☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Bachittar Natak
Harinder Singh Mehboob's Essay On The Dasam Granth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zafarnamah" data-source="post: 157549" data-attributes="member: 10472"><p>Please see Harinder Singh Mehboob's Essay on the <a href="http://www.academicroom.com/humanities/religion/sikhi/sikh-sources-%281469-1849%29/early-sikh-sources-gurmukh%C4%AB-script/dasam-gra%E1%B9%85th" target="_blank">Dasam Granth</a></p><p></p><p>1</p><p>Dasam Granth: The Question of Authenticity</p><p>Harinder Singh Mahboob</p><p></p><p>When the earthly sojourn of the Tenth Master was nearing its end at Nanded, he gathered the small bunch of his devout followers around him, and declared in an emphatic but revelational tone, “I am soon leaving my visible abode of divine law [Drmswl in the jpujI], but I will not leave you in utter loneliness. I entrust to the ambrosial reservoir of immortal Word,</p><p>the finality of which is preserved by my super insight in the Damdami Bir. I bestow the divine gift of Gurgaddi upon the Guru Granth Sahib—an everlasting spirit of the Ten Guru-Prophets."</p><p></p><p>These echoes of divine Faith made a powerful tradition, which had appeared in all channels of history of the Khalsa, facing no obstruction in its continuity. The Sikhs have been making solutions to their great Scripture, and thus paying their obeisance to no other Scripture as</p><p>their Guru, since the physical departure of the Tenth Master. No student of history witnesses any gap, any contradiction and any obstruction in the endless flow of this divine practice.</p><p></p><p>Thus the prophetic faith of Guru Gobind Singh, transcending all illusory forms of knowledge and rejecting all false masks of poesy, but embracing none but the Supreme Word revealed his final commitment to the Guru Granth Sahib as the only eternal Guru of the Khalsa. Guru Gobind Singh never mentioned existential validity as well as the historic</p><p>whereabouts of the Dasam Granth anywhere.</p><p></p><p>1. The tenth Guru didn't give any clue of a single volume of the Dasam Granth as revealed or compiled by him. Sainapat (the author of the Sri Gur</p><p>Sobha) and Koer Singh (author of the Gur Bilas Patshahi Das) were, undoubtedly, influenced by some unauthentic but contemporary poetic compositions such as the Bachitar Natak (the fabulous autobiography of the 10th Guru) and the Chandi Charitars (I and II) which were</p><p>incorporated in one of the so-called Dasa Granths (actually voluminous collections of different "Bachitar Nataks") near the first half of the eighteenth century, but these two famous poets didn't give any trace of the existence of a single volume of the Dasam Granth in their epics. So I</p><p>conclude, in all humility, that the title of the Dasam Granth is a misnomer.</p><p>1 All references that follow are from Srī Dasam Granth Sāhib, 2 vols. (Amritsar: Bhāī Jawāhar</p><p></p><p>Singh, Bhāī Kirpāl Singh and Sons, 1967).</p><p></p><p>2. Guru Gobind Singh was not the author of the bulky part of the Dasam Granth. I ascribe only a slim part of it to his genuine authorship. Even this slim part, which includes the Jap, the Akal Ustat, the Shabad Hazare, the Swayyas and the Zafarnama, does not become a single whole,</p><p>displaying and contemplating its structural beauty. The arrangement of compiling of these highly socio-metaphysical compositions of the master is arbitrary. Therefore, we see that these true Dasam Guru-Banis are scattered in a haphazard manner in the Dasam Granth. There</p><p>is an exception also. We witness an absurd intrusion of Brahamanical reflexes in the Akal Ustat.</p><p></p><p>The devotee finds 20 Kiratas (numbers 210 to 230) eulogizing Chandi (other names Durga, Bhagwati and Siva). Thus even here the purity of genuine text is impaired by the false compilers.</p><p></p><p>I divide this paper in the following sections to justify my analytical conclusions, long cherished poetic experiences and meditations on the metaphysical Sikh literature.</p><p></p><p><strong>I. The Dasam Granth vs. the Guru Granth Sahib</strong></p><p><strong></strong>The blessed status of an eternal spiritual preceptor granted to the Guru Granth Sahib in his final meeting with the Khalsa shows that Guru Gobind Singh's contemplative understanding of Gurgaddi to his scripture was perfect. It proves that he was in an absolute command of plunging deeply into the far reaching mysteries of the Guru Granth Sahib. It means</p><p>the tenth master would never betray his distinct religious cause as envisioned in the Guru Granth Sahib like Minerva—insights awakening the age-long human ordeals of truthful struggles. How could he contradict the unique transmutation of rare Guru-inspiration of his Guru Scripture by incorporating in the Dasam Granth the stale, stereotyped and static</p><p>descriptions of mythological characters of feeble symbolical significance and artificial combinations of explosive sounds?</p><p></p><p>a. The Gods, Goddesses and Avtars in the Dasam Granth: The authors of the Dasam Granth in the Chandi Charitars (Parts I, II) shower praises on Chandi and her other manifestations in profusion, bring forth twenty four incarnation of Vishnu in the Chaubis Avtar, give seven mythological descriptions of Brahma in the Brahma Avtar and describe two forms of Rudra (Siva) in the Rudra Avtar in such a manner that these</p><p>Brahamanical gods, goddesses and avtars inevitably tend to become the center of worship for the devotees of other religions. Thus these heroes of Hindu Mythology create a hotchpotch situation in the pure conceptual centers of Sikhism also.</p><p></p><p>The Dasam Granth concludes in some scattered lines that the purpose of these poetical narrations of mythological gods/goddesses is to intensify the religious felicity in the hearts of devotees (i.e. the Khalsa) to escalate lawful battles against the opponents of God. In my humble opinion this statement should would prove to be a wrong hypothesis as the bulky size of the descriptions of Brahamanical Gods doesn't justify their declared purposes of holy war. The reader is caught in the meshes of ritualistic</p><p>worship of these Hindu Gods, and as a result of the dense mythological atmosphere will never allow the devotees to realize the sanctity, faith and fervor of the religious mission as propounded in the concluding sections of these gods and goddesses. The declared pious mission becomes meaningless and stands isolated. It is in reality a misguiding hallucination. The poetical presentation of the fables of gods, goddesses and avtars are a shrewd device to prepare the Khalsa-consciousness to surrender itself</p><p>to the mythological heroes and heroines of the Brahamanical cult. Thus the declared missionary slogans in the poetical compositions of the Dasam Granth are false temptations. The dominating Brahamanical atmosphere in these fables becomes an arbitrary movement which ensnares ultimately the natural freedom of Khalsa-mind.</p><p></p><p>The pious manifests of religious battles as mentioned in the Bachitar Natak and other poetical compositions of the Dasam Granth becomes null and void when it is followed by the paraphernalia of inert tales. The brief but sacred claims made in these pansanic kathas find themselves enveloped in the superstitions contents, false assumptions and disconnected visions.</p><p>The gods, goddesses and avtars of Indian mythology along with ancient Hindu scriptures are not used in the Guru Granth Sahib as full fledged, exuberant and selfdependent personalities of super-status transmitting themselves into independent worship centers. They are merely used in the Adi Granth as literary illustrations of some higher truth, symbols, metaphors, similes or sole references. Their role doesn't</p><p>move beyond the main/dominating contents of the Guru Granth Sahib. They never aspire to establish the limited sovereignty of their divinity over the vast devotional system of the Guru Granth Sahib. Their existence serves the solitary purpose of enhancing their literary genres. Vishnu, Shiva, Ram, Krishna and devis and so many other manifestations in their line never transcend the spiritual fabric of the Guru Granth Sahib, posing themselves as free spiritual preceptors.</p><p> </p><p>As far as vision of God is concerned, the Dasam Granth, with the exception of five Banis, presents a perspective that is contrary to the vision and total sensibility of the Guru Granth Sahib. Leaving aside the question of Supreme Reality without any substitute, it gives priority to the worship of countless godly existences. In human thought and imagination they move freely in their supernatural realms, but practically they descend on earth in their solid, stagnant and shrunk forms as idols for worship. The flat and single layered consciousness of mythological forms doesn't make proper</p><p>harmony with abstract realms of divinity of the Guru Granth Sahib. The result is that anthropomorphic existences in their super frenzy dominate the bulky sections of the Dasam Granth. The dense and nebulous pageants of the haphazard dramas (nwtk) of Indian mythology-cum-history do not allow a free entry into the spheres of divine realization of one God of the Guru Granth Sahib. With the exception of five banis, the Dasam Granth doesn't present a harmonious vision that leads the prayers of man to the</p><p>Region of Eternal Truth (sc KMf in the jpujI ), where only the bliss of One God burgeons forth. In the Dasam Granth, the isolated poetic sensibilities of heterogeneous contents, structural deformity and hotchpotch compilations dominate. The unbalanced literary genres of the Dasam Granth do no prove the credibility of their declared purposes and unified vision. The bulky size of its dominating material convinces the reader definitely of its original impulse relating to avtar-worship. It shows a world of difference between the Guru Granth Sahib and the Dasam Granth.</p><p></p><p>b. Religious Battles, Explosive Sounds, and Worship of Weapons: According to numerous religious commentators of Sikhism, the battles, described in the different poetical compositions of the Dasam Granth are not flat descriptions of a fabulous turmoil that is supposed to be enacted in the supernatural world of gods and goddesses. Many Sikh commentators believe that those battles being fought between Good and Evil on</p><p>the different planes of universal Existence are symbolical, justifying the radiant struggles of divine forces and their final victory against the intriguing arrogance of super devilish agencies.</p><p></p><p>Now I take liberty to disagree with the learned scholars on this point. The holy battles envisioned in the contents of the Bachitar Natak, the Chaubis Avtar and other stories of avtars do not transcend the hegemony of Brahamanical reflexes, the pretensions of human pride, the pettiness of mundane interests of man, exaggerative heroism, and above all the boastful attitude of godly/religious crusaders. Therefore, holy battles</p><p>being sung in poetic compositions of the Dasam Granth seldom qualify to plunge deeply into blissful experience of oceanic depths of one God, enjoying eternally his absolute freedom in the Guru Granth Sahib. The holy battles belong to the limited but repeated exercises of Brahamanical instincts that enjoy the dominance of their priest-savagery,</p><p>freely enacted and highlighted in these dramatic battles of the Dasam Granth. If the reader tries to enhance other meanings of the said battles, the results will be forced interpretation of the text. For example, Dr. Gurbhagat Singh, without giving any satisfactory perspective of "religio-martial texts" explains in his Sikhism And Postmodern Thought the purpose of using "the explosive language" full of "binaric tensions" in the following words:</p><p></p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The sharpened binaric sounds arranged in their fierceness to clank like swords, to twang like arrows or to pierce like bullets were intended to shatter the decadent environment and at the same time create a new person of a different bio-consciousness.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The meta-intention behind this was to affect the biology of the reader, to give a new nervous system.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">By creating his martial infra-structure of language, the Guru was certainly trying to reverse the bio-functioning of his reader, who was obviously either the decadent Muslim or the exhausted Hindu of his times….</li> </ol><p>I disagree with the learned scholar's viewpoint on the following logical grounds:</p><p></p><p>a. The texts upon which the learned scholar draws his formulations are unable to produce sufficiently the thematic integrity of their literary visions, the harmonious wholeness of their cosmic logic, the creative continuity of their intrinsic virtues and the invisible profundity of a balanced universal Truth.</p><p></p><p>b. The learned scholar totally insolates his main ideas, speculations and philosophic flights from the intrinsic experience of those texts upon which he seems to concentrate his theory. A thinker cannot create "a new person of a different bio-consciousness" in the absence of proper context of life-material and without the multifarious support of the complete and flawless cosmic vision. The visionary attempts to create the "binaric</p><p>tensions", "explosive sound-combinations" and "a new nervous system" would lead the human consciousness to a blind alley without the timely help of proper material and without the participations of a same guiding spirit.</p><p></p><p>c. There is no possibility in the “mortal structure of language” of the Dasam Granth to infuse an inspired collection courage or an enlightened spiritual bliss into the minds of oppressed classes—whether Muslims or Hindus—in the absence of an idea text fulfilling the cosmic needs of a multi-layered lyrical genius of the Guru Granth Sahib. Otherwise the attempt to create the collective fervor of social victory would prove to be an artificial assumption or the short-lived mirage of intellect.</p><p></p><p>Indeed, sensing the futility of his impracticable ideology and unconsciously building up its defense, Dr. Gurbhagat Singh says:</p><p></p><p>If these explosive sound-combinations are flaming red without the context, they are blind; but within the context they are directed". In my opinion, the context is very much there, but its poor structure is without the breath of creativity. Its lethargic body (form) never throbs with vibrant intensity. So this theory that shows "how the martial sound becomes haloed and telic" is baseless and doesn't give any definite clue or</p><p>creative proof of the authenticity of Dasam Granth to the seekers.4</p><p>d. It is an irony of uncreative/mechanical knowledge that the "martial infra-structure of long age, "eulogized profusely by the author of Sikhism And Postmodern Thought ultimately degenerates into the ritualistic worship of lifeless arms in the Shastra Nam Mala. These arms producing the artificial music of chanting swords, flaming flashes of dazzling speed and the boisterous joy of fighters are related to the celebrated characters of Hindu Mythology such as Ravana, Karan, Krishan, Meghnad, Bali, and Arjana in the rhymed composition of the Shastra Nam Mala. The divine arms in the</p><p>Dasam Granth, producing light and speed and looking haloed and sanctified, become dead objects of mechanical worship in their ending point. They deteriorate themselves into the absurd petrifactions of human consciousness. We cannot claim these static arms to be the symbols of some higher life. The manifestation of great truths need also</p><p>a vast perspective of universal dimensions. "The martial red poem"6 envisioned by Dr. Gurbhagat Singh in the Dasam Granth, is without proper context and no multidimensional artistic harmony supports its intrinsic hypothesis. The arms of the Dasam Granth take the devotees to a stagnant point of idol-worship. This process negates mercurial human consciousness and meditative joy of the Guru Granth Sahib.</p><p></p><p>II. The Question of Scriptural Authenticity of the Image of Woman in the</p><p>Dasam Granth The texts of the Charitrapakhyan and the Hakayats incorporated in the Dasam Granth remain at a far-off distance from the sublimest point of scriptural experience of the Guru Granth Sahib. The vast vision of the Damdami Bir, which encompasses the metaphysical dimensions of timeless bliss, apical grandeur of multifarious truth, mystical nuances of divine thrill, handsome proportions of universal life and a serene union of visible-invisible spiritual perspectives is absent from the enormous text of the Charitrapakhyan. The experience of the Charitrapakhyan and the Hakayats is shallow, disproportionate and extravagant. It does not add</p><p>any aesthetic serenity to the mystical/spiritual existence of the woman-image of the Guru Granth Sahib. The descriptions of the Charitropakhyan bring out the lewdness of a corrupt society. These compositions are unable to explore any deep psychology. The Charitropakhyan versifies particularly in an immoral vein the fantastic manners of unchaste woman. When the reader applies literary canons to valuate the Chartiropakhyan, its text remains below the mediocre genres of fine literature. The reader finds no visionary quest of the Guru Granth Sahib</p><p>in the pages of the Charitropakhyan, which present an obscene drama of monstrous libidinous containing more than four hundred pageants of degenerate humanity. There are, undoubtedly, the lyrical illustrations of the role of unchaste woman in the Guru Granth Sahib, but these literary genres never break the sanctity of its supreme woman-image. The</p><p>uncontrollable and intriguing sexual impulses of the women in the Charitropakhyan shatter the scriptural balance/harmony and natural poise of sublime aspects of woman-image of the Guru Granth Sahib, which give her a permanent place or existential naturalness in the spiritual fabrics of society. So I conclude that the contents of the Charitropakhyan are anti-Guru Granth Sahib. The tenth Guru would never disown his final commitment by creating such a mundane and inartistic voice against the metaphysical canons of the Guru Granth Sahib—the everlasting</p><p>spiritual light of the Khalsa.</p><p></p><p>III. Authorship of the Bachitar Natak Ascribed Wrongfully to Guru Gobind</p><p>Singh After probing into the multiplicity of historical facts of Guru-Times and studying the profound socio-spiritual values of the Guru Granth Sahib I formulated this firm opinion in the Sahije Rachio Khalsa that a man of true Sikh psyche cannot ascribe the authorship of the Bachitar Natak to the tenth Guru. I cite some cardinal points of my logical conviction regarding the authorship of the Bachitar Natak below:</p><p></p><p>a. Ignorance of the most conspicuous fact of Guru Arjan's martyrdom: Guru</p><p>Arjan's martyrdom was not known to the unknown author of the Bachitar Natak. While composing his poetic narrative the poet got an appropriate opportunity to grasp the most significant moment of history, but the ignorance of fifth Guru's martyrdom failed him. His mind was too blank to mention it. I, indeed, admit that the poets often take liberty with their subject matter or contents in the form of so many poetic licenses and</p><p>artistic devices in the process of their creations. While creating poetic signs, symbols, metaphors, similes and above all multi-layered socio-cultural semiotic, the art of poetry enjoys enough freedom transmitting its raw material into fresh myriad forms. I also admit that in the process of poetic creation the given objective reality offers a vast scope of change and there remains every possibility that the given contents may blossom forth into new metamorphic spectrums of life. If the essential material of</p><p>poetic compositions contains the distinct features of history, geography and the presence of heroic person in the center of historic happenings, the art of poesy in spite of its generous acceptance and flexibility cannot avoid the basic and most representative feature of a particular historic fact.</p><p>In the canto V of the Bachitar Natak, the poet mentions the pious row of first nine Gurus. There is only a brief space of four lines between the names of Guru Arjan and Guru Tegh Bahadur. The poet devotes twelve lines to the nostalgic description of Guru Tegh Bahadur's martyrdom. He highlights, though purely in his Brahamanical way, this marvelous sacrifice in a nostalgic vein and lavishes praises in profusion on the exemplary perseverance of the ninth Guru. It seems unnatural that the Bachitar Natak</p><p>does not bring even a far-fetched hint to recollect the martyrdom of the fifth Guru. When there exists a short span of four lines between the two names of said Gurus, such a lapse on the part of the poet shows that there shimmers no glorious sign of intense past in his memory. The poet of the Bachitar Natak treats the physical disappearance of the fifth Master like the general demise of human beings. Had Guru Gobind Singh been</p><p>the author of the Bachitar-Natak, he would have, in the present context, given at least a reverential hint of his great grandfather's splendid sacrifice.</p><p></p><p>b. The Absence of Pir Budhu Shah's role in the Battle of Bhangani: All the</p><p>historical details and collective oral traditions are of the opinion that Pir Budhu Shah</p><p>was the most prominent character of the Bhangani Battle. Even the naive poetic logic</p><p>of the Bachitar Natak cannot ignore the blessed presence of the Sufi Saint-Soldier who</p><p>stands inevitably in the very center of the famous historic battle of Bhangani.</p><p>Defending the noble cause of the tenth Master, he sacrificed his two sons and many</p><p>pious followers in the bloody battle, which was fought against the mountainous chiefs</p><p>by the tenth Master. Pir Budhu Shah received abundant blessings, deep affection and</p><p>personal relics from Guru Gobind Singh. Thus he became a forerunner, signaling</p><p>beforehand the heroic martyrdom of Guru's four sons and great sacrifices of</p><p>innumerable Sikhs. Only an immature author would forget to mention the conspicuous</p><p>role played by a man of destiny like Budhu Shah in a very crucial battle of Guru's life.</p><p>The obscure author of the Bachitar Natak had not the least inkling of the solitary</p><p>existence of Pir Budhu Shah, otherwise, he would have mentioned his role in the poetic</p><p>annals of Bhangani battle. Guru Gobind Singh would never envision the battle of</p><p>Bhangani without referring to the immortal role of illustrious Pir.</p><p>9</p><p>c. Dull Approach towards the Family History of Gurus: The author of the</p><p>Bachitar Natak exhibits gross ignorance regarding the family histories of both the</p><p>second the third Gurus. He was nourishing this mistaken idea that first three Gurus</p><p>belong to the Bedi sub-caste, because his ignorance supported his stupid hypothesis</p><p>declaring that Bedis would hand over the Guruship to Sodhis in their next birth. The</p><p>author did not know that the sub-castes of Guru Angad and Guru Amar Das were Tehan</p><p>and Bhalla, respectively. The names “Bhalla” and “Sodhi” are used in the Guru Granth</p><p>Sahib to hint at worldly identity of the Gurus. These names signifying the sub-castes of</p><p>Gurus also serve the purpose of establishing the distinctive features of their family</p><p>histories by having no spiritual context. The name “Bhalla” is used in connection with</p><p>the sub-caste of Guru Amar Das in the “Bhatt Swayas.” The final version of the Guru</p><p>Granth Sahib was prepared under the supervision of Guru Gobind Singh who bestowed</p><p>eternal Guruship upon it at his eleventh hour. I, therefore, bring this fact to the kind</p><p>notice of my readers: if the author of the Bachitar Natak is Guru Gobind Singh, he must</p><p>have known at least the sub-caste of the third Guru, because the name Bhalla, with its</p><p>elaborative context, exists in the Sikh Scripture. Indeed, the knowledge of the name</p><p>Tehan, the sub-caste of the second Guru before his Gurgaddi, would also not betray the</p><p>memory of the Master.</p><p>d. Wrong Chronological Order of Relating to the Spiritual Preceptors: In the</p><p>sixth canto of the Bachitar Natak the poet presents a rhymed list of religious seekers</p><p>along with some vague comments, but he disobeys the right historic sequence</p><p>concerning the advent of two religious personalities. According to the chronological</p><p>order of the Bachitar Natak, prophet Muhammad (Mahan Din) appears on the canvas of</p><p>history after Ramanand. There arises no inevitable need of literary form, no creative</p><p>demand of symbolism, no powerful momentum of life experience, no irresistible call of</p><p>the mysterious circles of Time and no exuberant movement of visionary semiotics,</p><p>which might dictate the essential poetic logic to change the normal course of objective</p><p>history. In spite of that the author of the Bachitar Natak creates a wrong chronological</p><p>order, placing Mohammad after Ramanand, out of his blind ignorance. Guru Gobind</p><p>Singh, who was well versant scholar of Islamic History, could not have committed such</p><p>a gross error.</p><p>e. An Estranged Image of Anandpur Without the Full-Fledged Historic</p><p>Presence of the Tenth Master: While the seventh canto of the Bachitar Natak</p><p>mentions that the tenth Master was brought to the Panjab from Patna in his childhood,</p><p>10</p><p>in this context, the author does not allude to the existence of Anandpur. After the</p><p>martyrdom of his father he spent many meditative years there. The prophetic</p><p>experience of the tenth Master passed through many phases of divine enlightenment at</p><p>Anandpur, but the poet never reveals the name of the town and remains silent about its</p><p>existence in the seventh canto of the Bachitar Natak. In eighth canto, the author</p><p>informs the reader that the tenth Prophet proceeded to Patna, won the battle of</p><p>Bhangani after some years, visited Kahloor and established a town called Anandpur.</p><p>This brief statement is a self-evident proof that the author has misplaced all significant</p><p>historical situations associated with Guru Gobind Singh. Even a common reader of</p><p>history knows that Guru Tegh Bahadur laid the foundation stone of Anandpur and Guru</p><p>Gobind Singh received the divine status of Gurgaddi there. By releasing such a</p><p>distorted image of Anandpur that annihilates the right perspective of Gurus presence</p><p>related to it, the author of the Bachitar Natak cannot claim himself to be Guru Gobind</p><p>Singh.</p><p>f. The Immature Vision of Religious Crises and Unjustifiable Criticism of</p><p>Islam: The author of the Bachitar Natak is too immature to judge the historical</p><p>processes of religious crises. He is unable to understand the subtle wholeness of a</p><p>particular religion, which distinguishes it from its small sects. When the decline of</p><p>Hinduism appears on its historical surface, he passes harshly sweeping judgments on its</p><p>disruptive segments. The author is ignorant of the fact that in spite of the ritualistic</p><p>tendencies leaving behind the perfection of its moral values, those Hindu sects also</p><p>positively contian many divine element. An adamant egoistical tone of the Bachitar</p><p>Natak is not justified to brush aside the importance of those sects by making their</p><p>followers look like atheistic nincompoops. Again, such a harshness rooted in illogical</p><p>prejudices builds up no justification of the advent of the tenth Master. India had been</p><p>creating the subtlest patterns of religious thoughts of infinite variety since the birth of</p><p>the Vedas. The vast vision of history and a true realization of abstract channels of life</p><p>make this natural demand from a serious poet of prophetic consciousness to present</p><p>wonderful realistic pageants of the rise and fall of the universal religions manifesting</p><p>the logical culmination of the Khalsa. In the sixth canto, the poet of the Bachitar Natak</p><p>gives some common place illustrations of religiously misguided characters of</p><p>mythology basing his analysis on false assumptions. He creates a mazy narration of</p><p>Mahander, Bisham, Brahma and general category of idolaters who alienated themselves</p><p>from the true path of God in remote past. His declarations regarding the betrayal of</p><p>gods are based on common hearsay without any authentic scholarly information. As</p><p>the author doesn't understand the difference of mythology and the history of concrete</p><p>11</p><p>facts, he fails to draw a convincing line of the different evolutions of the subtlest</p><p>branches o f religious ideologies. Again, he makes a poor choice of theological</p><p>characters to delineate his point of view. For example, Datta-Tray and Gorakh look like</p><p>insignificant dim dots of meditative reflections of spiritual journey amidst the vast</p><p>panorama of varied religious paths of ancient times. The religious experience of the</p><p>author of Bachitar-Natak is too shallow to deserve its comparison with the</p><p>poetical/philosophic analysis of varied religious branches, revealed specially in the first</p><p>Var of Bhai Gardas. We find no justification to place the fresh manifestation of the</p><p>Khalsa at the end of that line of immature presentations of spiritual preceptors as</p><p>visualized by the author of the Bachitar Natak.</p><p>The obscure author of Bachitar-Natak gives a shocking treatment to the Prophet of</p><p>Islam when he reaches the ending point of his tizada of condemnation against the</p><p>certain religious paths and their crises. He underestimates the Prophet Muhammad in</p><p>a disrespectful manner by declaring him simply the King of Arabia. Then he denies him</p><p>indirectly the elevated status of Prophet and openly condemns him in an obscene</p><p>language for circumcising all the kings.</p><p>Mahadin tab prabhu upraja ||</p><p>Arab des ko kino raja ||26||</p><p>Tin bhi ek panth upraja ||</p><p>Ling bina kiney sabh raja ||</p><p>Sabh te apna naam japao ||</p><p>Satnam kahoon na dhirao ||27||</p><p>How ridiculous! What an absurdity! What an insulting manner to denounce a fellow</p><p>religion! Is circumcision meant for Kings only? Did the common folks of Islam not</p><p>adopt this symbolic ritual? Does circumcision mean for the Muslim Kings to be without</p><p>copulative organs?</p><p>The author of the Bachitar Natak is bereft of the knowledge that the ritual of</p><p>circumcision was in vogue in the Jewish world before the advent of Islam. Again he is</p><p>too naive to understand the spiritual meaning of circumcision suggested by Guru</p><p>Guru Nanak in his Majh Ki Var. The version of the Zafarnama, the historic epistle addressed to</p><p>Aurangzeb and his highly metaphysical composition entitled the Jap, prove that Guru</p><p>Gobind Singh respected the holy Qur’an, understood the value of faith and accepted the</p><p>prophetic magnanimity of Muhammad. Had the tenth Guru been the author of the</p><p>Bachitar Natak, he would not have contradicted his own message, conveyed so</p><p>12</p><p>beautifully in his Jap Sahib, the most musical poem of metaphysical dimensions.</p><p>The collective genius of Sikhism in her powerful faith, encompassing the living</p><p>memories of Time and her undisputed historical traditions bows to this general</p><p>agreement that Guru Gobind Singh established the Guru Granth Sahib on the eternal</p><p>throne of socio-spiritual values belonging to the ten Gurus. Again, it is a fact that the</p><p>Guru Granth Sahib accords the reverential serenity to the holy Qur’an and Islamic prayer</p><p>in its contents, but the tone of Bachitar Natak is totally different in this context. So its</p><p>authorship will remain alien to Guru Gobind Singh.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The commentators who claim that Guru Gobind Singh is the author of the entire Dasam Granth</p><p>base their belief on two false assumptions, which are as follows:</p><p>a. They believe that it was the prophetic mission of the Dasam Guru to create in the</p><p>Khalsa consciousness an invincible euphoria of religious battles against the</p><p>contemporary Hindu feudal systems and mainly against the despotic Mughal empire.</p><p>Dr. Gurbhagat Singh develops a modern philosophic viewpoint of transcendental fervor</p><p>of Guru's battles as manifested in his "religio-martial texts". The radiant enthusiasm</p><p>"was meant as a cultural weapon to transform and restore the needed vitality." I object</p><p>to this "notion of battle" which according to the zealous supporters of the Dasam Granth</p><p>functions as a pivotal force in its Chandi Charitars (including the Chandi Di Var) and the</p><p>Chaubis Avtar. The said battles of gods, goddesses and demons are not symbolical in a</p><p>profound creative sense, because they do not lead us to a new plane of reality higher</p><p>than the visible surface of this life. Those battles simply place the reader (or the</p><p>devotee) amidst the crude turmoil of gods and demons. The flat and single layered</p><p>descriptions of battles follow the slavish imitation of the bombastic style of</p><p>compositions such as the Pirthvi Raj Raso in the Bachitar Natak. It is sufficient to prove</p><p>that the said battles contain no "talic semiotic" as envisioned by Dr. Gurbhagat Singh.</p><p>The idealism regarding the fights between good and evil is relegated to a stale moral</p><p>precept of secondary place, but the supreme purpose of the Dasam Granth remains to</p><p>highlight the Brahamanical Guru-Status of gods and goddesses. The concluding two</p><p>lines of the Chandi Di Var invite the attention of the devotees to worship Durga:</p><p>Durga path banaya sabhey paurian ||</p><p>Fer na juuni aya jin eh gaya ||õõ||</p><p>The goddess Durga has composed the recitation of</p><p>13</p><p>all the stanzas (of Chandi Di Var).</p><p>Every worshipper who recites it will attain</p><p>freedom from the cycles of birth and death). ||55||</p><p>I conclude that all the battles of gods and goddesses leave us with no other choice</p><p>except tilting to the message of worshipping them. It is, therefore, impossible to</p><p>associate the authorship of the complete text of the Dasam Granth with the tenth</p><p>Master.</p><p>b. The commentators who believe Guru Gobind Singh to be the sole creator of the entire</p><p>Dasam Granth delineate its second purpose saying that the tenth Prophet wanted to</p><p>acquaint his Sikhs with the colorful religiocultural heritage of India through his</p><p>manifold poetic compositions compiled in the Dasam Granth. I think this viewpoint is</p><p>not valid enough in deciding the authenticity of authorship of the Dasam Granth. I</p><p>reject this clumsy idea of the impassioned votaries of the Dasam Granth by advancing</p><p>the following five arguments:</p><p>i. It has never been the role of any prophet before Guru Gobind Singh to educate</p><p>his followers in such a mechanical sense like an educational plan of prosaic</p><p>times. The blessed movement of a prophetic genius is more awe-inspiring,</p><p>creative and winning than offering the sluggish genre of degenerating literary</p><p>forms, such as the Charitropakhyan and the Hakayats.</p><p>ii. Even if we were to suppose that it was the thoughtful scheme of the tenth Guru</p><p>to instruct his followers by producing various poetic compositions of the Dasam</p><p>Granth, in no case would he make a wrong choice of literary specimens. The</p><p>bulky size of literature contained in the Dasam Granth is not even a dim shadow</p><p>of those sublime, pure and aesthetic dimensions of literature which belong to</p><p>the real and first rate heritage of South Asia. Here we see that the Chandi</p><p>Charitars are brimming with bombastic verbosity, mechanical devices of</p><p>reverberating word, pictures and conventional expressions of heroic feats. The</p><p>Chaubis Avtar and other stories of gods/avtars present the grotesque pictures of</p><p>mythological heroes with a mixture of heretics of shallow nature without</p><p>origins. Furthermore, the contents of the Charitropakhyan are pregnant with</p><p>obscene details of neurotic minds reflecting the one-sided, anti-aesthetic,</p><p>degenerate activities and vices of sexually perverted women of Vam Marag.</p><p>Will the tenth Prophet impose on the consciousness of the Khalsa this</p><p>superfluous and thoroughly anti-Gurmat material of disintegrated spirit to undo</p><p>those healthy traditions of Gurmat balanced poise of Sahij and majestic victories</p><p>14</p><p>of spirit which were brought about and then established by the previous nine</p><p>Gurus and finally by the undisputed Scripture of the Khalsa?</p><p>iii. With the exception of the Jap, the Akal Ustat (excluding 20 kabits mentioned</p><p>above) and the Swayyas, the reader (devotee) observes that the Dasam Granth</p><p>changes its stand again and again in relation to the worship of One God. In the</p><p>ending Swaya of the Ramavatar the author declares in somewhat rude tone that</p><p>being a votary of one God, he would not assign any divine status to Ram along</p><p>with the religious ideas contained in the shastras and the simaratis. In the</p><p>composition of the Krishanavatar, the Dasam Granth asserts rather in an</p><p>unsophisticated idiom of language that the stories of Ganesh, Krishan and</p><p>Bishan are known to the poet in a mechanical sense only, but in reality those</p><p>characters stand alien to his unshakable faith in one God (stanza 434).</p><p>Again, in the first canto of the Bachitar Natak, the author while claiming to be</p><p>the champion worshipper of the Timeless Being, denies Ram, Krishan, Brahma,</p><p>Shiv and Muhammad as the saviors of mankind. In spite of these denials and</p><p>emphatic declarations the fundamental faith of the author expressed in the said</p><p>poetic texts of the Dasam Granth, there is an unquestionable tilt towards the</p><p>worship of avtars, goddesses (specially Durga, Parvati and Chandi) and gods.</p><p>Even a part of the Gyan Prdodh, after revealing a dim reflection of the spiritual</p><p>image of one eternal Being of the Guru Granth Sahib, shifts its visionary ground</p><p>in part II of the text by adding to it a stereotyped Mahabharata-based history of</p><p>religions to confuse the spotless wholeness and originality of the Khalsa. Here</p><p>in the Dasam Granth, the devotee witnesses a faithless drama of the divided</p><p>loyalties of the fickle-minded author(s) who fluctuate(s) from the worshipping</p><p>point of Timeless God to the obeisance of secondary functioning agents of this</p><p>mysterious universe. Amidst this chaos created by the chameleon-like nature of</p><p>the worshippers, Guru Gobind Singh cannot be imagined to be the solitary</p><p>author of the entire Dasan Granth.</p><p>iv. The author of the Bachitar Natak in the fourteenth canto declares in an artificial</p><p>humility, like a telepathist, that he had seen all the wonderful feats of avtars and</p><p>Chandi (Kalka) in the previous ages. Again he claims (boasts?) that being a</p><p>divine witness he has revealed all their miraculous deeds in his granths. In other</p><p>words he states that he is the author of the Chandi Charitars (Part I & Part II) and</p><p>the Chaubis Avtar along with the pageants of other incarnations of the gods.</p><p>Now, here arises a significant point, as already argued by me: Guru Gobind Singh</p><p>15</p><p>is not the author of the Bachitar Natak. Therefore, the statement of the author in</p><p>fourteenth canto emerges as an ample proof in favor of our transparent view</p><p>assessing that the Chandi Charitars and the Chaubi Avtar are also not authored by</p><p>Guru Gobind Singh.</p><p>v. The Dasam Granth in one volume was an outcome of post-Guru period. It didn't</p><p>exist in the period of tenth Guru. The Master under his benign supervision</p><p>prepared the authentic version of the Guru Granth Sahib and at the last hour of</p><p>his physical departure he conferred on it the honor of Guru-Scripture of the</p><p>Khalsa. However, in his apical span of life, he never thought for a moment to</p><p>get his bani compiled in a single volume. Even Bhai Mani Singh, the last scribe</p><p>of the authentic Damdami Bir, did not make any suggestion to the Guru to</p><p>compile his bani in one volume. It is equally important that he did not receive</p><p>any direction in this matter from the Master. This fact of creative history is</p><p>known to the common Sikhs of today that members of the Khalsa-fellowship of</p><p>Guru-period generally committed to their memory the banis of the Dasam Guru,</p><p>entitled the Jap Sahib, the Akal Ustat and the Sawayyas. It was easy to preserve</p><p>them in their written form on loose sheets or in their bound copies, and</p><p>therefore, the Sikhs faced no indispensability to incorporate them in a bulky</p><p>volume such as the Dasam Granth. Then why did this passionate desire to create</p><p>the Dasam Granth out of a mass of anti-Gurmat literature enter Bhai Mani Singh's</p><p>mind at Amritsar after 1725 C.E.?</p><p>I do not recognize the authenticity of the Bir associated with the name of Bhai Mani Singh</p><p>because of the obscure history of its coming to light 83 years after the Bhai’s martyrdom in</p><p>1818 C.E.; its unmarked travels from Amritsar to Multan; its usurpation in mysterious</p><p>circumstances from the concealed center of its origin; its respectful preservation in the house</p><p>of an unknown Pathan at Multan; the secrecy of it name and mystery of its first location at</p><p>Amritsar or near Amritsar. Again, the Dasam Granth associated with the name of Bhai Mani</p><p>Singh includes in it the voluminous contents of Adi Granth in addition to the supposed Bani of</p><p>the Dasam Guru. Now, Bhai Mani Singh could never commit such an act of betrayal by</p><p>desecrating the original form of the undisputed Scripture of Khalsa Panth after it was installed</p><p>as their ageless Guru. How could Bhai Mani Singh play such a faithless role against the intense</p><p>friendly dictates of his beloved Master after being constantly submerged into the enlightened</p><p>experience of the Guru Granth Sahib in his presence for nine months? So the said Bir is spurious,</p><p>and it looks more spurious after emergence of the forged letter of Bhai Mani Singh. The</p><p>disclosure of fake Khas Dastkhati Patre in Gyan Singh's Panth Parkash and the logical conclusion</p><p>of spurious Hukamnamas in my book, the Sahije Rachio Khalsa, put a question mark against the</p><p>16</p><p>genuineness of the Dasam Granth. The unsymmetrical body of the Dasam Granth enveloped in</p><p>unbalanced superstitious beliefs, repulsive camouflages, hearsays and boastful utterances</p><p>during numerous encounters is not acceptable to me as the real word of Guru Gobind Singh's</p><p>luminous Gurmat vision.</p><p>Bibliography</p><p>Singh, Gurbhagat. Sikhism and Postmodern Thought. New Delhi: Ajanta, 1999.</p><p>Srī Dasam Granth Sāhib. 2 vols. Amritsar: Bhāī Jawāhar Singh, Bhāī Kirpāl Singh and Sons, 1967.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zafarnamah, post: 157549, member: 10472"] Please see Harinder Singh Mehboob's Essay on the [URL="http://www.academicroom.com/humanities/religion/sikhi/sikh-sources-%281469-1849%29/early-sikh-sources-gurmukh%C4%AB-script/dasam-gra%E1%B9%85th"]Dasam Granth[/URL] 1 Dasam Granth: The Question of Authenticity Harinder Singh Mahboob When the earthly sojourn of the Tenth Master was nearing its end at Nanded, he gathered the small bunch of his devout followers around him, and declared in an emphatic but revelational tone, “I am soon leaving my visible abode of divine law [Drmswl in the jpujI], but I will not leave you in utter loneliness. I entrust to the ambrosial reservoir of immortal Word, the finality of which is preserved by my super insight in the Damdami Bir. I bestow the divine gift of Gurgaddi upon the Guru Granth Sahib—an everlasting spirit of the Ten Guru-Prophets." These echoes of divine Faith made a powerful tradition, which had appeared in all channels of history of the Khalsa, facing no obstruction in its continuity. The Sikhs have been making solutions to their great Scripture, and thus paying their obeisance to no other Scripture as their Guru, since the physical departure of the Tenth Master. No student of history witnesses any gap, any contradiction and any obstruction in the endless flow of this divine practice. Thus the prophetic faith of Guru Gobind Singh, transcending all illusory forms of knowledge and rejecting all false masks of poesy, but embracing none but the Supreme Word revealed his final commitment to the Guru Granth Sahib as the only eternal Guru of the Khalsa. Guru Gobind Singh never mentioned existential validity as well as the historic whereabouts of the Dasam Granth anywhere. 1. The tenth Guru didn't give any clue of a single volume of the Dasam Granth as revealed or compiled by him. Sainapat (the author of the Sri Gur Sobha) and Koer Singh (author of the Gur Bilas Patshahi Das) were, undoubtedly, influenced by some unauthentic but contemporary poetic compositions such as the Bachitar Natak (the fabulous autobiography of the 10th Guru) and the Chandi Charitars (I and II) which were incorporated in one of the so-called Dasa Granths (actually voluminous collections of different "Bachitar Nataks") near the first half of the eighteenth century, but these two famous poets didn't give any trace of the existence of a single volume of the Dasam Granth in their epics. So I conclude, in all humility, that the title of the Dasam Granth is a misnomer. 1 All references that follow are from Srī Dasam Granth Sāhib, 2 vols. (Amritsar: Bhāī Jawāhar Singh, Bhāī Kirpāl Singh and Sons, 1967). 2. Guru Gobind Singh was not the author of the bulky part of the Dasam Granth. I ascribe only a slim part of it to his genuine authorship. Even this slim part, which includes the Jap, the Akal Ustat, the Shabad Hazare, the Swayyas and the Zafarnama, does not become a single whole, displaying and contemplating its structural beauty. The arrangement of compiling of these highly socio-metaphysical compositions of the master is arbitrary. Therefore, we see that these true Dasam Guru-Banis are scattered in a haphazard manner in the Dasam Granth. There is an exception also. We witness an absurd intrusion of Brahamanical reflexes in the Akal Ustat. The devotee finds 20 Kiratas (numbers 210 to 230) eulogizing Chandi (other names Durga, Bhagwati and Siva). Thus even here the purity of genuine text is impaired by the false compilers. I divide this paper in the following sections to justify my analytical conclusions, long cherished poetic experiences and meditations on the metaphysical Sikh literature. [B]I. The Dasam Granth vs. the Guru Granth Sahib [/B]The blessed status of an eternal spiritual preceptor granted to the Guru Granth Sahib in his final meeting with the Khalsa shows that Guru Gobind Singh's contemplative understanding of Gurgaddi to his scripture was perfect. It proves that he was in an absolute command of plunging deeply into the far reaching mysteries of the Guru Granth Sahib. It means the tenth master would never betray his distinct religious cause as envisioned in the Guru Granth Sahib like Minerva—insights awakening the age-long human ordeals of truthful struggles. How could he contradict the unique transmutation of rare Guru-inspiration of his Guru Scripture by incorporating in the Dasam Granth the stale, stereotyped and static descriptions of mythological characters of feeble symbolical significance and artificial combinations of explosive sounds? a. The Gods, Goddesses and Avtars in the Dasam Granth: The authors of the Dasam Granth in the Chandi Charitars (Parts I, II) shower praises on Chandi and her other manifestations in profusion, bring forth twenty four incarnation of Vishnu in the Chaubis Avtar, give seven mythological descriptions of Brahma in the Brahma Avtar and describe two forms of Rudra (Siva) in the Rudra Avtar in such a manner that these Brahamanical gods, goddesses and avtars inevitably tend to become the center of worship for the devotees of other religions. Thus these heroes of Hindu Mythology create a hotchpotch situation in the pure conceptual centers of Sikhism also. The Dasam Granth concludes in some scattered lines that the purpose of these poetical narrations of mythological gods/goddesses is to intensify the religious felicity in the hearts of devotees (i.e. the Khalsa) to escalate lawful battles against the opponents of God. In my humble opinion this statement should would prove to be a wrong hypothesis as the bulky size of the descriptions of Brahamanical Gods doesn't justify their declared purposes of holy war. The reader is caught in the meshes of ritualistic worship of these Hindu Gods, and as a result of the dense mythological atmosphere will never allow the devotees to realize the sanctity, faith and fervor of the religious mission as propounded in the concluding sections of these gods and goddesses. The declared pious mission becomes meaningless and stands isolated. It is in reality a misguiding hallucination. The poetical presentation of the fables of gods, goddesses and avtars are a shrewd device to prepare the Khalsa-consciousness to surrender itself to the mythological heroes and heroines of the Brahamanical cult. Thus the declared missionary slogans in the poetical compositions of the Dasam Granth are false temptations. The dominating Brahamanical atmosphere in these fables becomes an arbitrary movement which ensnares ultimately the natural freedom of Khalsa-mind. The pious manifests of religious battles as mentioned in the Bachitar Natak and other poetical compositions of the Dasam Granth becomes null and void when it is followed by the paraphernalia of inert tales. The brief but sacred claims made in these pansanic kathas find themselves enveloped in the superstitions contents, false assumptions and disconnected visions. The gods, goddesses and avtars of Indian mythology along with ancient Hindu scriptures are not used in the Guru Granth Sahib as full fledged, exuberant and selfdependent personalities of super-status transmitting themselves into independent worship centers. They are merely used in the Adi Granth as literary illustrations of some higher truth, symbols, metaphors, similes or sole references. Their role doesn't move beyond the main/dominating contents of the Guru Granth Sahib. They never aspire to establish the limited sovereignty of their divinity over the vast devotional system of the Guru Granth Sahib. Their existence serves the solitary purpose of enhancing their literary genres. Vishnu, Shiva, Ram, Krishna and devis and so many other manifestations in their line never transcend the spiritual fabric of the Guru Granth Sahib, posing themselves as free spiritual preceptors. As far as vision of God is concerned, the Dasam Granth, with the exception of five Banis, presents a perspective that is contrary to the vision and total sensibility of the Guru Granth Sahib. Leaving aside the question of Supreme Reality without any substitute, it gives priority to the worship of countless godly existences. In human thought and imagination they move freely in their supernatural realms, but practically they descend on earth in their solid, stagnant and shrunk forms as idols for worship. The flat and single layered consciousness of mythological forms doesn't make proper harmony with abstract realms of divinity of the Guru Granth Sahib. The result is that anthropomorphic existences in their super frenzy dominate the bulky sections of the Dasam Granth. The dense and nebulous pageants of the haphazard dramas (nwtk) of Indian mythology-cum-history do not allow a free entry into the spheres of divine realization of one God of the Guru Granth Sahib. With the exception of five banis, the Dasam Granth doesn't present a harmonious vision that leads the prayers of man to the Region of Eternal Truth (sc KMf in the jpujI ), where only the bliss of One God burgeons forth. In the Dasam Granth, the isolated poetic sensibilities of heterogeneous contents, structural deformity and hotchpotch compilations dominate. The unbalanced literary genres of the Dasam Granth do no prove the credibility of their declared purposes and unified vision. The bulky size of its dominating material convinces the reader definitely of its original impulse relating to avtar-worship. It shows a world of difference between the Guru Granth Sahib and the Dasam Granth. b. Religious Battles, Explosive Sounds, and Worship of Weapons: According to numerous religious commentators of Sikhism, the battles, described in the different poetical compositions of the Dasam Granth are not flat descriptions of a fabulous turmoil that is supposed to be enacted in the supernatural world of gods and goddesses. Many Sikh commentators believe that those battles being fought between Good and Evil on the different planes of universal Existence are symbolical, justifying the radiant struggles of divine forces and their final victory against the intriguing arrogance of super devilish agencies. Now I take liberty to disagree with the learned scholars on this point. The holy battles envisioned in the contents of the Bachitar Natak, the Chaubis Avtar and other stories of avtars do not transcend the hegemony of Brahamanical reflexes, the pretensions of human pride, the pettiness of mundane interests of man, exaggerative heroism, and above all the boastful attitude of godly/religious crusaders. Therefore, holy battles being sung in poetic compositions of the Dasam Granth seldom qualify to plunge deeply into blissful experience of oceanic depths of one God, enjoying eternally his absolute freedom in the Guru Granth Sahib. The holy battles belong to the limited but repeated exercises of Brahamanical instincts that enjoy the dominance of their priest-savagery, freely enacted and highlighted in these dramatic battles of the Dasam Granth. If the reader tries to enhance other meanings of the said battles, the results will be forced interpretation of the text. For example, Dr. Gurbhagat Singh, without giving any satisfactory perspective of "religio-martial texts" explains in his Sikhism And Postmodern Thought the purpose of using "the explosive language" full of "binaric tensions" in the following words: [LIST=1] [*]The sharpened binaric sounds arranged in their fierceness to clank like swords, to twang like arrows or to pierce like bullets were intended to shatter the decadent environment and at the same time create a new person of a different bio-consciousness. [*]The meta-intention behind this was to affect the biology of the reader, to give a new nervous system. [*]By creating his martial infra-structure of language, the Guru was certainly trying to reverse the bio-functioning of his reader, who was obviously either the decadent Muslim or the exhausted Hindu of his times…. [/LIST] I disagree with the learned scholar's viewpoint on the following logical grounds: a. The texts upon which the learned scholar draws his formulations are unable to produce sufficiently the thematic integrity of their literary visions, the harmonious wholeness of their cosmic logic, the creative continuity of their intrinsic virtues and the invisible profundity of a balanced universal Truth. b. The learned scholar totally insolates his main ideas, speculations and philosophic flights from the intrinsic experience of those texts upon which he seems to concentrate his theory. A thinker cannot create "a new person of a different bio-consciousness" in the absence of proper context of life-material and without the multifarious support of the complete and flawless cosmic vision. The visionary attempts to create the "binaric tensions", "explosive sound-combinations" and "a new nervous system" would lead the human consciousness to a blind alley without the timely help of proper material and without the participations of a same guiding spirit. c. There is no possibility in the “mortal structure of language” of the Dasam Granth to infuse an inspired collection courage or an enlightened spiritual bliss into the minds of oppressed classes—whether Muslims or Hindus—in the absence of an idea text fulfilling the cosmic needs of a multi-layered lyrical genius of the Guru Granth Sahib. Otherwise the attempt to create the collective fervor of social victory would prove to be an artificial assumption or the short-lived mirage of intellect. Indeed, sensing the futility of his impracticable ideology and unconsciously building up its defense, Dr. Gurbhagat Singh says: If these explosive sound-combinations are flaming red without the context, they are blind; but within the context they are directed". In my opinion, the context is very much there, but its poor structure is without the breath of creativity. Its lethargic body (form) never throbs with vibrant intensity. So this theory that shows "how the martial sound becomes haloed and telic" is baseless and doesn't give any definite clue or creative proof of the authenticity of Dasam Granth to the seekers.4 d. It is an irony of uncreative/mechanical knowledge that the "martial infra-structure of long age, "eulogized profusely by the author of Sikhism And Postmodern Thought ultimately degenerates into the ritualistic worship of lifeless arms in the Shastra Nam Mala. These arms producing the artificial music of chanting swords, flaming flashes of dazzling speed and the boisterous joy of fighters are related to the celebrated characters of Hindu Mythology such as Ravana, Karan, Krishan, Meghnad, Bali, and Arjana in the rhymed composition of the Shastra Nam Mala. The divine arms in the Dasam Granth, producing light and speed and looking haloed and sanctified, become dead objects of mechanical worship in their ending point. They deteriorate themselves into the absurd petrifactions of human consciousness. We cannot claim these static arms to be the symbols of some higher life. The manifestation of great truths need also a vast perspective of universal dimensions. "The martial red poem"6 envisioned by Dr. Gurbhagat Singh in the Dasam Granth, is without proper context and no multidimensional artistic harmony supports its intrinsic hypothesis. The arms of the Dasam Granth take the devotees to a stagnant point of idol-worship. This process negates mercurial human consciousness and meditative joy of the Guru Granth Sahib. II. The Question of Scriptural Authenticity of the Image of Woman in the Dasam Granth The texts of the Charitrapakhyan and the Hakayats incorporated in the Dasam Granth remain at a far-off distance from the sublimest point of scriptural experience of the Guru Granth Sahib. The vast vision of the Damdami Bir, which encompasses the metaphysical dimensions of timeless bliss, apical grandeur of multifarious truth, mystical nuances of divine thrill, handsome proportions of universal life and a serene union of visible-invisible spiritual perspectives is absent from the enormous text of the Charitrapakhyan. The experience of the Charitrapakhyan and the Hakayats is shallow, disproportionate and extravagant. It does not add any aesthetic serenity to the mystical/spiritual existence of the woman-image of the Guru Granth Sahib. The descriptions of the Charitropakhyan bring out the lewdness of a corrupt society. These compositions are unable to explore any deep psychology. The Charitropakhyan versifies particularly in an immoral vein the fantastic manners of unchaste woman. When the reader applies literary canons to valuate the Chartiropakhyan, its text remains below the mediocre genres of fine literature. The reader finds no visionary quest of the Guru Granth Sahib in the pages of the Charitropakhyan, which present an obscene drama of monstrous libidinous containing more than four hundred pageants of degenerate humanity. There are, undoubtedly, the lyrical illustrations of the role of unchaste woman in the Guru Granth Sahib, but these literary genres never break the sanctity of its supreme woman-image. The uncontrollable and intriguing sexual impulses of the women in the Charitropakhyan shatter the scriptural balance/harmony and natural poise of sublime aspects of woman-image of the Guru Granth Sahib, which give her a permanent place or existential naturalness in the spiritual fabrics of society. So I conclude that the contents of the Charitropakhyan are anti-Guru Granth Sahib. The tenth Guru would never disown his final commitment by creating such a mundane and inartistic voice against the metaphysical canons of the Guru Granth Sahib—the everlasting spiritual light of the Khalsa. III. Authorship of the Bachitar Natak Ascribed Wrongfully to Guru Gobind Singh After probing into the multiplicity of historical facts of Guru-Times and studying the profound socio-spiritual values of the Guru Granth Sahib I formulated this firm opinion in the Sahije Rachio Khalsa that a man of true Sikh psyche cannot ascribe the authorship of the Bachitar Natak to the tenth Guru. I cite some cardinal points of my logical conviction regarding the authorship of the Bachitar Natak below: a. Ignorance of the most conspicuous fact of Guru Arjan's martyrdom: Guru Arjan's martyrdom was not known to the unknown author of the Bachitar Natak. While composing his poetic narrative the poet got an appropriate opportunity to grasp the most significant moment of history, but the ignorance of fifth Guru's martyrdom failed him. His mind was too blank to mention it. I, indeed, admit that the poets often take liberty with their subject matter or contents in the form of so many poetic licenses and artistic devices in the process of their creations. While creating poetic signs, symbols, metaphors, similes and above all multi-layered socio-cultural semiotic, the art of poetry enjoys enough freedom transmitting its raw material into fresh myriad forms. I also admit that in the process of poetic creation the given objective reality offers a vast scope of change and there remains every possibility that the given contents may blossom forth into new metamorphic spectrums of life. If the essential material of poetic compositions contains the distinct features of history, geography and the presence of heroic person in the center of historic happenings, the art of poesy in spite of its generous acceptance and flexibility cannot avoid the basic and most representative feature of a particular historic fact. In the canto V of the Bachitar Natak, the poet mentions the pious row of first nine Gurus. There is only a brief space of four lines between the names of Guru Arjan and Guru Tegh Bahadur. The poet devotes twelve lines to the nostalgic description of Guru Tegh Bahadur's martyrdom. He highlights, though purely in his Brahamanical way, this marvelous sacrifice in a nostalgic vein and lavishes praises in profusion on the exemplary perseverance of the ninth Guru. It seems unnatural that the Bachitar Natak does not bring even a far-fetched hint to recollect the martyrdom of the fifth Guru. When there exists a short span of four lines between the two names of said Gurus, such a lapse on the part of the poet shows that there shimmers no glorious sign of intense past in his memory. The poet of the Bachitar Natak treats the physical disappearance of the fifth Master like the general demise of human beings. Had Guru Gobind Singh been the author of the Bachitar-Natak, he would have, in the present context, given at least a reverential hint of his great grandfather's splendid sacrifice. b. The Absence of Pir Budhu Shah's role in the Battle of Bhangani: All the historical details and collective oral traditions are of the opinion that Pir Budhu Shah was the most prominent character of the Bhangani Battle. Even the naive poetic logic of the Bachitar Natak cannot ignore the blessed presence of the Sufi Saint-Soldier who stands inevitably in the very center of the famous historic battle of Bhangani. Defending the noble cause of the tenth Master, he sacrificed his two sons and many pious followers in the bloody battle, which was fought against the mountainous chiefs by the tenth Master. Pir Budhu Shah received abundant blessings, deep affection and personal relics from Guru Gobind Singh. Thus he became a forerunner, signaling beforehand the heroic martyrdom of Guru's four sons and great sacrifices of innumerable Sikhs. Only an immature author would forget to mention the conspicuous role played by a man of destiny like Budhu Shah in a very crucial battle of Guru's life. The obscure author of the Bachitar Natak had not the least inkling of the solitary existence of Pir Budhu Shah, otherwise, he would have mentioned his role in the poetic annals of Bhangani battle. Guru Gobind Singh would never envision the battle of Bhangani without referring to the immortal role of illustrious Pir. 9 c. Dull Approach towards the Family History of Gurus: The author of the Bachitar Natak exhibits gross ignorance regarding the family histories of both the second the third Gurus. He was nourishing this mistaken idea that first three Gurus belong to the Bedi sub-caste, because his ignorance supported his stupid hypothesis declaring that Bedis would hand over the Guruship to Sodhis in their next birth. The author did not know that the sub-castes of Guru Angad and Guru Amar Das were Tehan and Bhalla, respectively. The names “Bhalla” and “Sodhi” are used in the Guru Granth Sahib to hint at worldly identity of the Gurus. These names signifying the sub-castes of Gurus also serve the purpose of establishing the distinctive features of their family histories by having no spiritual context. The name “Bhalla” is used in connection with the sub-caste of Guru Amar Das in the “Bhatt Swayas.” The final version of the Guru Granth Sahib was prepared under the supervision of Guru Gobind Singh who bestowed eternal Guruship upon it at his eleventh hour. I, therefore, bring this fact to the kind notice of my readers: if the author of the Bachitar Natak is Guru Gobind Singh, he must have known at least the sub-caste of the third Guru, because the name Bhalla, with its elaborative context, exists in the Sikh Scripture. Indeed, the knowledge of the name Tehan, the sub-caste of the second Guru before his Gurgaddi, would also not betray the memory of the Master. d. Wrong Chronological Order of Relating to the Spiritual Preceptors: In the sixth canto of the Bachitar Natak the poet presents a rhymed list of religious seekers along with some vague comments, but he disobeys the right historic sequence concerning the advent of two religious personalities. According to the chronological order of the Bachitar Natak, prophet Muhammad (Mahan Din) appears on the canvas of history after Ramanand. There arises no inevitable need of literary form, no creative demand of symbolism, no powerful momentum of life experience, no irresistible call of the mysterious circles of Time and no exuberant movement of visionary semiotics, which might dictate the essential poetic logic to change the normal course of objective history. In spite of that the author of the Bachitar Natak creates a wrong chronological order, placing Mohammad after Ramanand, out of his blind ignorance. Guru Gobind Singh, who was well versant scholar of Islamic History, could not have committed such a gross error. e. An Estranged Image of Anandpur Without the Full-Fledged Historic Presence of the Tenth Master: While the seventh canto of the Bachitar Natak mentions that the tenth Master was brought to the Panjab from Patna in his childhood, 10 in this context, the author does not allude to the existence of Anandpur. After the martyrdom of his father he spent many meditative years there. The prophetic experience of the tenth Master passed through many phases of divine enlightenment at Anandpur, but the poet never reveals the name of the town and remains silent about its existence in the seventh canto of the Bachitar Natak. In eighth canto, the author informs the reader that the tenth Prophet proceeded to Patna, won the battle of Bhangani after some years, visited Kahloor and established a town called Anandpur. This brief statement is a self-evident proof that the author has misplaced all significant historical situations associated with Guru Gobind Singh. Even a common reader of history knows that Guru Tegh Bahadur laid the foundation stone of Anandpur and Guru Gobind Singh received the divine status of Gurgaddi there. By releasing such a distorted image of Anandpur that annihilates the right perspective of Gurus presence related to it, the author of the Bachitar Natak cannot claim himself to be Guru Gobind Singh. f. The Immature Vision of Religious Crises and Unjustifiable Criticism of Islam: The author of the Bachitar Natak is too immature to judge the historical processes of religious crises. He is unable to understand the subtle wholeness of a particular religion, which distinguishes it from its small sects. When the decline of Hinduism appears on its historical surface, he passes harshly sweeping judgments on its disruptive segments. The author is ignorant of the fact that in spite of the ritualistic tendencies leaving behind the perfection of its moral values, those Hindu sects also positively contian many divine element. An adamant egoistical tone of the Bachitar Natak is not justified to brush aside the importance of those sects by making their followers look like atheistic nincompoops. Again, such a harshness rooted in illogical prejudices builds up no justification of the advent of the tenth Master. India had been creating the subtlest patterns of religious thoughts of infinite variety since the birth of the Vedas. The vast vision of history and a true realization of abstract channels of life make this natural demand from a serious poet of prophetic consciousness to present wonderful realistic pageants of the rise and fall of the universal religions manifesting the logical culmination of the Khalsa. In the sixth canto, the poet of the Bachitar Natak gives some common place illustrations of religiously misguided characters of mythology basing his analysis on false assumptions. He creates a mazy narration of Mahander, Bisham, Brahma and general category of idolaters who alienated themselves from the true path of God in remote past. His declarations regarding the betrayal of gods are based on common hearsay without any authentic scholarly information. As the author doesn't understand the difference of mythology and the history of concrete 11 facts, he fails to draw a convincing line of the different evolutions of the subtlest branches o f religious ideologies. Again, he makes a poor choice of theological characters to delineate his point of view. For example, Datta-Tray and Gorakh look like insignificant dim dots of meditative reflections of spiritual journey amidst the vast panorama of varied religious paths of ancient times. The religious experience of the author of Bachitar-Natak is too shallow to deserve its comparison with the poetical/philosophic analysis of varied religious branches, revealed specially in the first Var of Bhai Gardas. We find no justification to place the fresh manifestation of the Khalsa at the end of that line of immature presentations of spiritual preceptors as visualized by the author of the Bachitar Natak. The obscure author of Bachitar-Natak gives a shocking treatment to the Prophet of Islam when he reaches the ending point of his tizada of condemnation against the certain religious paths and their crises. He underestimates the Prophet Muhammad in a disrespectful manner by declaring him simply the King of Arabia. Then he denies him indirectly the elevated status of Prophet and openly condemns him in an obscene language for circumcising all the kings. Mahadin tab prabhu upraja || Arab des ko kino raja ||26|| Tin bhi ek panth upraja || Ling bina kiney sabh raja || Sabh te apna naam japao || Satnam kahoon na dhirao ||27|| How ridiculous! What an absurdity! What an insulting manner to denounce a fellow religion! Is circumcision meant for Kings only? Did the common folks of Islam not adopt this symbolic ritual? Does circumcision mean for the Muslim Kings to be without copulative organs? The author of the Bachitar Natak is bereft of the knowledge that the ritual of circumcision was in vogue in the Jewish world before the advent of Islam. Again he is too naive to understand the spiritual meaning of circumcision suggested by Guru Guru Nanak in his Majh Ki Var. The version of the Zafarnama, the historic epistle addressed to Aurangzeb and his highly metaphysical composition entitled the Jap, prove that Guru Gobind Singh respected the holy Qur’an, understood the value of faith and accepted the prophetic magnanimity of Muhammad. Had the tenth Guru been the author of the Bachitar Natak, he would not have contradicted his own message, conveyed so 12 beautifully in his Jap Sahib, the most musical poem of metaphysical dimensions. The collective genius of Sikhism in her powerful faith, encompassing the living memories of Time and her undisputed historical traditions bows to this general agreement that Guru Gobind Singh established the Guru Granth Sahib on the eternal throne of socio-spiritual values belonging to the ten Gurus. Again, it is a fact that the Guru Granth Sahib accords the reverential serenity to the holy Qur’an and Islamic prayer in its contents, but the tone of Bachitar Natak is totally different in this context. So its authorship will remain alien to Guru Gobind Singh. Conclusion The commentators who claim that Guru Gobind Singh is the author of the entire Dasam Granth base their belief on two false assumptions, which are as follows: a. They believe that it was the prophetic mission of the Dasam Guru to create in the Khalsa consciousness an invincible euphoria of religious battles against the contemporary Hindu feudal systems and mainly against the despotic Mughal empire. Dr. Gurbhagat Singh develops a modern philosophic viewpoint of transcendental fervor of Guru's battles as manifested in his "religio-martial texts". The radiant enthusiasm "was meant as a cultural weapon to transform and restore the needed vitality." I object to this "notion of battle" which according to the zealous supporters of the Dasam Granth functions as a pivotal force in its Chandi Charitars (including the Chandi Di Var) and the Chaubis Avtar. The said battles of gods, goddesses and demons are not symbolical in a profound creative sense, because they do not lead us to a new plane of reality higher than the visible surface of this life. Those battles simply place the reader (or the devotee) amidst the crude turmoil of gods and demons. The flat and single layered descriptions of battles follow the slavish imitation of the bombastic style of compositions such as the Pirthvi Raj Raso in the Bachitar Natak. It is sufficient to prove that the said battles contain no "talic semiotic" as envisioned by Dr. Gurbhagat Singh. The idealism regarding the fights between good and evil is relegated to a stale moral precept of secondary place, but the supreme purpose of the Dasam Granth remains to highlight the Brahamanical Guru-Status of gods and goddesses. The concluding two lines of the Chandi Di Var invite the attention of the devotees to worship Durga: Durga path banaya sabhey paurian || Fer na juuni aya jin eh gaya ||õõ|| The goddess Durga has composed the recitation of 13 all the stanzas (of Chandi Di Var). Every worshipper who recites it will attain freedom from the cycles of birth and death). ||55|| I conclude that all the battles of gods and goddesses leave us with no other choice except tilting to the message of worshipping them. It is, therefore, impossible to associate the authorship of the complete text of the Dasam Granth with the tenth Master. b. The commentators who believe Guru Gobind Singh to be the sole creator of the entire Dasam Granth delineate its second purpose saying that the tenth Prophet wanted to acquaint his Sikhs with the colorful religiocultural heritage of India through his manifold poetic compositions compiled in the Dasam Granth. I think this viewpoint is not valid enough in deciding the authenticity of authorship of the Dasam Granth. I reject this clumsy idea of the impassioned votaries of the Dasam Granth by advancing the following five arguments: i. It has never been the role of any prophet before Guru Gobind Singh to educate his followers in such a mechanical sense like an educational plan of prosaic times. The blessed movement of a prophetic genius is more awe-inspiring, creative and winning than offering the sluggish genre of degenerating literary forms, such as the Charitropakhyan and the Hakayats. ii. Even if we were to suppose that it was the thoughtful scheme of the tenth Guru to instruct his followers by producing various poetic compositions of the Dasam Granth, in no case would he make a wrong choice of literary specimens. The bulky size of literature contained in the Dasam Granth is not even a dim shadow of those sublime, pure and aesthetic dimensions of literature which belong to the real and first rate heritage of South Asia. Here we see that the Chandi Charitars are brimming with bombastic verbosity, mechanical devices of reverberating word, pictures and conventional expressions of heroic feats. The Chaubis Avtar and other stories of gods/avtars present the grotesque pictures of mythological heroes with a mixture of heretics of shallow nature without origins. Furthermore, the contents of the Charitropakhyan are pregnant with obscene details of neurotic minds reflecting the one-sided, anti-aesthetic, degenerate activities and vices of sexually perverted women of Vam Marag. Will the tenth Prophet impose on the consciousness of the Khalsa this superfluous and thoroughly anti-Gurmat material of disintegrated spirit to undo those healthy traditions of Gurmat balanced poise of Sahij and majestic victories 14 of spirit which were brought about and then established by the previous nine Gurus and finally by the undisputed Scripture of the Khalsa? iii. With the exception of the Jap, the Akal Ustat (excluding 20 kabits mentioned above) and the Swayyas, the reader (devotee) observes that the Dasam Granth changes its stand again and again in relation to the worship of One God. In the ending Swaya of the Ramavatar the author declares in somewhat rude tone that being a votary of one God, he would not assign any divine status to Ram along with the religious ideas contained in the shastras and the simaratis. In the composition of the Krishanavatar, the Dasam Granth asserts rather in an unsophisticated idiom of language that the stories of Ganesh, Krishan and Bishan are known to the poet in a mechanical sense only, but in reality those characters stand alien to his unshakable faith in one God (stanza 434). Again, in the first canto of the Bachitar Natak, the author while claiming to be the champion worshipper of the Timeless Being, denies Ram, Krishan, Brahma, Shiv and Muhammad as the saviors of mankind. In spite of these denials and emphatic declarations the fundamental faith of the author expressed in the said poetic texts of the Dasam Granth, there is an unquestionable tilt towards the worship of avtars, goddesses (specially Durga, Parvati and Chandi) and gods. Even a part of the Gyan Prdodh, after revealing a dim reflection of the spiritual image of one eternal Being of the Guru Granth Sahib, shifts its visionary ground in part II of the text by adding to it a stereotyped Mahabharata-based history of religions to confuse the spotless wholeness and originality of the Khalsa. Here in the Dasam Granth, the devotee witnesses a faithless drama of the divided loyalties of the fickle-minded author(s) who fluctuate(s) from the worshipping point of Timeless God to the obeisance of secondary functioning agents of this mysterious universe. Amidst this chaos created by the chameleon-like nature of the worshippers, Guru Gobind Singh cannot be imagined to be the solitary author of the entire Dasan Granth. iv. The author of the Bachitar Natak in the fourteenth canto declares in an artificial humility, like a telepathist, that he had seen all the wonderful feats of avtars and Chandi (Kalka) in the previous ages. Again he claims (boasts?) that being a divine witness he has revealed all their miraculous deeds in his granths. In other words he states that he is the author of the Chandi Charitars (Part I & Part II) and the Chaubis Avtar along with the pageants of other incarnations of the gods. Now, here arises a significant point, as already argued by me: Guru Gobind Singh 15 is not the author of the Bachitar Natak. Therefore, the statement of the author in fourteenth canto emerges as an ample proof in favor of our transparent view assessing that the Chandi Charitars and the Chaubi Avtar are also not authored by Guru Gobind Singh. v. The Dasam Granth in one volume was an outcome of post-Guru period. It didn't exist in the period of tenth Guru. The Master under his benign supervision prepared the authentic version of the Guru Granth Sahib and at the last hour of his physical departure he conferred on it the honor of Guru-Scripture of the Khalsa. However, in his apical span of life, he never thought for a moment to get his bani compiled in a single volume. Even Bhai Mani Singh, the last scribe of the authentic Damdami Bir, did not make any suggestion to the Guru to compile his bani in one volume. It is equally important that he did not receive any direction in this matter from the Master. This fact of creative history is known to the common Sikhs of today that members of the Khalsa-fellowship of Guru-period generally committed to their memory the banis of the Dasam Guru, entitled the Jap Sahib, the Akal Ustat and the Sawayyas. It was easy to preserve them in their written form on loose sheets or in their bound copies, and therefore, the Sikhs faced no indispensability to incorporate them in a bulky volume such as the Dasam Granth. Then why did this passionate desire to create the Dasam Granth out of a mass of anti-Gurmat literature enter Bhai Mani Singh's mind at Amritsar after 1725 C.E.? I do not recognize the authenticity of the Bir associated with the name of Bhai Mani Singh because of the obscure history of its coming to light 83 years after the Bhai’s martyrdom in 1818 C.E.; its unmarked travels from Amritsar to Multan; its usurpation in mysterious circumstances from the concealed center of its origin; its respectful preservation in the house of an unknown Pathan at Multan; the secrecy of it name and mystery of its first location at Amritsar or near Amritsar. Again, the Dasam Granth associated with the name of Bhai Mani Singh includes in it the voluminous contents of Adi Granth in addition to the supposed Bani of the Dasam Guru. Now, Bhai Mani Singh could never commit such an act of betrayal by desecrating the original form of the undisputed Scripture of Khalsa Panth after it was installed as their ageless Guru. How could Bhai Mani Singh play such a faithless role against the intense friendly dictates of his beloved Master after being constantly submerged into the enlightened experience of the Guru Granth Sahib in his presence for nine months? So the said Bir is spurious, and it looks more spurious after emergence of the forged letter of Bhai Mani Singh. The disclosure of fake Khas Dastkhati Patre in Gyan Singh's Panth Parkash and the logical conclusion of spurious Hukamnamas in my book, the Sahije Rachio Khalsa, put a question mark against the 16 genuineness of the Dasam Granth. The unsymmetrical body of the Dasam Granth enveloped in unbalanced superstitious beliefs, repulsive camouflages, hearsays and boastful utterances during numerous encounters is not acceptable to me as the real word of Guru Gobind Singh's luminous Gurmat vision. Bibliography Singh, Gurbhagat. Sikhism and Postmodern Thought. New Delhi: Ajanta, 1999. Srī Dasam Granth Sāhib. 2 vols. Amritsar: Bhāī Jawāhar Singh, Bhāī Kirpāl Singh and Sons, 1967. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Bachittar Natak
Harinder Singh Mehboob's Essay On The Dasam Granth
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top