☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jass Singh" data-source="post: 21151" data-attributes="member: 1904"><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Harsimiritkaur</span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Even Satan will quote scripture to suit his goals by twisting it, e.g. when he tempted Jesus at the beginning of His ministry. Your quote:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Is in correct the verse reads: “You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder” (JAM 2:19 NASB).</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The context & subject of this verse is belief/faith. The demons have a perfect theology of God and know the truth about ultimate reality. They give intellectual assent (i.e. agree with) to the truth about God and shudder because they also know their ultimate fate. </span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">You write:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Sure we have pakhandi Sikhs as well as pakhandi Christians. That is why GND </span></span></strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Guru Nanak Dev</span></span></strong> </span><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">said </span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">“sachahu orai sabh ko upar sach aachaar. </span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Truth is higher than everything; but higher still is truthful living (SGGS Page 62 M1).</span></span></strong> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">In other words</span></span></strong> <strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">walk the walk as a characteristic lifestyle & not merely talk the talk of intellectual assent to the truth. But when you say:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">your conclusion is incorrect for knowledge or intellectual assent divorced from a lifestyle characterized by obedience to the SGGS or the Bible does not necessarily mean that you never truly understood the message of God's grace and royal hukam. It simply does not follow and is a non-sequiter. You have left the will out of the equation. One might well understand the message of God's grace and royal Hukam but be simply unwilling to obey. </span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">What exactly do you mean by:</span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">You also say:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">You have incorrectly quoted Jesus. This is what I mean about the necessity of precision in articulating an argument. Jesus actually said: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words shall not pass away” (MAT 24:35 NASB). He did not say my “word” but my “words” plural and it means exactly that Jesus’ words not what you incorrectly read into it as:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">This is another example of your incorrect hermeneutics – the misinterpretation and twisting the truth of scripture to fit your syncretistic agenda. </span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">You write:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">God is spirit and is transcendent. He is not the physical universe itself. Modern science says that at the moment of creation, 4 of the 11 dimensions curled up in a singularity uncurled. These are the time-space continuum in which we live. The creator exists in at least 11 dimensions and He is beyond or transcends the space-time continuum. He is not the creation! He is not locked into the cage of His created physical time-space universe. </span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Regarding Jesus being God, you wrote:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">So what is your point? There are a lot of things that we do not understand but that does not mean they are untrue. There are mysteries that our finite minds will never understand. "The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our sons forever, that we may observe all the words of this law (DEU 29:29 NASB). The real question is are our beliefs warranted beliefs? </span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">You also wrote:</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: green"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Wow! And how do you know that? This is another example of an unjustified and unwarranted assertion. Why do you think it is an irrevocable and` non negotiable core belief of Christianity? </span></span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jass Singh, post: 21151, member: 1904"] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Harsimiritkaur[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Even Satan will quote scripture to suit his goals by twisting it, e.g. when he tempted Jesus at the beginning of His ministry. Your quote:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Is in correct the verse reads: “You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder” (JAM 2:19 NASB).[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]The context & subject of this verse is belief/faith. The demons have a perfect theology of God and know the truth about ultimate reality. They give intellectual assent (i.e. agree with) to the truth about God and shudder because they also know their ultimate fate. [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]You write:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Sure we have pakhandi Sikhs as well as pakhandi Christians. That is why GND [/FONT][/COLOR][/B][SIZE=3][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Arial]Guru Nanak Dev[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][FONT=Arial] [/FONT][/SIZE][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]said “sachahu orai sabh ko upar sach aachaar. Truth is higher than everything; but higher still is truthful living (SGGS Page 62 M1).[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][FONT=Arial][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]In other words[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][FONT=Arial][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]walk the walk as a characteristic lifestyle & not merely talk the talk of intellectual assent to the truth. But when you say:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]your conclusion is incorrect for knowledge or intellectual assent divorced from a lifestyle characterized by obedience to the SGGS or the Bible does not necessarily mean that you never truly understood the message of God's grace and royal hukam. It simply does not follow and is a non-sequiter. You have left the will out of the equation. One might well understand the message of God's grace and royal Hukam but be simply unwilling to obey. [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]What exactly do you mean by:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]You also say:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]You have incorrectly quoted Jesus. This is what I mean about the necessity of precision in articulating an argument. Jesus actually said: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words shall not pass away” (MAT 24:35 NASB). He did not say my “word” but my “words” plural and it means exactly that Jesus’ words not what you incorrectly read into it as:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]This is another example of your incorrect hermeneutics – the misinterpretation and twisting the truth of scripture to fit your syncretistic agenda. [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]You write:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]God is spirit and is transcendent. He is not the physical universe itself. Modern science says that at the moment of creation, 4 of the 11 dimensions curled up in a singularity uncurled. These are the time-space continuum in which we live. The creator exists in at least 11 dimensions and He is beyond or transcends the space-time continuum. He is not the creation! He is not locked into the cage of His created physical time-space universe. [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Regarding Jesus being God, you wrote:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]So what is your point? There are a lot of things that we do not understand but that does not mean they are untrue. There are mysteries that our finite minds will never understand. "The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our sons forever, that we may observe all the words of this law (DEU 29:29 NASB). The real question is are our beliefs warranted beliefs? [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]You also wrote:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=green][FONT=Times New Roman]Wow! And how do you know that? This is another example of an unjustified and unwarranted assertion. Why do you think it is an irrevocable and` non negotiable core belief of Christianity? [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top