☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Sikh History & Heritage
Did Guru Nanak Accurately Predict The Mughal Invasion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swarn bains" data-source="post: 206018" data-attributes="member: 17695"><p>Babur attacked India in 1519 and lost. as per 1578 theory, it appears that he attacked Aimnabad a village near by Lahore but not Lahore and went back. So the 1578 figure does not fit there or may be he trained his army and went back and attacked India again in 1522 and lost and retreated. if the 1578 or 1521 prediction is correct then why would Babur not rule Punjab or lahore or appoint his ruler there instead of going back to kabul. That is just to prove a point. Nanak never predicted any such thing. Babur he conquered Delhi in 1526.</p><p>Humayun lost the battle of kanauj in 1540 that figure is1597 if someone may call it as Bikrmy. But humayun left India for Afghanistan or Iran on july 17 1543. the wording of the stanza aaun 78 re jaan 97 will fit here for 97 only if the prediction was to leave delhi. but the figure suggests that he left India in 1600 bikarmy. then it is different</p><p>If this prediction for Mugals only or all Muslims then no other muslim from any other dynasty ruled India wording hor vee uthsi maaad ka chella does not work either. Let us discus this. Abdali attacked India many times after that. He just came to plunder. he never ruled India. If we say that it means the same then this argument agrees. On the other hand if we say to rule, in this case no other dynasty of muslims ruled India after that.then it is wrong. baba Nanak never spread rumours. what if it is wrong. So it is not a prediction</p><p>Next argument is ਆਉਣ ਅਠੱਤਰੈ ਜਾਣ ਸਤਨਵੈ ਹੋਰ ਵੀ ਉਠਸੀ ਮਰਦ ਕਾ ਚੇਲਾ</p><p>The figures are 78 and 97. why are we making it 1578 and 1597. If it was so, he would have written it as 1578 and 1597. We the so called scholars make the figures of 1578 and 1597 to prove our point. What if he did not mean so. Who is wrong? one who says it is 1578 or 1597. This is the way how the learned scholars twist the meaning or he who says that it is just the figures used to complete the couplet. I was not there. I can only go by what is written not imagined. is the wording written correct or the wording put into some ones mouth correct. take it the way you want</p><p>We can run our horses of ill knowledge wild, but Baba Nanak only can answer this question correctly</p><p>the figures I wrote were wrong or typing slip sorry</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="swarn bains, post: 206018, member: 17695"] Babur attacked India in 1519 and lost. as per 1578 theory, it appears that he attacked Aimnabad a village near by Lahore but not Lahore and went back. So the 1578 figure does not fit there or may be he trained his army and went back and attacked India again in 1522 and lost and retreated. if the 1578 or 1521 prediction is correct then why would Babur not rule Punjab or lahore or appoint his ruler there instead of going back to kabul. That is just to prove a point. Nanak never predicted any such thing. Babur he conquered Delhi in 1526. Humayun lost the battle of kanauj in 1540 that figure is1597 if someone may call it as Bikrmy. But humayun left India for Afghanistan or Iran on july 17 1543. the wording of the stanza aaun 78 re jaan 97 will fit here for 97 only if the prediction was to leave delhi. but the figure suggests that he left India in 1600 bikarmy. then it is different If this prediction for Mugals only or all Muslims then no other muslim from any other dynasty ruled India wording hor vee uthsi maaad ka chella does not work either. Let us discus this. Abdali attacked India many times after that. He just came to plunder. he never ruled India. If we say that it means the same then this argument agrees. On the other hand if we say to rule, in this case no other dynasty of muslims ruled India after that.then it is wrong. baba Nanak never spread rumours. what if it is wrong. So it is not a prediction Next argument is ਆਉਣ ਅਠੱਤਰੈ ਜਾਣ ਸਤਨਵੈ ਹੋਰ ਵੀ ਉਠਸੀ ਮਰਦ ਕਾ ਚੇਲਾ The figures are 78 and 97. why are we making it 1578 and 1597. If it was so, he would have written it as 1578 and 1597. We the so called scholars make the figures of 1578 and 1597 to prove our point. What if he did not mean so. Who is wrong? one who says it is 1578 or 1597. This is the way how the learned scholars twist the meaning or he who says that it is just the figures used to complete the couplet. I was not there. I can only go by what is written not imagined. is the wording written correct or the wording put into some ones mouth correct. take it the way you want We can run our horses of ill knowledge wild, but Baba Nanak only can answer this question correctly the figures I wrote were wrong or typing slip sorry [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Sikh History & Heritage
Did Guru Nanak Accurately Predict The Mughal Invasion?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top