Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!
  1. Guest ji, please consider donating today!
      Become a Supporter    ::   Make a Contribution   
    Monthly Recurring Target: $300 :: Achieved: $95

Surrey Uncle Demanded Refund of Wedding Gift

Discussion in 'Hard Talk' started by Archived_Member16, May 29, 2010.

  1. Archived_Member16

    Archived_Member16
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,450
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    Surrey uncle demanded refund of wedding gift
     
    By Dan Ferguson - Surrey North Delta Leader
    Published: May 23, 2010 6:00 AM

    When Surrey blueberry farmer Surjit Gill arranged the marriage of his niece Kulwinder Kaur to Balbir Jaspal in 2000, he gave the husband-to-be $25,000.

    Two years after the marriage took place, Gill demanded the money back.

    The matter ended up in court, where a Vancouver B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled the money was a gift, not a loan, and did not have to be repaid.

    In her written reasons for judgement released Tuesday, Justice Gail Dickson said neither Gill nor his wife Parmjit Gill were credible witnesses.

    "He [Gill] testified in a manner that was evasive and sometimes demonstrably inaccurate," Dickson said.

    The wife Dickson said, "gave her evidence in a pat manner in an apparent effort to mirror Mr. Gill's evidence."

    Gill claimed that Jaspal had demanded a loan before he went to India to get married and pressured the uncle into taking the money out of an already-overdrawn bank account.

    The judge called that version of events "inherently improbable."

    There was nothing written on the cheque to show the amount was a loan, Dickson noted, nor was there any written loan agreement.

    Jaspal and another man testified that when Gill wrote the cheque, he said nothing about a loan, hugging his niece's fiancé and saying "this is what I promised you."

    Jaspal's testimony was "generally credible" the judge said.

    The written reasons for judgment noted that before their falling-out over the money, the younger Jaspal and Gill were friends.

    "The sum advanced was undeniably substantial," the judge said.

    "Mr. Gill is, however a man of substantial means. He chose to offer and give Mr, Jaspal a wedding gift of this magnitude. For undisclosed reasons, he later had a change of heart."

    dferguson@surreyleader.com

    source:
    http://www.bclocalnews.com/surrey_area/surreyleader/news/94617874.html
     
  2. Loading...


Since you're here... we have a small favor to ask...

More people are visiting & reading SPN than ever but far fewer are paying to sustain it. Advertising revenues across the online media have fallen fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Donating to SPN's is vote for free speech, for diversity of opinions, for the right of the people to stand up to religious bigotry. Without any affiliation to any organization, this constant struggle takes a lot of hard work to sustain as we entirely depend on the contributions of our esteemed writers/readers. We do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too... Fund our efforts and together we can keep the world informed about the real Sikh Sikhi Sikhism. If everyone who writes or reads our content, who likes it, helps us to pay for it, our future would be much more secure. Every Contribution Matters, Contribute Generously!

    Become a Supporter      ::     Make a Contribution     



Share This Page