☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Are Sikhs Hindus?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Archived_Member_19" data-source="post: 75268" data-attributes="member: 2850"><p>please visit the site <a href="http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/debates/debates.htm" target="_blank">Constituent Assembly DEBATES (PROCEEDINGS)</a></p><p> </p><p>you might be able to find the relevant documents</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>as a proof of the signatories, i suggest you visit the parliament exhibitory hall and see the replica copy of the signatories of the constitution</p><p> </p><p>you can see aforementioned signatures</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><<[Whether Mr. P.S .Kairon was a member or Hukum singh was a member of a DRAFTING COMMITTEE becomes irrelevant. They would have been just GLORIFIED CLERKS only if they could not get the document drafted as per what they thought they wanted to say i.e mention of a Sikh State. >></p><p> </p><p>double standards, you are making personal comments on character of two distinguished gentlemen, one of whom the majoriy of punjab even elected their chief minister.</p><p> </p><p>in debates this is called negation of exact by generalization, how can you prove that they were "mere clerks" ?</p><p> </p><p>and WHY do you think a SIKH state is needed?</p><p> </p><p><<Any comments on this, Sir.<strong><span style="color: red">Mr. Kairon was and has been ‘stated to be’ a personal servants of Nehrus.</span></strong> Both joined hands with congress and lived their lives peacefully. We do not need such kinds of Sikhs and <span style="color: red"><strong>the entire community is paying for the mistakes of some traitors</strong></span>>>></p><p> </p><p> dear SIKH80 ji</p><p> </p><p>just your statement of Mr. Kairon as a "traitor" and "servant" of Nehru doesnot make him one.</p><p> </p><p> just as you "might" be miserable being cheated out into being born as an Indian, i am proud to be one and this doesnot make YOU a better person , nor it makes me a worse.</p><p> </p><p>i request you to abstain from mud slinging on deceased persons without FACTS, </p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: red">i am still waiting for the "sources" to prove your quoted article's contents - </span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: red"><<<<Nehru is reported to have said: "I shut my ears when someone speaks to me about honoring promises made to Sikhs during the independence movement". >>>>></span></strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><<They would be equally guilty of misrepresenting the Sikhs if in the final document there was no mention of Independent and autonomous state of Sikhs.>>></p><p> </p><p> <strong><span style="color: red">Please provide me any CENSUS source/opinion poll stating that SIKHS wanted a seperate independent nation.</span></strong></p><p> </p><p>please just donot make assumptions that sikhs were fighting for khalistan/whatever</p><p> </p><p><span style="color: red"><strong>there might be people here on the board whose fore fathers sacrificed lives and spilled their blood for getting India's freedom. please donot demean them by saying that they were fighing for "SIKH nation"</strong></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">SIKHS were not mercenaries in the WAR for independence. They fought with others shoulder to shoulder. </span></strong></p><p> </p><p><<Yes, if anyone is a Government Servant in any country, one would be able to serve as per the terms of appointment only. If one has to take an oath to protect the Constitution one has to be on oath else people shall not get any appointment. This applies to all the caste and communities or do you think that there should be some concessions for Sikhs. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hence any person calling him an Indian shall have to take an oath. It is not only for sikhs. It is for INDIANS. There is no logic in statement of yours in view of the context and the thrust of the topic.>>></p><p> </p><p>i am confused here, please donot side step from the point</p><p> </p><p>if you say that all indians take oath of constitution , then it means ALL indians and it includes SIKHS</p><p> </p><p>i only provided the fact to prove it wrong that SIKHS donot accept the constitution. please enlighten me how this is not in line with the "thrust" of the article?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><<Yes, about three years back a <span style="color: blue"><u>Sikh Chief Secy. of UP </u></span>had to resign 3 days before/prior to retirement due to corrupt practices in Taj corridor case. </p><p></p><p>It is the reputation that Sikhs in IAS are earning for the community.</p><p></p><p>Now pl. do not tell me that you do not know and it cannot happen.>></p><p> </p><p>once again, you use the second fallacy of debate, giving an example and generalizing.</p><p> </p><p>one sikh IAS bad = all sikh IAS bad</p><p> </p><p>i admire the ingenuity of your logic <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p>i donot consider this statement of any relevance to the points of discussion.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><<<u>Things do not change if you are not a fan of Nehru.</u></p><p><u></u></p><p><u></u>I shall request that kindly check the statements that you author so that we can process it peacefully. Although I did not have any intention of entering into controversy but if it is let it be. Please reply only after checking facts.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: blue">It shall be meaningless to proceed on so called presumptions.>>.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">instead of asking me to check facts , you can help me by pointing out mistakes like i did.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">i am not of a closed mind Sikh80 ji, </span><span style="color: #0000ff">i am absolutely open to criticism of my statements, but only through facts and not vague statements. Also i hope that before you call some deceased as "clerks", "traitors" or else, do post DATA to substantiate your claims.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">also i did not understand that what are "non peaceful" discussions <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">----------------------------------------</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">as a piece of advice to Mr. Choor Singh - he seems like a learned man, he should keep his hands in his pockets and stop meddling with other country's internal affairs. The moment he became an Singaprean citizen, he lost all right to yak yak on things concerning us Indians.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">i would love to see him working more productively in his free time, rather than fanning khalistani/divisive ideologies by making baseless allegations.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Archived_Member_19, post: 75268, member: 2850"] please visit the site [url=http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/debates/debates.htm]Constituent Assembly DEBATES (PROCEEDINGS)[/url] you might be able to find the relevant documents as a proof of the signatories, i suggest you visit the parliament exhibitory hall and see the replica copy of the signatories of the constitution you can see aforementioned signatures <<[Whether Mr. P.S .Kairon was a member or Hukum singh was a member of a DRAFTING COMMITTEE becomes irrelevant. They would have been just GLORIFIED CLERKS only if they could not get the document drafted as per what they thought they wanted to say i.e mention of a Sikh State. >> double standards, you are making personal comments on character of two distinguished gentlemen, one of whom the majoriy of punjab even elected their chief minister. in debates this is called negation of exact by generalization, how can you prove that they were "mere clerks" ? and WHY do you think a SIKH state is needed? <<Any comments on this, Sir.[B][COLOR=red]Mr. Kairon was and has been ‘stated to be’ a personal servants of Nehrus.[/COLOR][/B] Both joined hands with congress and lived their lives peacefully. We do not need such kinds of Sikhs and [COLOR=red][B]the entire community is paying for the mistakes of some traitors[/B][/COLOR]>>> dear SIKH80 ji just your statement of Mr. Kairon as a "traitor" and "servant" of Nehru doesnot make him one. just as you "might" be miserable being cheated out into being born as an Indian, i am proud to be one and this doesnot make YOU a better person , nor it makes me a worse. i request you to abstain from mud slinging on deceased persons without FACTS, [B][COLOR=red]i am still waiting for the "sources" to prove your quoted article's contents - [/COLOR][/B] [B][/B] [B][COLOR=red]<<<<Nehru is reported to have said: "I shut my ears when someone speaks to me about honoring promises made to Sikhs during the independence movement". >>>>>[/COLOR][/B] <<They would be equally guilty of misrepresenting the Sikhs if in the final document there was no mention of Independent and autonomous state of Sikhs.>>> [B][COLOR=red]Please provide me any CENSUS source/opinion poll stating that SIKHS wanted a seperate independent nation.[/COLOR][/B] please just donot make assumptions that sikhs were fighting for khalistan/whatever [COLOR=red][B]there might be people here on the board whose fore fathers sacrificed lives and spilled their blood for getting India's freedom. please donot demean them by saying that they were fighing for "SIKH nation"[/B][/COLOR] [B][/B] [B][COLOR=#ff0000]SIKHS were not mercenaries in the WAR for independence. They fought with others shoulder to shoulder. [/COLOR][/B] [B][/B] <<Yes, if anyone is a Government Servant in any country, one would be able to serve as per the terms of appointment only. If one has to take an oath to protect the Constitution one has to be on oath else people shall not get any appointment. This applies to all the caste and communities or do you think that there should be some concessions for Sikhs. Hence any person calling him an Indian shall have to take an oath. It is not only for sikhs. It is for INDIANS. There is no logic in statement of yours in view of the context and the thrust of the topic.>>> i am confused here, please donot side step from the point if you say that all indians take oath of constitution , then it means ALL indians and it includes SIKHS i only provided the fact to prove it wrong that SIKHS donot accept the constitution. please enlighten me how this is not in line with the "thrust" of the article? <<Yes, about three years back a [COLOR=blue][U]Sikh Chief Secy. of UP [/U][/COLOR]had to resign 3 days before/prior to retirement due to corrupt practices in Taj corridor case. It is the reputation that Sikhs in IAS are earning for the community. Now pl. do not tell me that you do not know and it cannot happen.>> once again, you use the second fallacy of debate, giving an example and generalizing. one sikh IAS bad = all sikh IAS bad i admire the ingenuity of your logic :) i donot consider this statement of any relevance to the points of discussion. <<[U]Things do not change if you are not a fan of Nehru. [/U]I shall request that kindly check the statements that you author so that we can process it peacefully. Although I did not have any intention of entering into controversy but if it is let it be. Please reply only after checking facts. [COLOR=blue]It shall be meaningless to proceed on so called presumptions.>>.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]instead of asking me to check facts , you can help me by pointing out mistakes like i did.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]i am not of a closed mind Sikh80 ji, [/COLOR][COLOR=#0000ff]i am absolutely open to criticism of my statements, but only through facts and not vague statements. Also i hope that before you call some deceased as "clerks", "traitors" or else, do post DATA to substantiate your claims.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]also i did not understand that what are "non peaceful" discussions :)[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]----------------------------------------[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]as a piece of advice to Mr. Choor Singh - he seems like a learned man, he should keep his hands in his pockets and stop meddling with other country's internal affairs. The moment he became an Singaprean citizen, he lost all right to yak yak on things concerning us Indians.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]i would love to see him working more productively in his free time, rather than fanning khalistani/divisive ideologies by making baseless allegations.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Are Sikhs Hindus?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top