☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
2+2=5: A Case For Agnostic-Atheism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lee" data-source="post: 122239" data-attributes="member: 1301"><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">*Sigh* And again sir you have me wrong. I have already adressed this, but to clarify yes I agree that emotions make up a large part of what a human is, this though is not the point that I am addressing. </span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Well yes and no Sinister ji. If I for instance make a claim that my own morality is deviod of emotion and instead works only on reason, then this is how I am. Or to use your own phrasology for me this is 'what is' Now we can belive that I am the only one, do not think it would be true though. So you are half right and half wrong. You are correct that I view my own moral stance as being the correct way to view morality and so you are correct that I urge others to emulate me. Or 'Ought to be'.</span></span></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Again you have me wrong. You are guesing my motives for saying what I do and getting them wrong my freind.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #001f4b"><span style="font-size: 12px">[/FONT]</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Again I have already answered this, but here it is agian.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">It is moraly wrong for the strong to oppresed the weak as in doing so negates the choices for the oppresed</span> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Whooooa there fellow. Are you here equating a morality deviod of emotion and instead based on reason as socialpathic? Remember I have twice agreed that emotions are normal and needed for us humans, and that I talk only of how I see a persons morality should be? </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Well you say that I disagree. As you say using emotion, specificaly empathy you can't make up your mind on what is moraly correct the death penalty(empathy for the victim and family) or no death penalty(empathy for the criminal).</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Using only reason, we can see the crime of killing is moraly wrong. If this is true then we cannot perfom an immoral act in killing the killer. That is reasonable without emotions. Now if we throw emotions into the mix then we get people baying for the blood of the murder. Or put another way, moral confusion as people call for the killing of the killer, thereby making themselves inplicit in the same imorral act!</span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Completely wrong and quite ad homine if you ask me. Morality devoid of emotion is merely morality devoid of emotion. Socialpathy is the lack of emotional attachment to others specificly empathy.</p><p> </p><p>The rest is of course rubbish. My morality IS devoid of emotion, I am not a socialpath, I feel massive empathy towards the plight of my fellow man, I am married with children have many many many freinds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lee, post: 122239, member: 1301"] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]*Sigh* And again sir you have me wrong. I have already adressed this, but to clarify yes I agree that emotions make up a large part of what a human is, this though is not the point that I am addressing. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Well yes and no Sinister ji. If I for instance make a claim that my own morality is deviod of emotion and instead works only on reason, then this is how I am. Or to use your own phrasology for me this is 'what is' Now we can belive that I am the only one, do not think it would be true though. So you are half right and half wrong. You are correct that I view my own moral stance as being the correct way to view morality and so you are correct that I urge others to emulate me. Or 'Ought to be'.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Again you have me wrong. You are guesing my motives for saying what I do and getting them wrong my freind.[/FONT] [COLOR=#001f4b][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [SIZE=3][/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Again I have already answered this, but here it is agian.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3][/SIZE] [SIZE=3]It is moraly wrong for the strong to oppresed the weak as in doing so negates the choices for the oppresed[/SIZE] Whooooa there fellow. Are you here equating a morality deviod of emotion and instead based on reason as socialpathic? Remember I have twice agreed that emotions are normal and needed for us humans, and that I talk only of how I see a persons morality should be? [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Well you say that I disagree. As you say using emotion, specificaly empathy you can't make up your mind on what is moraly correct the death penalty(empathy for the victim and family) or no death penalty(empathy for the criminal).[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Using only reason, we can see the crime of killing is moraly wrong. If this is true then we cannot perfom an immoral act in killing the killer. That is reasonable without emotions. Now if we throw emotions into the mix then we get people baying for the blood of the murder. Or put another way, moral confusion as people call for the killing of the killer, thereby making themselves inplicit in the same imorral act![/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] Completely wrong and quite ad homine if you ask me. Morality devoid of emotion is merely morality devoid of emotion. Socialpathy is the lack of emotional attachment to others specificly empathy. The rest is of course rubbish. My morality IS devoid of emotion, I am not a socialpath, I feel massive empathy towards the plight of my fellow man, I am married with children have many many many freinds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
2+2=5: A Case For Agnostic-Atheism
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top