☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Evolution & Sikhism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="P_Sikh" data-source="post: 54010" data-attributes="member: 4765"><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="color: red">HUH? You mean philosophy department’s right? You won’t find a “god” discussion in any scientific community … I’ll assure you that. Your claims are groundless… learn the difference between science and metaphysics. Sorry to say this but “J..to the A” is right…These questions are invalid in science (upon closer observation).</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: blue">Sinister, that’s the MOST MEANINGLESS statement I have ever come across. Now you mean either Einstein wasn’t ‘True Scientist’ or didn’t belong to ‘Scientific Community’ when he spent years of his career modifying his ‘General Relativity Equations’ to attempt to eliminate the need for a Creator/God and ALAS HE HAD TO GIVE UP BECAUSE HIS EQUATIONS INDICATED HIM OTHERWISE and he admitted he was wrong by stating the universe was static and was always there. He further admitted ‘this was the blunder of his career’ and there was origin and equations did indicate point of creation. If you have any problem understanding his equations then the case is different. He also wrote book ‘</span><em><span style="color: blue">Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology’ </span></em></strong><strong><span style="color: blue">and you saying ‘We won’t find a ‘God’ discussion in scientific community’ </span></strong></span></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Dr. Hugh Ross, British physicist Steven Hawking, Michael Turner, Geroge Smoot with his team of 30 American astrophysicists, you know common between these scientists, they studied ‘Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God’. </span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">I’m not going to discuss the results of their discussions/research but if you say there is no discussion about ‘God’ in scientific community then THAT IS JUST MEANINGLESS. DON’T MISLEAD THE FOLKS. Yes, you could definitely say that there is no ‘God’ discussion in ‘Sinister Scientific Community’’.</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">how desparate this debate becomes when people cannot distinguish between fields of study.</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Sinister stop contradicting yourself for GOD sake. You want people to distinguish between fields of study where if we listen to the results of one field of Study there is NO NEED of the other field of study. And then yet again you don’t want the folks of other field to say anything to first field of study which is trying to make it extinct. NOT FARE DUDE…. </span></span></span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="P_Sikh, post: 54010, member: 4765"] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Verdana][COLOR=red]HUH? You mean philosophy department’s right? You won’t find a “god” discussion in any scientific community … I’ll assure you that. Your claims are groundless… learn the difference between science and metaphysics. Sorry to say this but “J..to the A” is right…These questions are invalid in science (upon closer observation).[/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=#993366][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=red][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=blue]Sinister, that’s the MOST MEANINGLESS statement I have ever come across. Now you mean either Einstein wasn’t ‘True Scientist’ or didn’t belong to ‘Scientific Community’ when he spent years of his career modifying his ‘General Relativity Equations’ to attempt to eliminate the need for a Creator/God and ALAS HE HAD TO GIVE UP BECAUSE HIS EQUATIONS INDICATED HIM OTHERWISE and he admitted he was wrong by stating the universe was static and was always there. He further admitted ‘this was the blunder of his career’ and there was origin and equations did indicate point of creation. If you have any problem understanding his equations then the case is different. He also wrote book ‘[/COLOR][I][COLOR=blue]Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology’ [/COLOR][/I][/B][B][COLOR=blue]and you saying ‘We won’t find a ‘God’ discussion in scientific community’ [/COLOR][/B][/FONT][/SIZE] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Dr. Hugh Ross, British physicist Steven Hawking, Michael Turner, Geroge Smoot with his team of 30 American astrophysicists, you know common between these scientists, they studied ‘Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God’. [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]I’m not going to discuss the results of their discussions/research but if you say there is no discussion about ‘God’ in scientific community then THAT IS JUST MEANINGLESS. DON’T MISLEAD THE FOLKS. Yes, you could definitely say that there is no ‘God’ discussion in ‘Sinister Scientific Community’’.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana]how desparate this debate becomes when people cannot distinguish between fields of study.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Sinister stop contradicting yourself for GOD sake. You want people to distinguish between fields of study where if we listen to the results of one field of Study there is NO NEED of the other field of study. And then yet again you don’t want the folks of other field to say anything to first field of study which is trying to make it extinct. NOT FARE DUDE…. [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Evolution & Sikhism
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top