US Okay to bully based on religion...?

Discussion in 'Current News' started by ohhcuppycakee, Nov 10, 2011.

  1. ohhcuppycakee

    ohhcuppycakee SPNer

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://michiganmessenger.com/53702/senate-passes-license-to-bully-legislation

    Senate passes ‘license to bully’ legislation

    Advocates for a law to prohibit bullying and provide school districts with the tools to address the problem were dealt a stinging rebuke Wednesday morning in the Republican-controlled Michigan Senate.

    The GOP pushed through an amended bill, SB 137, which does nothing advocates have pushed for — including reporting requirements and enumeration, or listing, of protected classes. In addition, the legislation provides an exception which allows bullying based on “moral convictions.”

    The full language of the insert is: “This section does not prohibit a statement of a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction of a school employee, school volunteer, pupil, or a pupil and parent or guardian.”

    In a floor speech Minority Leader in the Senate Gretchen Whitmer (D-East Lansing) slammed the Republicans over the amended language.

    “Here today you claim to be protecting kids and you’re actually putting them in more danger,” Whitmer said. “But bullying is not OK. We should be protecting public policy that protects kids — all kids, from bullies — all bullies. But instead you have set us back further by creating a blueprint for bullying.”

    “Shockingly, Senate Bill 137 will do more harm than good. Senate Republicans left our students behind in favor of partisan politics and passed a bill that actually allows more bullying. Students and parents expect lawmakers to lead the charge against bullying, but instead Republicans made ideology more important than school safety,” said Emily Dievendorf, policy director of Equality Michigan. “Research clearly shows that only states with enumerated bills see a reduction in bullying. We need a bill that mentions the most affected populations and requires statewide reporting of bullying and harassment. SB 137 simply does nothing to reduce bullying in our schools.”

    Democratic senators also assailed the legislation.

    “The language in this legislation is disrespectful to the memory of the children who have committed suicide in this state due to bullying. Republicans clearly are not taking the bullying epidemic seriously,” said Senator John Gleason (D-Flushing). “The bill that was presented to us today offers no protections to our students and perpetuates a hostile environment in our schools.”

    Gleason made headlines last month after Democratic senators attempted to attach anti-bullying legislation to a bill to lift the cap on the number of charter schools in the state. The GOP rejected both a fully enumerated bill with reporting requirements, and their own version of the bill. In response, Gleason staged a sit-in at the Capitol to protest the move.

    “To the families of the ten reported suicides that were directly linked to bullying and the countless others that have gone unreported, this bill adds insult to injury,” said Senator Glenn Anderson (D-Westland). “I have been working for years to pass legislation to provide a safe school environment for all of our students. This bill goes in the exact opposite direction and in fact provides a license to bully.”

    The legislation passed 26-11. It now moves to the Republican-controlled House.

    Sara Wurfel, spokesperson for Gov. Rick Snyder, would not specifically address the question of the moral conviction exemption, instead issuing the following statement:

    The Governor is looking forward to working with the Legislature to get strong anti-bullying legislation to his desk and provide a safe environment for all students. The Governor believes bullying at any time, under any circumstances, is wrong. Period. It has no place in classrooms, schools or communities. It’s time for Michigan to join all the other states with tough laws on the books.

    “We’re pleased that the senate has passed an anti-bullying bill that will equally protect all children from all bullying for all reasons, based on their individual worth as human beings, not on being segregated into singled-out groups for special protection,” said Gary Glenn, president of the American Family Association of Michigan. AFA Michigan has been a leading voice opposing enumerated legislation for over a decade, often referring to the legislation as “a Trojan horse for the homosexual agenda.”

    “I am ashamed that this could be Michigan’s bill on anti-bullying, when in fact it is a ‘bullying is OK in MI’ law,” said Kevin Epling, an East Lansing parent whose son committed suicide as a result of bullying. His comment was posted on his Facebook page.

    In an interview he had more to say.

    “For years the line has been ‘no protected classes,’ and the first thing they throw in — very secretly — was a very protected class, and limited them from repercussions of their own actions. This line has no purpose within this piece of legislation except to incite ‘religious bigotry’ within our schools. Schools are trying to build more tolerant students and future leaders, not automatons blindly following misguided adult leaders who seek a return to a 1950′s America,” Epling said. “This will only cause unrest in schools and give schools one more thing to deal with rather than trying to solve a problem. Also it is not a very well thought out ploy, as in some areas of the state the tables might be turned on the ‘anointed ones’ they seek to keep from being punished. This is just very wrong and the way it was done was wrong as well. It was bullying at its best.”

    But Glenn says that the new legislation does not allow bullying based on religious beliefs or values.

    “It does no such thing,” Glenn said in response to a series of email questions from Michigan Messenger. “The religious free speech protections included in the bill, consistent with the First Amendment, simply ensure that students won’t be bullied or punished — as occurred last year at a high school in Howell — for daring to say they believe a certain behavior is wrong as a matter of sincerely held religious or moral conviction. The First Amendment and other free speech protections do just that, protect free speech, not bullying. And students, like all other Americans, are free to verbally express their opinions — including religious and moral views — without fear of government repression or persecution, including under anti-bullying or harrassment laws.”

    Sen. Whitmer answered Glenn’s claims in her floor speech.

    “You may be able to pat yourselves on the back today and say that you did something, but in actuality you are explicitly outlining how to get away with bullying,” she said. “Your exceptions have swallowed the rule. As passed today, bullying kids is OK if a student, parent, teacher or school employee can come up with a moral or religious reason for doing it.”
     
    Ishna and Ambarsaria like this.
  2. Ambarsaria

    Ambarsaria ੴ / Ik▫oaʼnkār Writer Supporter Content Master SPNer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,265
    Likes Received:
    5,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ohcuppycakee ji the following excerpted from above is very ridiculous,

    What have statements got to do with schools! These are supposed to be places of learning not grandstanding or teaching behaviors of how to sneak in nastiness without violating laws!

    Pretty sad. I suppose it will just add to further polarization versus positive and reconciliation of differences.

    Sat Sri Akal.
     
  3. Inderjeet Kaur

    Inderjeet Kaur Supporter SPNer

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Of course, this will be used to bully a boy with a patka or a girl with unshaved legs. Will the bullied also have the right to state their "sincerely held religious belief..."? I wonder if, in actual practice, this will apply to Muslims and Sikhs and even Jehovah's Witnesses, as well as the majority Christians? Why do I doubt this will be the case.

    :mundaviolin:japposatnamwaheguru:mundahug
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2011
    Ambarsaria likes this.
  4. Inderjeet Kaur

    Inderjeet Kaur Supporter SPNer

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Trophy Points:
    93
    FOLLOW UP:

    Michigan ‘Bullying OK If Religiously Motivated’ Bill to Be Amended

    The Michigan anti-bullying law into which locals Republicans put in a clause, introduced in secret, allowing a cop out for anyone who can provide a religious or moral reason for their action is to be amended, reports say.

    According to state Senator Gretchen Whitmer (D-East Lansing), whose recorded comments on the clause in the State Legislature went viral on YouTube, the clause will be removed before the bill becomes law.

    She made the comments to Michigan Live following a meeting with Republicans.

    “It looks like they are poised to do that,” she said. “I’m glad to say that there are people on both sides of the aisle that believe that we should not legitimize excuses for tormenting a student in school.”

    Key Republicans had already backed away from the clause.

    Rep. Phil Potvin (R-Cadillac) told MIRS that his bullying bill in the Michigan House Education Committee won’t have a religious and moral exemption like the Senate-passed bill.

    “Absolutely not,” Potvin said. “Why should it? We’re talking about everyone.”

    House Education Chair Paul Scott told MIRS that the language caught him off-guard.

    “It doesn’t strike me that a religious person would ever need to bully,” Scott said.

    Whitmer had accused Republicans of creating a “license to bully” with the clause.

    “Frankly, no one I talked to has any idea what the Senate Republicans were thinking when they decided to put this language in. We need to protect our kids. In the name and memory of Matt Epling, we need to do the right thing,” Whitmer said.

    The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Rick Jones, R-Grand Ledge, told ABC:

    “There were some caucus members who worried that if a child stood up in sex education class or speech class and made a statement: ‘In my religion, I don’t believe in gay marriage,’ or something, they didn’t want the child to be evicted from school for just making a statement.

    “Nothing in the bill is intended that the child could confront another child and abuse them in any way. I wouldn’t have a problem with some of the language being removed as long as it was very clear that a student’s First Amendment rights were protected. … There is no intent on my part to justify bullying, in any form.”

    The bill may also be amended further to cover cyberbullying. Kevin Epling, the father of Matt, said:

    “I think there needs to be stronger language on cyberbullying and there needs to be stronger language on reporting, all the way to the state level,” he said. “Students are attacking each other 24/7.”

    Michigan Senate Democrats have released a video with Michigan students speaking out against the ‘religious or moral reason’ clause.


    Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/michiga...d-bill-to-be-amended-video.html#ixzz1dK9TyOQr


    Michigan's Children Speak Out Against Republican Pro-Bullying Legislation - YouTube
     
    Tejwant Singh likes this.

Share This Page