☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Evolution & Sikhism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sinister" data-source="post: 54011" data-attributes="member: 2684"><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">You are doing a great injustice by lumping science with atheistic philosophy. <span style="color: darkslateblue">Correct Science</span> is the science that is Agnostic and without opinion (and yes I will continue to repeat this until it is drilled and engrained in everyone mind).</span></strong> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: darkorange">Einstein and his "physics and Theology" is not a work of science. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: blue"><strong><u>And I doubt you read any peer reveiwed scientific journals; which you will see have abosolutely NO disscussions of God or universe formation. All you read are books...which are largely spiced-up artwork made by scientists so that they sell. Scientists then collect royalties to help fund there actual research.</u></strong></span> </p><p> </p><p>most scientists will discuss theology for the fun of it NOT so that it may be indoctrinated and engrained as some scientific law. </p><p> </p><p>Correct Science is science that is Agnostic and without opinion. </p><p>the work, "Physics and theology" is not to be taken as "scientific" but as an abstract thought experiment by a very inteligeant individual ... its an argument in metaphysics (that obviously went wrong). </p><p> </p><p><strong>Now you know how silly you sound when you try to explain and verify God's existance through artifiscially constructed computer models! with artifiscial parameters.</strong></p><p> </p><p>the same way Einstein was ashamed of physics and theolgy. many people critiqued him for that and called him "a theolgian in disguise".</p><p> </p><p><span style="color: red"><strong><u>Look at his true works (his 1905 papers) Annus Mirabili Papers: no God discussion in there to my recollection just objective science (AND THAT IS WHAT HE IS RECOGNIZED FOR TODAY; WHICH HE RECEIVED A NOBEL PRIZE FOR)</u></strong></span></p><p>The works that are recognized in the scientific community are those that are agnostic. WITHOUT SWEEPING GENERALIZATIONS AND PREDICTION AND VARIABLES (OCCAM'S RAZOR PRINCIPLE)</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>true science is science without opinion...AND ONLY THIS SCIENCE IS THE SCIENCE WHICH IS REWARDED. </p><p><strong><u><span style="color: blue">Scientists do not sit there and cater to atheistic philosophy...they simply report that which is observed AS OBJECTIVE AND AS BLAND AS THEY CAN POSSIBLY MAKE IT.</span></u></strong> </p><p> </p><p>now if you disagree with that...then you truly do not understand the "scientific community".</p><p> </p><p>scientists may freely discuss religion and cosmic models...but they do NOT do these studies for merit of any sort</p><p>critiquing science is one thing, critiquing an individual and their philosophical veiwpoints is all-together a different event. </p><p> </p><p>MY WORDS ARE NOT SO MEANINGLESS IF ONE WERE TO PULL THEIR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND AND LOOK AT THINGS AT FACE VALUE.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sinister, post: 54011, member: 2684"] [B][COLOR=#ff0000]You are doing a great injustice by lumping science with atheistic philosophy. [COLOR=darkslateblue]Correct Science[/COLOR] is the science that is Agnostic and without opinion (and yes I will continue to repeat this until it is drilled and engrained in everyone mind).[/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=darkorange]Einstein and his "physics and Theology" is not a work of science. [/COLOR] [COLOR=blue][B][U]And I doubt you read any peer reveiwed scientific journals; which you will see have abosolutely NO disscussions of God or universe formation. All you read are books...which are largely spiced-up artwork made by scientists so that they sell. Scientists then collect royalties to help fund there actual research.[/U][/B][/COLOR] most scientists will discuss theology for the fun of it NOT so that it may be indoctrinated and engrained as some scientific law. Correct Science is science that is Agnostic and without opinion. the work, "Physics and theology" is not to be taken as "scientific" but as an abstract thought experiment by a very inteligeant individual ... its an argument in metaphysics (that obviously went wrong). [B]Now you know how silly you sound when you try to explain and verify God's existance through artifiscially constructed computer models! with artifiscial parameters.[/B] the same way Einstein was ashamed of physics and theolgy. many people critiqued him for that and called him "a theolgian in disguise". [COLOR=red][B][U]Look at his true works (his 1905 papers) Annus Mirabili Papers: no God discussion in there to my recollection just objective science (AND THAT IS WHAT HE IS RECOGNIZED FOR TODAY; WHICH HE RECEIVED A NOBEL PRIZE FOR)[/U][/B][/COLOR] The works that are recognized in the scientific community are those that are agnostic. WITHOUT SWEEPING GENERALIZATIONS AND PREDICTION AND VARIABLES (OCCAM'S RAZOR PRINCIPLE) true science is science without opinion...AND ONLY THIS SCIENCE IS THE SCIENCE WHICH IS REWARDED. [B][U][COLOR=blue]Scientists do not sit there and cater to atheistic philosophy...they simply report that which is observed AS OBJECTIVE AND AS BLAND AS THEY CAN POSSIBLY MAKE IT.[/COLOR][/U][/B] now if you disagree with that...then you truly do not understand the "scientific community". scientists may freely discuss religion and cosmic models...but they do NOT do these studies for merit of any sort critiquing science is one thing, critiquing an individual and their philosophical veiwpoints is all-together a different event. MY WORDS ARE NOT SO MEANINGLESS IF ONE WERE TO PULL THEIR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND AND LOOK AT THINGS AT FACE VALUE. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Evolution & Sikhism
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top