Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

Scientology Officials Accused of (sic: Forging) Hubbard War Records

Discussion in 'Interfaith Dialogues' started by spnadmin, Feb 11, 2011.

  1. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    The New Yorker article by Lawrence Wright on the Church of Scientology is getting a great deal of attention. The article details the departure of screenwriter and director Paul Haggis from the church after 35 years. However, I found one of the most interesting aspects to be Wright’s confrontation of Church officials over the alleged heroic record and severe battle scars of founder L. Ron Hubbard.

    The Church has long maintained that Hubbard was a war hero who was left blind and a ‘hopeless cripple’ at the end of World War II. The story is the basis of Hubbard claim that he healed himself with his own science that later became the basis of Dianetics.

    Wright asked Church leaders and large contingent of Scientology lawyers to back up the claims. Church official Tommy Davis responded with what Wright says were forged documents;

    Eventually, Davis sent us what is called a notice of separation — essentially discharge papers from World War II — along with some photographs of all of these medals that [Hubbard] had won. … At the same time, we finally gained access to Hubbard’s entire World War II records [through a request to the military archives] and there was no evidence that he had ever been wounded in battle or distinguished himself in any way during the war. We also found another notice of separation which was strikingly different than the one that the church had provided.”

    What I find interesting about this account is that, if true, it is hard to believe that these Church officials actually believe that stuff that they are instilling in followers. Self-delusion is rather difficult if you are actively creating false documents. This would tend to support those who insist that the Church is a criminal and fraudulent organization so I am waiting to see the response of the Church to this particular allegation.

    What is also interesting in this account is the possible legal consequences of forging U.S. military documents. Here they were not used commercial purposes technically, but it could still run afoul of the federal code. It is also an ironic twist on the “stolen valor” debate — here allegedly stealing valor for a dead man. Of course, if true, it was Hubbard who could be accused of building his church — and deriving financial benefits — from these claims.

    http://jonathanturley.org/2011/02/10/scientology-officials-accused-from-forging-hubbard-war-records/
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads Forum Date
    Celebrities put Scientology in forefront (The Indianapolis Star) Interfaith Dialogues Jun 22, 2005
    World 'Active' tolerance vital during times of extraordinary change, UN officials say Breaking News Nov 17, 2011
    Opinion PCR (Police control Room) officials on duty Punjab, Punjabi, Punjabiyat Nov 9, 2011
    Canada 'Mosaic' Doesn't Give Canadians Identity: Officials Say Breaking News Sep 7, 2011
    USA NYS Has No South Asian Elected Officials. Why? Breaking News May 25, 2011

  3. Archived_member11

    Archived_member11
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    20
    All new religions from Bahai to Nirankari are considered to be cults just because they are new and I never use that term or take it seriously but in the case of Scientology it is really a cult in the worst way. A freaky scary cult. Of course L Ron Hubbard wasn't a war hero_Of course there is false documents. The whole thing is a farce.
     
    • Like Like x 3

Share This Page