☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Interviews
Centre Drops Proposal For Separate Sikh Marriage Act
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Archived_Member16" data-source="post: 152387" data-attributes="member: 884"><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">Stunning blow to Sikh Aspirations </span></strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Sikhs had long been fighting for amendments to the Anand Karaj (Marriage) Act to convert it into a legislation governing their marriages. But the Centre’s decision to drop the proposal has dealt a blow to their aspirations. Perneet Singh takes an in-depth look into the issue </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Sikh leaders and scholars have reacted strongly to the Centre’s decision to drop the proposal for a Sikh Marriage Act, a major demand of the Sikhs since decades. Law Minister Salman Khursheed had yesterday informed Parliament that after receiving several representations for amendment to the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, the government had decided to drop the proposal. He was answering a query by Rajya Sabha member Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa (SAD). </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Sikhs have been fighting for amendments in the Anand Karaj (Marriage) Act, 1909, passed by Viceroy and Governor-General on October 22, 1909. The Act reads: “This Act would be extended to the whole of British India.” While introducing the Anand Marriage Act, the British Government had made it clear that it was being introduced to remove doubts as to the validity of the marriage ceremony of the Sikhs called “Anand”. Post-Independence, the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, was extended to the new provinces and states merged under the the Merged States (Laws) Act, 1949, and to the Union Territories in 1950 and Manipur and Tripura in 1956. The Act was brought into force in Meghalaya on January 21, 1972. However, Sikh marriages are not registered under it till date. The Sikh marriages performed under Sikh rites are registered either under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>Anand Marriage Act, 1909</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Act’s salient features are: </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">All marriages which may be or may have been duly solemnised according to the Sikh marriage ceremony called “Anand” shall be deemed to have been with effect from the date of the solemnisation of each respectively, good and valid in law; nothing in this Act shall apply to: (a) any marriage between persons not professing the Sikh religion, or (b) any marriage which has been judicially declared null and void</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Nothing in this Act shall affect the validity of any marriage duly solemnised according to any other marriage ceremony customary among the Sikhs. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to validate any marriage between persons related to each other in any degree of consanguinity or affinity which would, according to the customary law of the Sikhs, render a marriage between them illegal. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, extends to the whole of India, except Jammu and Kashmir, and applies also to Hindus domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who are outside the said territories. This Act applies to: </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Any person who is a Hindu by religion in any of its forms, including a Virashaiva, a Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Any person who is a Buddhist, Jain or Sikh by religion; Any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed. The Act also states that the expression “Hindu” in any portion of this Act shall be construed to include a person who, though not a Hindu by religion, is, nevertheless, a person to whom this Act applies by virtue of the provisions contained in this section. As a result, the Anand Marriage Act 1909, which was the only piece of legislation applicable exclusively to Sikhs, has become redundant.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>DIFFERENT CUSTOMS</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">So far, there is no provision for the registration of a marriage under the Anand Marriage Act, despite the fact that it has been on the statute books since 1909. As such, the Sikhs have to get their marriages registered either under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act. This is the reason why Sikhs have had reservations on getting their marriages registered under the Hindu Marriage Act. The Sikhs contend that they are a separate religion with a different set of customs and there are several differences in the way marriage ceremonies are solemnised by followers of the two religions.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Guru Granth Sahib strictly prohibits idol or element worship, but in the Hindu marriage ceremony, the worship of nine constellations of stars is necessary and the Agni (fire) is a witness to the holy union. In case of the Sikhs, Sri Guru Granth Sahib is the witness. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">A Sikh couple walks around the Holy Granth to the recitation of four hymns, known as "lawaan". A Hindu couple takes seven “pheras” around the Agni.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>POST-INDEPENDENCE SCENARIO</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Sikh scholars feel that the process of distinct laws for the Sikhs was undone by the policy adopted under Explanation II to Article 25 (2) of the Indian Constitution.This provision ensured that the Sikhs were included in the definition of Hindu. As a result, Sikhs come under the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>AN EVENTFUL YEAR</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The year 2008 turned out to be a momentous year for the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, with the Punjab Assembly passing the Punjab Compulsory Registration of Marriages Bill:2008 on March 12, 2008, paving the way for registration of marriages under the Anand Marriage Act: 1909. The Pakistan Govt, too, passed the draft of the Anand Marriage Act on January 23, 2008, to allow Sikhs to register marriages under a separate marriage Act.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>WHAT IS ANAND KARAJ</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Anand Karaj was introduced by third Sikh guru, Guru Amar Das. The four “lawaan” (hymns recited during the marriage ceremony) were composed by his successor Guru Ram Das</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Anand Karaj is governed by the Sikh “rehat maryada” (Sikh code of conduct) determined by the SGPC, according to which only those who follow the Sikh religion may marry under the ceremony </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">It also states that child marriage is invalid and that no account should be taken of the prospective spouse’s caste </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Anand Karaj usually takes place in a gurdwara, though it may also be conducted at the residence of bride or groom or any other place where Guru Granth Sahib has been installed </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">However, it must be ensured that the Holy Granth is installed following the proper procedure </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">According to an edict by Akal Takht, Anand Karaj is to take place only in a gurdwara and Guru Granth Sahib cannot be taken to a marriage hall for the purpose</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>Long PENDING DEMAND</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">There is no provision for registration of marriage under the Anand Marriage Act, despite the fact that it has been on the statute books since 1909. This legislation applicable exclusively to the Sikhs has, thus, become redundant</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">As such, the Sikhs have to get their marriages registered either under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Sikhs contend that theirs is a separate religion with a different set of customs</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>The voices</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“The government should not resort to dilly-dallying but implement the Act immediately. It has already been implemented in Pakistan and even the British regime had recognised the fact that Sikhism is a separate religion. Sikh lawyers should come forward to find a way out”</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— Akal Takht chief Giani Gurbachan Singh</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“The statement by the Law Minister in support of the move to drop the proposal is misleading. We are simply seeking an amendment to pave the way for adding a clause. What we are demanding was passed by the Standing Committee unanimously in December 2007 and the government had assured both the Houses that it would be passed” </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— Rajya Sabha MP Tarlochan Singh</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“We are deliberately being discriminated against. It is sheer injustice with us. We will consult legal experts and decide our future course of action</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— SGPC chief Avtar Singh Makkar </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“Anand Karaj is totally different from the marriage rituals of the Hindus and it should be brought under the Sikh Marriage Act. It is high time that the SGPC and the SAD fights for the cause”</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— Former GNDU VC SP Singh</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“This issue is related to the turban issue and other problems the Sikh abroad face. Right thinking men,Sikh or non-Sikh, should appreciate that it is a necessity now. I will impress upon the government to review the decision”</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— Noted lawyer HS Phoolka</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“The move is aimed at denying us a separate identity. The Law Minister’s argument justifying the government step does not hold water. We want to tell the minister, who is talking of Article 44, that whenever the Muslims and Christians accept a uniform civil code, we too will accept the same”</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— Former SGPC secy MS Calcutta </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“The Centre cannot drop the proposal. I have learnt that it will soon be placed before the Cabinet. If there is a hindrance, Punjab CM Parkash Singh Badal should call a special session of the Assembly and pave the way for registration of all the marriages performed as per the Sikh code of conduct under the Act”</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— DSGMC chief PS Sarna</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“Sikhism is a separate religion. It is a matter of regret that the birth, marriage, adoption, death of a Sikh is in accordance with the laws of another religion. Explanation II of Article 25 (2) (b) of the Constitution continues to classify Sikhs as Hindus”</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— Dal Khalsa leader Kanwar Pal Singh</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">“The Congress-led UPA Government at the Centre has adopted an "anti-Sikh" posture by "deliberately" rejecting the proposal of the separate 'Sikh Marriage Act' for solemnising the marriages of the community. The Sikh community in general and the SAD in particular had been impressing upon the Centre for expeditious enactment of the 'Anand Karaj Act' for Sikhs on the pattern of similar acts covering the Muslims, Christians, Parsis and Jews. The decision came despite an assurance to various SAD MPs by ex-Law Minister Veerappa Moily that the draft bill for the Act was ready and would be sent for Cabinet approval soon. before being placed in Parliament. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">— Chief Minister Parkash S Badal</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">Union Govt ignored House panel advice</span></strong></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Aditi Tandon/TNS</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">New Delhi, August 30</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">In dropping the proposal for an amendment to the Anand Marriage Act of 1909 to provide for compulsory registration of Sikh marriages, the Centre has disregarded a unanimous recommendation the Parliamentary Standing Committee had made in 2007. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">A day after the Law Minister justified abandoning the amendment on the grounds that it would breed similar demands from other communities and was against the principles of the uniform civil code, The Tribune has learnt that the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice (which is now considering the Lokpal Bill) had, on December 4, 2007, considered the issue and unanimously asked the Congress-led UPA government to come forward with a simple amendment to the Anand Karaj Act to allow Sikh marriages to be registered therein. Besides, two former law ministers - HR Bhardwaj and M Veerappa Moily - gave assurances in the RS to bring about the said amendment. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The Parliamentary Committee chaired by Congressman EM Sudershan Natchiappan, in its meeting held in December 2007, even impressed upon the then Law Secretary KN Chaturvedi of the necessity of the move in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2006 judgment, directing all states and UTs to make registration of marriages mandatory. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The meeting was held to take a view on the matter after 12 Sikh MPs cutting across party lines — including the then Lok Sabha Deputy Speaker Charanjit Atwal of the Akali Dal. He gave a letter to the house panel chief, seeking the amendment to prevent NRI grooms from leaving their wives in the lurch.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Former Rajya Sabha MP Tarlochan Singh, who was member of the said committee, today confirmed to TNS that the panel’s report was extremely positive and favoured the long-standing demand of Sikhs. Singh today even shot off a letter to Law Minister Salman Khursheed, who is also the Minority Affairs Minister. The letter states, “The Sikh minority has been shocked by this unrealistic approach of your ministry. You are also Minister for Minority Affairs where you are supposed to protect the rights of minorities. For long, there is a feeling that the government is showing different treatment to various minority communities,” Singh wrote.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p> <span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>Mata Ludiki performed first Anand Karaj for her son </strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Amarjit Thind</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Tribune News Service </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">Jalandhar, August 30</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">The famous Chhawale Sants, Sunder Singh and Pritam Singh, from the Doaba region had taken it upon themselves to get the marriages of their congregation solemnised as per the Anand Karaj enshrined in the rehat/maryada decided by the SGPC after the 'Mini Parliamant' of the Sikhs was founded. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">From the frontier regions of Peshawar till the hill tracts of Paonta Sahib, the duo carried the granth wherever their followers or their kith and kin were to be married over ninety years ago. Though the act was yet to be implemented, the Sikhs had been following this maryada at the time of marriage since long. Prof Harbans Singh Bolina, former SGPC honorary education secretary who is the coordinator of the Centre for Guru Granth Sahib Studies, Lyallpur Khalsa College, here, said the first ever Anand Karaj was performed by Mata Ludiki for her son Dayal Singh, who later on went to found the Nirankari Mission. She was a known social worker of the region and is said to have only brought the granth as her trousseau, he revealed.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">"The new committee that takes over on November 22 should raise the issue and take it to its logical conclusion," he said.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">On the other hand, the All-India Sikh Students Federation (AISSF) has termed dropping the 'Anand Marriage Act-1909' proposal by the Centre as a "discriminatory" act. The AISSF has decided to file a constitutional petition before the Supreme Court challenging the Home Ministry decision. Federation chief Karnail Singh Peermohammad said the Centre's decision of asking Sikhs to register their marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act was in violation of 'equal rights' provided under Article 14 & 15 of the Constitution. "The SAD (Badal), SGPC and DSGMC have betrayed the Sikh community by doing nothing to get the act implemented for decades. We will take the issue to the Sikh Community and would expose the ineffectiveness of these organizations," Peermohammad said.</span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy">At present, the Muslims, Christians, Parsis and Jews have their own marriage acts, he pointed out. </span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"></span></p><p><span style="color: Navy"><strong>source:</strong> <a href="http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110831/punjab.htm" target="_blank">http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110831/punjab.htm</a></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Archived_Member16, post: 152387, member: 884"] [COLOR="Navy"][B][SIZE="5"]Stunning blow to Sikh Aspirations [/SIZE][/B] The Sikhs had long been fighting for amendments to the Anand Karaj (Marriage) Act to convert it into a legislation governing their marriages. But the Centre’s decision to drop the proposal has dealt a blow to their aspirations. Perneet Singh takes an in-depth look into the issue Sikh leaders and scholars have reacted strongly to the Centre’s decision to drop the proposal for a Sikh Marriage Act, a major demand of the Sikhs since decades. Law Minister Salman Khursheed had yesterday informed Parliament that after receiving several representations for amendment to the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, the government had decided to drop the proposal. He was answering a query by Rajya Sabha member Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa (SAD). The Sikhs have been fighting for amendments in the Anand Karaj (Marriage) Act, 1909, passed by Viceroy and Governor-General on October 22, 1909. The Act reads: “This Act would be extended to the whole of British India.” While introducing the Anand Marriage Act, the British Government had made it clear that it was being introduced to remove doubts as to the validity of the marriage ceremony of the Sikhs called “Anand”. Post-Independence, the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, was extended to the new provinces and states merged under the the Merged States (Laws) Act, 1949, and to the Union Territories in 1950 and Manipur and Tripura in 1956. The Act was brought into force in Meghalaya on January 21, 1972. However, Sikh marriages are not registered under it till date. The Sikh marriages performed under Sikh rites are registered either under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act. [B]Anand Marriage Act, 1909[/B] The Act’s salient features are: All marriages which may be or may have been duly solemnised according to the Sikh marriage ceremony called “Anand” shall be deemed to have been with effect from the date of the solemnisation of each respectively, good and valid in law; nothing in this Act shall apply to: (a) any marriage between persons not professing the Sikh religion, or (b) any marriage which has been judicially declared null and void Nothing in this Act shall affect the validity of any marriage duly solemnised according to any other marriage ceremony customary among the Sikhs. Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to validate any marriage between persons related to each other in any degree of consanguinity or affinity which would, according to the customary law of the Sikhs, render a marriage between them illegal. [B]HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955[/B] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, extends to the whole of India, except Jammu and Kashmir, and applies also to Hindus domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who are outside the said territories. This Act applies to: Any person who is a Hindu by religion in any of its forms, including a Virashaiva, a Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj Any person who is a Buddhist, Jain or Sikh by religion; Any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed. The Act also states that the expression “Hindu” in any portion of this Act shall be construed to include a person who, though not a Hindu by religion, is, nevertheless, a person to whom this Act applies by virtue of the provisions contained in this section. As a result, the Anand Marriage Act 1909, which was the only piece of legislation applicable exclusively to Sikhs, has become redundant. [B]DIFFERENT CUSTOMS[/B] So far, there is no provision for the registration of a marriage under the Anand Marriage Act, despite the fact that it has been on the statute books since 1909. As such, the Sikhs have to get their marriages registered either under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act. This is the reason why Sikhs have had reservations on getting their marriages registered under the Hindu Marriage Act. The Sikhs contend that they are a separate religion with a different set of customs and there are several differences in the way marriage ceremonies are solemnised by followers of the two religions. Guru Granth Sahib strictly prohibits idol or element worship, but in the Hindu marriage ceremony, the worship of nine constellations of stars is necessary and the Agni (fire) is a witness to the holy union. In case of the Sikhs, Sri Guru Granth Sahib is the witness. A Sikh couple walks around the Holy Granth to the recitation of four hymns, known as "lawaan". A Hindu couple takes seven “pheras” around the Agni. [B]POST-INDEPENDENCE SCENARIO[/B] Sikh scholars feel that the process of distinct laws for the Sikhs was undone by the policy adopted under Explanation II to Article 25 (2) of the Indian Constitution.This provision ensured that the Sikhs were included in the definition of Hindu. As a result, Sikhs come under the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. [B]AN EVENTFUL YEAR[/B] The year 2008 turned out to be a momentous year for the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, with the Punjab Assembly passing the Punjab Compulsory Registration of Marriages Bill:2008 on March 12, 2008, paving the way for registration of marriages under the Anand Marriage Act: 1909. The Pakistan Govt, too, passed the draft of the Anand Marriage Act on January 23, 2008, to allow Sikhs to register marriages under a separate marriage Act. [B]WHAT IS ANAND KARAJ[/B] Anand Karaj was introduced by third Sikh guru, Guru Amar Das. The four “lawaan” (hymns recited during the marriage ceremony) were composed by his successor Guru Ram Das The Anand Karaj is governed by the Sikh “rehat maryada” (Sikh code of conduct) determined by the SGPC, according to which only those who follow the Sikh religion may marry under the ceremony It also states that child marriage is invalid and that no account should be taken of the prospective spouse’s caste The Anand Karaj usually takes place in a gurdwara, though it may also be conducted at the residence of bride or groom or any other place where Guru Granth Sahib has been installed However, it must be ensured that the Holy Granth is installed following the proper procedure According to an edict by Akal Takht, Anand Karaj is to take place only in a gurdwara and Guru Granth Sahib cannot be taken to a marriage hall for the purpose [B]Long PENDING DEMAND[/B] There is no provision for registration of marriage under the Anand Marriage Act, despite the fact that it has been on the statute books since 1909. This legislation applicable exclusively to the Sikhs has, thus, become redundant As such, the Sikhs have to get their marriages registered either under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act The Sikhs contend that theirs is a separate religion with a different set of customs [B] The voices[/B] “The government should not resort to dilly-dallying but implement the Act immediately. It has already been implemented in Pakistan and even the British regime had recognised the fact that Sikhism is a separate religion. Sikh lawyers should come forward to find a way out” — Akal Takht chief Giani Gurbachan Singh “The statement by the Law Minister in support of the move to drop the proposal is misleading. We are simply seeking an amendment to pave the way for adding a clause. What we are demanding was passed by the Standing Committee unanimously in December 2007 and the government had assured both the Houses that it would be passed” — Rajya Sabha MP Tarlochan Singh “We are deliberately being discriminated against. It is sheer injustice with us. We will consult legal experts and decide our future course of action — SGPC chief Avtar Singh Makkar “Anand Karaj is totally different from the marriage rituals of the Hindus and it should be brought under the Sikh Marriage Act. It is high time that the SGPC and the SAD fights for the cause” — Former GNDU VC SP Singh “This issue is related to the turban issue and other problems the Sikh abroad face. Right thinking men,Sikh or non-Sikh, should appreciate that it is a necessity now. I will impress upon the government to review the decision” — Noted lawyer HS Phoolka “The move is aimed at denying us a separate identity. The Law Minister’s argument justifying the government step does not hold water. We want to tell the minister, who is talking of Article 44, that whenever the Muslims and Christians accept a uniform civil code, we too will accept the same” — Former SGPC secy MS Calcutta “The Centre cannot drop the proposal. I have learnt that it will soon be placed before the Cabinet. If there is a hindrance, Punjab CM Parkash Singh Badal should call a special session of the Assembly and pave the way for registration of all the marriages performed as per the Sikh code of conduct under the Act” — DSGMC chief PS Sarna “Sikhism is a separate religion. It is a matter of regret that the birth, marriage, adoption, death of a Sikh is in accordance with the laws of another religion. Explanation II of Article 25 (2) (b) of the Constitution continues to classify Sikhs as Hindus” — Dal Khalsa leader Kanwar Pal Singh “The Congress-led UPA Government at the Centre has adopted an "anti-Sikh" posture by "deliberately" rejecting the proposal of the separate 'Sikh Marriage Act' for solemnising the marriages of the community. The Sikh community in general and the SAD in particular had been impressing upon the Centre for expeditious enactment of the 'Anand Karaj Act' for Sikhs on the pattern of similar acts covering the Muslims, Christians, Parsis and Jews. The decision came despite an assurance to various SAD MPs by ex-Law Minister Veerappa Moily that the draft bill for the Act was ready and would be sent for Cabinet approval soon. before being placed in Parliament. — Chief Minister Parkash S Badal [B][SIZE="5"]Union Govt ignored House panel advice[/SIZE][/B] Aditi Tandon/TNS New Delhi, August 30 In dropping the proposal for an amendment to the Anand Marriage Act of 1909 to provide for compulsory registration of Sikh marriages, the Centre has disregarded a unanimous recommendation the Parliamentary Standing Committee had made in 2007. A day after the Law Minister justified abandoning the amendment on the grounds that it would breed similar demands from other communities and was against the principles of the uniform civil code, The Tribune has learnt that the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice (which is now considering the Lokpal Bill) had, on December 4, 2007, considered the issue and unanimously asked the Congress-led UPA government to come forward with a simple amendment to the Anand Karaj Act to allow Sikh marriages to be registered therein. Besides, two former law ministers - HR Bhardwaj and M Veerappa Moily - gave assurances in the RS to bring about the said amendment. The Parliamentary Committee chaired by Congressman EM Sudershan Natchiappan, in its meeting held in December 2007, even impressed upon the then Law Secretary KN Chaturvedi of the necessity of the move in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2006 judgment, directing all states and UTs to make registration of marriages mandatory. The meeting was held to take a view on the matter after 12 Sikh MPs cutting across party lines — including the then Lok Sabha Deputy Speaker Charanjit Atwal of the Akali Dal. He gave a letter to the house panel chief, seeking the amendment to prevent NRI grooms from leaving their wives in the lurch. Former Rajya Sabha MP Tarlochan Singh, who was member of the said committee, today confirmed to TNS that the panel’s report was extremely positive and favoured the long-standing demand of Sikhs. Singh today even shot off a letter to Law Minister Salman Khursheed, who is also the Minority Affairs Minister. The letter states, “The Sikh minority has been shocked by this unrealistic approach of your ministry. You are also Minister for Minority Affairs where you are supposed to protect the rights of minorities. For long, there is a feeling that the government is showing different treatment to various minority communities,” Singh wrote. [SIZE="5"][B]Mata Ludiki performed first Anand Karaj for her son [/B][/SIZE] Amarjit Thind Tribune News Service Jalandhar, August 30 The famous Chhawale Sants, Sunder Singh and Pritam Singh, from the Doaba region had taken it upon themselves to get the marriages of their congregation solemnised as per the Anand Karaj enshrined in the rehat/maryada decided by the SGPC after the 'Mini Parliamant' of the Sikhs was founded. From the frontier regions of Peshawar till the hill tracts of Paonta Sahib, the duo carried the granth wherever their followers or their kith and kin were to be married over ninety years ago. Though the act was yet to be implemented, the Sikhs had been following this maryada at the time of marriage since long. Prof Harbans Singh Bolina, former SGPC honorary education secretary who is the coordinator of the Centre for Guru Granth Sahib Studies, Lyallpur Khalsa College, here, said the first ever Anand Karaj was performed by Mata Ludiki for her son Dayal Singh, who later on went to found the Nirankari Mission. She was a known social worker of the region and is said to have only brought the granth as her trousseau, he revealed. "The new committee that takes over on November 22 should raise the issue and take it to its logical conclusion," he said. On the other hand, the All-India Sikh Students Federation (AISSF) has termed dropping the 'Anand Marriage Act-1909' proposal by the Centre as a "discriminatory" act. The AISSF has decided to file a constitutional petition before the Supreme Court challenging the Home Ministry decision. Federation chief Karnail Singh Peermohammad said the Centre's decision of asking Sikhs to register their marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act was in violation of 'equal rights' provided under Article 14 & 15 of the Constitution. "The SAD (Badal), SGPC and DSGMC have betrayed the Sikh community by doing nothing to get the act implemented for decades. We will take the issue to the Sikh Community and would expose the ineffectiveness of these organizations," Peermohammad said. At present, the Muslims, Christians, Parsis and Jews have their own marriage acts, he pointed out. [B]source:[/B] [url]http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110831/punjab.htm[/url][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Interviews
Centre Drops Proposal For Separate Sikh Marriage Act
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top