-armed-for" target="_blank">Many military analysts predict that Russia will eventually defeat Ukraine not because of the competency of its armed forces but because of Russia's overwhelming numbers. If that is so, why is NATO prolonging the inevitable?</a></p><p>That’s rather shortsighted. If military actions were always defined by simple numbers, then most of military history would cease to exist.</p><p>And if numbers really mattered we wouldn’t even be talking about this now. Russia would have already won. Russia had more tanks, IFvs, helicopters, artillery, and aircraft at the start of the war. They should have won within a week. After nearly three months, they still haven’t won. So right there, we can already toss the whole “numbers” theory out on its ear.</p><p>If the outcome of battles were always defined by who has the most “numbers,” then…</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Spartans would have lost the Battle of Thermopylae within hours…they held on for days.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">During WW2, the isle of Malta would have fallen within days under Luftwaffe bombardment…it never fell.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The light carriers of Taffy 3, attacked by Kurita and his fleet battleships (including the super battleship, Yamato), would have been utterly destroyed in hours…Kurita’s Center Force were turned away, by little destroyers and unarmored light carriers.</li> </ul><p><img src="https://qphs.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2cf59e71232c1d52f111b4fc4a951a6b-lq" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The 100 Texans at the Alamo should have fallen to Santa Ana’s 1,500 in hours…it took 13 days.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In 1939, Finland should have been overrun by the Soviets in a few days…5 years later, Finland lost “some territory” (about 11%).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Americans would have lost at Midway…they won.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Thousands of books have been written about these and hundreds of more examples.</li> </ul><p>Warfare is not all about simple numbers. It’s about tactics, maneuver, understanding an enemy’s capabilities, use of terrain, concentration of force, intelligence, deception, morale, and hundreds of more details. An analyst who looks at who has more troops and pronounces that the side with more is the winner, hasn’t studied military history.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dalvinder Singh Grewal, post: 222240, member: 22683"] [URL='https://ondiplomacywarfare.quora.com/Many-military-analysts-predict-that-Russia-will-eventually-defeat-Ukraine-not-because-of-the-competency-of-its-armed-for']Many military analysts predict that Russia will eventually defeat Ukraine not because of the competency of its armed forces but because of Russia's overwhelming numbers. If that is so, why is NATO prolonging the inevitable?[/URL] That’s rather shortsighted. If military actions were always defined by simple numbers, then most of military history would cease to exist. And if numbers really mattered we wouldn’t even be talking about this now. Russia would have already won. Russia had more tanks, IFvs, helicopters, artillery, and aircraft at the start of the war. They should have won within a week. After nearly three months, they still haven’t won. So right there, we can already toss the whole “numbers” theory out on its ear. If the outcome of battles were always defined by who has the most “numbers,” then… [LIST] [*]The Spartans would have lost the Battle of Thermopylae within hours…they held on for days. [*]During WW2, the isle of Malta would have fallen within days under Luftwaffe bombardment…it never fell. [*]The light carriers of Taffy 3, attacked by Kurita and his fleet battleships (including the super battleship, Yamato), would have been utterly destroyed in hours…Kurita’s Center Force were turned away, by little destroyers and unarmored light carriers. [/LIST] [IMG]https://qphs.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2cf59e71232c1d52f111b4fc4a951a6b-lq[/IMG] [LIST] [*]The 100 Texans at the Alamo should have fallen to Santa Ana’s 1,500 in hours…it took 13 days. [*]In 1939, Finland should have been overrun by the Soviets in a few days…5 years later, Finland lost “some territory” (about 11%). [*]The Americans would have lost at Midway…they won. [*]Thousands of books have been written about these and hundreds of more examples. [/LIST] Warfare is not all about simple numbers. It’s about tactics, maneuver, understanding an enemy’s capabilities, use of terrain, concentration of force, intelligence, deception, morale, and hundreds of more details. An analyst who looks at who has more troops and pronounces that the side with more is the winner, hasn’t studied military history. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Social Lounge
Articles
General
Punjabi: Russia and Ukraine War Like Situation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top