☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
Is 'Wah-e-Guru' The Name Of God?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jazlim" data-source="post: 115338" data-attributes="member: 10313"><p>Narayanjot Kaur ji, </p><p>Your justification of banning Akalpurkh and censuring another senior member for more or less supporting Akalpurkh point of view is unprofessional. Perhaps you forget that this is a community forum and that you are curtailing the rights of the Sikhs, who you claim to represent, to a lively debate on a topic of grave importance to them. </p><p></p><p>You might want your Sikhism entirely divorced from its Sanatan dharmic roots. But then again, you cannot deny the truth. There is a substantial amount of borrowing from the Vedic Literature in the SGGS. However, there is no shame in it as you seem to make out. On the contrary, it is a prerequisite. Peer-reviewing is an important part of Indian spiritualism. We want it that way, for then the chance of being led astray is minimized. This is the system. Indeed, if you truly have a PhD, as it claims in your profile, then you should know that not a line may be said with it being peer-reviewed by pervious authorities. </p><p></p><p>However, you are right. Sikhism is different from Hinduism. And we know that! The Hindus follow the varna-ashram system, worship countless demigods, and so on. For you kind information, Sikhism is a vibrant and legitimate prong of the Bhakti Movement that took place in India in the 14-15th century. Sri Guru Nanak Devji is considered one of the foremost teachers of this reform movement. </p><p></p><p>The underlying reformation thread that connected all of the prongs was their stress on bhakti, and on taking the naam. All of the prongs also rejected the caste or varna-ashram system. The Vaishnavas, under the leadership of Chaitanya, which forms another prong, too has rejected the varna-ashram system. Individual saints such as Meera bai, Tukaram, etc., too are counted as catalyst or reform teachers who made meaningful contribution to the sub-continental spiritual reform movement. </p><p></p><p>It is thus that Sikhism is different from Hinduism. You do not need to create artificial divide by speculatively misinterpreting the SGGS! Indeed, who gave you the authority to do this? </p><p></p><p>Also, for you kind information, the various prongs, shared common teachers. The prominent Indian saint by the name of Jayadeva was one of them. For you kind information, the baani (original verses) of Jayadeva in enshrined the SGGS. For us Indians whose spiritualism demands rigorous peer-reviewing, and would rather have a bona fide School of Thought to monitor our spiritualism, having a Jayadeva on our board is a matter of great pride to us! </p><p></p><p><strong>But what indeed would you know of all this fine tradition?</strong></p><p></p><p>Madamji, I seriously think that you are unfit as a moderator for this forum. Please don't take offense. But I request the other moderators to view this heavy-handed moderation of a philosophical discussion with the express view to safe guard speculative ideologies as a grave breech of trust of the community.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jazlim, post: 115338, member: 10313"] Narayanjot Kaur ji, Your justification of banning Akalpurkh and censuring another senior member for more or less supporting Akalpurkh point of view is unprofessional. Perhaps you forget that this is a community forum and that you are curtailing the rights of the Sikhs, who you claim to represent, to a lively debate on a topic of grave importance to them. You might want your Sikhism entirely divorced from its Sanatan dharmic roots. But then again, you cannot deny the truth. There is a substantial amount of borrowing from the Vedic Literature in the SGGS. However, there is no shame in it as you seem to make out. On the contrary, it is a prerequisite. Peer-reviewing is an important part of Indian spiritualism. We want it that way, for then the chance of being led astray is minimized. This is the system. Indeed, if you truly have a PhD, as it claims in your profile, then you should know that not a line may be said with it being peer-reviewed by pervious authorities. However, you are right. Sikhism is different from Hinduism. And we know that! The Hindus follow the varna-ashram system, worship countless demigods, and so on. For you kind information, Sikhism is a vibrant and legitimate prong of the Bhakti Movement that took place in India in the 14-15th century. Sri Guru Nanak Devji is considered one of the foremost teachers of this reform movement. The underlying reformation thread that connected all of the prongs was their stress on bhakti, and on taking the naam. All of the prongs also rejected the caste or varna-ashram system. The Vaishnavas, under the leadership of Chaitanya, which forms another prong, too has rejected the varna-ashram system. Individual saints such as Meera bai, Tukaram, etc., too are counted as catalyst or reform teachers who made meaningful contribution to the sub-continental spiritual reform movement. It is thus that Sikhism is different from Hinduism. You do not need to create artificial divide by speculatively misinterpreting the SGGS! Indeed, who gave you the authority to do this? Also, for you kind information, the various prongs, shared common teachers. The prominent Indian saint by the name of Jayadeva was one of them. For you kind information, the baani (original verses) of Jayadeva in enshrined the SGGS. For us Indians whose spiritualism demands rigorous peer-reviewing, and would rather have a bona fide School of Thought to monitor our spiritualism, having a Jayadeva on our board is a matter of great pride to us! [B]But what indeed would you know of all this fine tradition?[/B] Madamji, I seriously think that you are unfit as a moderator for this forum. Please don't take offense. But I request the other moderators to view this heavy-handed moderation of a philosophical discussion with the express view to safe guard speculative ideologies as a grave breech of trust of the community. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
Is 'Wah-e-Guru' The Name Of God?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top