☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
2+2=5: A Case For Agnostic-Atheism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tejwant Singh" data-source="post: 121845" data-attributes="member: 138"><p>Caspian ji,</p><p></p><p>Guru Fateh.</p><p></p><p>It clearly shows from your post that you are distorting what I said, which is not logical.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Please read my post again. Sorry if you feel defensive about it whether it is logical or not, I will leave that to you. But there is nothing to get uptight and read between the lines. </p><p></p><p>So, let me ask you in a different way where you do not feel the way you did.</p><p></p><p>Does logic ( your favourite term) breed ethics?</p><p></p><p>If it does then in what manner and if it does not then should it?</p><p></p><p>It is a simple question about logic, your expertise as you claim.</p><p></p><p>So you mean you do not have an argument to prove your logic? Thanks for admitting that.</p><p></p><p>First and foremost you have to define what Ik Ong Kaar is according to Sikhi through SGGS. If you are not able to define HE/SHE/IT, then you have no argument to start with.</p><p></p><p> You know it very well that SGGS is not a math book, hence it can not have your stated concept which would be illogical but it has a wonderful poetry. </p><p></p><p>Is there any book in math that defines 2+2=5? If there is, please share with us.</p><p></p><p>It is nothing but illogical babble if you can not even define with the help of SGGS what Ik Ong Kaar is.</p><p></p><p> If you can not give examples from the scriptures of the different religions and define God according to them then you have no argument. It is illogical to say " God in general" because there is nothing like that. If your logic of " God in general" were true then there would not be millions of denominations in Christianity and millions of other different religions. It sounds very illogical from your own aspect of logic</p><p></p><p>It is your duty and responsibility to prove your claim with the facts from different scriptures, not mine. This is the only logical thing for you to do. It is your argument, not mine.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I just want you to prove it in a logical manner otherwise it is nothing but hot air.</p><p>I hope you use these skills to prove what you claim. Simply put.</p><p></p><p>Caspian ji,</p><p></p><p>Either you are very naive or you do not read the posts sent to you in a logical manner. Your Muslim friend was very open and frank on the offset to let you know that he wanted to convert you. Of course he was trying to respond from his religious viewpoint to no avail. I do not know how you missed that point. As, he found out he could not, he eventually went mum which is the case in most Muslims which happens quite often here. The case in point is Nasir from Iran who disappeared after he was asked some direct questions about his religion.</p><p></p><p>Just to refresh your memory, following is what your Muslim friend said:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=21009830" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=21009830</a></p><p></p><p> Thanks & regards</p><p></p><p>Tejwant Singh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tejwant Singh, post: 121845, member: 138"] Caspian ji, Guru Fateh. It clearly shows from your post that you are distorting what I said, which is not logical.:-) Please read my post again. Sorry if you feel defensive about it whether it is logical or not, I will leave that to you. But there is nothing to get uptight and read between the lines. So, let me ask you in a different way where you do not feel the way you did. Does logic ( your favourite term) breed ethics? If it does then in what manner and if it does not then should it? It is a simple question about logic, your expertise as you claim. So you mean you do not have an argument to prove your logic? Thanks for admitting that. First and foremost you have to define what Ik Ong Kaar is according to Sikhi through SGGS. If you are not able to define HE/SHE/IT, then you have no argument to start with. You know it very well that SGGS is not a math book, hence it can not have your stated concept which would be illogical but it has a wonderful poetry. Is there any book in math that defines 2+2=5? If there is, please share with us. It is nothing but illogical babble if you can not even define with the help of SGGS what Ik Ong Kaar is. If you can not give examples from the scriptures of the different religions and define God according to them then you have no argument. It is illogical to say " God in general" because there is nothing like that. If your logic of " God in general" were true then there would not be millions of denominations in Christianity and millions of other different religions. It sounds very illogical from your own aspect of logic It is your duty and responsibility to prove your claim with the facts from different scriptures, not mine. This is the only logical thing for you to do. It is your argument, not mine.:-) I just want you to prove it in a logical manner otherwise it is nothing but hot air. I hope you use these skills to prove what you claim. Simply put. Caspian ji, Either you are very naive or you do not read the posts sent to you in a logical manner. Your Muslim friend was very open and frank on the offset to let you know that he wanted to convert you. Of course he was trying to respond from his religious viewpoint to no avail. I do not know how you missed that point. As, he found out he could not, he eventually went mum which is the case in most Muslims which happens quite often here. The case in point is Nasir from Iran who disappeared after he was asked some direct questions about his religion. Just to refresh your memory, following is what your Muslim friend said: [URL="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=21009830"][/URL] Thanks & regards Tejwant Singh [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
2+2=5: A Case For Agnostic-Atheism
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top