☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="drkhalsa" data-source="post: 21110" data-attributes="member: 384"><p><strong><span style="color: navy">Dear Jass</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">Forgive me for delayed response as i was quite busy all these days</span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: darkslateblue">May Akal Purakh grant your wish</span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">I respect you intention od not intending to offend me . the uninvited response is not a thing that is very unsual if you happen to be in forums like this as on forums every body give their view about what is being disscused as this is open disscusion and personal disscusion could be done in private messages and no body ( especially fool like me) can interept so abruptly when you you are not accepting it . I was expecting such a response from you as I have been going through your posts on the forum ( just as a moderator ) and i found you to be very specific , logical , intellectual and thats the reason I asked for forgiveness in advance and I am reaaly very sorry as you found it to be inappropiate and vague . I will surely try to improve on myself with the Grace of Akal Purakh</span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">I believe you and Also thinks the same about both of you and I feel sorry for myself as I could very clearly appericiate your knowledge but could not precieve the disscusion to be of very depth most probably due my inability and shallow thinking</span></strong></p><p></p><p><strong>[<span style="color: darkorange">quote]</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: darkorange">I thought it was very rude of you to intrude and give the impression that harsimiritkaur was incapable of defending her own views. I was concerned about how you made her look. You could have shown more sensitivity by at least waiting for her to reply.</span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">I am again sorry for that </span></strong></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">But would like to mention the same thing you are accusing me you yourself has done very nice manner .If I have speaking as I I am defending Harsimratkaur and being rude to her then she should be one to say that before you do that for her . So have taken here liberty to speak for her just like me And I accept my Mistake</span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">Thanks for considering me brother and I have no problem with your intial reaction and thamks for forgiving </span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">And my reason for responding was eagerness , right but what resulted in that is the point you trying to disscus very in depth I can see very clearly without the deep disscusion ( as this the beauti of Sikhism)but I think it is really diificult for me to coney it ( my inability ) due lower intellectual mind set and that too again and again as people very very similar to as you, with very great knowledge of bible has been visting this forum and try to prove the same thing at least on two occasions well under different user name and has been always welcomed on the forum</span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">well this is your style and may be the shortcoming that you go by words and really miss the message the same you are trying to do with Bible and May be SGGS</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">My using AKAL as refering to him is just a style which was not used in SGGS and the reason it makes sense to me is that it helps me contemplating GOD in term of his qualities instead of defined noun as God is formless as per sikhism and it just helps me contamplating it remembering his qualities </span></strong></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">And the other reason could be my recently being involved in Bani of Dasam Patshah Guru Gobind Singh Ji as this is his style to use Akal as reference to god Directly in his bani </span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">And I would also reccommend you to try adding this to your knowledge bank as in my opinion it was written with intention to tackle problem you are facing understand smetic religious ideas relating to jesus as god and it has always helped gursikh to tackle mind set like you and one of our meber respected Vijaydeep Singh is very expert in it , you can definately benefit from him but as i told you he is bit tired of doing it alll again but he is always willing to help as a will of AKAL</span></strong></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">iwill give you link in next post of the previous disscusion with very similar intellectuals kike you </span></strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: navy">this is again an example where your understanding cripples in front of your knowledge as the bir you are refering as original was the bir which fell into hand of Dhirmal family and it was Bir prepared by fifith guruji and in face of the unavailabilty of bir at the time the very same GURU in the Tenth form again prepared the whole bir incuding the Bani of NiNth Form ( Guru Teg Bhadur Ji ) so it was the GURU NANAK himself in the tenth form that made sure the message from Akal purakh is recorded in a manner it was meant to be and to supplement that He even did Viakhiya ( detail Translation of all the message to the Singhs Of the time which included Baba Deep Singh ji who was first head of Damdami Taksal which is running till date </span></strong></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="drkhalsa, post: 21110, member: 384"] [B][COLOR=navy]Dear Jass[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]Forgive me for delayed response as i was quite busy all these days[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkslateblue]May Akal Purakh grant your wish[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]I respect you intention od not intending to offend me . the uninvited response is not a thing that is very unsual if you happen to be in forums like this as on forums every body give their view about what is being disscused as this is open disscusion and personal disscusion could be done in private messages and no body ( especially fool like me) can interept so abruptly when you you are not accepting it . I was expecting such a response from you as I have been going through your posts on the forum ( just as a moderator ) and i found you to be very specific , logical , intellectual and thats the reason I asked for forgiveness in advance and I am reaaly very sorry as you found it to be inappropiate and vague . I will surely try to improve on myself with the Grace of Akal Purakh[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]I believe you and Also thinks the same about both of you and I feel sorry for myself as I could very clearly appericiate your knowledge but could not precieve the disscusion to be of very depth most probably due my inability and shallow thinking[/COLOR][/B] [B][[COLOR=darkorange]quote][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange]I thought it was very rude of you to intrude and give the impression that harsimiritkaur was incapable of defending her own views. I was concerned about how you made her look. You could have shown more sensitivity by at least waiting for her to reply.[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/quote][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]I am again sorry for that [/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]But would like to mention the same thing you are accusing me you yourself has done very nice manner .If I have speaking as I I am defending Harsimratkaur and being rude to her then she should be one to say that before you do that for her . So have taken here liberty to speak for her just like me And I accept my Mistake[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]Thanks for considering me brother and I have no problem with your intial reaction and thamks for forgiving [/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]And my reason for responding was eagerness , right but what resulted in that is the point you trying to disscus very in depth I can see very clearly without the deep disscusion ( as this the beauti of Sikhism)but I think it is really diificult for me to coney it ( my inability ) due lower intellectual mind set and that too again and again as people very very similar to as you, with very great knowledge of bible has been visting this forum and try to prove the same thing at least on two occasions well under different user name and has been always welcomed on the forum[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]well this is your style and may be the shortcoming that you go by words and really miss the message the same you are trying to do with Bible and May be SGGS[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]My using AKAL as refering to him is just a style which was not used in SGGS and the reason it makes sense to me is that it helps me contemplating GOD in term of his qualities instead of defined noun as God is formless as per sikhism and it just helps me contamplating it remembering his qualities [/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]And the other reason could be my recently being involved in Bani of Dasam Patshah Guru Gobind Singh Ji as this is his style to use Akal as reference to god Directly in his bani [/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]And I would also reccommend you to try adding this to your knowledge bank as in my opinion it was written with intention to tackle problem you are facing understand smetic religious ideas relating to jesus as god and it has always helped gursikh to tackle mind set like you and one of our meber respected Vijaydeep Singh is very expert in it , you can definately benefit from him but as i told you he is bit tired of doing it alll again but he is always willing to help as a will of AKAL[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]iwill give you link in next post of the previous disscusion with very similar intellectuals kike you [/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=darkorange][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=navy]this is again an example where your understanding cripples in front of your knowledge as the bir you are refering as original was the bir which fell into hand of Dhirmal family and it was Bir prepared by fifith guruji and in face of the unavailabilty of bir at the time the very same GURU in the Tenth form again prepared the whole bir incuding the Bani of NiNth Form ( Guru Teg Bhadur Ji ) so it was the GURU NANAK himself in the tenth form that made sure the message from Akal purakh is recorded in a manner it was meant to be and to supplement that He even did Viakhiya ( detail Translation of all the message to the Singhs Of the time which included Baba Deep Singh ji who was first head of Damdami Taksal which is running till date [/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top