☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Bachittar Natak
Dasam Granth - A Critical Study
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vijaydeep Singh" data-source="post: 7969" data-attributes="member: 313"><p><strong>Re: Thus Das starts about Dasham Granth</strong></p><p></p><p>Ek Oankar Wahiguru Ji Ki Fateh</p><p></p><p>So there could be War in between Kushi Sodis and Lavi Sodis.Thats what Das understand.</p><p></p><p>And Kushis went to Benaras and learnt Vedas and became Bedi.</p><p></p><p>Like iron smith due to loha becomes lohar,Poter due to pot(kumbh becomes Kumahar.And one who reads Ramayan becomes Ramyani and like who reads Guru Granth Sahib ji is called Granthi.</p><p></p><p>Well one thing to rember here is that due to lack of script being developled.Vedas were in past rembered by heart and they used to be stored in mind.There are four Vedas and in Brahmins who use to rember one was Vedi,Two Dwivedi(dube),Trivedi and Chaturvedi(chaube).And like this we have thier surname.There are no one at present who learns Vedas like Parret but yes there are Many Muslims who take pride that they learn and can say whole holy Kuran by heart.</p><p></p><p>But Bedis from Kush were differnt.They stuedied Veda(This thing to be rembered that we can draw inferance that all studied Vedas but next line said that only those who studeied Vedas).And as they studied so there called Bedis(it is taking of understanding of essence of Vedas and not what we call Ratta or just recording them in mind here Veda is taken aas all four VEDAs .Veda is called VEd in Sanskrit and can be used as singular and plural,This type of Vedis who were Bedis were due to plural sense while Brahmins were to do with individual Vedas which they learnt by heart and recorded it).</p><p></p><p>Here Pathna or reading word is used.(page 71).</p><p></p><p>Then there is another very important thing.Just after thier saying to be reading Vedas.</p><p></p><p>They Moved/preached Dhram(Rightiousness's)'s Deed(Karam) (of ) Good(Neekye).</p><p></p><p>They encoraged the good and rightous deeds.</p><p></p><p>So is it not possible for person who understand VEDAS to be good or to do good.Thier are many Bhagats before Adi Guru Granth Sahib Ji were writtan who did good deeds and they were also having knowledge of VEDAs.Das Just want to prove from that line that these Bedis were doing Good work also alongside learning VEDAS.</p><p></p><p>Kala Afghana Sahib are in impression that thier reading Vedas is tagged as good deed by fictatious Brahman.When Guru Granth Sahib was not their does he wants to say that no one was doing good work? And if some one knows Veda then he can not do good work? In Fact Gurus also knew Vedas and did good work.</p><p></p><p>Well are all Granthis also may not be doing good inspite of just read Guru Granth Sahib JI.Das can say this that doing something and getting result of it is more to do with hinduism,Panth tells to be happy in will of God.</p><p></p><p>Like due to Vanijya(trade) we have Vanjara in Sikhs also,Due to polish on metal we have Sikligars so we had Bedis who studied Vedas.</p><p></p><p>Well why not Brahma became Bedi? Or why not Nirmala?</p><p></p><p>Das deals with Nirmalas first.</p><p></p><p>Nirmalas were sent by Guru to trap all the knowledge whcih was so far in the hands of Brahmins.</p><p>Like </p><p>history</p><p>Scripture of Hindus</p><p>Yoga</p><p>Ayurveda</p><p>Astrology</p><p>Logic</p><p>Vedantan</p><p>Purana</p><p>And also Sanskrit and also Vedas.</p><p></p><p>At the time of Bedis it is possible that many Puranas were yet to be wrrttan.</p><p></p><p>So bowler is bowler,Batter is Batter and one who does both is all rounder.</p><p></p><p>Nirmala means pure. And work of Nirmalas is to detoxify or purify hindus from hinduism and make them Sanatan Dhrami or Khalsa.So thense is thier name.</p><p></p><p>Sirdar Sahib also talk of something Nanak Nirmal Panth Chalaya.REad it carefully.Panth was Chalaya or maved and not Bannaya or made.Guru made Dharam to move by will of Good on Path(Panth) which was stagnent till then.</p><p></p><p>As a Nirmala Das can say that differnt between way of his moving Dhram then preivous one was that He had preached rightiousness in unprcedented manner by will of Akal.Our Faithg is combine therapy of devotion(Bhakti) and Knowldge(Gyan). This never happened before.God made it to happen.Kala Afghan Sahib is near Gyan and Akhand Kirtani Jatha is near Bhakti.Both need to learn from each other.</p><p></p><p>so due to Extra education Nirmalas can not just be called Vedis or Bedis.</p><p></p><p>Then lets talk about Brahma.Even if he transfered Vedas to mankind from God and even if he was not perfect(He had a lust on his own doughter Sarwati as per a few Purana),He could be very much like our own Granthis who delivers us a good lot of Gurmat from Akal (Guru Granth Sahib Ji are Akal's verbal manifestation) but may not follow themselves.So deliveres of Veda can not be Bedi.</p><p></p><p>like Valmiki can not be Ramayani but one who read it and preach it are the one.Many of the Bhagats like Shekh Farid who made contribution in Guru Granth Sahib Ji can never be called Granthi.Das hope that those questions raised by Kala Afghana Sahib were only to show thier sense of humour and had no logic.</p><p></p><p>A writter of a book is writer and reader and student of it is reader or student.Brahma did not understand Veda even after delivering them to us from Akal.So how can he be called Bedi.And As his mention in that article said that thier is a Sabad in Guru Granth Sahib Ji,Brahma did not understand the name of Akal.So like Swami Dayanand Ji,If we go by interpetaion of Gurubani by Kala Afghana sahib Brahm Ji were not knowing God.He was binding himself to a book and intead of leanring about God from book he learnt about book itself.</p><p></p><p>Anand Sahib when says in Vedas(Scripture) supreme name ,that does not listen and move like ghost in dead body.There Guru wants to talk of all books or scriptures as all tell about God and God binding us via books and we can not bound God with book.(Guru Granth Sahib ji are more clear in it).But in case of other faiths some vested intersets did do misinterpetations to bound God with book.Like our own Kala Afghana Sahib are trying.</p><p></p><p>Can any writer of book is oblige to go by book which he/she writes.Say when some docters write a therpy to a pateint them does docter also has to under go therpy.</p><p></p><p>So by all Das thinks that Das could prove from other Examples how can Ram the Grand son of Raghu became Raghuvanshi but mandhata father of Raghu did not.So Kal Rai was not sodi but later one did became.</p><p></p><p>Like we have some Granthis we had Bedis. </p><p></p><p>Then why did Tulsi Das did not mention this thing in his Ramchritar Manas.Well Sirdar Sahib may be knowing hindus upto the level or primary book by Tulsidas.</p><p></p><p>Tulsidas was a Brahmin.And Soory to say that Kala Afghana Sahib does not know these Brahmin better then Das so Sirdar Sahib are afraid of Brahmins as if Sahib are Budhist or jain who were absorbed by BRahmins.</p><p></p><p>Well both of them were Nastiks like Arya Samaj or personal worshipper but we worship Akal.And our Guru is great neither born nor die.</p><p></p><p>Tulsidas Ji were not the fool that he would tell the people that yuonger generation of Rama has abondined Rama Worshipping and started to worship akal and no longer are Hindu.</p><p></p><p>Thing to rember here is that this would have made his follwers to leave hindusim and become Sikh.</p><p></p><p>Then let us talk of north of Aydhya.In North we have Braj area which was won from demon by youngest brother of Rama Shatru Ghana.Further north is say Madra and Kekaya. Further north is Gandhara.</p><p></p><p>There is a story that Gandhrvas of Ghandhras were Bad unlike heavnely one.So another brother of Rama Bharat sent his sons Tax and perhaps Purush ,who defeated Gandhravas(perhaps Pathans of tody) and set up two towens,TaxShila(still there) and Purushpur(Peshawar).This das read from a Puran in childhood but it is true as per Puranas.So if Bharat's son can do this why not sons of Rama can not go to north and make Lahore and Kusur.</p><p></p><p>In Fact Sau Sakhi call Lahore as Luvpur.Ludhiana as Ludhpur etc.Tulsi Das was a real Brahmin and as per that always to live in high spirit.He did not lacked Chardi Kala like our Kala Afghana Sahib.After Ghaznavi over took Punjab in Brahminical Granths there is very littel referance of them.They did not want to put 'lower spirit' or Dhandiyan Kala in the minds of hindus that thier areas are under infidals control.</p><p></p><p>They rather banned thier movement to areas which they ruled in past so that they may not go outside India and come out of the influence of Brahmanism.If it is Jayas,Amethi,Benaras,Ayodhya where thier were still hindu majority and often hindu chiefe tains were ruling and Army of Naga Sanyasi was ever ready for holy War then Brahmins did write about such place.</p><p></p><p>But in Areas where hindus were not allowed to ride horse even then why should they talk of Katasraj(Near Taxial) whcih is birth place of Shiv,Lahore,Kasur,Hinglaj(Balochistan where Rama did peneace for forgivness of Brahm Hatya of Pandit Ravana),Ruqqband or Kabul where Hindus were like salt in flour and in bad shape.</p><p></p><p>No one especialy like hindus who has attachemnt to land like we have to God will tell that thier holy lands are now under the controls of infidals.Sanskrit Brahimns only knew till Nirmalas came some exception could be great holy men from rich classes but commen hindu was only able to understand Hindi and so in hindi writings there was nothing brought in from Sanskrit.And words of Sanskrit were also twisted so that actual reaSON only oftten Brahmin understand.</p><p></p><p>So to not to demoralise Hindus from worshipping Rama Personaly did Tulsidas Ji did not mentioed that younger generation is now givung up hinduism and thier empire has Muslim rule as well as Muslim majority.</p><p></p><p>Then question come s that why does not famiy tree given as a whole?</p><p></p><p>Well writer was Guru and not the one who could bother about the fancy of some purist of fabricated idealogy.</p><p></p><p>Had writer gave the family tree as a whole then it would have been taken by the same critic that look he is giving the whole family tree and encouraging caste system and he can not be Guru but a Brahmin.</p><p></p><p>Guru gave name of only important persons.</p><p></p><p>Actual setter of dynasty Surya</p><p>Rama</p><p>His sons</p><p></p><p>Then how they became sodis</p><p></p><p>Then how some became Bedis</p><p></p><p>and he was not interested about thier negative or positive life but about proving his linage for the intention of preaching Sikhism.Why should he write irrelavent just to make thing bulky and complex and thats why does Guru tell that he is not puting irrealvent hings in here.</p><p></p><p>Rattan Singh Bhangu also used such thing that the things which are not of any use so use of them is out of scope.In Fact Guru's Life was so busy and an Army man as well as great schooloar when working as a preacher,why should he write irrelvent things as policemen of Punjab police write(Kala Afghan Sahib Ji were also inspector in that depratment).And Guru tells that thing time and again but sleuth doubts Guru.</p><p></p><p>In Fac reason of not writng abouot all linage during Krishana times has another thing attached.At that time main attraction was Krishana and all regarding it is writtan in Krishana avtar.</p><p></p><p>When a Bhat says that Guru Nanakdev Ji were Baman,Rama and Krishan in preivous ages and Guru gives that line a place in Guru Granth Sahib Ji,That Bhat can not be an agent of Brahmanism but when Guru who is the light of First form only writes about same light of Akal taking form of Rama or Krishana in past then he becomes Brahmin.Sirdar Sahib must know that In Bali and Baman,In Rama and Ravan,In Krishana and Kansa and In Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Aurangzeeb,There is only one light and that is Akal.</p><p></p><p>Yes there are very prevert type of attempts to paint whole Previous Sanatan Dharmi people just as myth which is nothing else but copying evenglist who are not at all succesful by this attempt.Rather they are ahteed by Hindus for contempt.</p><p></p><p>Das has seen some Granthi saying that Krishan was rapist.This means at least they say that Krishana was there but he quote Gurbani,Asa Di War,</p><p></p><p>He says He brought Parijat(according to him it is a female but das know that it is tree and of good importance to enviroment) and did Rang in Braindaban.</p><p></p><p>So as per him Guru used term Rang(pleasure) for sinister act like Rape.</p><p></p><p>(To Be continued..)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vijaydeep Singh, post: 7969, member: 313"] [b]Re: Thus Das starts about Dasham Granth[/b] Ek Oankar Wahiguru Ji Ki Fateh So there could be War in between Kushi Sodis and Lavi Sodis.Thats what Das understand. And Kushis went to Benaras and learnt Vedas and became Bedi. Like iron smith due to loha becomes lohar,Poter due to pot(kumbh becomes Kumahar.And one who reads Ramayan becomes Ramyani and like who reads Guru Granth Sahib ji is called Granthi. Well one thing to rember here is that due to lack of script being developled.Vedas were in past rembered by heart and they used to be stored in mind.There are four Vedas and in Brahmins who use to rember one was Vedi,Two Dwivedi(dube),Trivedi and Chaturvedi(chaube).And like this we have thier surname.There are no one at present who learns Vedas like Parret but yes there are Many Muslims who take pride that they learn and can say whole holy Kuran by heart. But Bedis from Kush were differnt.They stuedied Veda(This thing to be rembered that we can draw inferance that all studied Vedas but next line said that only those who studeied Vedas).And as they studied so there called Bedis(it is taking of understanding of essence of Vedas and not what we call Ratta or just recording them in mind here Veda is taken aas all four VEDAs .Veda is called VEd in Sanskrit and can be used as singular and plural,This type of Vedis who were Bedis were due to plural sense while Brahmins were to do with individual Vedas which they learnt by heart and recorded it). Here Pathna or reading word is used.(page 71). Then there is another very important thing.Just after thier saying to be reading Vedas. They Moved/preached Dhram(Rightiousness's)'s Deed(Karam) (of ) Good(Neekye). They encoraged the good and rightous deeds. So is it not possible for person who understand VEDAS to be good or to do good.Thier are many Bhagats before Adi Guru Granth Sahib Ji were writtan who did good deeds and they were also having knowledge of VEDAs.Das Just want to prove from that line that these Bedis were doing Good work also alongside learning VEDAS. Kala Afghana Sahib are in impression that thier reading Vedas is tagged as good deed by fictatious Brahman.When Guru Granth Sahib was not their does he wants to say that no one was doing good work? And if some one knows Veda then he can not do good work? In Fact Gurus also knew Vedas and did good work. Well are all Granthis also may not be doing good inspite of just read Guru Granth Sahib JI.Das can say this that doing something and getting result of it is more to do with hinduism,Panth tells to be happy in will of God. Like due to Vanijya(trade) we have Vanjara in Sikhs also,Due to polish on metal we have Sikligars so we had Bedis who studied Vedas. Well why not Brahma became Bedi? Or why not Nirmala? Das deals with Nirmalas first. Nirmalas were sent by Guru to trap all the knowledge whcih was so far in the hands of Brahmins. Like history Scripture of Hindus Yoga Ayurveda Astrology Logic Vedantan Purana And also Sanskrit and also Vedas. At the time of Bedis it is possible that many Puranas were yet to be wrrttan. So bowler is bowler,Batter is Batter and one who does both is all rounder. Nirmala means pure. And work of Nirmalas is to detoxify or purify hindus from hinduism and make them Sanatan Dhrami or Khalsa.So thense is thier name. Sirdar Sahib also talk of something Nanak Nirmal Panth Chalaya.REad it carefully.Panth was Chalaya or maved and not Bannaya or made.Guru made Dharam to move by will of Good on Path(Panth) which was stagnent till then. As a Nirmala Das can say that differnt between way of his moving Dhram then preivous one was that He had preached rightiousness in unprcedented manner by will of Akal.Our Faithg is combine therapy of devotion(Bhakti) and Knowldge(Gyan). This never happened before.God made it to happen.Kala Afghan Sahib is near Gyan and Akhand Kirtani Jatha is near Bhakti.Both need to learn from each other. so due to Extra education Nirmalas can not just be called Vedis or Bedis. Then lets talk about Brahma.Even if he transfered Vedas to mankind from God and even if he was not perfect(He had a lust on his own doughter Sarwati as per a few Purana),He could be very much like our own Granthis who delivers us a good lot of Gurmat from Akal (Guru Granth Sahib Ji are Akal's verbal manifestation) but may not follow themselves.So deliveres of Veda can not be Bedi. like Valmiki can not be Ramayani but one who read it and preach it are the one.Many of the Bhagats like Shekh Farid who made contribution in Guru Granth Sahib Ji can never be called Granthi.Das hope that those questions raised by Kala Afghana Sahib were only to show thier sense of humour and had no logic. A writter of a book is writer and reader and student of it is reader or student.Brahma did not understand Veda even after delivering them to us from Akal.So how can he be called Bedi.And As his mention in that article said that thier is a Sabad in Guru Granth Sahib Ji,Brahma did not understand the name of Akal.So like Swami Dayanand Ji,If we go by interpetaion of Gurubani by Kala Afghana sahib Brahm Ji were not knowing God.He was binding himself to a book and intead of leanring about God from book he learnt about book itself. Anand Sahib when says in Vedas(Scripture) supreme name ,that does not listen and move like ghost in dead body.There Guru wants to talk of all books or scriptures as all tell about God and God binding us via books and we can not bound God with book.(Guru Granth Sahib ji are more clear in it).But in case of other faiths some vested intersets did do misinterpetations to bound God with book.Like our own Kala Afghana Sahib are trying. Can any writer of book is oblige to go by book which he/she writes.Say when some docters write a therpy to a pateint them does docter also has to under go therpy. So by all Das thinks that Das could prove from other Examples how can Ram the Grand son of Raghu became Raghuvanshi but mandhata father of Raghu did not.So Kal Rai was not sodi but later one did became. Like we have some Granthis we had Bedis. Then why did Tulsi Das did not mention this thing in his Ramchritar Manas.Well Sirdar Sahib may be knowing hindus upto the level or primary book by Tulsidas. Tulsidas was a Brahmin.And Soory to say that Kala Afghana Sahib does not know these Brahmin better then Das so Sirdar Sahib are afraid of Brahmins as if Sahib are Budhist or jain who were absorbed by BRahmins. Well both of them were Nastiks like Arya Samaj or personal worshipper but we worship Akal.And our Guru is great neither born nor die. Tulsidas Ji were not the fool that he would tell the people that yuonger generation of Rama has abondined Rama Worshipping and started to worship akal and no longer are Hindu. Thing to rember here is that this would have made his follwers to leave hindusim and become Sikh. Then let us talk of north of Aydhya.In North we have Braj area which was won from demon by youngest brother of Rama Shatru Ghana.Further north is say Madra and Kekaya. Further north is Gandhara. There is a story that Gandhrvas of Ghandhras were Bad unlike heavnely one.So another brother of Rama Bharat sent his sons Tax and perhaps Purush ,who defeated Gandhravas(perhaps Pathans of tody) and set up two towens,TaxShila(still there) and Purushpur(Peshawar).This das read from a Puran in childhood but it is true as per Puranas.So if Bharat's son can do this why not sons of Rama can not go to north and make Lahore and Kusur. In Fact Sau Sakhi call Lahore as Luvpur.Ludhiana as Ludhpur etc.Tulsi Das was a real Brahmin and as per that always to live in high spirit.He did not lacked Chardi Kala like our Kala Afghana Sahib.After Ghaznavi over took Punjab in Brahminical Granths there is very littel referance of them.They did not want to put 'lower spirit' or Dhandiyan Kala in the minds of hindus that thier areas are under infidals control. They rather banned thier movement to areas which they ruled in past so that they may not go outside India and come out of the influence of Brahmanism.If it is Jayas,Amethi,Benaras,Ayodhya where thier were still hindu majority and often hindu chiefe tains were ruling and Army of Naga Sanyasi was ever ready for holy War then Brahmins did write about such place. But in Areas where hindus were not allowed to ride horse even then why should they talk of Katasraj(Near Taxial) whcih is birth place of Shiv,Lahore,Kasur,Hinglaj(Balochistan where Rama did peneace for forgivness of Brahm Hatya of Pandit Ravana),Ruqqband or Kabul where Hindus were like salt in flour and in bad shape. No one especialy like hindus who has attachemnt to land like we have to God will tell that thier holy lands are now under the controls of infidals.Sanskrit Brahimns only knew till Nirmalas came some exception could be great holy men from rich classes but commen hindu was only able to understand Hindi and so in hindi writings there was nothing brought in from Sanskrit.And words of Sanskrit were also twisted so that actual reaSON only oftten Brahmin understand. So to not to demoralise Hindus from worshipping Rama Personaly did Tulsidas Ji did not mentioed that younger generation is now givung up hinduism and thier empire has Muslim rule as well as Muslim majority. Then question come s that why does not famiy tree given as a whole? Well writer was Guru and not the one who could bother about the fancy of some purist of fabricated idealogy. Had writer gave the family tree as a whole then it would have been taken by the same critic that look he is giving the whole family tree and encouraging caste system and he can not be Guru but a Brahmin. Guru gave name of only important persons. Actual setter of dynasty Surya Rama His sons Then how they became sodis Then how some became Bedis and he was not interested about thier negative or positive life but about proving his linage for the intention of preaching Sikhism.Why should he write irrelavent just to make thing bulky and complex and thats why does Guru tell that he is not puting irrealvent hings in here. Rattan Singh Bhangu also used such thing that the things which are not of any use so use of them is out of scope.In Fact Guru's Life was so busy and an Army man as well as great schooloar when working as a preacher,why should he write irrelvent things as policemen of Punjab police write(Kala Afghan Sahib Ji were also inspector in that depratment).And Guru tells that thing time and again but sleuth doubts Guru. In Fac reason of not writng abouot all linage during Krishana times has another thing attached.At that time main attraction was Krishana and all regarding it is writtan in Krishana avtar. When a Bhat says that Guru Nanakdev Ji were Baman,Rama and Krishan in preivous ages and Guru gives that line a place in Guru Granth Sahib Ji,That Bhat can not be an agent of Brahmanism but when Guru who is the light of First form only writes about same light of Akal taking form of Rama or Krishana in past then he becomes Brahmin.Sirdar Sahib must know that In Bali and Baman,In Rama and Ravan,In Krishana and Kansa and In Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Aurangzeeb,There is only one light and that is Akal. Yes there are very prevert type of attempts to paint whole Previous Sanatan Dharmi people just as myth which is nothing else but copying evenglist who are not at all succesful by this attempt.Rather they are ahteed by Hindus for contempt. Das has seen some Granthi saying that Krishan was rapist.This means at least they say that Krishana was there but he quote Gurbani,Asa Di War, He says He brought Parijat(according to him it is a female but das know that it is tree and of good importance to enviroment) and did Rang in Braindaban. So as per him Guru used term Rang(pleasure) for sinister act like Rape. (To Be continued..) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Bachittar Natak
Dasam Granth - A Critical Study
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top