☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Is There A God?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Atheist" data-source="post: 128713" data-attributes="member: 10421"><p>Dear Seeker Ji,</p><p></p><p>Thank you for your comments. Despite Tejwant Singh Ji's claim what you said makes sense. </p><p></p><p>I will re-iterate, I originally posted this because I was curious about other people's beliefs. Hardly something to get criticized for. Unless of course one believes religion looks down upon curiosity...god knows that's how most christians feel I've talked to.</p><p></p><p>Onto Tejwant Singh Ji:</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Your being in the medicine field should be very aware of the correct language you use. Yes, I know you have made lots of wrong assumptions before and they are self evident in many of your own posts.</span></p><p></p><p>My my...you know if you read my entire response first it would not have even been a question what I was talking about. Yes I said "your article" but you were too concrete and assumed I meant "the article that YOU PERSONALLY WITH YOUR OWN HANDS wrote." As I explained before and if you had read my whole reply first, later on I mentioned that article was written by a christian (ie, NOT you). I don't know how much more clear I could have been. Once again I ASSUMED (yes ASSUMED) rather incorrectly that you got it. You didn't. I said "I have made wrong assumptions before" to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you just retorted and said "Yes, I know you have made lots of wrong assumptions..." Who does that??? I'm just here because I'm curious! You make it seem like such a crime. Has religion made you this utterly critical (not an assumption, a question)?</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">Once again, you said something totally different and feels insecure to apologise for the distortions. A truth seeker should be the first one to step forward in this manner. Now you seem to claim about most people's dispassionate side. One wonders how you jumped to the conclusion about others in this manner! It seems you claim to know more about others than about yourself. Once again, re read what you wrote, it has nothing to do with what you have said now in your post.</span></p><p></p><p>Frankly you have no idea what you're talking about. You claim to know that I feel insecure? And that I'm apologizing for distortions? Once again - I am here for my curiosity, and many people have satisfied my curiosity here but you are making ASSUMPTIONS (that's right - assumptions!) about me now. You are assuming that I'm jumping to unreasonable conclusions about other people and are bewildered by it. All I said was more than likely people are passionate about what they believe, WHATEVER THAT MAY BE. Why else would they be on this forum? Take you for example. You are so passionate about what you believe that you continue to challenge me and make these assumptions. Perhaps you are the one that should re-read what you wrote.</p><p></p><p>Please do not make assumptions about me and criticize me based on those faulty assumptions. I assumed you were not christian and passionate about your beliefs (whatever they are, and admittedly not the same as my beliefs - that's life). Am I right? And where does this notion come from that I am insecure? I am very secure in my beliefs, like I said again and again, I'm simply curious. If that's a religious crime, I want nothing to do with your religion.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Blue">It is hillarious to notice that you call other people's opinions as distortions. This is an opinion by someone as you have an opinion from the Atheist viewpoint. Shall we call your opinions as distortions? Yes, you did distort what I said and I corrected you by directing you towards my posts.</span></p><p></p><p>Wow you really just don't get it. What I said was that article (that YOU made me aware of but did NOT WRITE - are we on the same page now about it?) distorted atheism. And then you just took that to mean that I am calling other people's opinions as distortions...no, I'm saying THAT ARTICLE is distorted. Sheesh, if someone wrote an article about Sikhism and CLAIMED that sikhs believe in Jesus wouldn't you say that's a distortion? And then would it be right for me to accuse you of calling other people's opinions distortions? No, I would say "oh my, you are right to point out that this article made an incorrect claim." Seriously how much more clear can I make it.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, it's not to say I've learned nothing from you. I have learned the pantheistic side of Sikhism, something my parents did not teach. They made it seem much more like a personal god, and you make it seem like a pantheistic god. Again I am not criticizing, simply thanking you for satisfying my curiosity. </p><p></p><p>I will re-iterate again: I am here to satisfy my curiosity about why people believe what they do.</p><p></p><p>So, THANK YOU for sharing your beliefs with me. Although I can clearly see you jump to conclusions about me (like I'm insecure), I appreciate that you shared your pantheistic beliefs with me. An eye-opener!</p><p></p><p>Cheers!</p><p></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/sikhsmileys/happymunda.jpg" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happymunda:" title="Happymunda :happymunda:" data-shortname=":happymunda:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Atheist, post: 128713, member: 10421"] Dear Seeker Ji, Thank you for your comments. Despite Tejwant Singh Ji's claim what you said makes sense. I will re-iterate, I originally posted this because I was curious about other people's beliefs. Hardly something to get criticized for. Unless of course one believes religion looks down upon curiosity...god knows that's how most christians feel I've talked to. Onto Tejwant Singh Ji: [COLOR=Blue]Your being in the medicine field should be very aware of the correct language you use. Yes, I know you have made lots of wrong assumptions before and they are self evident in many of your own posts.[/COLOR] My my...you know if you read my entire response first it would not have even been a question what I was talking about. Yes I said "your article" but you were too concrete and assumed I meant "the article that YOU PERSONALLY WITH YOUR OWN HANDS wrote." As I explained before and if you had read my whole reply first, later on I mentioned that article was written by a christian (ie, NOT you). I don't know how much more clear I could have been. Once again I ASSUMED (yes ASSUMED) rather incorrectly that you got it. You didn't. I said "I have made wrong assumptions before" to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you just retorted and said "Yes, I know you have made lots of wrong assumptions..." Who does that??? I'm just here because I'm curious! You make it seem like such a crime. Has religion made you this utterly critical (not an assumption, a question)? [COLOR=Blue]Once again, you said something totally different and feels insecure to apologise for the distortions. A truth seeker should be the first one to step forward in this manner. Now you seem to claim about most people's dispassionate side. One wonders how you jumped to the conclusion about others in this manner! It seems you claim to know more about others than about yourself. Once again, re read what you wrote, it has nothing to do with what you have said now in your post.[/COLOR] Frankly you have no idea what you're talking about. You claim to know that I feel insecure? And that I'm apologizing for distortions? Once again - I am here for my curiosity, and many people have satisfied my curiosity here but you are making ASSUMPTIONS (that's right - assumptions!) about me now. You are assuming that I'm jumping to unreasonable conclusions about other people and are bewildered by it. All I said was more than likely people are passionate about what they believe, WHATEVER THAT MAY BE. Why else would they be on this forum? Take you for example. You are so passionate about what you believe that you continue to challenge me and make these assumptions. Perhaps you are the one that should re-read what you wrote. Please do not make assumptions about me and criticize me based on those faulty assumptions. I assumed you were not christian and passionate about your beliefs (whatever they are, and admittedly not the same as my beliefs - that's life). Am I right? And where does this notion come from that I am insecure? I am very secure in my beliefs, like I said again and again, I'm simply curious. If that's a religious crime, I want nothing to do with your religion. [COLOR=Blue]It is hillarious to notice that you call other people's opinions as distortions. This is an opinion by someone as you have an opinion from the Atheist viewpoint. Shall we call your opinions as distortions? Yes, you did distort what I said and I corrected you by directing you towards my posts.[/COLOR] Wow you really just don't get it. What I said was that article (that YOU made me aware of but did NOT WRITE - are we on the same page now about it?) distorted atheism. And then you just took that to mean that I am calling other people's opinions as distortions...no, I'm saying THAT ARTICLE is distorted. Sheesh, if someone wrote an article about Sikhism and CLAIMED that sikhs believe in Jesus wouldn't you say that's a distortion? And then would it be right for me to accuse you of calling other people's opinions distortions? No, I would say "oh my, you are right to point out that this article made an incorrect claim." Seriously how much more clear can I make it. Anyway, it's not to say I've learned nothing from you. I have learned the pantheistic side of Sikhism, something my parents did not teach. They made it seem much more like a personal god, and you make it seem like a pantheistic god. Again I am not criticizing, simply thanking you for satisfying my curiosity. I will re-iterate again: I am here to satisfy my curiosity about why people believe what they do. So, THANK YOU for sharing your beliefs with me. Although I can clearly see you jump to conclusions about me (like I'm insecure), I appreciate that you shared your pantheistic beliefs with me. An eye-opener! Cheers! :happymunda: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Is There A God?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top