☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
A Sikh Without His Flowing Hair And Turban
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BhagatSingh" data-source="post: 90002" data-attributes="member: 2610"><p>EDIT: read post below, first! I forgot to submit it.</p><p>It wasn't in simple enough sense for you, before? Ok let us proceed then.</p><p>So what is the difference between A and B?</p><p>A = the Guru of Sikhs is going to change to SGGS</p><p>B = hukam of the previous guru</p><p>Question raised: Do we follow upcoming Guru or go back to the previous one?</p><p></p><p>B has not been mentioned in upcoming Guru, SGGS!</p><p>Level of importance has declined.</p><p></p><p>Valid point. </p><p>But A does not HAVE to be in SGGS. Do you understand that? It is the nature of A. <strong>Don't read further if you do not understand what I am talking about here!!</strong></p><p></p><p>When A was put out, B became less important because it was not found in SGGS. You are giving A and B equal values but when A happens B becomes of less value/importance!</p><p></p><p>WRONG! read above.</p><p></p><p>Nope</p><p></p><p>Read my reply to Aad ji post just below.</p><p></p><p> NO it is not that simple. Is khalsa someone who is pure of heart or an amritdhari? </p><p>Khalsa could definitely be both, but let's look at a case where Khalsa isnt both.</p><p>Person x has not taken amrit but is what GGS would consider Khalsa.</p><p>Person y has taken amrit but is GGS would not consider Khalsa.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am getting your point, don't worry.</p><p>Guru Gobind SIngh ji did not say he was guru. Am I correct? Yet we "moved on" to him. When SGGS was made guru it was time to "move on" to SGGS.</p><p></p><p>That is because you have not even considered the fact that maybe, just maybe SGGS is what we have to follow, and Khalsa was not given as much importance by GGS.</p><p>I am NOT saying agree with me!!</p><p> </p><p>By thing I meant either person or object, no one is getting disrespected here, calm down. SGGS would be considered the new Guru since it was granted guruship by the old/previous one. I thought that would be obvious.</p><p></p><p>What's a thing?? Please clarify what you mean by thing. Since you bringing it up again.</p><p></p><p>When we say they are the same, we don't mean physically the same. WE mean their teaching are the same. </p><p></p><p>Ya so since he did not preserve the orders, we simply ignore them. Of course, we study them and they are of importance but were only of importance when they were given out and in the context they were given out.</p><p>Guru Gobind Singh ji was a man, SGGS is a book. There is a HUGE difference. GGS fought many wars, SGGS did not! Another HUGE difference. GGS could move on his own!! </p><p></p><p>If you mean the teachings then of course!! Another similarity:</p><p>GGS was revolutionary, SGGS is GOING to be revolutionary!!! :happy:</p><p> </p><p>To conclude you didn't consider the part you missed in the conclusion.... again, so no.</p><p>Anyone else want to make is clear for me? Please don't hesitate. I am not saying I am right and you are wrong, just trying to bring up confusing parts of our history.</p><p></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/whatsapp/wah.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wah:" title="Wah :wah:" data-shortname=":wah:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BhagatSingh, post: 90002, member: 2610"] EDIT: read post below, first! I forgot to submit it. It wasn't in simple enough sense for you, before? Ok let us proceed then. So what is the difference between A and B? A = the Guru of Sikhs is going to change to SGGS B = hukam of the previous guru Question raised: Do we follow upcoming Guru or go back to the previous one? B has not been mentioned in upcoming Guru, SGGS! Level of importance has declined. Valid point. But A does not HAVE to be in SGGS. Do you understand that? It is the nature of A. [B]Don't read further if you do not understand what I am talking about here!![/B] When A was put out, B became less important because it was not found in SGGS. You are giving A and B equal values but when A happens B becomes of less value/importance! WRONG! read above. Nope Read my reply to Aad ji post just below. NO it is not that simple. Is khalsa someone who is pure of heart or an amritdhari? Khalsa could definitely be both, but let's look at a case where Khalsa isnt both. Person x has not taken amrit but is what GGS would consider Khalsa. Person y has taken amrit but is GGS would not consider Khalsa. I am getting your point, don't worry. Guru Gobind SIngh ji did not say he was guru. Am I correct? Yet we "moved on" to him. When SGGS was made guru it was time to "move on" to SGGS. That is because you have not even considered the fact that maybe, just maybe SGGS is what we have to follow, and Khalsa was not given as much importance by GGS. I am NOT saying agree with me!! By thing I meant either person or object, no one is getting disrespected here, calm down. SGGS would be considered the new Guru since it was granted guruship by the old/previous one. I thought that would be obvious. What's a thing?? Please clarify what you mean by thing. Since you bringing it up again. When we say they are the same, we don't mean physically the same. WE mean their teaching are the same. Ya so since he did not preserve the orders, we simply ignore them. Of course, we study them and they are of importance but were only of importance when they were given out and in the context they were given out. Guru Gobind Singh ji was a man, SGGS is a book. There is a HUGE difference. GGS fought many wars, SGGS did not! Another HUGE difference. GGS could move on his own!! If you mean the teachings then of course!! Another similarity: GGS was revolutionary, SGGS is GOING to be revolutionary!!! :happy: To conclude you didn't consider the part you missed in the conclusion.... again, so no. Anyone else want to make is clear for me? Please don't hesitate. I am not saying I am right and you are wrong, just trying to bring up confusing parts of our history. :wah: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
A Sikh Without His Flowing Hair And Turban
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top