☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Prophet Lot And The Painful Reality Today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Archived_member15" data-source="post: 165103" data-attributes="member: 17438"><p>My dear brother Gyani jipeacesign</p><p> </p><p>I can asure you that my lack of interest in this thread stems not from tacit agreement but rather from the standpoint of utter disgust at what Naben is saying swordfight</p><p> </p><p>To be honest, I am far more interested in Sikhi than Naben's homophobia lol His style of writing - which reads like a very poor attempt at proselytism to me - is very unappealing to my sensibilities, which is why I have - until now - largely tried to overlook it. </p><p> </p><p>Well, I do belong to an Abrahamic religion - yes - but I certainly do not read the story of Lot in the Book of Genesis and come away with it hateful of homosexuals, so the similarities between me and Naben end there I am afraid, although perhaps this is because my reading of it is filtered through the eyes of Christ who never even mentioned homosexuality once in any of his recorded sayings and certainly, like myself, understood the parable of Lot very differently from Naben and the holy Qur'an. </p><p> </p><p>First of all, before I discuss the story of Lot specifically, please allow me to explain how one should read and interpret ancient texts, especially Old Testament stories which come from nearly 3,000 years ago. </p><p> </p><p>Catholics believe in the <em>Doctrine of Divine Accomodation. </em></p><p> </p><p>This doctrine of the Catholic Church, held by every Father and theologian from the first century till now, was explained by the Protestant historian and sociologist Rodney Stark in his recent 2011 book, "<em>The Triumph of Christianity": </em></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>"...The doctrine of divine accomodation holds that God's communications with humans are always limited to their current capacity to comprehend. As St. Gregory of Nyssa wrote in the fourth century, God is so "far above our nature and inaccessible to all approach" that he, in effect, speaks to us in baby talk, thereby giving "to our human nature what is is capable of receiving"..."</em></span></p><p> </p><p>This is closely linked to the other important doctrine of <em>progressive revelation </em>which I explained to brother Harry Haller ji on this post in this another thread: </p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/163797-post44.html" target="_blank">http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/163797-post44.html</a></p><p> </p><p>Just check about half-way down the post and you will find my explanation of it. </p><p> </p><p>The story of Lot isn't actually about homosexuality. The primary "sin" was actually rape - in this case the attempted rape of two men by a group of other men, that is, an abusive homosexual act. The Sodomites wanted to rape the visitors whom Lot, the one just man in the city, welcomed in hospitality for the night.</p><p> </p><p>The Bible itself is lucid on the sins of Sodom: pride, lack of concern for the poor and needy (Ezekiel 16:48-49); hatred of strangers and cruelty to guests (Wisdom 19:13); arrogance (Sirach/Ecclesiaticus 16; evildoing, injustice, oppression of the widow and orphan (Isaiah 1:17); adultery (in those days, the use of another man’s property), and lying (Jeremiah 23:12).</p><p> </p><p>So you have a whole variety of evils committed by the Sodomites for which the biblical authors condemn them. Homosexuality is not one of them, although abusive homosexual acts certainly are. </p><p> </p><p>Homosexuality, despite ancient Jewish dislike for homosexual sex, was not one of the many sins of the city of Sodom but rather <em>it was SEXUAL ABUSE</em>. Later on in the narrative, the same men of Sodom try to rape Lot's daughters. So we see that the narrative is about sexual abuse, whether homosexual or heterosexual. This is surely very telling. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The tale of Lot is a parable. In the Bible it makes no attempts at historicity, although I presume it must in the Qur'an, but rather has all the hallmarks of a fictional oral tradition passed around at firesides that exemplifies an understanding of a much deeper divine truth. I am quite sure that Lot as presented in the tale never existed nor did the cities of Sodom or Gommorrah. There may have been, archaelogically speaking, a city called Sodom in the ancient world whose inhabitants had a reputation of great evil and which was, tragically, destroyed in some kind of volcanic eruption much like Pompeii and which ancients took as a punishment from the gods or indeed some kind of deity. However there is no concrete evidence in this respect. </p><p> </p><p>To try and use an ancient parable as a standard by which to make judgements about the mental health of homosexual people, or indeed to stereotype these poor people and castigate them as filthy or worthy of being shunned or - God forbid - "stoned", is an abuse of an ancient narrative produced in the Near Middle East nearly 3,000 years ago. It is quite sick actually, and very disturbing that people in the 21st century still read religious texts produced by ancients this way. </p><p> </p><p>The crux of the story of Lot - in the Bible although I cannot speak for the Qur'an where it does seem to be predominantly about the "wickedness" of homosexuality - is actually a kind of "moral tale" about the mercy of God. </p><p> </p><p>The moral of the story is that all a society needs to redeem it is to have one good, humane person living within it, and if it has just that, then there is hope for that country and for that people. One light shinning in the darkness is enough to compensate for, and indeed to absolve, the sins of millions of other people. It is like a candle shinning in a very dark hall. No matter how large the hall is, and no matter how pitch dark the night may be, the darkness cannot put out that single light, cannot overcome it. </p><p> </p><p>So let us read the story first, remembering its venerable age as coming from the pen of far less enlightened people, and let us reflect on <em>God's divine accomodation</em> and <em>progressive revelation </em>through this narrative to help further the spiritual progress of these ancient Jews. </p><p> </p><p>Given its age, the story presents a rather primitive view of God which the Qur'an sadly seems to have adopted well over a thousand years later, from Naben's quotations anyway. In this view, God is seen as a <em>judge </em>to these ancients <em>who will quite literally take justice himself upon cities of evildoers </em>much like a human court Judge would. To this end, God was understood by these ancient Jews to actively intervene in human affairs, punishing those who commit evil and helping the oppressed. However this story, presents a true development in understanding of God's nature, which ancient peoples had prior to this not received. In this story we see a God who is <em>merciful</em>. The city is going to be destroyed by some kind of volcanic eruption, and the ancient peoples of the Near East consider this to be a sign of God's or the gods retribution on the city of Sodom for its great cruelty to other people. </p><p> </p><p>Abraham cries out to God about the imminent destruction of the city, thinking that it is God who is destroying it through nature, as ancient eople often assumed: </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">“Will you indeed destroy the righteous with the wicked? Suppose there are fifty righteous within the city; will you then destroy the place and not spare it for the fifty righteous who are in it? Far be it from you to do such a thing, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from you! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” (Gen 18: 23-25).</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Thus we come to a moral dilemna: Does God view human beings collectively? If a country, say Nazi Germany, has fallen into the grip of dictatorship and cruelty, does that thereby mean that it is without hope? Should one simply regard that civilisation as having gone too far and now have no hope of change, of redemption, worthy now only to be condemned or indeed left to destruction through its own evil? </p><p> </p><p>Abraham asks forgiveness for the whole city and does so by appealing to God’s justice, on the basis of good people living within it who can still redeem it. As Pope Benedict XVI explained when commenting on this passage: "<em>Abraham’s thought, which seems almost paradoxical, could be summed up like this: obviously</em> <em>it is not possible to treat the innocent as guilty, this would be unjust; it would be necessary instead to treat the guilty as innocent, putting into practice a “superior” form of justice, offering them a possibility of salvation because, if evildoers accept God’s pardon and confess their wrongdoing, letting themselves be forgiven, they will no longer continue to do wicked deeds, they too will become righteous. It is this request for justice that Abraham expresses in his intercession, a request based on the certainty that the Lord is merciful</em>". </p><p> </p><p>So we have hear, first of all, a clear progression in understanding of God for these ancient people through this story. </p><p> </p><p>Secondly, and more importantly, the indictment of society. </p><p> </p><p>Read: </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">26 And the LORD said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">27 And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #ffffff">.</span>28 Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five? And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">29 And he spake unto him yet again, and said, Peradventure there shall be forty found there. And he said, I will not do it for fortys sake. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">30 And he said unto him, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Peradventure there shall thirty be found there. And he said, I will not do it, if I find thirty there. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">31 And he said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord: Peradventure there shall be twenty found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for twentys sake. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #ffffff">.</span>32 And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for tens sake.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The moral of this ancient story is clear and it fits in with what the Lord Jesus said on one occassion: </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>"...Whoever has ears, let him hear. There is light within a man of light, and he lights up the whole world...You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. </em><em>In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father...The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness cannot overcome it..."</em> </span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>- Jesus Christ</em></span> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>All that it takes for a society to have hope, is for a few good individuals to stand up within it and "let their light shine". </p><p> </p><p>Thus in Nazi Germany, a group of young devout Christian students called <em>the White Rose </em>passively resisted the government and tried to spread around pamphlets alerting Germans to the horrors committed by the Nazi regime in the occupied territories against Jews and other innocents. These young people, one of who was a 21 year old woman called Sophie Scholl, paid with their lives. They were beheaded in 1943. </p><p> </p><p>And yet they were a "light" to their society, and through brave people like them - now revered in Germany - a new Germany arose after the war, freed from the evils of Nazism. </p><p> </p><p>In the story of Sodom, Lot was a light shinning his society. He stood up against the evils committed by the other residents of Sodom, and his uncle Abraham - a holy man - tried to intercede and make the inhabitants of Sodom change their ways. And from this story, we receive a very powerful message that all it takes for a society to be redeemed and saved from lapsing into barbarism, is a few, brave people who are willing to "let their light shine".</p><p> </p><p>This is the true moral that the story of Lot teaches us. peacesign</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Archived_member15, post: 165103, member: 17438"] My dear brother Gyani jipeacesign I can asure you that my lack of interest in this thread stems not from tacit agreement but rather from the standpoint of utter disgust at what Naben is saying swordfight To be honest, I am far more interested in Sikhi than Naben's homophobia lol His style of writing - which reads like a very poor attempt at proselytism to me - is very unappealing to my sensibilities, which is why I have - until now - largely tried to overlook it. Well, I do belong to an Abrahamic religion - yes - but I certainly do not read the story of Lot in the Book of Genesis and come away with it hateful of homosexuals, so the similarities between me and Naben end there I am afraid, although perhaps this is because my reading of it is filtered through the eyes of Christ who never even mentioned homosexuality once in any of his recorded sayings and certainly, like myself, understood the parable of Lot very differently from Naben and the holy Qur'an. First of all, before I discuss the story of Lot specifically, please allow me to explain how one should read and interpret ancient texts, especially Old Testament stories which come from nearly 3,000 years ago. Catholics believe in the [I]Doctrine of Divine Accomodation. [/I] This doctrine of the Catholic Church, held by every Father and theologian from the first century till now, was explained by the Protestant historian and sociologist Rodney Stark in his recent 2011 book, "[I]The Triumph of Christianity": [/I] [SIZE=3][I]"...The doctrine of divine accomodation holds that God's communications with humans are always limited to their current capacity to comprehend. As St. Gregory of Nyssa wrote in the fourth century, God is so "far above our nature and inaccessible to all approach" that he, in effect, speaks to us in baby talk, thereby giving "to our human nature what is is capable of receiving"..."[/I][/SIZE] This is closely linked to the other important doctrine of [I]progressive revelation [/I]which I explained to brother Harry Haller ji on this post in this another thread: [URL]http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/163797-post44.html[/URL] Just check about half-way down the post and you will find my explanation of it. The story of Lot isn't actually about homosexuality. The primary "sin" was actually rape - in this case the attempted rape of two men by a group of other men, that is, an abusive homosexual act. The Sodomites wanted to rape the visitors whom Lot, the one just man in the city, welcomed in hospitality for the night. The Bible itself is lucid on the sins of Sodom: pride, lack of concern for the poor and needy (Ezekiel 16:48-49); hatred of strangers and cruelty to guests (Wisdom 19:13); arrogance (Sirach/Ecclesiaticus 16; evildoing, injustice, oppression of the widow and orphan (Isaiah 1:17); adultery (in those days, the use of another man’s property), and lying (Jeremiah 23:12). So you have a whole variety of evils committed by the Sodomites for which the biblical authors condemn them. Homosexuality is not one of them, although abusive homosexual acts certainly are. Homosexuality, despite ancient Jewish dislike for homosexual sex, was not one of the many sins of the city of Sodom but rather [I]it was SEXUAL ABUSE[/I]. Later on in the narrative, the same men of Sodom try to rape Lot's daughters. So we see that the narrative is about sexual abuse, whether homosexual or heterosexual. This is surely very telling. The tale of Lot is a parable. In the Bible it makes no attempts at historicity, although I presume it must in the Qur'an, but rather has all the hallmarks of a fictional oral tradition passed around at firesides that exemplifies an understanding of a much deeper divine truth. I am quite sure that Lot as presented in the tale never existed nor did the cities of Sodom or Gommorrah. There may have been, archaelogically speaking, a city called Sodom in the ancient world whose inhabitants had a reputation of great evil and which was, tragically, destroyed in some kind of volcanic eruption much like Pompeii and which ancients took as a punishment from the gods or indeed some kind of deity. However there is no concrete evidence in this respect. To try and use an ancient parable as a standard by which to make judgements about the mental health of homosexual people, or indeed to stereotype these poor people and castigate them as filthy or worthy of being shunned or - God forbid - "stoned", is an abuse of an ancient narrative produced in the Near Middle East nearly 3,000 years ago. It is quite sick actually, and very disturbing that people in the 21st century still read religious texts produced by ancients this way. The crux of the story of Lot - in the Bible although I cannot speak for the Qur'an where it does seem to be predominantly about the "wickedness" of homosexuality - is actually a kind of "moral tale" about the mercy of God. The moral of the story is that all a society needs to redeem it is to have one good, humane person living within it, and if it has just that, then there is hope for that country and for that people. One light shinning in the darkness is enough to compensate for, and indeed to absolve, the sins of millions of other people. It is like a candle shinning in a very dark hall. No matter how large the hall is, and no matter how pitch dark the night may be, the darkness cannot put out that single light, cannot overcome it. So let us read the story first, remembering its venerable age as coming from the pen of far less enlightened people, and let us reflect on [I]God's divine accomodation[/I] and [I]progressive revelation [/I]through this narrative to help further the spiritual progress of these ancient Jews. Given its age, the story presents a rather primitive view of God which the Qur'an sadly seems to have adopted well over a thousand years later, from Naben's quotations anyway. In this view, God is seen as a [I]judge [/I]to these ancients [I]who will quite literally take justice himself upon cities of evildoers [/I]much like a human court Judge would. To this end, God was understood by these ancient Jews to actively intervene in human affairs, punishing those who commit evil and helping the oppressed. However this story, presents a true development in understanding of God's nature, which ancient peoples had prior to this not received. In this story we see a God who is [I]merciful[/I]. The city is going to be destroyed by some kind of volcanic eruption, and the ancient peoples of the Near East consider this to be a sign of God's or the gods retribution on the city of Sodom for its great cruelty to other people. Abraham cries out to God about the imminent destruction of the city, thinking that it is God who is destroying it through nature, as ancient eople often assumed: [SIZE=3]“Will you indeed destroy the righteous with the wicked? Suppose there are fifty righteous within the city; will you then destroy the place and not spare it for the fifty righteous who are in it? Far be it from you to do such a thing, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from you! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” (Gen 18: 23-25).[/SIZE] Thus we come to a moral dilemna: Does God view human beings collectively? If a country, say Nazi Germany, has fallen into the grip of dictatorship and cruelty, does that thereby mean that it is without hope? Should one simply regard that civilisation as having gone too far and now have no hope of change, of redemption, worthy now only to be condemned or indeed left to destruction through its own evil? Abraham asks forgiveness for the whole city and does so by appealing to God’s justice, on the basis of good people living within it who can still redeem it. As Pope Benedict XVI explained when commenting on this passage: "[I]Abraham’s thought, which seems almost paradoxical, could be summed up like this: obviously[/I] [I]it is not possible to treat the innocent as guilty, this would be unjust; it would be necessary instead to treat the guilty as innocent, putting into practice a “superior” form of justice, offering them a possibility of salvation because, if evildoers accept God’s pardon and confess their wrongdoing, letting themselves be forgiven, they will no longer continue to do wicked deeds, they too will become righteous. It is this request for justice that Abraham expresses in his intercession, a request based on the certainty that the Lord is merciful[/I]". So we have hear, first of all, a clear progression in understanding of God for these ancient people through this story. Secondly, and more importantly, the indictment of society. Read: [SIZE=3]26 And the LORD said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]27 And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes: [/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=#ffffff].[/COLOR]28 Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five? And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]29 And he spake unto him yet again, and said, Peradventure there shall be forty found there. And he said, I will not do it for fortys sake. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]30 And he said unto him, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Peradventure there shall thirty be found there. And he said, I will not do it, if I find thirty there. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]31 And he said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord: Peradventure there shall be twenty found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for twentys sake. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=#ffffff].[/COLOR]32 And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for tens sake.[/SIZE] The moral of this ancient story is clear and it fits in with what the Lord Jesus said on one occassion: [SIZE=3][I]"...Whoever has ears, let him hear. There is light within a man of light, and he lights up the whole world...You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. [/I][I]In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father...The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness cannot overcome it..."[/I] [/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3][I]- Jesus Christ[/I][/SIZE] [/B] All that it takes for a society to have hope, is for a few good individuals to stand up within it and "let their light shine". Thus in Nazi Germany, a group of young devout Christian students called [I]the White Rose [/I]passively resisted the government and tried to spread around pamphlets alerting Germans to the horrors committed by the Nazi regime in the occupied territories against Jews and other innocents. These young people, one of who was a 21 year old woman called Sophie Scholl, paid with their lives. They were beheaded in 1943. And yet they were a "light" to their society, and through brave people like them - now revered in Germany - a new Germany arose after the war, freed from the evils of Nazism. In the story of Sodom, Lot was a light shinning his society. He stood up against the evils committed by the other residents of Sodom, and his uncle Abraham - a holy man - tried to intercede and make the inhabitants of Sodom change their ways. And from this story, we receive a very powerful message that all it takes for a society to be redeemed and saved from lapsing into barbarism, is a few, brave people who are willing to "let their light shine". This is the true moral that the story of Lot teaches us. peacesign [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Prophet Lot And The Painful Reality Today
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top