☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Sikh Philosophy Network
Opinion Polls & Surveys
Do You Think You Are Khalsa?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sinister" data-source="post: 83372" data-attributes="member: 2684"><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">You asked a good question;</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">To which a rational reply would be:</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">The Sikh or Khalsa usually wears uncut hair in a top knot as ornamentation (fetishism), as a display of cultural unity and to display cultural differences from the majority of other tribal practices in India and abroad…not to attract lightning nor to pick up an “electro-magnetic current” from mantra and god!</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">An individual can say what she or he desires for keeping or not keeping hair.</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Explaining something using incorrect pseudo-science, I frown upon…it’s the misuse of intellect that is the most derogatory thing a person can do. (Whether you do it, or you relay what the “yogis” have taught you…doesn’t matter to me…nonsense shall remain nonsense)</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #993300">“As I said hair has the quality of being able to conduct electric current, this can be proved as scientific fact. As I did not say hair was the best known conductor of electricity, the basis of whether it is great, moderate or poor conductor is not the question.”</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Again, another display of intellectual dishonesty. Everything known to man has the “quality” to conduct electric current (on some variation). I’m pretty sure you would not have said “it attracts lightning like a lightning rod” had you not thought it was a good conductor.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Brush up on your physics (and drop the “metaphysics”). I recommend learning the difference between static discharge and current.</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #993300"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">“So you are only concluding I am wrong because you desperately want to invalidate the basis of yoga theory.”</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Yeap, that must be it! …lol (yoga is fine with me…I even do yoga…but I don’t try to justify it using science that is beyond me) </span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #993300"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">“I believe there are also subtle currents in the body. Again, I can't scientifically prove this belief, but it isn't my theory, these are older yogic theories about energy which isn't exactly electro-magnetic, but thats the closest we have on the physical plane to describe it subtle energies.”</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Then don’t use the word “electro-magnetic current”…you know I don’t read minds.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">You can continue to believe in these “subtle energies”, just don’t try to describe and justify them with scientific terms that you may not understand.</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #993300">“This is a forum. I'm sharing my views based on metaphysical interpretations of hidden and unseen energies within the human body to explain the purpose of a joora.”</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Good (please do share), and I am sharing my views on your views from a rational perspective.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #993300">“However, seeing the picture you posted and investigating the Andalusian long-mane horse, I must modify my understanding to acknowledge human beings are NOT the only creatures with long hair on the head, but are one of few creatures which grows extremely long hair on the head. But I add, this doesn't negate it's yogic function as part of the body-brain-kundalini energy center.”</span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Why hasn’t this negated what you said earlier? Your previous post preached exclusivity (so rationally, I have just negated what you have said about exclusivity).</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #993300"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">“But you're entitled to disagree. These are my views. If you don't appreciate them, why not make a post of your own exploring what you do value?</span></span></span><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">”</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">I have many times explored what I value…just browse the forums.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b">I value the same things you value! (I don’t for a second actually believe you value these yogic teachings…because you, like myself, are a rational, human being)</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #993300"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">“The nine openings are 2 eyes, 2 ears, 2 nostrils, 1 mouth, 1 rectum, 1 urethra.”</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">what about the umbilical cord? And the Vaginal orifice, which is separate from the urethra? (what a convenient way of leaving out these important openings)</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #993300"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">“Why thank you for saying by inference that my post was worthless</span></span><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">.”</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Oh don’t mention…twas my honour….I was initially torn whether or not I should have responded…now I’m rather grateful that I did.</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #993300">“Even those with hair can hardly find the gate of liberation.”</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b">That was not the point of my post…the entire point of my post was to show how you put a barrier/preconditions between man and god to satisfy yourself. </span></span></p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">The Yogis also loved creating these barriers! Which is why Guru Nanak apposed them and their ways? </span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">According to your models, sikhi is no longer a universal faith! YOU HAVE EFFECTIVELY DESTROYED IT! When you said:</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #993300"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">“This is why you cannot have Guru's mantra as a sehajdhari. You may say the word. But it will not achieve the same effect. Without keeping hairs and japping Naam, you cannot achieve liberation in this life. “ </span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'"><span style="color: #808080">(as if you know what “liberation” is)</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Once this ball starts rolling the underlying principle that make up a faith are destroyed…of co{censored} do not admit to this…your best defence is to state that your “intentions” were clean (which they may or may not be true…I am no judge).</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Listen and contemplate to the shabad that namjap ji posted (post #41).</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Your hair can be long in spirit even if they are not long physically!</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">Truthiness for all. (last post)</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black'">sinister</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sinister, post: 83372, member: 2684"] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]You asked a good question;[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]To which a rational reply would be:[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]The Sikh or Khalsa usually wears uncut hair in a top knot as ornamentation (fetishism), as a display of cultural unity and to display cultural differences from the majority of other tribal practices in India and abroad…not to attract lightning nor to pick up an “electro-magnetic current” from mantra and god![/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]An individual can say what she or he desires for keeping or not keeping hair.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Explaining something using incorrect pseudo-science, I frown upon…it’s the misuse of intellect that is the most derogatory thing a person can do. (Whether you do it, or you relay what the “yogis” have taught you…doesn’t matter to me…nonsense shall remain nonsense)[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#993300]“As I said hair has the quality of being able to conduct electric current, this can be proved as scientific fact. As I did not say hair was the best known conductor of electricity, the basis of whether it is great, moderate or poor conductor is not the question.”[/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Again, another display of intellectual dishonesty. Everything known to man has the “quality” to conduct electric current (on some variation). I’m pretty sure you would not have said “it attracts lightning like a lightning rod” had you not thought it was a good conductor.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Brush up on your physics (and drop the “metaphysics”). I recommend learning the difference between static discharge and current.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#993300][FONT=Arial Black]“So you are only concluding I am wrong because you desperately want to invalidate the basis of yoga theory.”[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Yeap, that must be it! …lol (yoga is fine with me…I even do yoga…but I don’t try to justify it using science that is beyond me) [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#993300][FONT=Tahoma]“I believe there are also subtle currents in the body. Again, I can't scientifically prove this belief, but it isn't my theory, these are older yogic theories about energy which isn't exactly electro-magnetic, but thats the closest we have on the physical plane to describe it subtle energies.”[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Then don’t use the word “electro-magnetic current”…you know I don’t read minds.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]You can continue to believe in these “subtle energies”, just don’t try to describe and justify them with scientific terms that you may not understand.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#993300]“This is a forum. I'm sharing my views based on metaphysical interpretations of hidden and unseen energies within the human body to explain the purpose of a joora.”[/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Good (please do share), and I am sharing my views on your views from a rational perspective.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#993300]“However, seeing the picture you posted and investigating the Andalusian long-mane horse, I must modify my understanding to acknowledge human beings are NOT the only creatures with long hair on the head, but are one of few creatures which grows extremely long hair on the head. But I add, this doesn't negate it's yogic function as part of the body-brain-kundalini energy center.”[/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Why hasn’t this negated what you said earlier? Your previous post preached exclusivity (so rationally, I have just negated what you have said about exclusivity).[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#993300][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]“But you're entitled to disagree. These are my views. If you don't appreciate them, why not make a post of your own exploring what you do value?[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]”[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]I have many times explored what I value…just browse the forums.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#5b5b5b]I value the same things you value! (I don’t for a second actually believe you value these yogic teachings…because you, like myself, are a rational, human being)[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT] [COLOR=#993300][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]“The nine openings are 2 eyes, 2 ears, 2 nostrils, 1 mouth, 1 rectum, 1 urethra.”[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Arial Black]what about the umbilical cord? And the Vaginal orifice, which is separate from the urethra? (what a convenient way of leaving out these important openings)[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#993300][FONT=Tahoma]“Why thank you for saying by inference that my post was worthless[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma].”[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Oh don’t mention…twas my honour….I was initially torn whether or not I should have responded…now I’m rather grateful that I did.[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#993300]“Even those with hair can hardly find the gate of liberation.”[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#5b5b5b]That was not the point of my post…the entire point of my post was to show how you put a barrier/preconditions between man and god to satisfy yourself. [/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]The Yogis also loved creating these barriers! Which is why Guru Nanak apposed them and their ways? [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]According to your models, sikhi is no longer a universal faith! YOU HAVE EFFECTIVELY DESTROYED IT! When you said:[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#993300][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]“This is why you cannot have Guru's mantra as a sehajdhari. You may say the word. But it will not achieve the same effect. Without keeping hairs and japping Naam, you cannot achieve liberation in this life. “ [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial Black][COLOR=#808080](as if you know what “liberation” is)[/COLOR][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Once this ball starts rolling the underlying principle that make up a faith are destroyed…of co{censored} do not admit to this…your best defence is to state that your “intentions” were clean (which they may or may not be true…I am no judge).[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Listen and contemplate to the shabad that namjap ji posted (post #41).[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Your hair can be long in spirit even if they are not long physically![/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Arial Black]Truthiness for all. (last post)[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Arial Black]sinister[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Sikh Philosophy Network
Opinion Polls & Surveys
Do You Think You Are Khalsa?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top