☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Is Bhatt Bani Not Guru?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harjas Kaur Khalsa" data-source="post: 75229" data-attributes="member: 2125"><p></p><p><span style="color: black">First you are calling me Harjap. that is not my name. </span>Now, if it was only a name misunderstanding, it would be one thing, but your post goes on to accuse me of having allegations which are baseless. So you are denying that last year when I had run in with your moderator S**** and discussions with K**** over deletions, removal of posts and in fact for quite a long time, the inability to post on this forum, that all my allegations are baseless and this did not occur? Yet there are even old posts from this time still on your forums where I have discussed deletions, inability to post, missing posts, and received PMs from certain moderators discussing precisely these issues.</p><p> </p><p>Anyone can see people like Ekmusafir can come to this forum, and on this thread, insult every member directly and not be told anything. Yet, in context of discussion corruptions of Gurbani, I said such people who undermine the foundations of Sikh faith by invalidating supportive Gurbani such as Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji, rehitnamay act as termites. Now the forum administrator joins the forum moderator to persist in accusing that I am singling out some (imaginary) person for name-calling as a termite. When it is quite clear that I am refering to erosion of the foundations of Sikh belief which is an activity not a person, and thus not name-calling any forum member in particular.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: black">You are referencing deleted portions of my posts which no one can read, and accusing that what was erased (and conveniently no one can see) were "derogatory" to other members and "unnecessary bragging, trash talk, childish arguments which take away from the topic at hand." </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black">Talk about personal attacks and nindya! And all this from the site administrator! Well, I guess that leaves no doubt about what can be expected with regards to pretended "fairness" on this forum. Well, anyone can erase my words and say they said whatever they want. But obviously since the words are erased no one can have a chance to know. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black">I accuse you of nindya against me publically, and also of discriminating against the content of my posts because you people did not like the OPINIONS expressed. And I also accuse that you have tolerated an opposing viewpoint, even ones which were stated in way as to actually insult forum members as you have just insulted me. They are still on the forum. Anyone can read them. they have never received deletions, corrections, moderation or accusations of any kind...even to this day.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Why did these kind of posts never receive deletions, moderation, correction or anything?</p><p><a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurmat-vichaar/15306-gurmat-who-is-the-deciding-authority.html" target="_blank">http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurmat-vichaar/15306-gurmat-who-is-the-deciding-authority.html</a></p><p></p><p>You see, I have posted an example of personal attack against me still on this forum, to prove only my posts are filled with deletions, accusations and attacks against me personally. Of, course, per Aman Ji, perhaps I am only "falsely alleging." This forum has allowed people to call me stupid, a false Sikh, posing to be a khalsa, allege that I invalidate Shabadguru Ji Maharaaj... because I said the supporting bania in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji and vaaran and rehitnamay which Akal Takht has recognized is legitimate bani...is legitimate and also part of Gurmat Gursikhi such as nitenam, panj kakkars, proper way of reciting Vaheguru Gurmantra Saas Giras Simran, practice of Sarbloh bibek, etc. There is valid supportive bani which has always been part of Gurmat Gursikhi. Otherwise you would have to invalidate Amrit Sinchaar and the Khalsa.</p><p> </p><p>Curious...that debate was much like the discussions here on this thread. This is what I refer to as "blacklisting" in order to derail my opinions and viewpoints and discriminate in my posting here." Thank you for washing my karams.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harjas Kaur Khalsa, post: 75229, member: 2125"] [COLOR=darkred][/COLOR] [COLOR=black]First you are calling me Harjap. that is not my name. [/COLOR]Now, if it was only a name misunderstanding, it would be one thing, but your post goes on to accuse me of having allegations which are baseless. So you are denying that last year when I had run in with your moderator S**** and discussions with K**** over deletions, removal of posts and in fact for quite a long time, the inability to post on this forum, that all my allegations are baseless and this did not occur? Yet there are even old posts from this time still on your forums where I have discussed deletions, inability to post, missing posts, and received PMs from certain moderators discussing precisely these issues. Anyone can see people like Ekmusafir can come to this forum, and on this thread, insult every member directly and not be told anything. Yet, in context of discussion corruptions of Gurbani, I said such people who undermine the foundations of Sikh faith by invalidating supportive Gurbani such as Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji, rehitnamay act as termites. Now the forum administrator joins the forum moderator to persist in accusing that I am singling out some (imaginary) person for name-calling as a termite. When it is quite clear that I am refering to erosion of the foundations of Sikh belief which is an activity not a person, and thus not name-calling any forum member in particular. [COLOR=navy][/COLOR] [COLOR=blue][/COLOR] [COLOR=#8b0000][/COLOR] [COLOR=black]You are referencing deleted portions of my posts which no one can read, and accusing that what was erased (and conveniently no one can see) were "derogatory" to other members and "unnecessary bragging, trash talk, childish arguments which take away from the topic at hand." [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Talk about personal attacks and nindya! And all this from the site administrator! Well, I guess that leaves no doubt about what can be expected with regards to pretended "fairness" on this forum. Well, anyone can erase my words and say they said whatever they want. But obviously since the words are erased no one can have a chance to know. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]I accuse you of nindya against me publically, and also of discriminating against the content of my posts because you people did not like the OPINIONS expressed. And I also accuse that you have tolerated an opposing viewpoint, even ones which were stated in way as to actually insult forum members as you have just insulted me. They are still on the forum. Anyone can read them. they have never received deletions, corrections, moderation or accusations of any kind...even to this day.[/COLOR] Why did these kind of posts never receive deletions, moderation, correction or anything? [URL]http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurmat-vichaar/15306-gurmat-who-is-the-deciding-authority.html[/URL] You see, I have posted an example of personal attack against me still on this forum, to prove only my posts are filled with deletions, accusations and attacks against me personally. Of, course, per Aman Ji, perhaps I am only "falsely alleging." This forum has allowed people to call me stupid, a false Sikh, posing to be a khalsa, allege that I invalidate Shabadguru Ji Maharaaj... because I said the supporting bania in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji and vaaran and rehitnamay which Akal Takht has recognized is legitimate bani...is legitimate and also part of Gurmat Gursikhi such as nitenam, panj kakkars, proper way of reciting Vaheguru Gurmantra Saas Giras Simran, practice of Sarbloh bibek, etc. There is valid supportive bani which has always been part of Gurmat Gursikhi. Otherwise you would have to invalidate Amrit Sinchaar and the Khalsa. Curious...that debate was much like the discussions here on this thread. This is what I refer to as "blacklisting" in order to derail my opinions and viewpoints and discriminate in my posting here." Thank you for washing my karams. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Is Bhatt Bani Not Guru?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top