☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
How Buddha Talks About Shabad (Divine Light And Sound)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="muddymick" data-source="post: 186866" data-attributes="member: 14492"><p>Harryji,</p><p></p><p>"It has nothing to do with taste, it has everything to do with perception, today I like bacon, tommorow, I hate bacon, so do I like bacon or not?</p><p></p><p>I was using taste as both a description of the process and a predilection towards like or dislike. Of course that involves perception. And as I have already slightly belaboured in my last answer you are requesting an immutable truth for very mutable phenomena.</p><p></p><p>I am wondering if you are confusing objective truth and relative truth?A very common confusion.</p><p></p><p>"Lets stick with the piggy analogy, I agree with what you say above, but the question still remains, am I a bacon lover or not? </p><p>If you did agree or lets say understood what I had answered here you would realise that in light of it the question about a fixed state of liking bacon was impossible.</p><p>Your neither addressing my points not it would seem understanding them.</p><p></p><p>"The next time I hate bacon, do I run with it? or do I take a deep breathe and realise that the truth is that I love bacon and I just need to let this time pass? I wish to cut through these rising and cessating feelings, and know the true me, I need to know what my true feelings are on Mr Piggy"</p><p></p><p>If you had actually read and understood my previous statements regarding the mutable transient nature of phenomena you would neither ask the question nor expect an answerto that. </p><p></p><p>"f we apply this analogy to life, then there are things affecting our 'state' all around us, the woman at the bus stop in her mini skirt and high heels, the policeman in his patrol car parked up, looking for criminals, the chap in the alley way with a hoodie and a bulge in his pocket, (is that an eighth or are you just pleased to see me?), the argument with our partner over breakfast, the puppy leaving a huge stain of doggypoo on your already stained t shirt, a nice hot bath, I believe that a natural state not only exists, but can exist despite external stimuli, a Sikh would view the woman at the bus stop as a sister/mother/daughter regardless of dress, the policeman as a friend, not an enemy, the hoodie without being afraid, would not argue, and would hug the puppy and change t shirts, the natural state of a Sikh can only be obtained once one knows oneself, and one can only know oneself when the fog of duality has been lifted. It is not good enough to go with feelings, feelings lie, I need to know about whether I like bacon or not dammit"</p><p></p><p>This is just a regurgitation of your previous postulation and as I have already quite clearly stated such questions vis-a-vis immutable answers make no sense.</p><p></p><p>You are now beginning to confuse relative and objective truth. When you talk about non-dual states and mundane phenomena.</p><p></p><p>I never suggested "going with feelings" and have been quite clear on a number of occasions that I do not suggest that, just because they are real does not mean they should be acted upon! </p><p></p><p>"this is an oxy{censored}, you cannot have your cake and eat it my friend. I act on the feelings I feel are valid, I try not to act on those that are not, maybe we are at cross purposes on the words 'real' and 'true', yes, all feelings are real, but, in my opinion, not all are true, by your statement above, you are conceding this, as your discernment is a device to decide yourself what is true and what is false"</p><p></p><p>Sorry it is neither an oxy{censored} nor is it contradictory.</p><p> I think again you may be need to define what you mean by true in a relative or objective sense because you seem to confuse them.</p><p></p><p>"as your discernment is a device to decide yourself what is true and what is false"</p><p>No it is not, and you really need to decide what you mean by truth and whether you are referring to relative or objective truth. If you muddle them together it makes no sense especially when refering to non-dual realities and paradigms.</p><p></p><p>I think it is often referred to as conventional and ultimate truth...it might be worth looking up.</p><p></p><p>"I firmly believe the Gurus meant us to mentally debate with ourselves"</p><p>I have absolutely no proof of that, however the proof on the other hand is very compelling and holds weight with many scholars.</p><p></p><p>"I do not agree to it being highly unlikely"</p><p>I think the evidence speaks more than simple opinions however often stated.</p><p></p><p>"I do however, believe it highly unlikely that the Gurus meant us to sit in dark rooms"</p><p>I think this is a red herring and also a slightly underhand way at discrediting another's postulation. No one has suggested sitting in dark rooms.....</p><p></p><p></p><p>"meditating on the name of God"</p><p>I think this you will find is very much prescribed by the Guru's and very explicitly</p><p></p><p>With deep Regards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="muddymick, post: 186866, member: 14492"] Harryji, "It has nothing to do with taste, it has everything to do with perception, today I like bacon, tommorow, I hate bacon, so do I like bacon or not? I was using taste as both a description of the process and a predilection towards like or dislike. Of course that involves perception. And as I have already slightly belaboured in my last answer you are requesting an immutable truth for very mutable phenomena. I am wondering if you are confusing objective truth and relative truth?A very common confusion. "Lets stick with the piggy analogy, I agree with what you say above, but the question still remains, am I a bacon lover or not? If you did agree or lets say understood what I had answered here you would realise that in light of it the question about a fixed state of liking bacon was impossible. Your neither addressing my points not it would seem understanding them. "The next time I hate bacon, do I run with it? or do I take a deep breathe and realise that the truth is that I love bacon and I just need to let this time pass? I wish to cut through these rising and cessating feelings, and know the true me, I need to know what my true feelings are on Mr Piggy" If you had actually read and understood my previous statements regarding the mutable transient nature of phenomena you would neither ask the question nor expect an answerto that. "f we apply this analogy to life, then there are things affecting our 'state' all around us, the woman at the bus stop in her mini skirt and high heels, the policeman in his patrol car parked up, looking for criminals, the chap in the alley way with a hoodie and a bulge in his pocket, (is that an eighth or are you just pleased to see me?), the argument with our partner over breakfast, the puppy leaving a huge stain of doggypoo on your already stained t shirt, a nice hot bath, I believe that a natural state not only exists, but can exist despite external stimuli, a Sikh would view the woman at the bus stop as a sister/mother/daughter regardless of dress, the policeman as a friend, not an enemy, the hoodie without being afraid, would not argue, and would hug the puppy and change t shirts, the natural state of a Sikh can only be obtained once one knows oneself, and one can only know oneself when the fog of duality has been lifted. It is not good enough to go with feelings, feelings lie, I need to know about whether I like bacon or not dammit" This is just a regurgitation of your previous postulation and as I have already quite clearly stated such questions vis-a-vis immutable answers make no sense. You are now beginning to confuse relative and objective truth. When you talk about non-dual states and mundane phenomena. I never suggested "going with feelings" and have been quite clear on a number of occasions that I do not suggest that, just because they are real does not mean they should be acted upon! "this is an oxy{censored}, you cannot have your cake and eat it my friend. I act on the feelings I feel are valid, I try not to act on those that are not, maybe we are at cross purposes on the words 'real' and 'true', yes, all feelings are real, but, in my opinion, not all are true, by your statement above, you are conceding this, as your discernment is a device to decide yourself what is true and what is false" Sorry it is neither an oxy{censored} nor is it contradictory. I think again you may be need to define what you mean by true in a relative or objective sense because you seem to confuse them. "as your discernment is a device to decide yourself what is true and what is false" No it is not, and you really need to decide what you mean by truth and whether you are referring to relative or objective truth. If you muddle them together it makes no sense especially when refering to non-dual realities and paradigms. I think it is often referred to as conventional and ultimate truth...it might be worth looking up. "I firmly believe the Gurus meant us to mentally debate with ourselves" I have absolutely no proof of that, however the proof on the other hand is very compelling and holds weight with many scholars. "I do not agree to it being highly unlikely" I think the evidence speaks more than simple opinions however often stated. "I do however, believe it highly unlikely that the Gurus meant us to sit in dark rooms" I think this is a red herring and also a slightly underhand way at discrediting another's postulation. No one has suggested sitting in dark rooms..... "meditating on the name of God" I think this you will find is very much prescribed by the Guru's and very explicitly With deep Regards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
How Buddha Talks About Shabad (Divine Light And Sound)?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top