Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!
  1.   Become a Supporter    ::   Make a Contribution   
    Target (Recurring Monthly): $200 :: Achieved: $98

World Australia and Japan in Court Battle over Whaling

Discussion in 'Breaking News' started by Tejwant Singh, Jun 28, 2013.

  1. Tejwant Singh

    Tejwant Singh United States
    Expand Collapse
    Mentor Writer SPNer Contributor

    Jun 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    Australia and Japan in Court Battle over Whaling

    THE HAGUE (Reuters) -
    By Thomas Escritt

    Australia accused Japan of carrying out commercial whaling under the guise of scientific research on the first day of court hearings between the two nations that campaigners say could lead to an end to whaling in the Antarctic.

    Australia accused Japan of carrying out commercial whaling under the guise of scientific research on the first day of court hearings between the two nations that campaigners say could lead to an end to whaling in the Antarctic.

    "Japan seeks to cloak its ongoing commercial whaling in the lab coat of science," Bill Campbell, an Australian government lawyer, told judges of the International Court of Justice in The Hague on Wednesday.

    Japan catches and kills hundreds of whales in the Southern Ocean each year despite having agreed, under pressure from the United States, to an international moratorium on commercial whaling from 1986.

    Tokyo says it is carrying out essential scientific research - allowed by a 1946 treaty on whaling - to establish whether whale stocks are recovering from past overfishing.

    But Australia, backed by New Zealand, says the research is a fig-leaf to conceal Japan's true purpose of commercial whaling.

    Justin Gleeson, Australia's solicitor general, said Japan's research only began on its current scale after the commercial whaling ban had come into force and said whaling had continued using "similar boats, similar crews and similar techniques".

    "The government of Japan saw scientific whaling as a way around the moratorium," he said.


    Japan's court filings are not yet public and it will not present its case until next Tuesday but Koji Tsuruoka, deputy minister for foreign affairs, told reporters in The Hague that the scientific whaling program was legal.

    "Japan is proud of its tradition of living in harmony with nature and of utilizing living resources while respecting their sustainability," he said.

    Earlier this week, Japanese diplomat Noriyuki Shikata said the research was sustainable.

    "There are about 515,000 minke whales in the Antarctic, and Japan's research is taking only about 815 a year," Shikata said.

    "This is below the reproductive rate and ... very sustainable."

    Activists at the court looked forward to a ruling that they said could put an end to whaling in the Southern Ocean.

    "We have been campaigning on this for 10 years," said Geert Vons, director of Sea Shepherd Netherlands, a conservation group that monitors whaling.

    "If Australia wins, we shouldn't need to go down to the Southern Ocean to monitor any more."

    Australia says more than 10,000 whales have been killed since the start of the moratorium, which was introduced to allow depleted whale stocks to recover after years of overfishing.

    Environmental campaigners said science could not be used to justify any commercial whaling.

    "Commercial whaling, whether conducted openly or under the guise of science, is a cruel and outdated practice which produces no science of value," said Patrick Ramage, director of the whales program at the International Fund for Animal Welfare in London.

    "All necessary research on these whales can be done by non-lethal means," said John Frizell, a whales campaigner at Greenpeace. Neither group is involved in the case.

    Japan and Australia have both agreed to be bound by the Hague court's ruling.

    While Australia has many backers, support for a complete whaling ban is not unanimous. Norway, which never agreed to the moratorium, continues to whale commercially and has declined to intervene in the case.

    Norway's fisheries minister Lisbeth Berg-Hansen said it was for Japan to decide how it wanted to do research into whales.

    (Additional reporting by Alister Doyle in Oslo and Lincoln Feast in Sydney; Editing by Sara Webb and Gareth Jones)

    • Like Like x 1
  2. Loading...

Since you're here... we have a small favor to ask...

More people are visiting & reading SPN than ever but far fewer are paying to sustain it. Advertising revenues across the online media have fallen fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Donating to SPN's is vote for free speech, for diversity of opinions, for the right of the people to stand up to religious bigotry. Without any affiliation to any organization, this constant struggle takes a lot of hard work to sustain as we entirely depend on the contributions of our esteemed writers/readers. We do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too... Fund our efforts and together we can keep the world informed about the real Sikh Sikhi Sikhism. If everyone who writes or reads our content, who likes it, helps us to pay for it, our future would be much more secure. Every Contribution Matters, Contribute Generously!

    Become a Supporter      ::     Make a Contribution     

Share This Page