☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Interviews
Implications Of Kirpan Ban In Rochester Gurdwara’s Lawsuit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spnadmin" data-source="post: 144777" data-attributes="member: 35"><p>Implications of Kirpan Ban in Rochester Gurdwara's Lawsuit</p><p></p><p>By Anju Kaur, SikhNN staff writer, Washington Bureau</p><p></p><p>What began last year as a commonplace lawsuit about control of the Gurdwara of Rochester, New York, has turned into a case with possible implications about the ability of Sikhs to freely carry Kirpans in the United States.</p><p></p><p>“I do not want to get into the issues relating to our own history and our current and future needs,” said Santokh Badesha, a member of the board of trustees and a plaintiff in the case. You are very aware of the Kirpan issues and counter arguments for and against. “Any of my answers …would have legal implication for our pending case.”</p><p></p><p>The World Sikh Council – America Region, an Ohio-based group of about 38 gurdwaras and seven organizations, stated it would accept nothing short of a full retraction of all Kirpan related items from court documents. The council became involved in the matter because Kirpan issues were interjected into the management dispute, representatives said.</p><p></p><p>According to court documents, in The trustees had first asked the court in May 2010, the trustees asked the Supreme Court in Monroe County, a lower state court, to issue a temporary restraining order to bar three members of the gurdwara for disrupting Sunday services. Among the other four relief items, they also asked that Kirpans be banned from the premises.</p><p></p><p>The judge granted all relief items, including a ban on Kirpans.</p><p></p><p>News reports spread quickly saying Amritdharis were banned from the Rochester gurdwara.</p><p></p><p>The trustees went back to court to modify the injunction order from a total ban to a conditional ban. The Jan. 11 order allows the gurdwara’s general secretary to approve, on a case-by-case basis, Kirpans that are less than six inches, and full-size Kirpans for grooms and visiting dignitaries. All Kirpans must be fully sheathed.</p><p></p><p>The temporary restraining order has been in effect for more than 10 months. Although these individuals have been barred from coming to the gurdwara, the trustees said having a blanket restriction on Kirpans was requested because of safety issues.</p><p></p><p>“…There is precedence for such governance disputes boiling over into violence,” said Badesha, also one of the original founders of the gurdwara more than 30 years ago, in his June 8, 2010, affidavit.</p><p></p><p>Of the two news articles from 2010 submitted as evidence, one is about a Kirpan stabbing in Canada. And the other is about a man brandishing a cleaver in an Ohio gurdwara. A Google search did not list any Kirpan violence incidents in the United States.</p><p></p><p>“We requested the size limit based on our and congregants’ safety concerns caused by the defendants’ actions inside the worship hall,” he added in an email to SikhNN.</p><p></p><p>A police report regarding an individual yelling and disrupting services was also submitted as evidence, but no violence was reported at the gurdwara.</p><p></p><p>In restricting Kirpans, the court imposed a broad injunction that impacts not only the parties affected, but also nonparties to the case, said Hansdeep Singh, senior staff attorney for United Sikhs, an international advocacy group based in New York. The judge can do this if he decides that this is their private property, and it has ceased to be a public place, he told SikhNN.</p><p></p><p>“I would reach that far only because one side over-played its hand in claiming that they feel their safety was threatened, and the court stepped in not looking at the religious impact,” he added.</p><p></p><p>“Sikhs in general have had to make non-Sikhs aware of the significance of the Kirpan,” said Satpal Singh, spokesman for the WSC-AR. There have been court cases brought by Sikhs arrested for wearing a Kirpan, especially after 9/11.</p><p></p><p>“If a gurdwara says there is no need for Amritdharis to carry a Kirpan. And in sworn affidavits it says that Guru Gobind Singh only instituted the Kirpan for Sikhs fighting Mughals, then this sets a precedent that can go a very long way (against Sikhs). People will say, what is your problem, a gurdwara says it’s not necessary.”</p><p></p><p>“How can our organizations fight for permission to wear Kirpans in schools, colleges and workplaces when our own people are putting a ban on the Kirpan inside a gurdwara,” said Gurrinder Singh Bedi, a defendant.</p><p></p><p>Other Sikh groups that were asked for comment either did not respond or stated they did not want to be associated with the case.</p><p></p><p>One advocacy attorney said, on condition of anonymity: “This whole scenario is a disaster for our work and that of other like-minded, active groups and individuals.”</p><p></p><p>United Sikhs said the ban on Kirpans creates a problem of perception.</p><p></p><p>“This absolutely presents more challenges for us,” Hansdeep Singh said. “We already have hurdles to overcome, and in this case, our own community has put our ability in jeopardy, …and undermined our arguments for us.</p><p></p><p>“We can, (however), distinguish these things, make it clear that they have no relation to cases in which we are seeking accommodations,” he said.</p><p></p><p>If made permanent, the ban can be challenged on First Amendment rights, he added. “(But) in barring Kirpans, it ceases to be a gurdwara in our eyes.”</p><p></p><p>The Akal Takhat echoed the same sentiment last month.</p><p></p><p>Unable to address the issue with the trustees, the WSC-AR, which was established under the patronage of the Akal Takhat, approached the highest seat of Sikh authority. The council’s envoy in Amritsar delivered copies of court documents to Jathedar Gurbachan Singh and his personal assistant, Jaswinder Pal Singh, at a meeting at least a month ago.</p><p></p><p>In its March 9 letter, the Akal Takhat responded angrily: “…Exploiting the American judges’ lack of complete knowledge about the Sikh faith, you have made highly misleading and false statements to them about the fundamental principles and rules of the Sikh faith. In these statements, you have mocked the holy Sikh Kakaars with the selfish motive of winning your lawsuit.”</p><p></p><p>The trustees had previously attempted to temper the Akal Takhat with the new court order to restrict rather than ban Kirpans. They met with its fact-finding committee in January, and then engaged in a conference call with the jathedar.</p><p></p><p>They also sent two letters to the Akal Takhat in late January and early February in which they justified the restrictions by saying that it is difficult for Sikhs to lawfully carry Kirpans in the United States that are greater than six inches.</p><p></p><p>“Sikhs have brought 22 cases since 9/11,” Hansdeep Singh said. “All were dropped.”</p><p></p><p>United Sikhs took part in two of the cases in which Kirpans were carried in public places. Both were dismissed in the interest of justice, under First Amendment protection, he said.</p><p></p><p>In another case, a college student in Detroit was arrested for bringing two Kirpans onto campus, a 5-inch and a 10-inch. The judge also dismissed that case, he said.</p><p></p><p>“We have more rights than that group is making it out to be.”</p><p></p><p>The Akal Takhat stated it considers the Kirpan restrictions equivalent to a full ban.</p><p></p><p>“A site or a religious place where there is any restriction of any kind on any of the Kakaars (Kirpan, Kanga, Kesh, Kachh or Karra) gifted by Guru Sahib, such site or place absolutely does not retain the right to be called a Sikh Gurdwara,” the Akal Takhat said in its letter to Badesha and the trustees. “Thus, in the current unfortunate situation created by you at the Gurdwara Sahib at Rochester, while under the facade of a modification there is relief on bringing in a 4”-6” Kirpan, the ban on the complete freedom of Guru approved Kirpan is still in place unchanged.”</p><p></p><p>In an email to SikhNN, Badesha responded: “Once the temporal issues are legally resolved, we would consider working with an independent body to readdress the Shri Sahib’s remaining issues, if there is any.”</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.sikhnn.com/headlines/1356/implications-kirpan-ban-rochester-gurdwara%E2%80%99s-lawsuit" target="_blank">http://www.sikhnn.com/headlines/1356/implications-kirpan-ban-rochester-gurdwara’s-lawsuit</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spnadmin, post: 144777, member: 35"] Implications of Kirpan Ban in Rochester Gurdwara's Lawsuit By Anju Kaur, SikhNN staff writer, Washington Bureau What began last year as a commonplace lawsuit about control of the Gurdwara of Rochester, New York, has turned into a case with possible implications about the ability of Sikhs to freely carry Kirpans in the United States. “I do not want to get into the issues relating to our own history and our current and future needs,” said Santokh Badesha, a member of the board of trustees and a plaintiff in the case. You are very aware of the Kirpan issues and counter arguments for and against. “Any of my answers …would have legal implication for our pending case.” The World Sikh Council – America Region, an Ohio-based group of about 38 gurdwaras and seven organizations, stated it would accept nothing short of a full retraction of all Kirpan related items from court documents. The council became involved in the matter because Kirpan issues were interjected into the management dispute, representatives said. According to court documents, in The trustees had first asked the court in May 2010, the trustees asked the Supreme Court in Monroe County, a lower state court, to issue a temporary restraining order to bar three members of the gurdwara for disrupting Sunday services. Among the other four relief items, they also asked that Kirpans be banned from the premises. The judge granted all relief items, including a ban on Kirpans. News reports spread quickly saying Amritdharis were banned from the Rochester gurdwara. The trustees went back to court to modify the injunction order from a total ban to a conditional ban. The Jan. 11 order allows the gurdwara’s general secretary to approve, on a case-by-case basis, Kirpans that are less than six inches, and full-size Kirpans for grooms and visiting dignitaries. All Kirpans must be fully sheathed. The temporary restraining order has been in effect for more than 10 months. Although these individuals have been barred from coming to the gurdwara, the trustees said having a blanket restriction on Kirpans was requested because of safety issues. “…There is precedence for such governance disputes boiling over into violence,” said Badesha, also one of the original founders of the gurdwara more than 30 years ago, in his June 8, 2010, affidavit. Of the two news articles from 2010 submitted as evidence, one is about a Kirpan stabbing in Canada. And the other is about a man brandishing a cleaver in an Ohio gurdwara. A Google search did not list any Kirpan violence incidents in the United States. “We requested the size limit based on our and congregants’ safety concerns caused by the defendants’ actions inside the worship hall,” he added in an email to SikhNN. A police report regarding an individual yelling and disrupting services was also submitted as evidence, but no violence was reported at the gurdwara. In restricting Kirpans, the court imposed a broad injunction that impacts not only the parties affected, but also nonparties to the case, said Hansdeep Singh, senior staff attorney for United Sikhs, an international advocacy group based in New York. The judge can do this if he decides that this is their private property, and it has ceased to be a public place, he told SikhNN. “I would reach that far only because one side over-played its hand in claiming that they feel their safety was threatened, and the court stepped in not looking at the religious impact,” he added. “Sikhs in general have had to make non-Sikhs aware of the significance of the Kirpan,” said Satpal Singh, spokesman for the WSC-AR. There have been court cases brought by Sikhs arrested for wearing a Kirpan, especially after 9/11. “If a gurdwara says there is no need for Amritdharis to carry a Kirpan. And in sworn affidavits it says that Guru Gobind Singh only instituted the Kirpan for Sikhs fighting Mughals, then this sets a precedent that can go a very long way (against Sikhs). People will say, what is your problem, a gurdwara says it’s not necessary.” “How can our organizations fight for permission to wear Kirpans in schools, colleges and workplaces when our own people are putting a ban on the Kirpan inside a gurdwara,” said Gurrinder Singh Bedi, a defendant. Other Sikh groups that were asked for comment either did not respond or stated they did not want to be associated with the case. One advocacy attorney said, on condition of anonymity: “This whole scenario is a disaster for our work and that of other like-minded, active groups and individuals.” United Sikhs said the ban on Kirpans creates a problem of perception. “This absolutely presents more challenges for us,” Hansdeep Singh said. “We already have hurdles to overcome, and in this case, our own community has put our ability in jeopardy, …and undermined our arguments for us. “We can, (however), distinguish these things, make it clear that they have no relation to cases in which we are seeking accommodations,” he said. If made permanent, the ban can be challenged on First Amendment rights, he added. “(But) in barring Kirpans, it ceases to be a gurdwara in our eyes.” The Akal Takhat echoed the same sentiment last month. Unable to address the issue with the trustees, the WSC-AR, which was established under the patronage of the Akal Takhat, approached the highest seat of Sikh authority. The council’s envoy in Amritsar delivered copies of court documents to Jathedar Gurbachan Singh and his personal assistant, Jaswinder Pal Singh, at a meeting at least a month ago. In its March 9 letter, the Akal Takhat responded angrily: “…Exploiting the American judges’ lack of complete knowledge about the Sikh faith, you have made highly misleading and false statements to them about the fundamental principles and rules of the Sikh faith. In these statements, you have mocked the holy Sikh Kakaars with the selfish motive of winning your lawsuit.” The trustees had previously attempted to temper the Akal Takhat with the new court order to restrict rather than ban Kirpans. They met with its fact-finding committee in January, and then engaged in a conference call with the jathedar. They also sent two letters to the Akal Takhat in late January and early February in which they justified the restrictions by saying that it is difficult for Sikhs to lawfully carry Kirpans in the United States that are greater than six inches. “Sikhs have brought 22 cases since 9/11,” Hansdeep Singh said. “All were dropped.” United Sikhs took part in two of the cases in which Kirpans were carried in public places. Both were dismissed in the interest of justice, under First Amendment protection, he said. In another case, a college student in Detroit was arrested for bringing two Kirpans onto campus, a 5-inch and a 10-inch. The judge also dismissed that case, he said. “We have more rights than that group is making it out to be.” The Akal Takhat stated it considers the Kirpan restrictions equivalent to a full ban. “A site or a religious place where there is any restriction of any kind on any of the Kakaars (Kirpan, Kanga, Kesh, Kachh or Karra) gifted by Guru Sahib, such site or place absolutely does not retain the right to be called a Sikh Gurdwara,” the Akal Takhat said in its letter to Badesha and the trustees. “Thus, in the current unfortunate situation created by you at the Gurdwara Sahib at Rochester, while under the facade of a modification there is relief on bringing in a 4”-6” Kirpan, the ban on the complete freedom of Guru approved Kirpan is still in place unchanged.” In an email to SikhNN, Badesha responded: “Once the temporal issues are legally resolved, we would consider working with an independent body to readdress the Shri Sahib’s remaining issues, if there is any.” [url]http://www.sikhnn.com/headlines/1356/implications-kirpan-ban-rochester-gurdwara%E2%80%99s-lawsuit[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Interviews
Implications Of Kirpan Ban In Rochester Gurdwara’s Lawsuit
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top