Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!
  1.   Become a Supporter    ::   Make a Contribution   
    Target (Recurring Monthly): $200 :: Achieved: $98

Controversial Why Do People Believe in Conspiracy Theories? They Happen!

Discussion in 'Hard Talk' started by spnadmin, Nov 22, 2013.

  1. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Jun 17, 2004
    Likes Received:
    Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? Because conspiracies happen
    In the years after John F Kennedy's assassination, it wasn't insane or irrational to wonder if the truth was being concealed

    Oliver Burkeman's Blog


    JFK and Jackie Kennedy smile at the crowds lining their motorcade route in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963. John F Kennedy and Jackie Kennedy smile at the crowds lining their motorcade route in Dallas, Texas, on 22 November 1963. Photo: Bettmann/Corbis

    The 50th anniversary of the assassination of John F Kennedy has been accompanied by a lot of soul-searching about the fact that a majority of Americans – and presumably millions of people elsewhere – believe we still don't know the whole story about the shooting. Demolishing conspiracy theories is, quite justifiably, a favourite pursuit of the self-styled "skeptic" movement, and psychological explanations of the phenomenon abound. There's evidence that people who feel socially powerless are prone to a conspiracist mindset; in an increasingly complex world, we're told, paranoid speculations are a way to reassert a feeling of agency and control; the echo-chambers of the modern media reinforce bizarre beliefs, protecting them from challenge. All true, no doubt, as underlined by conspiracists' embarrassing tendency to believe simultaneously in mutually contradictory conspiracies. People who believe Princess Diana was murdered, it turns out, are also more likely to believe she faked her own death.

    But this kind of psychological explanation, however valid, always runs the risk of curdling into a kind of condescension, in which the critics of some social malaise imply that their grasp of reality must obviously be superior to the sufferers'. So if only as an exercise in humility, it's worth remembering that one of the many reasons people believe in conspiracies is because conspiracies actually happen.

    This marks a crucial difference between conspiracy theorism and some of the psychological delusions with which it's frequently grouped. Disembodied voices don't ever occur outside a disordered mind; people who are convinced they were Napoleon in a previous life, or who believe they have telepathic powers, or that terrible accidents will befall those they think bad thoughts about, are all always wrong. (Or put it this way: if they're not, we'd have to radically overhaul our most basic assumptions about the world.) Whereas people who think government agencies or other shady groups are engaged in elaborate schemes to delude the general population for nefarious ends are only usually mistaken.

    Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting there was any conspiracy to kill JFK. (Shall I say that again? I'm not suggesting there was any conspiracy to kill JFK.) But as Fred Kaplan pointed out recently in an excellent essay at Slate, devoted mainly to debunking the main Dallas conspiracy theories, it wasn't exactly insane to have a conspiracist mindset about politics in the 1960s:

    Back in 1971, not long before he died, a retired Lyndon B Johnson told the journalist Leo Janos that the Kennedy administration had been “running a damn Murder Incorporated in the Caribbean.” Nobody knew what he was talking about at the time. A few years later, the Church Committee revealed the details of Operation Mongoose — an intense plot by the Kennedy White House and the CIA to assassinate Fidel Castro. Revelations also emerged of the mafia’s cooperation in Mongoose, of JFK’s affair with a mafia moll, and of his brother Robert Kennedy’s crusade against the same mafia kingpins. Could Dallas have been a revenge shooting, mounted by either Castro or the mafia? Even if Oswald had been the lone gunman, could he have been a recruit in some larger power’s plot?

    There are many other examples. There's persuasive evidence that the US army really did test potentially damaging chemicals by spraying them around poor neighbourhoods of St Louis during the Cold War; the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment really did take place; a group of wealthy American businessmen probably really did discuss a coup to unseat FDR; the CIA really did covertly fund modern American art in an effort to combat the menace of Soviet realism. None of this, it ought to go without saying, adds credibility to the chemtrail theory or the "global warming scam" or the vast labyrinths of 9/11 Truther lore. But they offer a partial explanation for conspiracy-mindedness that's not based on some deep psychological weakness.

    Then there's the problem of how much gets encompassed by the phrase "conspiracy theorist". It refers sometimes to deeply unpleasant bigots, determined to find evidence for their anti-semitic or otherwise repugnant prejudices; to people who honestly seem to believe that the administration of George W Bush was able to stage an epic, multi-pronged cover-up over 9/11, yet was somehow unable to stop a twentysomething from upstate New York distributing a web documentary exposing the fact. (The most withering response to that idea can be found here.)

    Then there are the sceptics who just think there are some "unanswered questions" about the JFK assassination, or 9/11, etcetera. Not only are these people not true-believer conspiracists; they're not even incorrect. Of course there'll always be unanswered questions, untied-up loose ends, about any momentary event that shifts the course of history – if only because we subject such moments to such relentless scrutiny. Combine that fact with the reality of at least a few alleged conspiracies, and it's not so strange or irrational to wonder if there's a story behind the story. In some sense or other – usually mundane, occasionally sinister – there often is.
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads Forum Date
    SciTech Why we should believe in science Breaking News Jun 26, 2014
    Why Should I Believe Guru Nanak? Sikh Sikhi Sikhism Aug 14, 2013
    Christianity Losing My Religion: Why I'm Raising My Child To Believe In Science, Not God Interfaith Dialogues May 21, 2013
    Why Do You Believe in God is the Wrong Question to Ask Interfaith Dialogues Apr 11, 2011
    Judaism The Rabbi Who Believes in Zeus: Why All Intuitions of God Are Incomplete Interfaith Dialogues Feb 6, 2011

  3. Abneet

    Expand Collapse

    Apr 8, 2013
    Likes Received:
    From my point of view, I don't believe in all conspiracy theories. But rarely there are a good points made that aren't answered. The truth is we will never know the REAL TRUTH. You have people that debunk conspiracy theories, but even them debunking the theories are making bunch of stuff up to back up their point. In the end, I guess in the end , including me, should just stay quiet about what you really think happened in events back in the past and carry on our lives.
  4. Astroboy

    Astroboy Malaysia
    Expand Collapse
    ਨਾਮ ਤੇਰੇ ਕੀ ਜੋਤਿ ਲਗਾਈ (Previously namjap)
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Jul 14, 2007
    Likes Received:
    It is mainly imagination running wild. Once you give in to the first conspiracy theory, others also find their way into your sub-conscious mind. Usually people whom you mistrust would seem to be conspiring against you. It's all a psychological factor playing out a drama in your mind which many are led to believe is true.
    • Like Like x 1
  5. linzer

    linzer Mexico
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer Supporter

    Nov 23, 2010
    Likes Received:
    "Nobody is listening to your telephone calls" Barack Obama

    In this day and age, It is almost mandatory that you should think the government and coporate media are lying to you. There was a study that showed that Fox News viewers knew less about current events than people who watched no news at all.
    • Like Like x 1
Since you're here... we have a small favor to ask...

More people are visiting & reading SPN than ever but far fewer are paying to sustain it. Advertising revenues across the online media have fallen fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Donating to SPN's is vote for free speech, for diversity of opinions, for the right of the people to stand up to religious bigotry. Without any affiliation to any organization, this constant struggle takes a lot of hard work to sustain as we entirely depend on the contributions of our esteemed writers/readers. We do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too... Fund our efforts and together we can keep the world informed about the real Sikh Sikhi Sikhism. If everyone who writes or reads our content, who likes it, helps us to pay for it, our future would be much more secure. Every Contribution Matters, Contribute Generously!

    Become a Supporter      ::     Make a Contribution     

Share This Page