☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jass Singh" data-source="post: 21812" data-attributes="member: 1904"><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">My dear Inderjit</span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Let’s get one thing straight – I am just refuting a single & solitary assertion of your, namely your claim that </span></span></strong></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">I have not even addressed anything you might say about Sikhism or Christianity. If you are UNWILLING to admit that this is a false assertion of yours, we cannot discuss anything at all. If you really believe </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">it is utter nonsense to talk about proving me wrong. In your worldview you can never do that and only publicly announce your own ignorance & shortcomings. For according to your beliefs when I am wrong, I am right and this is perfectly compatible in your worldview. So what is your problem? It means that when you talk about ultimate reality, divine essence Sikh doctrine or Christianity or anything else it is utterly futile to do so in your worldview. In your worldview nothing is true and everything is true simultaneously & in the same sense! This is the height of lunacy and obviously you don’t believe your own worldview for you keep demanding proof. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">In reality you have no belief whatsoever because your beliefs are compatible with their contraries thus amounting to nothing. According to your worldview, you cannot have any questions because contraries & contradictions are compatible in your worldview. So why do you keep going on about me answering your questions? I don’t have to answer any questions, for your own worldview says contradictions are compatible. You have no right to ask me to supply you:</span></span></strong></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">Don’t you get it? Proof requires LOGIC but you say </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">There is no proving anything in your worldview. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">Now once you realize and admit that you are wrong about this very basic fact, we can continue logical argumentation. But as it is you are demanding logical argumentation and at the same time saying </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">Even an imbecile can see the stupidity of your assertions. LOGIC is a priori and stands over and against anything you might say to the contrary. You cannot annul and cancel the laws of logic by fiat. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">You do not even know when you talk nonsense for you turn around and say:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">And just what do you think the intellect is if not the faculty to reason? In reality you eat your own words by using & demanding the use of Logic and at the same time deny the laws of logic. </span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Although you claim to have the books by Ahluwalia, I do not for a minute believe it for you are still denying the quotes which are in the book in black & white. After all how hard is it to turn to the relevant pages and check? </span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Let’s start at the beginning. Answer these questions on how logic was annihilated. </span></span></strong></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">1. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">What is logic? </span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">2. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">What are the laws of logic?</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">3. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">Which laws of logic were annihilated?</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">4. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">How do you define annihilation?</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">5. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">When were they annihilated?</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">6. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">Who annihilated them?</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">7. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">Why were they annihilated?</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">8. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">What is proof?</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">9. </span></strong><strong><span style="color: green">How do you prove something without logic?</span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">That should be a good start & we can proceed to see just exactly what you mean when you say that:</span></span></strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: green">BTW when are you going to get Dr. Ahluwalia to join our discussion and back your assertion that </span></strong></span></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Jass Singh</span></span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jass Singh, post: 21812, member: 1904"] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]My dear Inderjit[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Let’s get one thing straight – I am just refuting a single & solitary assertion of your, namely your claim that [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=black][/COLOR][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]I have not even addressed anything you might say about Sikhism or Christianity. If you are UNWILLING to admit that this is a false assertion of yours, we cannot discuss anything at all. If you really believe [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=black][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]it is utter nonsense to talk about proving me wrong. In your worldview you can never do that and only publicly announce your own ignorance & shortcomings. For according to your beliefs when I am wrong, I am right and this is perfectly compatible in your worldview. So what is your problem? It means that when you talk about ultimate reality, divine essence Sikh doctrine or Christianity or anything else it is utterly futile to do so in your worldview. In your worldview nothing is true and everything is true simultaneously & in the same sense! This is the height of lunacy and obviously you don’t believe your own worldview for you keep demanding proof. [/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]In reality you have no belief whatsoever because your beliefs are compatible with their contraries thus amounting to nothing. According to your worldview, you cannot have any questions because contraries & contradictions are compatible in your worldview. So why do you keep going on about me answering your questions? I don’t have to answer any questions, for your own worldview says contradictions are compatible. You have no right to ask me to supply you:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][/FONT][/COLOR][FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]Don’t you get it? Proof requires LOGIC but you say [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=black][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]There is no proving anything in your worldview. [/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]Now once you realize and admit that you are wrong about this very basic fact, we can continue logical argumentation. But as it is you are demanding logical argumentation and at the same time saying [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=black][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]Even an imbecile can see the stupidity of your assertions. LOGIC is a priori and stands over and against anything you might say to the contrary. You cannot annul and cancel the laws of logic by fiat. [/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]You do not even know when you talk nonsense for you turn around and say:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]And just what do you think the intellect is if not the faculty to reason? In reality you eat your own words by using & demanding the use of Logic and at the same time deny the laws of logic. [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Although you claim to have the books by Ahluwalia, I do not for a minute believe it for you are still denying the quotes which are in the book in black & white. After all how hard is it to turn to the relevant pages and check? [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Let’s start at the beginning. Answer these questions on how logic was annihilated. [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]1. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]What is logic? [/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]2. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]What are the laws of logic?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]3. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]Which laws of logic were annihilated?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]4. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]How do you define annihilation?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]5. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]When were they annihilated?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]6. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]Who annihilated them?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]7. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]Why were they annihilated?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]8. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]What is proof?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]9. [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=green]How do you prove something without logic?[/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]That should be a good start & we can proceed to see just exactly what you mean when you say that:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Times New Roman][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=green]BTW when are you going to get Dr. Ahluwalia to join our discussion and back your assertion that [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=black][/COLOR][/B][/FONT] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Jass Singh[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top