☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Is Bhatt Bani Not Guru?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harjas Kaur Khalsa" data-source="post: 74979" data-attributes="member: 2125"><p></p><p>Harjas ji</p><p> </p><p></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: #ff0000">But one is jumping to conclusions when SPN members are also described this way. And it is unfair. The termite part is not necessary. </span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Blue">*************************************</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">No one is being singled out for name-calling here. I am addressing a challenge to the legitimacy of Gurbani itself.<span style="color: Blue"> *******************************</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Blue">Y*********************************</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">Indeed. Kindly show what person was being debated and how my post derailed the issue and degenerated into the name-calling and person bashing you allege. Thank you. And if you cannot on the basis of my own words, I kindly ask you to stop alleging what I did not say.</span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Blue"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Blue">*************************************</span></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">Are you saying that when Akal Takht in the authority corrects the activities of a declared tankiya and his supporters and addresses them as mischevious and says their talk against Gurbani is "trash talk." That we can decide for ourselves whether Akal Takht Sahib Ji has any dignity in doing this? And even in this you do not once criticize the mischevious activities of the tankiya and his supporters but attack my post and put it in a false light and criticize the dignity of Akal Takht?</span></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Blue">**************************</span></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">Calling someone a name, and being "unfair" to them as you allege is nowhere in my post. Or are you saying Akal Takht Sahib Ji is being unfair to the alleged tankiya and his supporters by condemning the actions they are taking to erode the confidence of the Sikh community in Guru's bani?</span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">Because this is clearly the issue. It has been directly addressed. It is not derailed at all in this post. The only derailing of the issue was your accusation of name-calling and personal attack against a forum member(s). That was a complete derailment of my post and the validity of the points raised, DESPITE it being a quote from the position of Akal Takht Sahib in these matters.</span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Blue">**********************</span></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">The "position" about anti-Gurmat lifestyles being behind the challenge to bani outside of Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Granth Sahib Ji isn't relevent? How many arguments on this forum deal with challenges to Sikh teaching on the basis of wanting a homosexual marriage, or to be mona, or to criticize the panj kakkars and amrit? Or to drink and smoke, party, have relations with not the wife...and still be labeled...the Guru's Sikh? To say modern society does not even need the Khalsa? To say Guru didn't mean for their to be Khalsa because this bani was not in Shabad Guru Ji Maharaaj? Because groups of people are saying these things. That is the point of the criticism of bani. It is direct attack on the institution of the Khalsa Panth. It is direct intent to undermine Sikh teaching and Sikh morality. </span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">If people (in general, not particular) such as Kala Afghana do not believe in karma, do not believe Guruji is in form of Vaheguru to speak timeless truth, do not believe in life after death...why should people be good? Why should people try to live with dharam? Why sacrifice your life for anything? Why not just party and have a great time? Why would we listen to bani at all? Why would we have belief in Shabad Guru Ji at all?</span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black">It isn't a lie, a fraud, an audacity and a challenge to Gurmat teaching to support these positions which challenge the legitimacy of Gurbani? It isn't the mischevious intent of certain groups to undermine the legitimacy of amritdhari Khalsa by attacking the validity of bani which supports the existence of Khalsa? Most particularly those bani supporting the Rehat Maryada and proper behaviors?</span></span></p><p> <span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Red"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"><span style="color: Red"><span style="color: Blue">************************</span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="color: black"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harjas Kaur Khalsa, post: 74979, member: 2125"] [COLOR=#2f4f4f][/COLOR] Harjas ji [COLOR=red][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][COLOR=#ff0000]But one is jumping to conclusions when SPN members are also described this way. And it is unfair. The termite part is not necessary. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black][COLOR=Blue]*************************************[/COLOR] [/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][COLOR=black]No one is being singled out for name-calling here. I am addressing a challenge to the legitimacy of Gurbani itself.[COLOR=Blue] *******************************[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][COLOR=black][COLOR=Blue]Y*********************************[/COLOR] [COLOR=#ff0000][/COLOR] Indeed. Kindly show what person was being debated and how my post derailed the issue and degenerated into the name-calling and person bashing you allege. Thank you. And if you cannot on the basis of my own words, I kindly ask you to stop alleging what I did not say. [COLOR=Blue] *************************************[/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Are you saying that when Akal Takht in the authority corrects the activities of a declared tankiya and his supporters and addresses them as mischevious and says their talk against Gurbani is "trash talk." That we can decide for ourselves whether Akal Takht Sahib Ji has any dignity in doing this? And even in this you do not once criticize the mischevious activities of the tankiya and his supporters but attack my post and put it in a false light and criticize the dignity of Akal Takht?[/COLOR] [COLOR=Blue]**************************[/COLOR] Calling someone a name, and being "unfair" to them as you allege is nowhere in my post. Or are you saying Akal Takht Sahib Ji is being unfair to the alleged tankiya and his supporters by condemning the actions they are taking to erode the confidence of the Sikh community in Guru's bani? Because this is clearly the issue. It has been directly addressed. It is not derailed at all in this post. The only derailing of the issue was your accusation of name-calling and personal attack against a forum member(s). That was a complete derailment of my post and the validity of the points raised, DESPITE it being a quote from the position of Akal Takht Sahib in these matters. [COLOR=Blue]**********************[/COLOR] The "position" about anti-Gurmat lifestyles being behind the challenge to bani outside of Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Granth Sahib Ji isn't relevent? How many arguments on this forum deal with challenges to Sikh teaching on the basis of wanting a homosexual marriage, or to be mona, or to criticize the panj kakkars and amrit? Or to drink and smoke, party, have relations with not the wife...and still be labeled...the Guru's Sikh? To say modern society does not even need the Khalsa? To say Guru didn't mean for their to be Khalsa because this bani was not in Shabad Guru Ji Maharaaj? Because groups of people are saying these things. That is the point of the criticism of bani. It is direct attack on the institution of the Khalsa Panth. It is direct intent to undermine Sikh teaching and Sikh morality. If people (in general, not particular) such as Kala Afghana do not believe in karma, do not believe Guruji is in form of Vaheguru to speak timeless truth, do not believe in life after death...why should people be good? Why should people try to live with dharam? Why sacrifice your life for anything? Why not just party and have a great time? Why would we listen to bani at all? Why would we have belief in Shabad Guru Ji at all? It isn't a lie, a fraud, an audacity and a challenge to Gurmat teaching to support these positions which challenge the legitimacy of Gurbani? It isn't the mischevious intent of certain groups to undermine the legitimacy of amritdhari Khalsa by attacking the validity of bani which supports the existence of Khalsa? Most particularly those bani supporting the Rehat Maryada and proper behaviors? [COLOR=Red] [COLOR=Blue]************************[/COLOR][/COLOR] [/COLOR][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Is Bhatt Bani Not Guru?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top